|
krodmandoon
|
 |
January 07, 2014, 07:48:27 PM |
|
again, if it isn't difficult...do it. The OP clearly states a bounty for block explorer. I'd be willing to bet the dev would pay handsomely to meet the new "standard" to ensure the success of the coin.
|
|
|
|
|
Xtrata
|
|
January 07, 2014, 07:50:52 PM |
|
So if the big premine is to give away some and so on: 9ZQm6QM5uUtYwLWvsvvarE29hv5ZZ9W7YA I want some  |
|
|
|
|
|
KickAzzDude
|
|
January 07, 2014, 07:57:37 PM |
|
Btw maybe the ticker could be[NBL] or [NBC] not sure If they are taken already
|
|
|
|
HashHound
Member
 Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
January 07, 2014, 08:00:30 PM |
|
Learned a little about the original Noble coin today... Thanks to NobleCoin.  (and of course wikipedia) From Wikipedia The Noble was the first English gold coin produced in quantity, having been preceded by the Gold penny and the Florin earlier in the reigns of King Henry III and King Edward III, which saw little circulation.
The derivatives of the Noble, the Half Noble and Quarter Noble, on the other hand were produced in quantity and were very popular. |
Pleb
|
|
|
|
hearnomore
|
|
January 07, 2014, 08:06:01 PM |
|
Sorry for the problems with Validation Error Pool. We are looking issue right now
It looks like we got it fixed now. Hash rates are what they should be. |
|
|
|
|
|
xwortel
|
|
January 07, 2014, 08:16:41 PM |
|
I think this coin is missing attention due all the other shitcoins released the last period. But in my opinion it has a good potential to grow in 2014. Yes the coin isn't technically innovative comparing to other coins, but it has a vision to actually built a physical trade marked (watch there site with the beta announcement). I`ll mine it and save it for the future  9rLc4FYNNq15hCJ7MM2HoY7rEVSkdLb7Vj |
|
|
|
|
T7UNDER
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
|
|
January 07, 2014, 08:47:16 PM |
|
Look promissing. NOBL: 9r7vnw63RQW9Qe4gcwRotncSqJ4epHzLHH Thanks |
|
|
|
|
|
Bfljosh
|
|
January 07, 2014, 08:48:28 PM |
|
Thanks smooth launch!
9f2RiQJzoAn2ziGG25rEiyAfR1c2j1dpfR
|
|
|
|
|
|
WhyS
|
|
January 07, 2014, 08:49:48 PM |
|
I like everything about this coin so far. Let's see how it pans out.
Any word on exchanges?
I love me some giveaways, too:
9YGSZ2eEuASd6nPVia4NS3Jk24JBEgoopx
|
|
|
|
|
|
ctenc001
|
|
January 07, 2014, 09:32:09 PM |
|
Is there a fork? The two pools net hash aren't anywhere close to being similar?
Hit me up with free coins please =)
9pfpgAiCDWV9ffVdC8tR2cYVf3uJqg5Pv7
|
|
|
|
|
HashHound
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
January 07, 2014, 09:37:35 PM |
|
Is there a fork? The two pools net hash aren't anywhere close to being similar?
Hit me up with free coins please =)
9pfpgAiCDWV9ffVdC8tR2cYVf3uJqg5Pv7
I think something like that is going on... Valid Error's pool hash rate is 230MH/s and it says the network hash rate is 120MH/s... We need some pros in here to get this fixed. |
Pleb
|
|
|
monik09
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
January 07, 2014, 09:45:25 PM |
|
9pikFgT9eZwHZYsNfjCvcHD8QnTetXLjKe
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zeraful
|
|
January 07, 2014, 09:58:03 PM |
|
Well this coin seems promising but the pools seem to be off... In case there's a giveaway going  9g7QUvFL8MNSZTgDiGRmcN1XQriTUkoctJ |
|
|
|
|
int3ractivodular
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
TECHNOLOGY, BABY!
|
|
January 07, 2014, 10:15:19 PM |
|
Yeah don't know what's going on with the pools... my payout over the last day is much lower than projected and the hashrates seem to be all over the place. 14:13:29

getmininginfo
14:13:29

{
"blocks" : 1165,
"currentblocksize" : 0,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 1.18446023,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"networkhashps" : 66564840,
"pooledtx" : 2,
"testnet" : false
}
Showing networkhps at ~66MH/s but the pool is showing >200MH from just the pool itself... This is discouraging. Pool operators / dev, any idea what the issue is and when it will be resolved? This coin has had a very smooth launch otherwise. |
|
|
|
|
MaGNeT
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1002
Waves | 3PHMaGNeTJfqFfD4xuctgKdoxLX188QM8na
|
|
January 07, 2014, 10:41:32 PM |
|
http://noble.cryptominer.net runs very smooth low rejects
|
|
|
|
|
HashHound
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
January 07, 2014, 10:45:56 PM |
|
Just pointed my miners here, trying to even out these pools hashrates. All seems good so far. |
Pleb
|
|
|
T7UNDER
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
|
|
January 07, 2014, 10:47:58 PM |
|
I subscribe to that, http://noble.cryptominer.net/ has been working fine all day, it's in pair with my wallet block count and have been receiving deposits from it all day. |
|
|
|
|
icecube45
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1000
|
|
January 07, 2014, 11:00:26 PM |
|
New Pool!
http://noblepool.zapto.org
stratum+tcp://noblepool.zapto.org:3333
1% fee
PPLNS
Happy Hashing
|
|
|
|
|
xazure
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
Thanks for help! God is a ....
|
|
January 07, 2014, 11:20:30 PM |
|
Hope the NobleCoin's features will be ok soon. So NOBL will have a bright future.
|
|
|
|
|
hearnomore
|
|
January 07, 2014, 11:37:18 PM |
|
Validation Error Pool has now fixed it's problem. and is hashing away to hell and back! But, we need to balance out the hashing powers
|
|
|
|
|
|
