Bitcoin Forum
June 20, 2024, 09:08:58 AM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 [172] 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][BLC] Blakecoin Blake-256 for GPU/FPGA With Merged Mined Pools Stable Net  (Read 409445 times)
bzyzny
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 274
Merit: 254


View Profile
April 11, 2016, 02:09:29 PM
 #3421



Be warned there be zombies and a dragon in these woods!!
no-ice-please
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 955
Merit: 500


View Profile
April 11, 2016, 04:16:31 PM
 #3422

That is some well done graphics man. Did you do that with GIMP?
BlueDragon747 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1509
Merit: 1030


Solutions Architect


View Profile WWW
April 11, 2016, 11:09:21 PM
Last edit: April 12, 2016, 12:24:45 PM by BlueDragon747
 #3423

BlakeZone Update:

5.4 beta failed testing of client project not huge but couple of packages need to be updated by their authors, will try and re validate it closer to June
5.3.4f1 and 5.3.4p2 passed testing for client project and are listed as stable no issues with packages all updated yay  Cheesy

doing some more UI and gun animation next but before that need to do some overdue maintenance on pools which I will start next day or two

Info: GithubBlakecoin.org - BCT Blakecoin thread - Twitter - BCS - BlakeZone  Trade Blakecoin: Xeggex.com Merged Mining Pools: EU3 - NY2/AT1 - LA1
Donation Addresses: BLC: Bd3jJftFbwxWSKNSNz35vkDd57kG6jHAjt PHO: BZXPMc8eF9YZcJStskkP2bVia38fv9VmuT BBTC: 2h8c4NbzXJXk6QQ89r7YYMGhe13gQUC2ajD ELT: e7cm6cAgpfhvk3Myh2Jkmi1nqaHtDHnxXb 
UMO: uQH9H17t7kz3eVQ3vKDzMsWCK4hn5nh2gC LIT: 8p8Z4h5fkZ8SCoyEtihKcjzZLA7gFjTdmL BTC: 1Q6kgcNqhKh8u67m6Gj73T2LMgGseETwR6
bzyzny
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 274
Merit: 254


View Profile
April 13, 2016, 12:53:29 AM
 #3424

@no-ice-please thanks, and yes i used gimp how did you guess? i can't take credit for the dragon, its from some martial arts site.

@BlueDragon747 thanks for the update keep up the good work
BlueDragon747 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1509
Merit: 1030


Solutions Architect


View Profile WWW
April 13, 2016, 09:34:20 AM
Last edit: April 13, 2016, 05:38:42 PM by BlueDragon747
 #3425

Maintenance on Pools(will update with current progress):

starting the backups before any other work this can take a few hours and pools may be a bit sluggish while its going on  done

Edit:
working on EU3 now maybe about ~1 hour down time mostly done*

working on AT1/NY2 now maybe about ~1 hour down time mostly done*

working on LA1 now maybe about ~1 hour down time mostly done*

*mining back on just prune of data from db and any old logs which will do over next few days

any issues let me know

Info: GithubBlakecoin.org - BCT Blakecoin thread - Twitter - BCS - BlakeZone  Trade Blakecoin: Xeggex.com Merged Mining Pools: EU3 - NY2/AT1 - LA1
Donation Addresses: BLC: Bd3jJftFbwxWSKNSNz35vkDd57kG6jHAjt PHO: BZXPMc8eF9YZcJStskkP2bVia38fv9VmuT BBTC: 2h8c4NbzXJXk6QQ89r7YYMGhe13gQUC2ajD ELT: e7cm6cAgpfhvk3Myh2Jkmi1nqaHtDHnxXb 
UMO: uQH9H17t7kz3eVQ3vKDzMsWCK4hn5nh2gC LIT: 8p8Z4h5fkZ8SCoyEtihKcjzZLA7gFjTdmL BTC: 1Q6kgcNqhKh8u67m6Gj73T2LMgGseETwR6
Bare
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 130
Merit: 11


View Profile
April 19, 2016, 01:50:02 PM
 #3426


8 round Blake-256 is the fastest!

