go1111111
|
|
November 04, 2013, 10:06:38 AM |
|
Can someone explain to me what the fear is here? That he would disclose some information to the public?
Read his description of what happened with Bitcoinica that he linked to earlier in this thread. It doesn't seem like he realizes what a huge mistake he made with the security breach, and he doesn't seem to really own up to it. It's more like "oops, oh well.. moving on...". People who take security seriously tend to have a certain mindset (listen to some interviews with the guy who created Armory), and from what I've seen that mindset is lacking in Amir. Btw, it looks like this is the thread where Amir notified everyone of the breach (or a similar one, hard to tell because I think Bitcoinica was hacked 3 times): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=93074
|
|
|
|
molecular
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2772
Merit: 1019
|
|
November 04, 2013, 10:09:00 AM |
|
Can someone explain to me what the fear is here? That he would disclose some information to the public?
Read his description of what happened with Bitcoinica that he linked to earlier in this thread. It doesn't seem like he realizes what a huge mistake he made with the security breach, and he doesn't seem to really own up to it. It's more like "oops, oh well.. moving on...". People who take security seriously tend to have a certain mindset (listen to some interviews with the guy who created Armory), and from what I've seen that mindset is lacking in Amir. Btw, it looks like this is the thread where Amir notified everyone of the breach (or a similar one, hard to tell because I think Bitcoinica was hacked 3 times): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=93074 It doesn't explain why someone with such a mindset you describe shouldn't be allowed on that list.
|
PGP key molecular F9B70769 fingerprint 9CDD C0D3 20F8 279F 6BE0 3F39 FC49 2362 F9B7 0769
|
|
|
adamas
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1017
Merit: 1003
VIS ET LIBERTAS
|
|
November 04, 2013, 10:14:04 AM |
|
We are providing an alternative. With 1% of the BF resources, we will do 10x more development and continue serving the community. Free market ftw.
Yes! You guys are extremely efficient .. LOL, are you serious
|
"Es ist kein Zeichen geistiger Gesundheit, gut angepasst an eine kranke Gesellschaft zu sein."
|
|
|
The 4ner
aka newbitcoinqtuser
Hero Member
Offline
Activity: 602
Merit: 500
R.I.P Silk Road 1.0
|
|
November 04, 2013, 03:45:15 PM |
|
I still feel that this project lacks a concrete plan. However, I strongly share similar views and have decided to support the project. As everyone else has stated, please don't disappoint the community. Don't let this turn into another Bitcoinica. A donation from The 4ner is coming your way.
|
|
|
|
BadAss.Sx
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1002
Bulletproof VPS/VPN/Email @ BadAss.Sx
|
|
November 04, 2013, 08:20:54 PM |
|
Just a project to grab some coins together...thats it. Like he said above me, there is no significant plan and also not really a point. BUT, i will be the first who gives his excuse when it comes to a great project.
|
|
|
|
The 4ner
aka newbitcoinqtuser
Hero Member
Offline
Activity: 602
Merit: 500
R.I.P Silk Road 1.0
|
|
November 04, 2013, 09:12:23 PM |
|
Will this wallet include support for Mac OS 10.9?
|
|
|
|
NewLiberty
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1002
Gresham's Lawyer
|
|
November 04, 2013, 10:01:55 PM |
|
Interested but not investing... yet. I wish you every success.
|
|
|
|
Alpaca Bob
|
|
November 05, 2013, 04:22:39 PM |
|
NSoogleA
That aggregation didn't really work.Lol I know, but could not find something else! But the idea behind and the question is real good... America is out of controle! For what it's worth: https://plus.google.com/+MikeHearn/posts/LW1DXJ2BK8k
|
The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks
|
|
|
caedes
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 44
Merit: 0
|
|
November 06, 2013, 05:32:26 PM |
|
Regarding bloom filtering you say: So they take a giant dump on Bloom filtering - which I proposed and partly designed to solve this very problem - then it turns out that their "Obelisk server" doesn't have any alternative solution. It has a cool name but no solutions to difficult privacy problems. So in fact your privacy is much better protected by using the regular P2P protocol, talking to the regular P2P network and uploading a noisy Bloom filter (or sharded set of noisy filters). Too bad Amir regards that scheme as impure, rushed and a "debasement", otherwise he could just use it in Dark Wallet.
