Bitcoin Forum
June 28, 2024, 03:33:57 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 [655] 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Vertcoin - First Scrypt N | First Stealth Address - Privacy without mixer  (Read 1232526 times)
SpeedDemon13
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500



View Profile WWW
December 13, 2014, 01:06:38 AM
 #13081

Good luck, Vertans! See you on the other side.. Cool

Definitely will be a fun ride...lol

CRYPTSY exchange: https://www.cryptsy.com/users/register?refid=9017 BURST= BURST-TE3W-CFGH-7343-6VM6R BTC=1CNsqGUR9YJNrhydQZnUPbaDv6h4uaYCHv ETH=0x144bc9fe471d3c71d8e09d58060d78661b1d4f32 SHF=0x13a0a2cb0d55eca975cf2d97015f7d580ce52d85 EXP=0xd71921dca837e415a58ca0d6dd2223cc84e0ea2f SC=6bdf9d12a983fed6723abad91a39be4f95d227f9bdb0490de3b8e5d45357f63d564638b1bd71 CLAMS=xGVTdM9EJpNBCYAjHFVxuZGcqvoL22nP6f SOIL=0x8b5c989bc931c0769a50ecaf9ffe490c67cb5911
djm34
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050


View Profile WWW
December 13, 2014, 01:24:25 AM
 #13082

SpeedDemon13 ,

i made some tests and it showed that a old 5870 is almost as efficient as R9 270 (200 KH/s scrypt-n). Lyra 2 uses half the power of n scrypt, so i think it doesn't matter if old or new gpu is used.

But yes, i forgot -> whe don't know the hashrate this cards do on lyra2re.

-----

All,

I get ~1.15 MH/s on Sapphire R9 290 Tri-X OC.

There also was a guy who did 1.1 MH/s on R9 280X i remember...



He must have oc'd the 280x 1150 or higher on the core and 1500 on mem at least, maybe.

Scyrpt-N is really power hungry type of algo because the huge memory requirements. Have anyone did a power efficient test yet, ie. kill-a-watt meter?

Cool, guess a 6950 will do about the same as a 5870 and a 6970 will do a little bit higher than a 5870.
seems ok to me, a friend tested my latest version (previous page...) on a 280x undervolted (1020/1500) and was getting 1.06MH/s average.
I get on my 290x (1030/1250 stock msi gaming) 1.3MH/s average.

djm34 facebook page
BTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze
Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
TheCoinFinder
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 938
Merit: 1001



View Profile WWW
December 13, 2014, 01:48:26 AM
 #13083

pool.verters.com is forked to  LYRA2RE ready for fork. All miners now need to mine using the Lyra2RE Algo. Please refer to your getting started page. You can mine on port 3333 or 4444

.Deviant.io.                ▄▄▄▄███▄▄▄▄
             ▄█▀▀░░░░░░░░░▀▀█▄
           ██▀░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░██
         ▄█▀░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▐█▄
        ▐█░░░▄████████████████▄░░
        █▌░░███▀▀▀████████▀▀▀██▌▐█
        █▌░░█████▌  ▐▄▄   ██████░▐█
        ██░░▀██████████████████░▒██
        ▄██▄▄███▀▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▀███▄░▄███▄
     ▄██▓▓▓██▓▓███▀▀▒▒▒▀▀███▓▓██▓▓▓▓██
    ▐█▓▓▓▓█▓██▀▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▌▒▀████▓█▓▓▓
    ▀███████▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒█▀█▒▒▒████████▀
      ▀████▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▄█▀▒▒█▒██▀▒████▀
      ▐█▓█▌▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒██▒▓▓▓▒▀▒▒▒▒▓██▓█▌
      ██▓█▌▒▒▒▒▒▒██▓████▓▒▒▒▓▓▒███▓█▌
      ▐█▓██▒▒▒▒███▀▒▒▒█▌▓▓▓██▀▒██▓█▌
       ██▒█▌▒▀▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒█▌▓██▀▒▒▒▒█▒██
        ██▒██▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒█▀▒▒▒▒▒▒██▒██
         ▀█▓▓██▄▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▄██▓▓█▀
           ▀██▒▀█████▄█████▀▓██▀
         ▄▄▓▓▓█████▄▄▓▄▄█████▓▓▄▄

























      ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▄
     ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▌
     ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓     ▓▀▓▓▓▌
     ▓▓▓   ▓▓▓▓▓        ▐▓▓▌
     ▓▓▓               ▐▓▓▓▌
    ▐▓▓▓               ▓▓▓▓▌
    ▐▓▓▓▓             ▓▓▓▓▓▌
    ▐▓▓▓▓▓▄▄         ▓▓▓▓▓▓▌
    ▐▓▓▓▓         ▄▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▌
    ▐▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▌
     ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓

    ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▌
    ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▀▀▀▀▓▓▓▌
    ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▀      ▓▓▓▌
    ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▌    ▓▓▓▓▓▓▌
    ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▌   ▐▓▓▓▓▓▓▌
    ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▌          ▓▓▓▌
    ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▌         ▐▓▓▓▌
    ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▌   ▐▓▓▓▓▓▓▌
    ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▌   ▐▓▓▓▓▓▓▌
    ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▌   ▐▓▓▓▓▓▓▌
    ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▌   ▐▓▓▓▓▓▓▌

    ░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
    ░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
    ░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓░░▓▓▓▓░░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
    ░▓▓▓▓▓²         ` ║▓▓▓▓▓
    ░▓▓▓▓              ╢▓▓▓▓
    ░▓▓▓Γ    ▓╥  ╓▓┐    ▓▓▓▓
    ░▓▓▓     ╙`   ╙     ▓▓▓▓
    ░▓▓▓╥   ─,,  ,,─   ╓▓▓▓▓
    ░▓▓▓▓▓▓░░▓▓▓▓▓▓░░░▓▓▓▓▓▓
    ░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
    ░▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓

    ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
    ▓▓▓▓▀▀▀▓▓▓▓▓    ▀▀▀▀▓▓▓▓
    ▓▓▓▓   `▓▓▓▀        ▓▓▓▓
    ▓▓▓▓▌            ▄▓▓▓▓▓▓
    ▓▓       ,▄▄▓▓   ▐▓▓▓▓▓▓
    ▓▓▄,▄▄   ▐▓▓▓▓▓   ▀▀ '▀▓
    ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓   ▀▓▀▀▀       ▄▓
    ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓             ▓▓▓▓
    ▓▓▓▓▀       ▄▄▓▓▌   ▓▓▓▓
    ▓▓▓▓▓▄▄▄▄   ▓▓▓▓▓▄,▄▓▓▓▓
    ▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▄  ▐▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓▓
karimdr2
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 13, 2014, 01:48:42 AM
 #13084

SpeedDemon13 ,

i made some tests and it showed that a old 5870 is almost as efficient as R9 270 (200 KH/s scrypt-n). Lyra 2 uses half the power of n scrypt, so i think it doesn't matter if old or new gpu is used.

But yes, i forgot -> whe don't know the hashrate this cards do on lyra2re.

-----

All,

I get ~1.15 MH/s on Sapphire R9 290 Tri-X OC.

There also was a guy who did 1.1 MH/s on R9 280X i remember...



He must have oc'd the 280x 1150 or higher on the core and 1500 on mem at least, maybe.

Scyrpt-N is really power hungry type of algo because the huge memory requirements. Have anyone did a power efficient test yet, ie. kill-a-watt meter?

Cool, guess a 6950 will do about the same as a 5870 and a 6970 will do a little bit higher than a 5870.
seems ok to me, a friend tested my latest version (previous page...) on a 280x undervolted (1020/1500) and was getting 1.06MH/s average.
I get on my 290x (1030/1250 stock msi gaming) 1.3MH/s average.

You will get a better hashrate with Hynix GPUs, Lyra2RE don't like too much Elpida Vram.

★ BitNet ★ New Darknet, better than TOR ! FREE VPN ! Free Distribution 14,000,000 VPNCOIN!!! Vg7NuuuJt2snso5N1EMPyPwSTHb2ByiHRo
BTC: 1Gu3KYr3HV1TGJmqgSXXQbGxxdLzTEAN6o
geenius
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 110
Merit: 10


View Profile
December 13, 2014, 01:50:19 AM
 #13085

SpeedDemon13 ,

i made some tests and it showed that a old 5870 is almost as efficient as R9 270 (200 KH/s scrypt-n). Lyra 2 uses half the power of n scrypt, so i think it doesn't matter if old or new gpu is used.

