Bounty and too many participants

[sandgluenick]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

Yes, bounty campaign is getting more and more popular, and there are many new participants also, but it doesn't mean with more participants we earn less rewards for bounty campaign. In fact, there are many bounty campaigns which they didn't limit their participants.

Maybe for the restriction of campaign participants would be a discrimination, for newcomers, because here we are the same looking for bounty, so if I think there is nothing wrong if you have to share with the large number of participants

[1714795482]

1714795482

[1714795482]

1714795482

[1714795482]

1714795482

[feelideb]

Somebody's surviver instinct is on the prowl. Cryptocurrency market is like sky and the investors, traders, bounty hunter are like birds. I am sure all the stakeholders can exist side by side each other without causing any harm.

[meaamir86]

Hi, Well previously i invested in many ICO's which is a better way to earn from cryptocurrencies but I also got some fraud from 2 ICO's that was my bad experience , Well now i tend to do bounties instead of invest a lot , normally I do invest the almost the same I am going to be rewarded, so one thing more bounty hunting also gave me more experience to know the ICO.
Currently, i am in bountyhive which enforced many new policies and limits of person to join which is the much better idea to keep only genuine hunters. I think the bounty hunting market is also evolving day by day.

[paynercash]

You are too greedy, you just want to earn you money, others can not; I think many ICOs are now available, so the number of people involved in the Bounty program is much to meet the needs of ICO projects. I think we should share to make money together. It is a virtue for us. Today, the signature campaign was less participant, because the forum was more difficult to create Merit.

[ityandsyn]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

        Yes that's true our community population were getting bigger and number of campaigners  are also improving but if you notice, there's also a lot of ICO's without campaigners,that's means there's a big offset between ICO and bounty campaigners.
        Just remember that We are entitle of one account and this account will be engage for two or three months,so we will not be able to accommodate the other ICO.

[francojon]

Yes this is a classic, a bounty is good, the ICO looks good, you join and then the mass of bounty hunters joins and you get nothing. I think that this should be addressed by setting a progressive decrease in stakes.

[jackylion]

Today, the Bounty program is gaining in popularity, attracting many participants because they are not risky. If they encounter a scam ICO they will not lose anything, only time consuming. That's the strength of the Bounty program. Bounty is suitable for those who earn monthly income and earn extra income in Crypto.

[mikaeltomcruz12]

That was selfish thing, some of the investors are investing because they don't want an extra work lets give a chance to other to earn also token who don't have extra money for investment. Bounty campaign is the easy way to earn money but the income of investors is higher than bounty hunters.

[Stavri]

for me it is meaningless to join to social media campaigns such as twitter or facebook. because there are so many people participating with multi accounts. those people takes most of the share. for normal participants it is not easy to get a good share there.

[samward]

People r now beginning to become curious and interested in joining.. And not just investor, but also participants in bounty campaign, the more participant the lesser or smaller the possible profit each could get or earned. There has to be some limitation like in one campaign like 150-300 participant only and well again it's still depend on the rules of the bounty campaign.

[alkhie01]

I understand your concern, many participant, many reward sharing so less reward for you. Now I hope you can understand also the real meaning of the word CAMPAIGNS is an activities that intended to achieve goals. So what we are doing in bounty campaigns is to promote the project to be known in the market if the less participant do you think its enough? All bounty hunters like to have big reward but also think the company goals is to be successfully known by using us for help.

[bitcoinskyrocket09]

Bounty campaigns are very popular and the main and number one reason why btc and cryptocurrency is known and spreading. People are very smart and intelligent when it comes to money thats why they are making and finding way to earn money and they easiest way is the bounty campaigns with many participants, for me thats the problem too many participants in a bounty thats why they are making and implementing more bounties so the cryptocurrency is being relevant in that way.

[tedes]

If I think because bounty campaign has allocation per campaign (twitter, facebook, signature) I think it is difficult to limit the participants because the allocation will be divided into the number of participants so there is nothing wrong with it especially the high allocation.

[hritevanz]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

I like it every time there's a new bounty campaign that has a great project with the famous team member of it because the first thing that comes to my mind is that this ICO will surely be successful in the future. Indeed, that as long as there are more participants in a bounty campaign, the reward of each participant will be less depending on the stakes. To be honest, there are some bounty campaigns who choose people with best members with best posts.

[thilak.s99]

yes the manager should take an action, strict in receiving the participants and limit the participants so that selected most qualified participants can get rewards according to their hard work

[ducphucmmo]

The popularity of bounty all over the world has made marks in people's lives. Glad to know that despite others suspicion, still many people choose to join bounties for they know what it can bring to their lives and to others. It looks like you are worried about your personal profit in the bounty campaign. For the investor and the campaign itself, a large number of participants is the success of the project

[alphaomega.f]

bounty programs is beginning to be popular and yes its true that the greater is the number of participants in a bounty program, the lesser is also of the value you'll earn. but how will it be regulated? i think bitcoin made a move on that by putting on "merit".

[Jimbo Abu]

It is better to join if the campaign is new release. It is sure if you are payed. But I think that too many who join is good for the campaign. Because there are many participant that post their new project and this is the success of a campaign.

[NerdYale]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

Actually, the more the participants are, the better for the ICO. Since they are doing this for advertisements of their project. So I dont think some regulations will happen especially in the social campaigns because it is more effective. That is why social campaign participants have less share in the bounties, because it was too easy for a job and the requirement is easier too than the other bounties (except airdrop though).

[insomnia79]

If there a lot of participant for bounty I think that is a good condition for the bounty program, participant can campaign the bounty and advertise people around the world so they want to join investation to support the project and it help the project success, so lets support ICO