[20 gh] NMCBit pool 3% fee prop 6.6% PPS

[DavinciJ15]

I don't think my balance is right. I've mined at 13 Ghash/s for 8 hours, and only get 1.3235831 BTC on the balance. And I saw I have 80000+ shares at some point earlier.

I will check it but 80,000 shares seems excessive please pm me you user name.  All shares are in the database even rejected ones.

Okay, got the balance looks better now. 2.89 BTC in 8 hours, not bad.

I will point 20 Ghash/s to your pool after breakfast. (UTC+08:00 here)

Don't bother I can't handle it.

[DavinciJ15]

I'm going to cut off the .0003000 PPS (its 0.000313 plus a 3% fee) as of Midnight EST or 4 UTC.

I will not be able to fix the problems with my pool in time to support large amounts of hashing so I will not bother.

I will save the BTC for something else.

Sorry, but it's over except for the fat lady the developers of namecoin have not said a word about this and its very demoralizing as a supporter.

Lets hope they have better luck than I did coming up with a solution.

Thanks everyone for trying.

As of now PPS is disabled everyone will get paid so fear not.

If you want to continue mining to support Namecoin you can and you will be paid NMC.

Thanks

Davinci

BTW If I can support 100Gh + I will try again.

UPDATE:  I'm to tired to change all the settings in the db, I will deal with it tomorrow evening. That means PPS is enabled and will be paid for the next 16+ hrs, Please do not add any more hash rate or the system will collapse.  You will not be able to create a new worker with BTC pps.

[DavinciJ15]

The system has fallen behind on payments it has not paid out on 4 blocks. Please be patient the balance will update.

[DavinciJ15]

Seriously,how long does it take for a pool to come out of beta?
You've been at it for more than a month now and still your pool is unstable.
Why is it down this time?
 

I have kept you informed via this thread.

My current issues are 2 fold.
1)  linux command Balance doesn't work very well it ends up pushing all request to one server this cause pushpool to crash after a few hours
2)  The SQL db is too slow it can't handle much more than 25GHs before it's unable to keep up with the inserts this is why you see...

Code:

2011-09-13 22:23:00: Listener for "nmcbit.com test": 13/09/2011 22:23:00, Problems communicating with bitcoin RPC 0 2

Solutions..

Try out CrossRoads balancer.
Cluster SQL so for each MYSQL I can get 25Ghs

Other issues are that I may need to customize crossroads as the balancer must be smart enough to detect hash rates to avoid putting to much load on one server.

If you are looking to get paid the 10 BTC I will pay you now just ask.

Regards

Davinci

[DavinciJ15]

MySql is not Microsoft SQL server.

This is a very sad statement.
If you want to try and help save the NMC blockchain, this kind of computer illiteracy won't get you nowhere, and many people will NOT trust you. As much as I support your good intentions.. well, good intentions do not justify ignorance.

Try to reflect a bit about what you type before you do it, and in the meantime... optimize your MySql, or evolve to Postgres.

Just sayin'.

Software ignorance and linux illiteracy does not reflect badly on me but for the proponents of the software.  It shows it's difficult to use, poor support and the communities inability to help users.

I am impressed with my self that I got this far.  Why?   You are a typical high and might linux guru that assumes that some should just know it all first before they try even using the product.  How about you get off your high horse and give me a hand out of the mud, I am eager to learn.

1 BTC says you will insult me some more instead of helping.

[Nebuluz]

Will you lower the btc payout when cutting the deal off. Or will you do the btc payout manualy?

[DavinciJ15]

Will you lower the btc payout when cutting the deal off. Or will you do the btc payout manualy?

You will get paid manually.  Just wait for the DB to catch up and you balance will update and you withdraw.  If there are any issues I will fix and get you your coins.

[DavinciJ15]

Solutions..

Try out CrossRoads balancer.
Cluster SQL so for each MYSQL I can get 25Ghs

Other issues are that I may need to customize crossroads as the balancer must be smart enough to detect hash rates to avoid putting to much load on one server.

If you are looking to get paid the 10 BTC I will pay you now just ask.

Regards

Davinci

Not up on the whole pool software BUT if you need a load balancer I have had GREAT experiences with Pound, it was easy to configure, encryption capable and performs very well....
http://www.apsis.ch/pound/

maybe take a look, it might work for you...

Thanks for the tip.

[DavinciJ15]

To be honest... I looked at the CRUSHING hashing power that's creating blocks like mad... I do not want to stop it.

So I will keep paying out BTC to he current users until further notice.  BUT DO NOT ADD MORE POWER it's too much as it is lots of rejects, server keep going down, and the DB can't keep up.

[mb300sd]

Have you seen this? http://poolserverj.org/performance-testing/

Especially the ISAM vs InnoDB for the database...

[jav]

DavinciJ15, if you have some money to throw at the protection of the Namecoin network, you could place a bet on one of the Bitcoin betting sites that the attack will be _successful_. Then you invite people to bet against you and encourage them to tilt the chances in their favor by contributing hashing power. Additional plus for you: if the attack succeeds anyway, you get to keep your bounty.

I don't know what is a reliable betting site these days, but I have seen one existing bet here already: http://betsofbitco.in/item?id=101 .

