Bounty and too many participants

[Ekaterinat]

The problem is not that the bounty programs involved a large number of people and the fact that investments in ICO is now reduced and new projects extend the terms of fees and reduce bounty pool. If this continues and then wishing to participate in the bounty of the company will become less.

[hessanseen]

We should not prevent more new people from joining twitter and Facebook's bounty activities, as long as we work hard, everyone is fair. The good news is that the forum has upgraded the new rules. In the new rules, new users are not easy to upgrade, so that if you are a senior account, you can participate in the signing activity, which is rich in the bounty movement.

[JENREM]

Based on what I've see many people choose bounty rather that airdrops because they see that it is more easy to make,  telegram, Instagram and twitter bounty are the good example that many individuals are doing right now, and because of this popularity of bounty it is bitter if we need to have a regulation in order to avoid malicious transaction and anonymity.

I think many participants already joining bounty campaigns as of this moment because they see that even though the payment is too long to wait but the salary is to high to receive most especially if the project becomes successful.

[tulpash]

Generally speaking, bounty campaigns are good for the development of cryptocurrency.
Lots of people get to know cryptocurrency because of it.
When google and facebook banned crypto ads, bounty campaigns become more important.

Yes, the importance of bounty campaigns will increase taking into account the ban on advertising crypto currency projects in facebook, Google and YouTube. Therefore, I think that the rules for joining a bounty campaign in the future can be even more complicated, because the number of those wishing to increase. This is logical and I do not see anything wrong with this.

[Dima95]

gotta say that some popular bounties are complete scum. some good project are hardly undersimated. so your question is not a big deal. that`s just the coincidence

[The Count of MonteCrypto]

When one thing has too many participants, by definition it becomes unprofitable, and in fact it is what you are stuck out now. The bounties do not pay, and when they pay, they give only small change. That's no good.

[Beazerdred]

It is necessary to find very good companies with very few people.There are such companies and their payments are much higher

[lifeinwinter]

This is the circle of ALL things, not just bounty.
So better go with it and re-adjust ourselves

[RDNX]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

I saw bounty platform like Bountyhive.io announce new rule today. They said that the participant of social media will limit only 15 projects. So, basically, every participant can join only 15 project max. I believe in the next few months another bounty platform will be born. So, limiting and ruling a bounty project is still possible.

[Sevaev]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

Yes, too much people now are tended to be involved in any ICO. And sure, other participants have less opportunities to earn good rewards.

[X-avier]

We will not see less participants with you, the more this direction develops, the more participants will be in any business, and the crypto currency will not be an exception. But all this will only facilitate the involvement of new people in crypto-currencies, and this is very good news, at least for me. Success in this direction depends only on the number of people.

[iloveturtles]

Have a look into Crowdholding.

They are a co-creation platform where you sign up for free, give feedback and earn crypto for your responses to tasks. They already have over 15k users and I think they are going to grow and have a very good future.

It's great because you can respond to tasks and earn other altcoins (DeepOnion, ITT, Smartcash) and also Crowdholding's YUP (which is on exchanges)

If you want to actually contribute towards crypto projects and also earn for your good ideas, check out Crowdholding.

https://www.crowdholding.com

[waser12]

Not surprisingly, this type of earnings is becoming more popular every day. High competition will cause a reduction in payments. With each passing day, the number of new ISO projects is shrinking, which ultimately leads to a profit cuts per person or a tightening of entry barriers.

[Krabat]

It seems to me that the problem is not that there are too many participants in Bounty projects. The problem is that too many projects are scam. This is a much bigger problem than the number of participants.

[bestariaz]

There are too many participants in bounty campaign, the competition is getting high. We cannot avoid it because peoples have right to enjoy this industry. So I hope that this industry will also get better.

[dolcefarniente]

There are many bounty campaigns that limit the amount of bounty hunters from the very beginning. Typically, this is 200-500 participants. Try to view the forum more often to be among these lucky ones.

[castellodocet]

I don't know... everybody should be able to join bounties if he wants, you don't have to bee that close, people may lose interest

[Abarov]

We have already mentioned above, and I will agree with this. The problem is not the number of participants, but some of them are registered and do nothing. They are shielded by their shares.

[Milamol]

Developers are interested in the maximum possible number of participants. That's why I expect that rewards for participants of bounties will decrease with time. People from poor countries can participate for smaller rewards.

[Blockman21]

According to my observation if one campaign limit the number of bounty hunters that able to participate the loses is not for the bounty hunters but for them. Bounty hunters play some major roles to promote the project effectively.