Bounty and too many participants

[tuvic01]

You are very right,there seems to be too many participants now joining the bounty campaign  and it's definitely affecting the reward because the more the people participating the less the reward per participant. I think there should be rules that can regulate the type of participants that can join bounty.

[NikitaGo]

The higher the level of the company, the more difficult the conditions for bounty, and in companies that make restrictions there is a possibility to make good money, but everything can change because the team reserves the right to make changes.

[JasonCroper]

The market will always be saturated, and now the rules of the forum have brought a lot of inconvenience, but it also sets a very large threshold. Newcomers are not easy to join in.

[sureblinks]

no, i don't agree with you. we don't have too many participant yet. when we do. you will know that you have. it will be heard from peoples mouth.

[-Maks-]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

Let's start with the fact that the number of ICO is growing together with the participants. And another important fact is that the ICO is interested in more quantity than quality. Advertising has always been a dirty business and I doubt that the ICO will agree to pay 10 participants with an undeniable authorit who will write posts on their topic, and from the ICO will show off the signature, hashtag or something. I think if there will be complications to such companies, it is likely that you'll have to write aggressive ads.

[mainthread]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

Of course, this situation makes me very frustrated. The worst thing is that a lot of bots are involved in the campaigns. Already there are a lot of alternative accounts not only in social networks, but also in the signature campaigns. Unfortunately, not all managers want to identify fraudsters ...

[sneakycoin]

The more people involved in a campaign, the less money is being earned. Very popular campaigns are very slow to pay and you can take your money after months. The amount of stake that you will also receive is also very low

Why so? If they promise to deliver the tokens earned within 2-3 weeks after the ICO, it's normal to expect they will. Or what time period do you mean by "slow"?

[coinholic]

With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO

Yes the more participants there are, the lesser the rewards will be. But that’s just how things usually are with bounties unless the manager or the project admin puts a limit on the # of participants. Other than that, there’s really nothing we can do.                               

[ofeefee]

With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO

Yes the more participants there are, the lesser the rewards will be. But that’s just how things usually are with bounties unless the manager or the project admin puts a limit on the # of participants. Other than that, there’s really nothing we can do.                               

I don't mind the number of participants. Usually more participants means bigger campaign and better chance to reach the hard cap.

[podavan]

Well, the choice we have is not big. Or smash an account on the forum. Or write articles and shoot videos. Choose campaigns from unknown managers, campaign managers!

[gbenga88]

I believe the bounty managers can set other stiff measures to measure rewards for bounty thereby leaving those going into it for cheap money no other option but to opt out

[coin-investor]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

I think this bounty campaign already have rules and they only allowed a participant who can comply and qualified to their campaign, it's just too many participants that are joining bounty campaign that is well qualified to be part of the campaign, so there is no need a regulation from moderators of this forum.

[delarossa]

I think it's reasonable that the popular bounty turns out that many participants are following. But the consequence we have to accept is that we only get lower rewards. Therefore many follow many different types of bounty campaign so we can get more prizes. Especially Signature campaign is bounty with the largest allocation. So if the project is a success, surely we will be able to many reward.

[btcvinci]

Indeed. Many people just signup and do nothing for the bounty. Just wasting everyone's time.

[DyllanGM]

I think there are already strict rules and regulations to participating in bounties. But since member of this community is increasing, you can't avoid that some bounties would be flocked especially the popular ones. And about the social campaigns, I think the developers would want to get as much as they can get because advertising in social medias is also a great way to introduce their ICO to the community.

[durgeshjishri]

Never going to happen, but what will happen is those who are in areas that have higher costs of living will cease to do them. It is like any industry, if you can't make enough money people move on. And this is no different, the equilibrium will be found constantly, and will always be evolving to find a new equilibrium.

It seems to be more correct that when the profit decreases and no.of participants increases ,people will move on for new resources as in any other business.
Therefore it becomes compulsory to make the rules and regulations more stringent to participate in Bounty.

[favelle75]

Working for bounty is nice but risky cause lots of scammy ICO projects running. You will get shitty tokens and coins for your work.
Also there are too many participants so this means less shitty tokens.

[Bella Thorne]

The higher the level of the company, the more difficult the conditions for bounty, and in companies that make restrictions there is a possibility to make good money, but everything can change because the team reserves the right to make changes.

Well that is normal that almost all bounty campaign has so many partcipants because right now there are now a lot of people is trusting and joining bounty campaign, and if we want to earn more rewards even there are so many participants we should join the bounty campaign that has a great chance to raised a lot of money.

[kakajones25]

Yes, more and more peple getting known about bounty. I see in Twitter there are about 4-5 thousands people. Its crazy. But if you join, everybody can do the same. Seems like in half a year we gonna have maximum 20$ payment haha. But for sure its not funny

[nellycanezo]

Yes, it was tough one for us bounty hunters. Maybe they would gave at least cut off counts for every bounty like 300 participants for facebook same with twitter. Also I think they must strict before accepting if the facebook is genuine. Some of the participants, if you look on their facebook account, you will see that some are using other picture to have more friends. At least have a rule for video chat for at least 5 seconds, for facebook verification. It was a great help to lessen them by that.