Easteregg69
|
|
June 20, 2018, 11:46:42 PM Last edit: June 21, 2018, 12:09:37 AM by Easteregg69 |
|
Good news is that monkeyproject is 50% up. Those coins are soooo expensive. I am in for a restart. Antivirus update. Have a movie for the break: Are Space and Time An Illusion? | Space Time | PBS Digital Studios https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YycAzdtUIko"Neither of them is wrong".. "Someone's past is in someone's future.."
|
Throw some "shit" and see what sticks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you see garbage posts (off-topic, trolling, spam, no point, etc.), use the "report to moderator" links. All reports are investigated, though you will rarely be contacted about your reports.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
Ballysto
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
|
|
June 20, 2018, 11:51:52 PM |
|
Can anyone help? I keep getting "out of memory" error on GPU5 on EWBF v2.
Sounds like you need to expand your virtual memory for that fifth card. I think on average in Windows you need approximately 4gb per card.
|
|
|
|
Easteregg69
|
|
June 21, 2018, 12:01:10 AM |
|
No one has a clue as to why every share I mine is being rejected?
Using new EWFB miner 2.0 and updated wallet
Put "--pers BitcoinZ" in the command line for the miner. thanks ill try that. This is what Im using now miner --algo 192_7 --pers BitcoinZ --server us.miningspeed.com --port 3072 --user (address) --pass x pause EDIT: i SEE NOW. tHE POOLS CHANGED THEIR COMMAND LINES. I was using the stock algo. Running smooth now Great :-) The 192_.. should be "--algo 144_5". At least that is what i am using.
|
Throw some "shit" and see what sticks.
|
|
|
Easteregg69
|
|
June 21, 2018, 01:22:36 AM |
|
wrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr. .1.4.0 is no better than 1.2.1 wrrrrrrrrwrrrrrrrrrrrr Still in progress. Latest version comes with an antivirus trigger and no reply. https://github.com/btcz/bitcoinz-wallet/issues/49Q: About limitations! How many BTCZ can one send in one transaction ? It takes at least an hour to send 10.000 in one transfer on my setup. From Z to T.
|
Throw some "shit" and see what sticks.
|
|
|
dragon72
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
June 21, 2018, 02:22:33 AM Last edit: June 21, 2018, 02:52:02 AM by dragon72 |
|
wrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr. .1.4.0 is no better than 1.2.1 wrrrrrrrrwrrrrrrrrrrrr Still in progress. Latest version comes with an antivirus trigger and no reply. https://github.com/btcz/bitcoinz-wallet/issues/49Q: About limitations! How many BTCZ can one send in one transaction ? It takes at least an hour to send 10.000 in one transfer on my setup. From Z to T. I did several transactions sending and receiving several hundred of thousands BTCZ (up to +/- 650K), from T to Z without any issue while using the Swing Wallet 1.1.5.1 and 1.1.5.2. In the last two versions, 1.2.1 and 1.4.0, I have moved several times up to +/- 20K without any issue. Only few times I have had issues with the wallets and a clean up of the folder except the wallet.dat, of course, plus a re-index fixes everything. For my personal experience this wallet has been very reliable. I just did two tests moving from Z to T, first test 5K BTCZ and second test 10K. The transactions took few seconds and the confirmation time about 2 min each time, so no issues at all for me. Swing Wallet 1.4.0.
|
|
|
|
dragon72
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
June 21, 2018, 02:30:54 AM |
|
wrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr. .1.4.0 is no better than 1.2.1 wrrrrrrrrwrrrrrrrrrrrr Still in progress. Latest version comes with an antivirus trigger and no reply. https://github.com/btcz/bitcoinz-wallet/issues/49Q: About limitations! How many BTCZ can one send in one transaction ? It takes at least an hour to send 10.000 in one transfer on my setup. From Z to T. I have never suffered any antivirus trigger with any of the Swing Wallet versions. I am using Kaspersky Total Security 2018. I have had the triggers with the miners (of course - as expected), added them to the exceptions and no more triggering.
|
|
|
|
|
boomboommin
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 92
Merit: 0
|
|
June 21, 2018, 06:53:46 AM |
|
308kSol at the moment, just as yesterday
|
|
|
|
ganteralex
|
|
June 21, 2018, 07:14:15 AM |
|
Hello everyone, tell me how much you can get coins per day from the following hardware configuration - (gtx 1070x4 8gb, gtx 1080tix4 11gb)
|
|
|
|
Yatsida
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 67
Merit: 0
|
|
June 21, 2018, 08:03:19 AM |
|
Why is there such a big hashrate rise?
|
|
|
|
Trafo
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 109
Merit: 0
|
|
June 21, 2018, 08:31:09 AM |
|
No one has a clue as to why every share I mine is being rejected?
