Bounty and too many participants

[Evangeline2]

There are a lot of participants in the reward activities, and each participant can get a small share of the reward, and the ico market is not very good at present, so I should not participate more in the short term.

[1714957285]

1714957285

[1714957285]

1714957285

[Schirer]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

It depends on the campaign and manager.
Good managers define a limit for participant number because they understand that bounty hunters need to make something otherwise they wont come back to his next bounties.

And - dont be lazy , if you go to bountyhive , you will earn pennies, if you do your research you will make a lot more.

[gordeevaverona]

Yes, I often notice that the more participants in the bounty the less we then get money from them but the popularity increases with them.

[nani culi]

I participate in signature campaigns for more than half of a year - and yes, the number of participants slightly increased, but profits are still good.

[svetochka.yakovleva.93]

Well, in the near future I believe that at such a rate it will not be very pleasant to work for such a small amount then that the more large the pool, the fewer tokens.

[sashulya7979]

I think that at such rates we will soon choose and participate in the bounty in a certain and then the number of participants will reach a certain number of example participants will be 500

[xanto]

Sooner or later this was to happen. I do not see this as a big problem, just a reward will be distributed among a large number of people, but the tasks should be less

[ostrovagaly]

 I do not think that this will have a big impact on us because we will continue to participate, but that's how much we will get less.

[teskostecenje]

Well ofcourse that they are popular because you can earn solid amount of $ on them especialy if you are from some country that doesnt have high average paycheck.Atm only signature bounty can earn you some money unless you have a masive amount of twitter bots

[richardjam]

This depends on the bounty managers . I think that bounty managers should limit to participants . Less participants = more profits

[mary cury]

I think they've considered the sharing of bounty results, the more bounty ico participants are getting crowded and that's good, nothing is set up anymore

[Pamela1966]

Popularity of bounty has gone far and social media campaign is not paying off anymore because there's no regulations. The only campaign that doesn't allow virtually everybody is signature bounty campaign, only few people can meet up with the requirements so it's advisable to stick to signature campaign to get mouth watering gains

[Boristhecat]

This depends on the bounty managers . I think that bounty managers should limit to participants . Less participants = more profits

Sometimes: Less participants = less advertising = less collecting =  less profits 

[awakpane]

in my opinion, it does not matter if many participants join the bounty campaign as long as the participant obeys the rules set by the bounty manager, because other people also want to get a reward like us.

[serjik228]

And it's not so bad
If there is competition-then there is a profit
Develop social networks and get more than others

[faisaladitya]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

I agree with you that the bounty campaign makes some rules more stringent and they choose the best participants to join the bounty campaign, especially if more participants join the bounty campaign, the less we will get the rewards.

[digiadven]

The bounty campaigns has become popular and make new peoples comes and joined them. Well it could be a good news or bad news. Because many newbies, many spams post and low quality comments. But hope all be better.

[Cryptobel]

Cryptocurrencies do not stand still!all growing very rapidly!more and more ISO enter the market!and more and more people will know about it!so the influx of new users is not avoided!

[Ecex.Exchange]

We made additional bounty functionality to our Ecex.Exchange Trading Platform project.

IN-HOUSE BOUNTY  https://ecex.exchange

Telegram https://t.me/ZigguratICO



https://token.store/trade/ZIG

[Malabarka]

Hello community!
 What do you think about popularity of the bounty campaigns? I see many new participants joining bounty campaigns, especially Twitter and Facebook. With more and more new participants, we will earn less and less rewards, also many of potential buyers would rather join bounty campaign than invest to ICO - again less rewards for bounty participants.
 I hope that we will see some regulations here and bounty campaigns be more strict in rules and they will choose only the best participants.
So, what is your opinion, guys?

As you said, there is only one way out of this situation. This output-tightening of the rules of the bounty campaigns.
it is necessary to carry out more difficult selection of participants and their works.