[Sekioh]

Value: 6.26E-5000BTC

lol :|

[DavinciJ15]

In unrelated news...
It's time to load the boat on silver!
Sell your gold plow into silver. NOW.

[DutchBrat]

Good to see the pool is back up !!!

Let's go save NameCoin

[twobits]

Good to see the pool is back up !!!

Let's go save NameCoin

I am not sure just what DavinciJ15  thinks he is doing now, but he mentioned in irc he enabled merged mining already, prematurely to what the official client was set for.     He also has on his newspage


Sept 14 Merged mining right now but no payment method for both.
Sept 14 New block chain created Pool Down for updates.

Since he has created his own fork of the namecoins chain at this point, mining here is attacking namecoins, not defending it now.

[DavinciJ15]

Good to see the pool is back up !!!

Let's go save NameCoin

I am not sure just what DavinciJ15  thinks he is doing now, but he mentioned in irc he enabled merged mining already, prematurely to what the official client was set for.     He also has on his newspage


Sept 14 Merged mining right now but no payment method for both.
Sept 14 New block chain created Pool Down for updates.

Since he has created his own fork of the namecoins chain at this point, mining here is attacking namecoins, not defending it now.

It may seem that way but there are only 3 pools and a few Gh solo mining on the main chain so it did not make sense to wait we needed to circle the wagons be for he attack.

Is it a mistake?

Time will tell.

[twobits]

Good to see the pool is back up !!!

Let's go save NameCoin

I am not sure just what DavinciJ15  thinks he is doing now, but he mentioned in irc he enabled merged mining already, prematurely to what the official client was set for.     He also has on his newspage


Sept 14 Merged mining right now but no payment method for both.
Sept 14 New block chain created Pool Down for updates.

Since he has created his own fork of the namecoins chain at this point, mining here is attacking namecoins, not defending it now.

It may seem that way but there are only 3 pools and a few Gh solo mining on the main chain so it did not make sense to wait we needed to circle the wagons be for he attack.

Is it a mistake?

Time will tell.

Since your blocks are going to be rejected by  the official client, it seems a mistake to me to have forked namecoin.  Did you get doublec to go along with this as well?  That would surprise me.

[DutchBrat]

Good to see the pool is back up !!!

Let's go save NameCoin

I am not sure just what DavinciJ15  thinks he is doing now, but he mentioned in irc he enabled merged mining already, prematurely to what the official client was set for.     He also has on his newspage


Sept 14 Merged mining right now but no payment method for both.
Sept 14 New block chain created Pool Down for updates.

Since he has created his own fork of the namecoins chain at this point, mining here is attacking namecoins, not defending it now.

It may seem that way but there are only 3 pools and a few Gh solo mining on the main chain so it did not make sense to wait we needed to circle the wagons be for he attack.

Is it a mistake?

Time will tell.

But that does that mean you forked the chain ?

And how will that stop the 51% attack from taking place. There's still not nearly enough hashing power to prevent that. Only adaption by a few large pools will be able to.

Getting really confusing now

I've spent the last hour reading the Dot-BIT forum and it seems there's not a real coordinated effort to step up to the challenge....

Brat

[DutchBrat]

Good to see the pool is back up !!!

Let's go save NameCoin

I am not sure just what DavinciJ15  thinks he is doing now, but he mentioned in irc he enabled merged mining already, prematurely to what the official client was set for.     He also has on his newspage


Sept 14 Merged mining right now but no payment method for both.
Sept 14 New block chain created Pool Down for updates.

Since he has created his own fork of the namecoins chain at this point, mining here is attacking namecoins, not defending it now.

It may seem that way but there are only 3 pools and a few Gh solo mining on the main chain so it did not make sense to wait we needed to circle the wagons be for he attack.

Is it a mistake?

Time will tell.

Since your blocks are going to be rejected by  the official client, it seems a mistake to me to have forked namecoin.  Did you get doublec to go along with this as well?  That would surprise me.

Doesn't this pool have more than 51% of the hash-rate ? Doesn't that mean that this fork will be THE original chain before long ? Or is that too much of a doomsday scenario ?

BTW I really don't believe Davinci wants to do something sinister and dark here

[DavinciJ15]

Good to see the pool is back up !!!

Let's go save NameCoin

I am not sure just what DavinciJ15  thinks he is doing now, but he mentioned in irc he enabled merged mining already, prematurely to what the official client was set for.     He also has on his newspage


Sept 14 Merged mining right now but no payment method for both.
Sept 14 New block chain created Pool Down for updates.

Since he has created his own fork of the namecoins chain at this point, mining here is attacking namecoins, not defending it now.

It may seem that way but there are only 3 pools and a few Gh solo mining on the main chain so it did not make sense to wait we needed to circle the wagons be for he attack.

Is it a mistake?

Time will tell.

Since your blocks are going to be rejected by  the official client, it seems a mistake to me to have forked namecoin.  Did you get doublec to go along with this as well?  That would surprise me.

NodeMaster and slush told me that they got doublec to agree and it made sense to me, the only way to get hashing power is to pay bitcoins so forking the block chain seems right, we can deal with the fallout later.