  • 6.4GH/s - 6.9GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 295X2
  • 3.3GH/s - 3.5GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 290X
  • 2.9GH/s - 3.1GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 290
  • 2.6GH/s - 2.8GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 280X
  • 2.2GH/s - 2.4GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 280
  • 1.2GH/s - 1.5GH/s on a AMD Radeon R9 270
  • 4.8GH/s - 5.1GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 7990
  • 2.2GH/s - 2.8GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 7970
  • 2.1GH/s - 2.4GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 7950
  • 2.6GH/s - 2.9GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 6990
  • 1.4GH/s - 1.5GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 6970
  • 1.4GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 6950
  • 900MH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 6870
  • 800MH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 6850
  • 1.3GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 5870
  • 1.1GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 5850
  • 1.6GH/s on a ZTEX USB-FPGA 1.15y Quad Spartan-6 LX150 Development Board
  • 1.5GH/s on a Enterpoint Cairnsmore 1 Quad Spartan-6 LX150 Development Board
  • 960MH/s on a Lancelot Dual Spartan-6 LX150 Development Board
  • 360MH/s on a ZTEX USB-FPGA 1.15x Spartan-6 LX150 Development Board
  • 4.1GH/s on a NVIDIA GeForce 980ti
  • 3.05GH/s on a NVIDIA GeForce 980
  • 2.63GH/s on a NVIDIA GeForce 970
  • 1.71GH/s on a NVIDIA GeForce 960
  • 930MH/s on a NVIDIA GeForce 750ti



add this line: 2.0GH/s - 2.3GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 5970

Tested with 2x 5970 cards
First card is overclocked on 850 MHz engine and second one is on stock speed 735 MHz (OC edition)

BlueDragon747 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1509
Merit: 1030


Solutions Architect


View Profile WWW
April 19, 2016, 03:08:33 PM
 #3427


add this line: 2.0GH/s - 2.3GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 5970

Tested with 2x 5970 cards
First card is overclocked on 850 MHz engine and second one is on stock speed 735 MHz (OC edition)


Done

thanks for testing  Cool

will add to site and other OPs when I do next update

Info: GithubBlakecoin.org - BCT Blakecoin thread - Twitter - BCS - BlakeZone  Trade Blakecoin: Xeggex.com Merged Mining Pools: EU3 - NY2/AT1 - LA1
Donation Addresses: BLC: Bd3jJftFbwxWSKNSNz35vkDd57kG6jHAjt PHO: BZXPMc8eF9YZcJStskkP2bVia38fv9VmuT BBTC: 2h8c4NbzXJXk6QQ89r7YYMGhe13gQUC2ajD ELT: e7cm6cAgpfhvk3Myh2Jkmi1nqaHtDHnxXb 
UMO: uQH9H17t7kz3eVQ3vKDzMsWCK4hn5nh2gC LIT: 8p8Z4h5fkZ8SCoyEtihKcjzZLA7gFjTdmL BTC: 1Q6kgcNqhKh8u67m6Gj73T2LMgGseETwR6
Bare
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 130
Merit: 11


View Profile
April 19, 2016, 09:15:07 PM
Last edit: April 21, 2016, 02:48:20 AM by Bare
 #3428


add this line: 2.0GH/s - 2.3GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 5970

Tested with 2x 5970 cards
First card is overclocked on 850 MHz engine and second one is on stock speed 735 MHz (OC edition)


Done

thanks for testing  Cool

will add to site and other OPs when I do next update

np man,
It's always a pleasure to contribute! Cool

anyways, I've got a question related to mining and I'm hoping you or anybody else with experience would know the answer or something.
the word is about mining with dual gpu graphic cards such as my 5970(what i'm about to ask is applicable to other dual gpu cards too like 6990, 7990, 295x2...)
(note: my mobo's chipset is 990fxa = two x16, two x4 and two x1 pci-e slots)

problem description:
As you can see in the image from my previous post I have 2 physical 5970 cards(4 utilized gpu cores) inserted in pci-e x16 slot on my mobo and my pc recognizes all 4 gpu cores and utilizes them for mining.
now, I have a fully working usb 3.0 powered pci-e riser x1 to x16, which i tried on one of my 5970's and I got this problem - pc recognizes that particular 5970 as a single core gpu card and utilizes only one gpu core whereas other gpu core remains completely idle and unused(checked it in device manager and  .
So when using this card with a riser I'm basically using the card with a half potential since only 1 out of 2 gpu cores can be used and that sucks so hard.

