Bounty and too many participants

[ervinmadureri]

I like it every time there's a new bounty campaign that has a great project with the famous team member of it because the first thing that comes to my mind is that this ICO will surely be successful in the future. Indeed, that as long as there are more participants in a bounty campaign. That's the strength of the Bounty program. Bounty is suitable for those who earn monthly income and earn extra income in Crypto

[htconem7]

It would help to grow the economy but in the other hand for bounty hunters this not good. To maintain the high reward so we have no choice to up our ranks, increase our followers, improve our skills. In my opinion I think all ICO's should limit the number of bounty participants but on the other side in one particular ICO its good for them to have many bounty participants to advertise their project

Yes, company bounties are becoming more and more popular. But now it's not as easy as before to get a big profit, with each month I see a decrease in profits on the bounty. Therefore, if new people want to get a satisfactory profit, it will be necessary to work hard for this

[SnapFX]

Really, lately more and more participants jam into Bounty-campaigns. I think, in 2-3 their months will be much and the possibility of earnings will significantly decrease.

[Janeth]

I think its hard to choose the best bounty hunter you can't tell if the one who participates is the best one by signing up. much better if they pot a limitation of participant.

[aldrin6697]

usually it happens in twitter and other social media bounties where participants are so many that we end up dividing the tokens to many people and receive just a little portion of it. I recommend that you stay away from the crowd like signature and translation campaigns can give more tokens than just the usual ones.

[semar nyengir]

with the number of participants bounty campaign I think the better to memanjukan an ico held by the project. as more and more supporters of the project are more trusted in an ico.

[onesalt]

Number of  participants give a clue about the quality of the project but yet again you share the money distributed with many people. There is a tradeoff. However, with a good research, you may find bounties with less people for good projects.

[anwar98]

I think if the rules of bounty become strict I strongly agree. But chances are if it happens all the participants who can follow bounty like facebook, twitter, media, telegram and translate only full member rankings. That's just my thinking.

[royalfestus]

nothing can be done with the large number of participants in campaigns, The only good rewarding part now is still the signature campaign where everyone cant participate, everyone can participate in the social media. have stopped the social media campaign for a period due to the work involved and the small reward earn, I prefer investing than social media activities.

[David1996]

I personally think that if a bounty campaign has more participants, it will help reach more potential ICO buyers.
But there are so many scams in these bounty campaigns that they go wrong with the rules set out to earn a lot of bonuses. And, of course, the introduction of more stringent new laws is a good idea.

[longwintershere]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

exactly, there is huge amount of bounty hunters, but majority are simply the peopl who have no clue about the market and can't even write in English and understand the most basic rules. If bounty managers were thorough, only handful of participants would have got their stakes

[CryptoAllDay]

I try to get in early on a project while not too many members are signed up for their bounties.   For the first few weeks the bounty program is active, the members that got in early receive higher amount of stakes split between less people.  Once too many people enter a bounty, if possible I will look for a different bounty to start with fewer members.

[casternetwork]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

I do not like the Bounty and Airdrop programs. It would be a waste of money to buy ICO coins. After being listed for exchange, many receive free ICO coins that will sell off all their coins and prices will fall. That is what people who spend money buying ICO coins do not want to see

[pocketfullofpoke]

The more the participants a bounty campaign has, the better effect of disseminating information to the public will be. But the problem of having a big number of participants is that the bounty pool will be divided much making it unfair to those who are already in the bounty since day 1 because their rewards will be cut down as more and more participants join.

[suhano]

It is good for the projects launching these campaigns as they get good number of applicants to choose from. Members will also make good posts in order to get selected.

[serkhio]

I Think the media bounty should have some requirement like: each tweet must collect a required amount of like and view or just be disqualified as scammer.

[Aso at bata]

For the newbie like me it's better to start in bounty from there we have to learn everything, I like to earn money for free, no need to buy coins to have benefits.

[neli234]

I do not think it's easy, a bounty that lasts four to six months, and if they are really hard, they should get what they deserve.

[castiloros]

then two years ago to the present, change the number of participants increased the bounty is enormous. not just on social media, but the signatures, articles, videos, all of which increases with the number of very large. Maybe it's a lot of people who see great potential in the bounty but of course, it will have an impact on earnings will be obtained because of the split with more and more participants.

[stillerror]

See only the one way. No help for bounty. First of all forum is about cripto, so to make less number of Facbook and Twitter champ - no halp of getting friends. All topics of this delete. Maybe you say that its not honest, but if i dont read here how to add friends, i dont start bounty.
Signatere champ started be more payed in 6 month, because of merits finish and some people lost there acc on this period.