But yes, i forgot -> whe don't know the hashrate this cards do on lyra2re.

-----

All,

I get ~1.15 MH/s on Sapphire R9 290 Tri-X OC.

There also was a guy who did 1.1 MH/s on R9 280X i remember...



He must have oc'd the 280x 1150 or higher on the core and 1500 on mem at least, maybe.

Scyrpt-N is really power hungry type of algo because the huge memory requirements. Have anyone did a power efficient test yet, ie. kill-a-watt meter?

Cool, guess a 6950 will do about the same as a 5870 and a 6970 will do a little bit higher than a 5870.
seems ok to me, a friend tested my latest version (previous page...) on a 280x undervolted (1020/1500) and was getting 1.06MH/s average.
I get on my 290x (1030/1250 stock msi gaming) 1.3MH/s average.


I have tried your latest version but the pool displayed only half of the actual hashrate. But sgminer 5.0 (the version from vertcoin main page) was OK.
SpeedDemon13
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500



View Profile WWW
December 13, 2014, 02:18:14 AM
 #13086

SpeedDemon13 ,

i made some tests and it showed that a old 5870 is almost as efficient as R9 270 (200 KH/s scrypt-n). Lyra 2 uses half the power of n scrypt, so i think it doesn't matter if old or new gpu is used.

But yes, i forgot -> whe don't know the hashrate this cards do on lyra2re.

-----

All,

I get ~1.15 MH/s on Sapphire R9 290 Tri-X OC.

There also was a guy who did 1.1 MH/s on R9 280X i remember...



He must have oc'd the 280x 1150 or higher on the core and 1500 on mem at least, maybe.

Scyrpt-N is really power hungry type of algo because the huge memory requirements. Have anyone did a power efficient test yet, ie. kill-a-watt meter?

Cool, guess a 6950 will do about the same as a 5870 and a 6970 will do a little bit higher than a 5870.
seems ok to me, a friend tested my latest version (previous page...) on a 280x undervolted (1020/1500) and was getting 1.06MH/s average.
I get on my 290x (1030/1250 stock msi gaming) 1.3MH/s average.

You will get a better hashrate with Hynix GPUs, Lyra2RE don't like too much Elpida Vram.

My AMD cards are all Hynix vrams.

Hey djm34, what's your friend's config for the 280x?

Has anyone try the AMD omega drivers on Lyra2RE?

CRYPTSY exchange: https://www.cryptsy.com/users/register?refid=9017 BURST= BURST-TE3W-CFGH-7343-6VM6R BTC=1CNsqGUR9YJNrhydQZnUPbaDv6h4uaYCHv ETH=0x144bc9fe471d3c71d8e09d58060d78661b1d4f32 SHF=0x13a0a2cb0d55eca975cf2d97015f7d580ce52d85 EXP=0xd71921dca837e415a58ca0d6dd2223cc84e0ea2f SC=6bdf9d12a983fed6723abad91a39be4f95d227f9bdb0490de3b8e5d45357f63d564638b1bd71 CLAMS=xGVTdM9EJpNBCYAjHFVxuZGcqvoL22nP6f SOIL=0x8b5c989bc931c0769a50ecaf9ffe490c67cb5911
fonyo
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 304
Merit: 100



View Profile
December 13, 2014, 02:35:04 AM
 #13087

SpeedDemon13 ,

i made some tests and it showed that a old 5870 is almost as efficient as R9 270 (200 KH/s scrypt-n). Lyra 2 uses half the power of n scrypt, so i think it doesn't matter if old or new gpu is used.

But yes, i forgot -> whe don't know the hashrate this cards do on lyra2re.

-----

All,

I get ~1.15 MH/s on Sapphire R9 290 Tri-X OC.

There also was a guy who did 1.1 MH/s on R9 280X i remember...



He must have oc'd the 280x 1150 or higher on the core and 1500 on mem at least, maybe.

Scyrpt-N is really power hungry type of algo because the huge memory requirements. Have anyone did a power efficient test yet, ie. kill-a-watt meter?