My question is(and I hope so hard someone has a solution for this pain):
Is there any way that I can utilize both cores on my 5970 using pci-e riser?(I tried out all lanes on my mobo and got the same result)
I heard of less popular x16 to x16 pci-e risers. has anyone tried to get them to work on them perhaps?

all suggestions are very welcome!  Smiley
BlueDragon747 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1509
Merit: 1030


Solutions Architect


View Profile WWW
April 20, 2016, 09:44:45 AM
Last edit: April 20, 2016, 11:43:24 AM by BlueDragon747
 #3429


add this line: 2.0GH/s - 2.3GH/s on a AMD ATI Radeon 5970

Tested with 2x 5970 cards
First card is overclocked on 850 MHz engine and second one is on stock speed 735 MHz (OC edition)


Done

thanks for testing  Cool

will add to site and other OPs when I do next update

np man,
It's always a pleasure to contribute! Cool

anyways, I've got a question related to mining and I'm hoping you or anybody else with experience would know the answer or something.
the word is about mining with dual gpu graphic cards such as my 5970(what i'm about to ask is applicable to other dual gpu cards too like 6990, 7990, 295x2...)
(note: my mobo's chipset is 990fxa = two x16, two x4 and one x1 pci-e slot)

problem description:
As you can see in the image from my previous post I have 2 physical 5970 cards(4 utilized gpu cores) inserted in pci-e x16 slot on my mobo and my pc recognizes all 4 gpu cores and utilizes them for mining.
now, I have a fully working usb 3.0 powered pci-e riser x1 to x16, which i tried on one of my 5970's and I got this problem - pc recognizes that particular 5970 as a single core gpu card and utilizes only one gpu core whereas other gpu core remains completely idle and unused(checked it in device manager and  .
So when using this card with a riser I'm basically using the card with a half potential since only 1 out of 2 gpu cores can be used and that sucks so hard.

My question is(and I hope so hard someone has a solution for this pain):
Is there any way that I can utilize both cores on my 5970 using pci-e riser?(I tried out all lanes on my mobo and got the same result)
I heard of less popular x16 to x16 pci-e risers. has anyone tried to get them to work on them perhaps?

all suggestions are very welcome!  Smiley


sounds like a driver issue rather than a pcie issue due to all the unused audio/dp/hdmi etc taking up resources? some people get similar with 4-8 gpu mining rigs, might want to check out modded drivers https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=712228.0

"usb 3.0 powered pci-e riser x1 to x16" these are best for most gpu miners using multi cards the older 1x-16x/16x-16x ribbon cables just not as good from my own experience but ymmv

Info: GithubBlakecoin.org - BCT Blakecoin thread - Twitter - BCS - BlakeZone  Trade Blakecoin: Xeggex.com Merged Mining Pools: EU3 - NY2/AT1 - LA1
Donation Addresses: BLC: Bd3jJftFbwxWSKNSNz35vkDd57kG6jHAjt PHO: BZXPMc8eF9YZcJStskkP2bVia38fv9VmuT BBTC: 2h8c4NbzXJXk6QQ89r7YYMGhe13gQUC2ajD ELT: e7cm6cAgpfhvk3Myh2Jkmi1nqaHtDHnxXb 
UMO: uQH9H17t7kz3eVQ3vKDzMsWCK4hn5nh2gC LIT: 8p8Z4h5fkZ8SCoyEtihKcjzZLA7gFjTdmL BTC: 1Q6kgcNqhKh8u67m6Gj73T2LMgGseETwR6
bzyzny
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 274
Merit: 254


View Profile
April 20, 2016, 06:09:56 PM
 #3430

I agree its probably driver issue. Search for if there is a preferred driver version for your card. Also try different operating system if nothing else helps. Also possible a mobo bios update might help
cinnamon_carter
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 1018


It's about time -- All merrit accepted !!!


