Bitcoin Forum
May 06, 2024, 06:02:31 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 3995 3996 3997 3998 3999 4000 4001 4002 4003 4004 4005 4006 4007 4008 4009 4010 4011 4012 4013 4014 4015 4016 4017 4018 4019 4020 4021 4022 4023 4024 4025 4026 4027 4028 4029 4030 4031 4032 4033 4034 4035 4036 4037 4038 4039 4040 4041 4042 4043 4044 [4045] 4046 4047 4048 4049 4050 4051 4052 4053 4054 4055 4056 4057 4058 4059 4060 4061 4062 4063 4064 4065 4066 4067 4068 4069 4070 4071 4072 4073 4074 4075 4076 4077 4078 4079 4080 4081 4082 4083 4084 4085 4086 4087 4088 4089 4090 4091 4092 4093 4094 4095 ... 7012 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency  (Read 9722506 times)
mpr20rt
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 15, 2015, 05:53:48 PM
 #80881

My MN VPServers on Vultr, Amsterdam showed enormous outbound traffic today  Roll Eyes
Is it only me ... ?



Whaaaat?  Shocked

Just checked my AWS traffic seems normal...

I'd like to thank eduffield and the other developers for this critically important evolution in virtual currency. DarkCoin is what bitcoin should have been. Some might call it "Bitcoin 2.0" but would do better by saying: "DarkCoin is digital cash."  -  Child Harold - February 28, 2014
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=421615.msg5424980#msg5424980
1715018551
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715018551

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715018551
Reply with quote  #2

1715018551
Report to moderator
1715018551
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715018551

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715018551
Reply with quote  #2

1715018551
Report to moderator
"If you don't want people to know you're a scumbag then don't be a scumbag." -- margaritahuyan
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1715018551
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715018551

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715018551
Reply with quote  #2

1715018551
Report to moderator
1715018551
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715018551

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715018551
Reply with quote  #2

1715018551
Report to moderator
Kuriso
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532
Merit: 500


View Profile
February 15, 2015, 05:54:10 PM
 #80882

Exchanges should write code that track stolen funds transferred to future wallets.  When a deposit is made to an exchange from one of those wallets, the exchange should automatically seize the deposit before it can be spent.  Thieves will be left to doing face to face transactions for liquidation of their stolen funds.  This will lead to capture at some point.

Another possible solution would be to build a feature into every wallet that would warn merchants and individuals that they received coins from a 'blacklist' address.  Any theft that can be proven and tracked to an address(es) can be added to a 'blacklist' database which is then broadcast to ever wallet.

If the community can figure out a way to make it unprofitable, we would see less problems from hackers.
ocminer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2660
Merit: 1240



View Profile WWW
February 15, 2015, 05:55:06 PM
 #80883

My MN VPServers on Vultr, Amsterdam showed enormous outbound traffic today  Roll Eyes
Is it only me ... ?



Whaaaat?  Shocked

Just checked my AWS traffic seems normal...

everything normal for me

suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet
https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools
xxxgoodgirls
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1092
Merit: 1001


View Profile
February 15, 2015, 05:55:48 PM
 #80884

My MN VPServers on Vultr, Amsterdam showed enormous outbound traffic today  Roll Eyes
Is it only me ... ?



Event:  Connectivity Loss

Date/Time: 12 February 2015, 15:30 GMT

At approximately 15:30 GMT Level(3) leaked routes to Vultr in Amsterdam. This event destabilized BGP for Level(3) and NTT causing Vultr to lose connectivity.

Our engineers have stabilized the network and we will be performing a maintenance next week to upgrade the routers to prevent this issue from reoccurring.

A credit for the outage has been automatically applied to your account. If you have any further questions, please open a support ticket from your customer portal.

-- Vultr Operations Team --

In summary, the Intel Management Engine and its applications are a backdoor with total access to and control over the rest of the PC. The ME is a threat to freedom, security, and privacy, and the libreboot project strongly recommends avoiding it entirely. Since recent versions of it can’t be removed, this means avoiding all recent generations of Intel hardware. details https://libreboot.org/faq.html#intelme --- https://tehnoetic.com/laptops --- https://store.vikings.net/x200-ryf-certfied
eduffield (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1036


Dash Developer


View Profile WWW
February 15, 2015, 05:56:16 PM
 #80885

From what we can tell there's a uncommon condition on the network (seems to be about 1 in 10 clients), where some databases have became corrupt. Please check your logs for these messages:

--

2015-02-15 17:34:26 ERROR: ReadBlockFromDisk : Deserialize or I/O error - ReadCompactSize() : size too large
OR
2015-02-15 17:34:26 ERROR: ReadBlockFromDisk : Errors in block header

---

If you find entries like that delete ~/.darkcoin/blocks and chainstate, then resync from the bootstrap:

https://github.com/UdjinM6/darkcoin-bootstrap

Thanks  Smiley

Dash - Digital Cash | dash.org | dashfoundation.io | dashgo.io
GilAlexander
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 68
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 15, 2015, 05:58:23 PM
 #80886

My MN VPServers on Vultr, Amsterdam showed enormous outbound traffic today  Roll Eyes
Is it only me ... ?




