Samir_H
Member
Offline
Activity: 83
Merit: 10
|
|
October 10, 2013, 04:55:21 PM |
|
There must be valid driver on CD that come with card.
|
|
|
|
stefffe
|
|
October 10, 2013, 05:41:16 PM |
|
No extra options tho
|
|
|
|
Biffa
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3234
Merit: 1220
|
|
October 10, 2013, 07:07:41 PM |
|
No extra options tho
Not surprising really, the 280X is just a 7970 with no voltage control
|
|
|
|
stefffe
|
|
October 10, 2013, 07:09:55 PM |
|
No extra options tho
Not surprising really, the 280X is just a 7970 with no voltage control Dont know about the voltage control, I was able to lower it with 20% in CCC?
|
|
|
|
forevernoob
|
|
October 10, 2013, 07:12:18 PM |
|
stefffe, any chance that you could measure the power it draws with a kill-a-watt?
|
|
|
|
stefffe
|
|
October 10, 2013, 07:19:02 PM |
|
stefffe, any chance that you could measure the power it draws with a kill-a-watt?
I got that thing in a closet somewhere, Im feeling too lazy right now (
|
|
|
|
l3jmr
Member
Offline
Activity: 99
Merit: 10
|
|
October 10, 2013, 08:02:11 PM |
|
looks more like a 7950 to me do you mind sharing from what store you bought them from, the ones im usually buying from dont have them yet...damn it
|
⚫ ⚫ ⚫ Listen to the weekly altcoinsidekick.com podcast to understand what cryptocurrency is really all about. ⚫ ⚫ ⚫
|
|
|
Wipeout2097
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 840
Merit: 255
SportsIcon - Connect With Your Sports Heroes
|
|
October 10, 2013, 08:56:57 PM |
|
Guys, everything is rebrand exept the R9 290X HD7970 = 280X HD7850 = 270X HD7770 = 260X
The 260X is similar to a 7790 iirc, but with "true audio". It's not a rebranding. So, The R9 290 boasts 2,560 stream processors, the current top model, HD7970 has 2048.
Simple math tells us that the 290X should have around 20% better results than a 7970.
So lets say a HD7970 gets to 750Kh/s, a R9 290X should get around 900Kh/s. The 290 series have 512 bit bus and the 290X has 2816 stream processors. So, we'll be looking at 1Mh/s
|
|
|
|
ivanlabrie
|
|
October 10, 2013, 09:17:56 PM |
|
Guys, everything is rebrand exept the R9 290X HD7970 = 280X HD7850 = 270X HD7770 = 260X
The 260X is similar to a 7790 iirc, but with "true audio". It's not a rebranding. So, The R9 290 boasts 2,560 stream processors, the current top model, HD7970 has 2048.
Simple math tells us that the 290X should have around 20% better results than a 7970.
So lets say a HD7970 gets to 750Kh/s, a R9 290X should get around 900Kh/s. The 290 series have 512 bit bus and the 290X has 2816 stream processors. So, we'll be looking at 1Mh/s That's what I thought, 1mh/s for 250w sounds good to me. But too expensive at launch...650usd, yikes.