View Profile WWW
April 21, 2016, 12:41:30 AM
 #3431

to run 4 5970's i 'think' you need 'powered' riser wires / assuming you know what i mean here .....

does the board you are trying to plug these multiple gpu's in have .....how many inputs Huh

i.e. what model is it, post a pic with the stats.... i assume running an older version of win x

Check out my coin Photon
Merge Mine 5 other Blake 256 coins - 6x your hash power  https://www.blakecoin.org/

The obvious choice is not always the best choice.

LOOK DEEPER - Look into the Blake 256 Family -- CC
Bare
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 130
Merit: 11


View Profile
April 21, 2016, 02:47:03 AM
 #3432

to run 4 5970's i 'think' you need 'powered' riser wires / assuming you know what i mean here .....

does the board you are trying to plug these multiple gpu's in have .....how many inputs Huh

i.e. what model is it, post a pic with the stats.... i assume running an older version of win x



guys, guys, I really appreciate your interest to help me Smiley

but I see some of you don't fully get my situation.
just to clarify one thing. I do not have 4 physical 5970 cards.
I have 2 physical 5970 cards, and since a single 5970 card is a dual gpu card that means I have 4 cores altogether!( 1x 5970 = 2x gpu cores => 2x 5970 = 4x gpu cores)
as you can see 4 gpu cores doesn't necessarily always mean 4 graphic cards. most graphic cards out there in the market are single core, 5970 happens to be one of the rare ones to be dual core, among some other rare few...(such as 6990, 7990, 295x2...)

next...
one particular reason why I don't believe my drivers are problematic is that...you see... 5970 is as of now...fairly old card(2009 - but still has a good kick in terms of hash power for it's age)
and as some of you may or may not know amd stopped releasing new drivers for these 5xxx models, the newest crimson drivers are not intended for 5970(they are intended for new generation gpus such as 2xx, 3xx and newer...) so I've got the last best working catalyst driver for this older card, it just so happens to be CCC 15.7.1 that I have(preferred driver for this card) note that I have win7.

I managed to find few people on some forums having this kind of problem I'm facing but never got the clear answer, most of them doubted it's the problem in 1x to 16x risers not having the ability to detect both cores on dual core graphic cards but only one core, unlike 16x to 16x riser which could do that!(you see now that this is not the problem at all for most graphic cards which are single core, only dual core cards face this kind of problem hence not many people discuss or know this)
also I don't know how much truth is there because I haven't had the chance to try 16x to 16x risers nor I have any specific proof from other people, all I know is what i gathered from other people's posts

to answer your question cinnamon_carter I have 6 pci-e slots 2x x16, 2x x4 and 2x x1 pci-e slots, theoretically that's 6x physical cards connected at once (this mobo officially supports 4 cards - 990fxa chipset look it up)

I dunno if you ever had experience with dual gpu cards but let me tell you head on they can be tricky to deal with unlike single gpu cards...
BlueDragon747 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1509
Merit: 1030


Solutions Architect


View Profile WWW
April 21, 2016, 11:16:54 AM
Last edit: April 21, 2016, 01:12:12 PM by BlueDragon747
 #3433

to run 4 5970's i 'think' you need 'powered' riser wires / assuming you know what i mean here .....

does the board you are trying to plug these multiple gpu's in have .....how many inputs Huh

i.e. what model is it, post a pic with the stats.... i assume running an older version of win x



guys, guys, I really appreciate your interest to help me Smiley

but I see some of you don't fully get my situation.
just to clarify one thing. I do not have 4 physical 5970 cards.
I have 2 physical 5970 cards, and since a single 5970 card is a dual gpu card that means I have 4 cores altogether!( 1x 5970 = 2x gpu cores => 2x 5970 = 4x gpu cores)
as you can see 4 gpu cores doesn't necessarily always mean 4 graphic cards. most graphic cards out there in the market are single core, 5970 happens to be one of the rare ones to be dual core, among some other rare few...(such as 6990, 7990, 295x2...)