 Cheesy
kointrend
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 655
Merit: 500



View Profile
February 15, 2015, 06:03:56 PM
 #80887

Didn't otoh put there a wall few days ago?
Shit  Undecided

I wonder what DRK would do without this otoh???  Cheesy
A smartest question would be "Why Otho is so heavily interested in Darkcoin?"
Get you it ?
Sub-Ether
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250


Quantum entangled and jump drive assisted messages


View Profile
February 15, 2015, 06:12:52 PM
 #80888

From what we can tell there's a uncommon condition on the network (seems to be about 1 in 10 clients), where some databases have became corrupt. Please check your logs for these messages:

--

2015-02-15 17:34:26 ERROR: ReadBlockFromDisk : Deserialize or I/O error - ReadCompactSize() : size too large
OR
2015-02-15 17:34:26 ERROR: ReadBlockFromDisk : Errors in block header

---

If you find entries like that delete ~/.darkcoin/blocks and chainstate, then resync from the bootstrap:

https://github.com/UdjinM6/darkcoin-bootstrap

Thanks  Smiley


3 machine's debug logs scanned and checked, all good here, including one local masternode wallet  Grin

I heard earlier there was a mined block of 2.6 darkcoin, is this connected, was it forked off or orphaned then?

Dash is 27.3 times faster with syncing and updating than Bitcoin and 93.7 times faster than Monero. Bitcoin (v0.11.0) has a Tao ratio 11.2% faster than bitcoin (v0.10.0) release.
Dash (v.0.12.0.49) = Tao sync ratio = 0.15 seconds / hour of update || Dash (v.0.11.2.23) = Tao sync ratio = 0.24 seconds / hour of update. V12 versus V11 speedup = +36.5%
Bitcoin (v.0.11.0) = Tao sync ratio = 4.14 seconds / hour of update || Monero (v.0.41.1)  = Tao sync ratio = 14.2 seconds / hour of update
qwizzie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2548
Merit: 1245



View Profile
February 15, 2015, 06:17:15 PM
 #80889

From what we can tell there's a uncommon condition on the network (seems to be about 1 in 10 clients), where some databases have became corrupt. Please check your logs for these messages:

--

2015-02-15 17:34:26 ERROR: ReadBlockFromDisk : Deserialize or I/O error - ReadCompactSize() : size too large
OR
2015-02-15 17:34:26 ERROR: ReadBlockFromDisk : Errors in block header

---

If you find entries like that delete ~/.darkcoin/blocks and chainstate, then resync from the bootstrap:

https://github.com/UdjinM6/darkcoin-bootstrap

Thanks  Smiley


i had those two days ago .. they must have caused my MN to stop working back then. I remember someone else complaining about these errors back then .. i did a reindex with version .25 and had no problems anymore.

2015-02-13 22:33:07 ERROR: ReadBlockFromDisk : Deserialize or I/O error - ReadCompactSize() : size too large
2015-02-13 22:33:07 ERROR: ReadBlockFromDisk : Deserialize or I/O error - ReadCompactSize() : size too large
2015-02-13 22:33:07 ERROR: ReadBlockFromDisk : Deserialize or I/O error - ReadCompactSize() : size too large
2015-02-13 22:33:07 ERROR: ReadBlockFromDisk : Deserialize or I/O error - ReadCompactSize() : size too large
2015-02-13 22:33:07 ERROR: ReadBlockFromDisk : Deserialize or I/O error - ReadCompactSize() : size too large
2015-02-13 22:33:07 ERROR: ReadBlockFromDisk : Deserialize or I/O error - ReadCompactSize() : size too large
2015-02-13 22:33:07 ERROR: ReadBlockFromDisk : Deserialize or I/O error - ReadCompactSize() : size too large
2015-02-13 22:33:07 ERROR: ReadBlockFromDisk : Deserialize or I/O error - ReadCompactSize() : size too large
2015-02-13 22:33:07 ERROR: ReadBlockFromDisk : Deserialize or I/O error - ReadCompactSize() : size too large
2015-02-13 22:33:07 ERROR: ReadBlockFromDisk : Deserialize or I/O error - ReadCompactSize() : size too large
2015-02-13 22:33:07 ERROR: CheckProofOfWork() : nBits below minimum work
2015-02-13 22:33:07 ERROR: ReadBlockFromDisk : Errors in block header
2015-02-13 23:02:08