We don't discard bloom filtering altogether. We have discussed about it, but are unsure about using it and would like to investigate other solutions. The zmq encryption is only so good to protect communications with the servers or other clients, but I'm not sure we can use bloom filters in all situations, also I'm not sure they really provide so much privacy unless used with other deniability or practices to make sure information is not leaked because of for example how you use the program or other patterns that could be traced to de-bloom your transactions. Anyways that kind of privacy is very important for us, and will make a client taking these things into account. We're making a client (and architecture) that will *care* about your privacy, but want to have some leads open for exploration, like darknet or onion routing... we're making a client here so can think a bit out of the box. We're making a wallet that knows big brother is out there looking for you, we won't be so dummy as to think the only enemy is the user or the server, you know what happens when you don't make those assumptions. Also mind that this is not just Amir working here, we have a lot more minds that thanks to this crowdfunding will be focusing on those problems.
|
|
|
|
Mike Hearn
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1136
|
|
November 07, 2013, 01:20:31 PM |
|
OK, good to hear that.
|
|
|
|
phelix
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1708
Merit: 1020
|
|
November 13, 2013, 05:56:40 PM |
|
Vote for Dark Wallet as your favorite Bitcoin Project of Autumn 2013Only KNCMiner has more votes as of now.
|
|
|
|
eiliant
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
November 14, 2013, 07:39:40 PM |
|
- You tolerate a dangerous, rather-much-extremely-more-extremely-more-mentally-ill-than-Amir-or-me beast like luke-jr
I'm curious, what's wrong with luke-jr?
|
|
|
|
Ecurb123
|
|
November 14, 2013, 09:44:51 PM |
|
did I hear on lets talk bitcoin that there is going to be some launching event in Milan for Dark Wallet?
|
|
|
|
hivewallet
|
|
November 14, 2013, 10:41:51 PM |
|
did I hear on lets talk bitcoin that there is going to be some launching event in Milan for Dark Wallet?
Planning event.
|
|
|
|
crazy_rabbit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1002
RUM AND CARROTS: A PIRATE LIFE FOR ME
|
|
November 15, 2013, 12:18:40 AM |
|
did I hear on lets talk bitcoin that there is going to be some launching event in Milan for Dark Wallet?
Planning event. Milan, italy?
|
more or less retired.
|
|
|
hivewallet
|
|
November 15, 2013, 02:00:15 AM Last edit: November 15, 2013, 02:57:12 AM by grabhive |
|
Dark Wallet Certification proposal:Ref: Let There Be Dark!Greetings from Bitcoin Singapore! Hive will be attending unSYSTEM's DarkWallet meeting in Milan on the week of the 24th. We propose that the outcome of this meeting be, at minimum, the establishment of a v1 "Dark Wallet Certification", a set of best-practice guidelines for wallets focused on decentralization and anonymity. This topic is has been opened in order to get the community thinking about what exactly a "Dark Wallet" should be: We assume the use of Tor, CoinJoin, CoinSwap and other such developments. We assume the lack of centralized services wherever possible. We presume that we can evolve ideas about authentication (see the work of John Light, Joe Casico etc)... Still, our ignorance is vast and we would like to come armed at this meeting, with your feedback. What ideas or thoughts do you all have? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=334241
|
|
|
|
|
Anon136
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1217
|
|
November 15, 2013, 04:28:02 PM |
|
can someone explain to me what would be the purpose of incorporating tor? what benefits would that offer that wouldn't already be achieved by coinjoin?
|
Rep Thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=381041If one can not confer upon another a right which he does not himself first possess, by what means does the state derive the right to engage in behaviors from which the public is prohibited?
|
|
|
QuantumQrack
|
|
November 15, 2013, 04:30:19 PM |
|
I'm not donating even a satoshi until I see some work.
|
|
|
|
Ecurb123
|
|
November 15, 2013, 06:10:45 PM |
|
I'm not a real developer, but would it be ok if I checked it out?
|
|
|
|
|