next...
one particular reason why I don't believe my drivers are problematic is that...you see... 5970 is as of now...fairly old card(2009 - but still has a good kick in terms of hash power for it's age)
and as some of you may or may not know amd stopped releasing new drivers for these 5xxx models, the newest crimson drivers are not intended for 5970(they are intended for new generation gpus such as 2xx, 3xx and newer...) so I've got the last best working catalyst driver for this older card, it just so happens to be CCC 15.7.1 that I have(preferred driver for this card) note that I have win7.

I managed to find few people on some forums having this kind of problem I'm facing but never got the clear answer, most of them doubted it's the problem in 1x to 16x risers not having the ability to detect both cores on dual core graphic cards but only one core, unlike 16x to 16x riser which could do that!(you see now that this is not the problem at all for most graphic cards which are single core, only dual core cards face this kind of problem hence not many people discuss or know this)
also I don't know how much truth is there because I haven't had the chance to try 16x to 16x risers nor I have any specific proof from other people, all I know is what i gathered from other people's posts

to answer your question cinnamon_carter I have 6 pci-e slots 2x x16, 2x x4 and 2x x1 pci-e slots, theoretically that's 6x physical cards connected at once (this mobo officially supports 4 cards - 990fxa chipset look it up)

I dunno if you ever had experience with dual gpu cards but let me tell you head on they can be tricky to deal with unlike single gpu cards...


I understand you say onboard 16x slot works 2 gpu cores mining but riser does not only 1 gpu core mining

things that might effect this are

  • power as the slot does provide 75w (you have powered riser so this does not matter)
  • OS (windows can get screwy about unused ports on multi cards and this is driver related)
  • motherboard (yes some with lots of features dont work as well even if it has spare pcie best set the pcie gen 1/1.1 if possible, pcie gen 2.0/3.0 not used by older cards and even 7xxx best to set low pcie speed when using risers, same for lane width if bios allows set to 1x when using risers)

others miners do get issues with multi gpu cores/cards, amd driver limit is 8 gpu cores per machine but some driver versions are better than other for mining rigs and newer drivers are not always best *most issues are for 5-8 gpu cores and with only 4 cores/2 cards you should be fine  Huh why works in slot and not on riser my best guess is driver or motherboard settings  Huh

from my own experience amd driver issues dont always show as obvious errors and its easy to overlook and think it might be hardware including other devices showing errors *not saying your issue is 100% drivers it maybe something else like bios settings but its easy to overlook drivers and has some weird effects with devices at least with windows

1x pci-e is all you need for mining any card dual or single, amd dual 5xxx-7xxx cards have a bridge chip on the card so the pcie is split on card so if you can see 1 gpu core that card is working rest is driver/os/motherboard (dual based cards with bridge chips use more resources and sometimes windows has errors/issues with this)

3x 5970 1x 5850 on a asrock h81 using usb 1x-16x powered risers


best of luck sure you will get it in the end  Cool

Info: GithubBlakecoin.org - BCT Blakecoin thread - Twitter - BCS - BlakeZone  Trade Blakecoin: Xeggex.com Merged Mining Pools: EU3 - NY2/AT1 - LA1
Donation Addresses: BLC: Bd3jJftFbwxWSKNSNz35vkDd57kG6jHAjt PHO: BZXPMc8eF9YZcJStskkP2bVia38fv9VmuT BBTC: 2h8c4NbzXJXk6QQ89r7YYMGhe13gQUC2ajD ELT: e7cm6cAgpfhvk3Myh2Jkmi1nqaHtDHnxXb 
UMO: uQH9H17t7kz3eVQ3vKDzMsWCK4hn5nh2gC LIT: 8p8Z4h5fkZ8SCoyEtihKcjzZLA7gFjTdmL BTC: 1Q6kgcNqhKh8u67m6Gj73T2LMgGseETwR6
temp89
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 246
Merit: 250