Learn from the past, set detailed and vivid goals for the future and live in the only moment of time over which you have any control : now
ocminer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2660
Merit: 1240



View Profile WWW
February 15, 2015, 06:17:57 PM
 #80890

From what we can tell there's a uncommon condition on the network (seems to be about 1 in 10 clients), where some databases have became corrupt. Please check your logs for these messages:

--

2015-02-15 17:34:26 ERROR: ReadBlockFromDisk : Deserialize or I/O error - ReadCompactSize() : size too large
OR
2015-02-15 17:34:26 ERROR: ReadBlockFromDisk : Errors in block header

---

If you find entries like that delete ~/.darkcoin/blocks and chainstate, then resync from the bootstrap:

https://github.com/UdjinM6/darkcoin-bootstrap

Thanks  Smiley


i had those two days ago .. they must have caused my MN to stop working back then. I remember someone else complaining about these errors back then .. i did a reindex then
and had no problems anymore.

2015-02-13 22:33:07 ERROR: ReadBlockFromDisk : Deserialize or I/O error - ReadCompactSize() : size too large
2015-02-13 22:33:07 ERROR: ReadBlockFromDisk : Deserialize or I/O error - ReadCompactSize() : size too large
2015-02-13 22:33:07 ERROR: ReadBlockFromDisk : Deserialize or I/O error - ReadCompactSize() : size too large
2015-02-13 22:33:07 ERROR: ReadBlockFromDisk : Deserialize or I/O error - ReadCompactSize() : size too large
2015-02-13 22:33:07 ERROR: ReadBlockFromDisk : Deserialize or I/O error - ReadCompactSize() : size too large
2015-02-13 22:33:07 ERROR: ReadBlockFromDisk : Deserialize or I/O error - ReadCompactSize() : size too large
2015-02-13 22:33:07 ERROR: ReadBlockFromDisk : Deserialize or I/O error - ReadCompactSize() : size too large
2015-02-13 22:33:07 ERROR: ReadBlockFromDisk : Deserialize or I/O error - ReadCompactSize() : size too large
2015-02-13 22:33:07 ERROR: ReadBlockFromDisk : Deserialize or I/O error - ReadCompactSize() : size too large
2015-02-13 22:33:07 ERROR: ReadBlockFromDisk : Deserialize or I/O error - ReadCompactSize() : size too large
2015-02-13 22:33:07 ERROR: CheckProofOfWork() : nBits below minimum work
2015-02-13 22:33:07 ERROR: ReadBlockFromDisk : Errors in block header
2015-02-13 23:02:08




Yup - I had that too.

A -reindex did not help, only a full resync with deleted blocks/chainstate (or a bootstrap resync)

suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet
https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools
anonymousxx1503
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 532
Merit: 500


View Profile
February 15, 2015, 06:23:10 PM
 #80891

I come back after 2 weeks and wolla, crazy action at the exchanges.

voilà

I'd like to thank eduffield and the other developers for this critically important evolution in virtual currency. DarkCoin is what bitcoin should have been. Some might call it "Bitcoin 2.0" but would do better by saying: "DarkCoin is digital cash." - Child Harold - February 28, 2014
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=421615.msg5424980#msg5424980
innergy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 685
Merit: 500


View Profile
February 15, 2015, 06:23:42 PM
 #80892

My MN VPServers on Vultr, Amsterdam showed enormous outbound traffic today  Roll Eyes
Is it only me ... ?



Event:  Connectivity Loss

Date/Time: 12 February 2015, 15:30 GMT

At approximately 15:30 GMT Level(3) leaked routes to Vultr in Amsterdam. This event destabilized BGP for Level(3) and NTT causing Vultr to lose connectivity.

Our engineers have stabilized the network and we will be performing a maintenance next week to upgrade the routers to prevent this issue from reoccurring.

A credit for the outage has been automatically applied to your account. If you have any further questions, please open a support ticket from your customer portal.

-- Vultr Operations Team --

I opened the ticket.. we'll see..  Wink
splawik21
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1372
Merit: 1005


DASH is the future of crypto payments!