|
|
|
|
superduh
|
|
October 11, 2013, 01:04:37 AM |
|
i think the thing to do for ALTCOIN mining would be to pick up the old cards being discontinued. or just leave the network as is
|
ok
|
|
|
fattypig
|
|
October 11, 2013, 01:19:28 AM |
|
No extra options tho 1) How much did you pay for your R9 280? 2) Can you download Trixx and test if it is able to lower down your voltage? 3) Can you also let me know the hash at stock clock? Thanks
|
|
|
|
chandrakant
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
October 11, 2013, 03:12:01 AM |
|
Nice If you have time can you test it on litecoin or any other Scrypt base coin? I want to see how many Kh/s it gives. Also please try to post watt usage
|
|
|
|
stefffe
|
|
October 11, 2013, 05:52:35 AM |
|
Atm Im getting more HW than accepted shares so I guess something is wrong with the command line settings. Could maybe have something to do with the card being stock oc'd
|
|
|
|
stefffe
|
|
October 11, 2013, 09:21:57 AM |
|
No extra options tho
Nice If you have time can you test it on litecoin or any other Scrypt base coin? I want to see how many Kh/s it gives. Also please try to post watt usage Hi, I have been testing different settings for scrypt and I think im doing something wrong with the settings. Atm I only get avg 585 khash with these settings: , "intensity" : "13", "vectors" : "1", "worksize" : "256", "kernel" : "scrypt", "lookup-gap" : "0", "thread-concurrency" : "8192", "shaders" : "2048", "gpu-engine" : "1110", "gpu-fan" : "10-90", "gpu-memclock" : "1605", "gpu-memdiff" : "0", "gpu-powertune" : "0", "gpu-vddc" : "0.000", "temp-cutoff" : "95", "temp-overheat" : "86", "temp-target" : "76", "api-port" : "4028", "expiry" : "120", "gpu-dyninterval" : "7", "gpu-platform" : "0", "gpu-threads" : "1", "log" : "5", "no-pool-disable" : true, "queue" : "1", "scan-time" : "120", "scrypt" : true, "temp-hysteresis" : "3", "shares" : "0", If anyone has a clue what to change for more khash please say so I have tried higher Tc with lg 1-2 but that doesnt work at all.
|
|
|
|
YipYip
|
|
October 11, 2013, 09:35:33 AM |
|
No extra options tho
Nice If you have time can you test it on litecoin or any other Scrypt base coin? I want to see how many Kh/s it gives. Also please try to post watt usage Hi, I have been testing different settings for scrypt and I think im doing something wrong with the settings. Atm I only get avg 585 khash with these settings: , "intensity" : "13", "vectors" : "1", "worksize" : "256", "kernel" : "scrypt", "lookup-gap" : "0", "thread-concurrency" : "8192", "shaders" : "2048", "gpu-engine" : "1110", "gpu-fan" : "10-90", "gpu-memclock" : "1605", "gpu-memdiff" : "0", "gpu-powertune" : "0", "gpu-vddc" : "0.000", "temp-cutoff" : "95", "temp-overheat" : "86", "temp-target" : "76", "api-port" : "4028", "expiry" : "120", "gpu-dyninterval" : "7", "gpu-platform" : "0", "gpu-threads" : "1", "log" : "5", "no-pool-disable" : true, "queue" : "1", "scan-time" : "120", "scrypt" : true, "temp-hysteresis" : "3", "shares" : "0", If anyone has a clue what to change for more khash please say so I have tried higher Tc with lg 1-2 but that doesnt work at all. Here are some cgminer settings that should be good to go for scrypt cgminer --scrypt -o stratum+tcp://ftcpps.nut2pools.com:5565 -u yipyip.11 -p x --thread-concurrency 21712 -I 20 -g 1 -w 256 --auto-fan --temp-target 71 --no-subnmit-stale U must have 4 gig ram to use the high end concurrency setings Also u must run Grab a dos\cmd box and add setx GPU_MAX_ALLOC_PERCENT 100 then close the dos box and then run cgminer v3.0 +
|
OBJECT NOT FOUND
|
|
|
hulk
|
|
October 11, 2013, 09:39:10 AM |
|
I just realise that u bought gigabyte R9 280x. Gigabyte is famous for voltage locked.
|
|
|
|
stefffe
|
|
October 11, 2013, 10:40:08 AM |
|
I just realise that u bought gigabyte R9 280x. Gigabyte is famous for voltage locked.
Okay, but does not have anything to do with the hash rate does it? Thats for saving power/lowering temp?
|
|
|
|
Badman0316
|
|
October 11, 2013, 02:02:40 PM |
|
any test in scrypt mining?
|
|
|
|
|
fattypig
|
|
October 11, 2013, 03:10:36 PM |
|
I just realise that u bought gigabyte R9 280x. Gigabyte is famous for voltage locked.
Okay, but does not have anything to do with the hash rate does it? Thats for saving power/lowering temp? Ya, voltage is only for saving power/lowering temp, it won't effect your hash rate at all unless its too hot (90 C and above). You might have to try different settings.
|
|
|
|
|