View Profile
April 29, 2016, 12:43:18 PM
 #3434

What's going on at bittrex? Every day I see virtual trader who buy about 55-65k BLC.
BlueDragon747 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1509
Merit: 1030


Solutions Architect


View Profile WWW
April 29, 2016, 02:46:14 PM
 #3435

What's going on at bittrex? Every day I see virtual trader who buy about 55-65k BLC.

Bittrex requires minimum volume of 0.2 BTC per day!

Info: GithubBlakecoin.org - BCT Blakecoin thread - Twitter - BCS - BlakeZone  Trade Blakecoin: Xeggex.com Merged Mining Pools: EU3 - NY2/AT1 - LA1
Donation Addresses: BLC: Bd3jJftFbwxWSKNSNz35vkDd57kG6jHAjt PHO: BZXPMc8eF9YZcJStskkP2bVia38fv9VmuT BBTC: 2h8c4NbzXJXk6QQ89r7YYMGhe13gQUC2ajD ELT: e7cm6cAgpfhvk3Myh2Jkmi1nqaHtDHnxXb 
UMO: uQH9H17t7kz3eVQ3vKDzMsWCK4hn5nh2gC LIT: 8p8Z4h5fkZ8SCoyEtihKcjzZLA7gFjTdmL BTC: 1Q6kgcNqhKh8u67m6Gj73T2LMgGseETwR6
madjihad
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 227
Merit: 260



View Profile
April 29, 2016, 10:59:35 PM
 #3436

is this coin still even alive ?
what is it for ?
BlueDragon747 (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1509
Merit: 1030


Solutions Architect


View Profile WWW
April 29, 2016, 11:06:38 PM
Last edit: April 29, 2016, 11:32:50 PM by BlueDragon747
 #3437

the merge mining is still working great on pools, no known network issues on any of the merge mined Blake eco coins

the main use is the MMO games that are being worked on like BlakeZone

I still run pools/nodes and take up any slack on minimum volume and will continue to maintain good service short/mid/long term

development is still ongoing but for me is mostly focused on game stuff(Unity3d+Custom MMO Framework) as it is the main use case, why? see my post here

Current Game Dev:
what I have been working with/testing this past week or so new input system this is only on a dev branch and not yet merged into main client *because it may break stuff hence the testing!  Shocked

Info: GithubBlakecoin.org - BCT Blakecoin thread - Twitter - BCS - BlakeZone  Trade Blakecoin: Xeggex.com Merged Mining Pools: EU3 - NY2/AT1 - LA1
Donation Addresses: BLC: Bd3jJftFbwxWSKNSNz35vkDd57kG6jHAjt PHO: BZXPMc8eF9YZcJStskkP2bVia38fv9VmuT BBTC: 2h8c4NbzXJXk6QQ89r7YYMGhe13gQUC2ajD ELT: e7cm6cAgpfhvk3Myh2Jkmi1nqaHtDHnxXb 
UMO: uQH9H17t7kz3eVQ3vKDzMsWCK4hn5nh2gC LIT: 8p8Z4h5fkZ8SCoyEtihKcjzZLA7gFjTdmL BTC: 1Q6kgcNqhKh8u67m6Gj73T2LMgGseETwR6
shotgun1969
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 723
Merit: 501



View Profile
May 01, 2016, 08:49:49 PM
 #3438

i just wanted to know why the mergepools dont include diraccoin
frostminer
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 505


View Profile WWW
May 01, 2016, 09:12:11 PM
 #3439

i just wanted to know why the mergepools dont include diraccoin


zpool does

shotgun1969
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 723
Merit: 501



View Profile
May 01, 2016, 09:16:33 PM
 #3440

but zpool doesnt have the other 5 coins that is why i ask
Pages: « 1 ... 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 [172] 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!