View Profile
February 15, 2015, 06:24:59 PM
 #80893

From what we can tell there's a uncommon condition on the network (seems to be about 1 in 10 clients), where some databases have became corrupt. Please check your logs for these messages:

--

2015-02-15 17:34:26 ERROR: ReadBlockFromDisk : Deserialize or I/O error - ReadCompactSize() : size too large
OR
2015-02-15 17:34:26 ERROR: ReadBlockFromDisk : Errors in block header

---

If you find entries like that delete ~/.darkcoin/blocks and chainstate, then resync from the bootstrap:

https://github.com/UdjinM6/darkcoin-bootstrap

Thanks  Smiley


i had those two days ago .. they must have caused my MN to stop working back then. I remember someone else complaining about these errors back then .. i did a reindex then
and had no problems anymore.

2015-02-13 22:33:07 ERROR: ReadBlockFromDisk : Deserialize or I/O error - ReadCompactSize() : size too large
2015-02-13 22:33:07 ERROR: ReadBlockFromDisk : Deserialize or I/O error - ReadCompactSize() : size too large
2015-02-13 22:33:07 ERROR: ReadBlockFromDisk : Deserialize or I/O error - ReadCompactSize() : size too large
2015-02-13 22:33:07 ERROR: ReadBlockFromDisk : Deserialize or I/O error - ReadCompactSize() : size too large
2015-02-13 22:33:07 ERROR: ReadBlockFromDisk : Deserialize or I/O error - ReadCompactSize() : size too large
2015-02-13 22:33:07 ERROR: ReadBlockFromDisk : Deserialize or I/O error - ReadCompactSize() : size too large
2015-02-13 22:33:07 ERROR: ReadBlockFromDisk : Deserialize or I/O error - ReadCompactSize() : size too large
2015-02-13 22:33:07 ERROR: ReadBlockFromDisk : Deserialize or I/O error - ReadCompactSize() : size too large
2015-02-13 22:33:07 ERROR: ReadBlockFromDisk : Deserialize or I/O error - ReadCompactSize() : size too large
2015-02-13 22:33:07 ERROR: ReadBlockFromDisk : Deserialize or I/O error - ReadCompactSize() : size too large
2015-02-13 22:33:07 ERROR: CheckProofOfWork() : nBits below minimum work
2015-02-13 22:33:07 ERROR: ReadBlockFromDisk : Errors in block header
2015-02-13 23:02:08




Yup - I had that too.

A -reindex did not help, only a full resync with deleted blocks/chainstate (or a bootstrap resync)

yes i had the same problem. Solved! Thnx Evan.

BE SMART, USE DASH ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
MakingMoneyHoney
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 500



View Profile
February 15, 2015, 06:37:04 PM
Last edit: February 15, 2015, 07:08:21 PM by MakingMoneyHoney
 #80894


Bitcoin mixing makes for nice artwork.

Right, everyone pick a node and follow this mother till they start consolidating again. Win a 720 BTC bounty !

https://blockchain.info/tree/77696250




That is really kind of fun. I found a couple of forks, that ended up sending them to the same address here: https://blockchain.info/address/1GBaPdA22TvGGpbN3reNJc8q55618o6yHZ (It's only up to 5.5btc)



Edit: Also: https://blockchain.info/address/3KJGtFJ7XnXpimppxEw22PjKKZ53WPSUEb (looks like it's just sitting there, in an address with a 3, that's usually multisig right?) ~16 BTC

Edit 2: This one may be, but I kind of lost track, looking on blockchain.info with it https://blockchain.info/address/3G3VpVD6fJs1Usg52zB8LToy1pHzDHC4a2 (another 3 address, and showed up a few more times) ~143 BTC

Edit 3: https://blockchain.info/address/3MtoT3LeUHHdxdwCnH7kyecBHeqRJybLFD (another 3 address) ~179 BTC
Furio
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 938
Merit: 1000

BTC | LTC | XLM | VEN | ARDR


View Profile
February 15, 2015, 06:39:36 PM
 #80895

Bitcoindark vs darkcoin, who do you think wins and why? I prefer Darkcoin atm, still heitant to which anon crypto will surpass Bitcoin.

mpr20rt
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 15, 2015, 06:44:55 PM
 #80896

From what we can tell there's a uncommon condition on the network (seems to be about 1 in 10 clients), where some databases have became corrupt. Please check your logs for these messages:

--

2015-02-15 17:34:26 ERROR: ReadBlockFromDisk : Deserialize or I/O error - ReadCompactSize() : size too large
OR
2015-02-15 17:34:26 ERROR: ReadBlockFromDisk : Errors in block header