Cool, guess a 6950 will do about the same as a 5870 and a 6970 will do a little bit higher than a 5870.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=404364.msg9785124#msg9785124
fonyo
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 304
Merit: 100



View Profile
December 13, 2014, 02:37:11 AM
 #13088

http://www.reddit.com/r/vertcoin/comments/2opa2y/lyra2re_power_consumption/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uCB3dBnHlVU

This user used 750 Ti. On a regular R9 280x i think it will pull only 50% of what i would pull at n-scrypt.

About third of Script-n when undervolted.
SpeedDemon13
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500



View Profile WWW
December 13, 2014, 02:59:19 AM
 #13089

SpeedDemon13 ,

i made some tests and it showed that a old 5870 is almost as efficient as R9 270 (200 KH/s scrypt-n). Lyra 2 uses half the power of n scrypt, so i think it doesn't matter if old or new gpu is used.

But yes, i forgot -> whe don't know the hashrate this cards do on lyra2re.

-----

All,

I get ~1.15 MH/s on Sapphire R9 290 Tri-X OC.

There also was a guy who did 1.1 MH/s on R9 280X i remember...



He must have oc'd the 280x 1150 or higher on the core and 1500 on mem at least, maybe.

Scyrpt-N is really power hungry type of algo because the huge memory requirements. Have anyone did a power efficient test yet, ie. kill-a-watt meter?

Cool, guess a 6950 will do about the same as a 5870 and a 6970 will do a little bit higher than a 5870.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=404364.msg9785124#msg9785124

I'll try AMD 14.12 Omega driver on one of my rigs and see how it does....

CRYPTSY exchange: https://www.cryptsy.com/users/register?refid=9017 BURST= BURST-TE3W-CFGH-7343-6VM6R BTC=1CNsqGUR9YJNrhydQZnUPbaDv6h4uaYCHv ETH=0x144bc9fe471d3c71d8e09d58060d78661b1d4f32 SHF=0x13a0a2cb0d55eca975cf2d97015f7d580ce52d85 EXP=0xd71921dca837e415a58ca0d6dd2223cc84e0ea2f SC=6bdf9d12a983fed6723abad91a39be4f95d227f9bdb0490de3b8e5d45357f63d564638b1bd71 CLAMS=xGVTdM9EJpNBCYAjHFVxuZGcqvoL22nP6f SOIL=0x8b5c989bc931c0769a50ecaf9ffe490c67cb5911
djm34
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1050


View Profile WWW
December 13, 2014, 03:50:42 AM
 #13090

SpeedDemon13 ,

i made some tests and it showed that a old 5870 is almost as efficient as R9 270 (200 KH/s scrypt-n). Lyra 2 uses half the power of n scrypt, so i think it doesn't matter if old or new gpu is used.

But yes, i forgot -> whe don't know the hashrate this cards do on lyra2re.

-----

All,

I get ~1.15 MH/s on Sapphire R9 290 Tri-X OC.

There also was a guy who did 1.1 MH/s on R9 280X i remember...



He must have oc'd the 280x 1150 or higher on the core and 1500 on mem at least, maybe.

Scyrpt-N is really power hungry type of algo because the huge memory requirements. Have anyone did a power efficient test yet, ie. kill-a-watt meter?

Cool, guess a 6950 will do about the same as a 5870 and a 6970 will do a little bit higher than a 5870.
seems ok to me, a friend tested my latest version (previous page...) on a 280x undervolted (1020/1500) and was getting 1.06MH/s average.
I get on my 290x (1030/1250 stock msi gaming) 1.3MH/s average.


I have tried your latest version but the pool displayed only half of the actual hashrate. But sgminer 5.0 (the version from vertcoin main page) was OK.
that's strange actually, it could be related to the difficulty.
I made a small update on my github where there is no difficulty correction, may it will be better.
In case the difficulty is too high, then it is possible to use "--difficulty-multiplier" to adjust it (you can also try to adjust the setting to your liking (or pool liking) with your current version).
hope this helps.

djm34 facebook page
BTC: 1NENYmxwZGHsKFmyjTc5WferTn5VTFb7Ze
Pledge for neoscrypt ccminer to that address: 16UoC4DmTz2pvhFvcfTQrzkPTrXkWijzXw
poiuty
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
December 13, 2014, 05:37:10 AM
 #13091



Welcome to P2POOL.PL - anonymous, stable, fee 1%
adaseb
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3808
Merit: 1723



View Profile
December 13, 2014, 06:25:05 AM
 #13092

We are close but I am pretty sure this will be no more profitable then X11 since there are many miners right now.