Using new EWFB miner 2.0 and updated wallet
Put "--pers BitcoinZ" in the command line for the miner. thanks ill try that. This is what Im using now miner --algo 192_7 --pers BitcoinZ --server us.miningspeed.com --port 3072 --user (address) --pass x pause EDIT: i SEE NOW. tHE POOLS CHANGED THEIR COMMAND LINES. I was using the stock algo. Running smooth now The "--algo 192_7" is not good. You should use "--algo 144_5" for mining BitcoinZ.
|
|
|
|
|
boomboommin
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 92
Merit: 0
|
|
June 21, 2018, 09:32:15 AM |
|
ewbf have speed x10 zhasher
|
|
|
|
Ballysto
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
|
|
June 21, 2018, 11:45:17 AM |
|
Fee for EWBF is 2% by default and can be manually set. All info on that is listed in his thread.
|
|
|
|
Easteregg69
|
|
June 21, 2018, 12:56:46 PM Last edit: June 21, 2018, 01:09:28 PM by Easteregg69 |
|
I have taken ~60.000 BTCZ out of stocks.exchange in one transfer comes to mind.
Still mining with with only one GTX-980. And i am back on emptying the 1.2.1/1.4.0 wallet. Gave up yesterday after a couple of more hours with just wrrrrrrrr. And "invalid or wrong adresses". And "in progress".
Pick the MyBitcoinz wallet for starters. (Still not completely tested here.).
|
Throw some "shit" and see what sticks.
|
|
|
Easteregg69
|
|
June 21, 2018, 02:23:31 PM |
|
Why is there such a big hashrate rise? Because someone wants some coins. Mine a billion more and it could go zclassic..
|
Throw some "shit" and see what sticks.
|
|
|
Trafo
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 109
Merit: 0
|
|
June 21, 2018, 02:42:45 PM |
|
I have taken ~60.000 BTCZ out of stocks.exchange in one transfer comes to mind.
Still mining with with only one GTX-980. And i am back on emptying the 1.2.1/1.4.0 wallet. Gave up yesterday after a couple of more hours with just wrrrrrrrr. And "invalid or wrong adresses". And "in progress".
Pick the MyBitcoinz wallet for starters. (Still not completely tested here.).
Did you try withdrawing less than 10 000 coins / transaction?
|
|
|
|
CarlOrff
|
|
June 21, 2018, 03:15:51 PM |
|
I have taken ~60.000 BTCZ out of stocks.exchange in one transfer comes to mind.
Still mining with with only one GTX-980. And i am back on emptying the 1.2.1/1.4.0 wallet. Gave up yesterday after a couple of more hours with just wrrrrrrrr. And "invalid or wrong adresses". And "in progress".
Pick the MyBitcoinz wallet for starters. (Still not completely tested here.).
@EasterEgg69 : Have you seen if your transaction problem is not just a size problem ? All the wallets have a limitation size for a unique transaction : not a limit in coins but in kb. If your transaction is the result of hundreds incomes in your wallet (for example you mine with a pool who withdraw with a very low limit), these size limitation can be easely be too low. If this is the problem, you have just to control your transaction size (in your wallet).
|
Bitcoin + privacy respect = BitcoinZ ( topic BitcoinZ) The only decentralized crypto that complements Bitcoin on privacy. You missed Bitcoin in 2009 ? Do not miss BitcoinZ in 2018 !
|
|
|
SLasVegas
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 45
Merit: 0
|
|
June 21, 2018, 04:20:38 PM |
|
I have been using the MyBitcoinZ wallet for months. Never had a problem with it. When I heard about the fork that happened last weekend, I downloaded the file "bitcoinz-windows-wallet_1.4.0_win64" from the github directory that I was pointed to in a thread on bitcointalk. It was recommended to use a new wallet. Ever since I've downloaded this file, I've tried to use it BEFORE and AFTER the fork, even a few minutes ago, and I keep getting this error: A general unexpected critical error has occured: error: couldn't connect to server: EOF reached (code 1) (make sure server is running and you are connecting to the correct RPC port) See the console/logfile output for more detailed error information! I can't look at the console output because the wallet won't start. I still have my Bitcoinz setting in the MyBitcoinZ wallet. Anyone have ANY idea why this suggested wallet is crashing non-stop? I'm still waiting on an AMD miner to be released also. Haven't seen nothing on that front except that people are working on it.
|
|
|
|
BitcoinZ Community (OP)
|
|
June 21, 2018, 05:05:25 PM |
|
I have been using the MyBitcoinZ wallet for months. Never had a problem with it. When I heard about the fork that happened last weekend, I downloaded the file "bitcoinz-windows-wallet_1.4.0_win64" from the github directory that I was pointed to in a thread on bitcointalk. It was recommended to use a new wallet. Ever since I've downloaded this file, I've tried to use it BEFORE and AFTER the fork, even a few minutes ago, and I keep getting this error: A general unexpected critical error has occured: error: couldn't connect to server: EOF reached (code 1) (make sure server is running and you are connecting to the correct RPC port) See the console/logfile output for more detailed error information! I can't look at the console output because the wallet won't start. I still have my Bitcoinz setting in the MyBitcoinZ wallet. Anyone have ANY idea why this suggested wallet is crashing non-stop? I'm still waiting on an AMD miner to be released also. Haven't seen nothing on that front except that people are working on it. You need to reindex. Please run tools\reindex.bat file. Once it completes please open your wallet.
|
|
|
|
|