---

If you find entries like that delete ~/.darkcoin/blocks and chainstate, then resync from the bootstrap:

https://github.com/UdjinM6/darkcoin-bootstrap

Thanks  Smiley


bump

I'd like to thank eduffield and the other developers for this critically important evolution in virtual currency. DarkCoin is what bitcoin should have been. Some might call it "Bitcoin 2.0" but would do better by saying: "DarkCoin is digital cash."  -  Child Harold - February 28, 2014
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=421615.msg5424980#msg5424980
mpr20rt
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 126
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 15, 2015, 07:11:26 PM
 #80897

Hacks all over the place! Take care!

https://exco.in/

I'd like to thank eduffield and the other developers for this critically important evolution in virtual currency. DarkCoin is what bitcoin should have been. Some might call it "Bitcoin 2.0" but would do better by saying: "DarkCoin is digital cash."  -  Child Harold - February 28, 2014
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=421615.msg5424980#msg5424980
qwizzie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2548
Merit: 1245



View Profile
February 15, 2015, 07:19:14 PM
 #80898

darkcoin is rising again, hopefully steaming towards 0.012 (although a big sell awaits us at 0.0115999)

Learn from the past, set detailed and vivid goals for the future and live in the only moment of time over which you have any control : now
Lebubar
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1288
Merit: 1000



View Profile
February 15, 2015, 07:28:12 PM
 #80899

From what we can tell there's a uncommon condition on the network (seems to be about 1 in 10 clients), where some databases have became corrupt. Please check your logs for these messages:

--

2015-02-15 17:34:26 ERROR: ReadBlockFromDisk : Deserialize or I/O error - ReadCompactSize() : size too large
OR
2015-02-15 17:34:26 ERROR: ReadBlockFromDisk : Errors in block header

---

If you find entries like that delete ~/.darkcoin/blocks and chainstate, then resync from the bootstrap:

https://github.com/UdjinM6/darkcoin-bootstrap

Thanks  Smiley


bump
I had like 40% of my masternodes affected.
All ok now.
qwizzie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2548
Merit: 1245



View Profile
February 15, 2015, 07:36:06 PM
 #80900


Bitcoin mixing makes for nice artwork.

Right, everyone pick a node and follow this mother till they start consolidating again. Win a 720 BTC bounty !

https://blockchain.info/tree/77696250




That is really kind of fun. I found a couple of forks, that ended up sending them to the same address here: https://blockchain.info/address/1GBaPdA22TvGGpbN3reNJc8q55618o6yHZ (It's only up to 5.5btc)



Edit: Also: https://blockchain.info/address/3KJGtFJ7XnXpimppxEw22PjKKZ53WPSUEb (looks like it's just sitting there, in an address with a 3, that's usually multisig right?) ~16 BTC

Edit 2: This one may be, but I kind of lost track, looking on blockchain.info with it https://blockchain.info/address/3G3VpVD6fJs1Usg52zB8LToy1pHzDHC4a2 (another 3 address, and showed up a few more times) ~143 BTC

Edit 3: https://blockchain.info/address/3MtoT3LeUHHdxdwCnH7kyecBHeqRJybLFD (another 3 address) ~179 BTC

so far i can tell 7000 BTC is resting in these 7 wallets (each 1000 BTC) and the rest (170 BTC) has been mixed further down in smaller and smaller amounts..

1MgM7WMAVteJ3k4PqfyB9AKdaBnHvdxvdG
14kgEXiKWCN46BEHVNwYjyuohFN83Uc5Jt
1AFbZuU5PufViRhNCChw8br6beo6K78r2H
1KPNHv8mfMPNivHptAiwwytUVZmzovVF8f
1J4TJQKgh1phPMcsV8cbRkAhV2Q6V8wW25
1Q2MxBc9Zbe6A35mTcD5jyU8PMr4K6oqGC
1Muse5NL7nDPPHVreF2Gkq5wv5XLbC2Qtz

Learn from the past, set detailed and vivid goals for the future and live in the only moment of time over which you have any control : now
Pages: « 1 ... 3995 3996 3997 3998 3999 4000 4001 4002 4003 4004 4005 4006 4007 4008 4009 4010 4011 4012 4013 4014 4015 4016 4017 4018 4019 4020 4021 4022 4023 4024 4025 4026 4027 4028 4029 4030 4031 4032 4033 4034 4035 4036 4037 4038 4039 4040 4041 4042 4043 4044 [4045] 4046 4047 4048 4049 4050 4051 4052 4053 4054 4055 4056 4057 4058 4059 4060 4061 4062 4063 4064 4065 4066 4067 4068 4069 4070 4071 4072 4073 4074 4075 4076 4077 4078 4079 4080 4081 4082 4083 4084 4085 4086 4087 4088 4089 4090 4091 4092 4093 4094 4095 ... 7012 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!