███████████████████████
███████████████████████
████████▀█▀████████████
████████████████████████
████████████████▀▀██████
████▀▀▀█████████████████
████████████▄▄▄▄███████
█████████████████▄▄▄████
█████████████████▀█████
████████████▀██▀████████
████████████████████████
███████████▄▄█████▄▄█████

███████████████████████
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
.
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██




██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
████
████▀▀▀
▀▄
▌░░▐▌
█████▄▄█
████████▄
████████▌
███████
███████
██████
██████
█████
██




██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
.
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
██
.
..Play Now..
[
DragonSlayer
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 181
Merit: 100



View Profile
December 13, 2014, 06:45:13 AM
 #13093

I have having the hardest time getting my Linux box switched over.  Anyone else getting Segmentation errors with Linux build?  I am running on a local p2pool.  I have 2 Windows boxes running fine.  Here is my conf file.

Code:
{
"pools" : [
{
"name" : "p2pool",
"url" : "http://192.168.1.4:9172",
"user" : "Vv8DSRtwKwYsFdaskKHLyAPvtNiVEoUaYp",
"pass" : "1234",
"priority" : "0",
"no-extranonce" : true,
"profile": "Lyra2RE"
}
],
"profiles" : [
{
"name" : "Lyra2RE",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"algorithm" : "Lyra2RE"
}
],

"kernel" : "Lyra2RE",
"xintensity" : "4",
"worksize" : "256",
"shaders" : "2048",
"failover-only" : true,
"no-submit-stales" : true,
"lookup-gap" : "2,",
"auto-fan" : true,
"log-file" : "output.log",


"gpu-engine" : "1020",
"gpu-memclock" : "1500",
"gpu-threads" : "2",

"temp-cutoff" : "85",
"temp-overheat" : "80",
"temp-target" : "72",
"temp-hysteresis" : "3",

"api-port" : "4028",
"api-listen" : true,
"api-allow" : "W:127.0.0.1",
"api-network" : true,

"kernel-path" : "/usr/local/bin"

}

Thanks

Sharkie
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 25
Merit: 0



View Profile
December 13, 2014, 07:12:07 AM
 #13094

Welcome to the Future Vertans!  Smiley
valsens
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 57
Merit: 0


View Profile
December 13, 2014, 07:12:40 AM
 #13095

HAPPY BIRTHDAY VERTANS!!!!!
nonny12
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 362
Merit: 250



View Profile
December 13, 2014, 07:15:35 AM
 #13096

Blocks are getting mined very quickly. How does difficulty retiming work with Lyra2RE? Or is this just an effect of the hashrate growing too quickly on Lyra2RE?

Est. Avg. Time per Block    0 minutes 21 seconds
SS2006
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 285
Merit: 250


View Profile
December 13, 2014, 07:17:14 AM
 #13097

im getting no accepts mining verters.com pool, any ideas? just keeps hsowing my hash rate every line. any other pools
nonny12
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 362
Merit: 250



View Profile
December 13, 2014, 07:19:32 AM
 #13098

im getting no accepts mining verters.com pool, any ideas? just keeps hsowing my hash rate every line. any other pools

It's working for me on port 4444. I am getting about 15% rejected from stales due to the fast blocktime though.
Handofmidas
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 61
Merit: 10


View Profile
December 13, 2014, 07:24:02 AM
 #13099

coinmine.pl acceptts shares but pool does not report hashrate. cannot register at verters because not getting confirmation email. -.- anyone knows pool which finds blocks plz? damn, most juicy part already over
nonny12
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 362
Merit: 250



View Profile
December 13, 2014, 07:26:18 AM
 #13100

coinmine.pl acceptts shares but pool does not report hashrate. cannot register at verters because not getting confirmation email. -.- anyone knows pool which finds blocks plz? damn, most juicy part already over

Verters confirm email took a minute for me, just wait. Difficulty is still at 4.23.

Edit: You're right though. There were a bunch of blocks with difficulty around 0.15 just after the switch.
Pages: « 1 ... 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 [655] 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!