[ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency

[TaoOfSaatoshi]

Hows enforcement been going guys?

I'm starting to get payments again, so pretty good!

[1715424133]

1715424133

[1715424133]

1715424133

[1715424133]

1715424133

[1715424133]

1715424133

[1715424133]

1715424133

[1715424133]

1715424133

[Lukas_Jackson]

https://github.com/darkcoin/darkcoin/commit/07e9678f093dc760e6d6e5c5b618f3a2ba006753

Fuck. Yeah.

Damn!! The guy's a f*ckin' robot I tell you!

What's this going to do

Will break inputs for DS tx's across multiple masternode so no single masternode knows all the inputs per round as it currently stands. Makes the probabilities of blockchain analysis per round exponentially harder because the masternodes are now blind to what other inputs are part of the mix. You're effectively taking Darksend as it currently stands and pumping it full of steroids.

And consequently greatly speeds the Darksend process as the same obfuscation can be achieved with far fewer rounds of mixing.

Bingo.

Great news!   When will the innovation end?

Once you stop moving you're dead.

[UdjinM6]

Someone earlier mentioned you have to "lock" the 1000 coins in a masternode if you pay out the "earnings" in order to keep the node running and that it is not spending the reserved coins.

How do i lock them @ Linux?

Enable coin control in settings.. Then go to send tab... You should see how then.

Linux commandline?

In general

Code:

darkcoind listunspent

Code:

listunspent ( minconf maxconf  ["address",...] )

Returns array of unspent transaction outputs
with between minconf and maxconf (inclusive) confirmations.
Optionally filter to only include txouts paid to specified addresses.
Results are an array of Objects, each of which has:
{txid, vout, scriptPubKey, amount, confirmations}

Arguments:
1. minconf          (numeric, optional, default=1) The minimum confirmationsi to filter
2. maxconf          (numeric, optional, default=9999999) The maximum confirmations to filter
3. "addresses"    (string) A json array of darkcoin addresses to filter
    [
      "address"   (string) darkcoin address
      ,...
    ]

Result
[                   (array of json object)
  {
    "txid" : "txid",        (string) the transaction id 
    "vout" : n,               (numeric) the vout value
    "address" : "address",  (string) the darkcoin address
    "account" : "account",  (string) The associated account, or "" for the default account
    "scriptPubKey" : "key", (string) the script key
    "amount" : x.xxx,         (numeric) the transaction amount in btc
    "confirmations" : n       (numeric) The number of confirmations
  }
  ,...
]

Examples
> darkcoin-cli listunspent 
> darkcoin-cli listunspent 6 9999999 "[\"1PGFqEzfmQch1gKD3ra4k18PNj3tTUUSqg\",\"1LtvqCaApEdUGFkpKMM4MstjcaL4dKg8SP\"]"
> curl --user myusername --data-binary '{"jsonrpc": "1.0", "id":"curltest", "method": "listunspent", "params": [6, 9999999 "[\"1PGFqEzfmQch1gKD3ra4k18PNj3tTUUSqg\",\"1LtvqCaApEdUGFkpKMM4MstjcaL4dKg8SP\"]"] }' -H 'content-type: text/plain;' http://127.0.0.1:9998/

But for local wallet masternode outputs it's easier:

Code:

darkcoind masternode outputs

And then

Code:

darkcoind lockunspent

Code:

lockunspent unlock [{"txid":"txid","vout":n},...]

Updates list of temporarily unspendable outputs.
Temporarily lock (unlock=false) or unlock (unlock=true) specified transaction outputs.
A locked transaction output will not be chosen by automatic coin selection, when spending darkcoins.
Locks are stored in memory only. Nodes start with zero locked outputs, and the locked output list
is always cleared (by virtue of process exit) when a node stops or fails.
Also see the listunspent call

Arguments:
1. unlock            (boolean, required) Whether to unlock (true) or lock (false) the specified transactions
2. "transactions"  (string, required) A json array of objects. Each object the txid (string) vout (numeric)
     [           (json array of json objects)
       {
         "txid":"id",    (string) The transaction id
         "vout": n         (numeric) The output number
       }
       ,...
     ]

Result:
true|false    (boolean) Whether the command was successful or not

Examples:

List the unspent transactions
> darkcoin-cli listunspent 

Lock an unspent transaction
> darkcoin-cli lockunspent false "[{\"txid\":\"a08e6907dbbd3d809776dbfc5d82e371b764ed838b5655e72f463568df1aadf0\",\"vout\":1}]"

List the locked transactions
> darkcoin-cli listlockunspent 

Unlock the transaction again
> darkcoin-cli lockunspent true "[{\"txid\":\"a08e6907dbbd3d809776dbfc5d82e371b764ed838b5655e72f463568df1aadf0\",\"vout\":1}]"

As a json rpc call
> curl --user myusername --data-binary '{"jsonrpc": "1.0", "id":"curltest", "method": "lockunspent", "params": [false, "[{\"txid\":\"a08e6907dbbd3d809776dbfc5d82e371b764ed838b5655e72f463568df1aadf0\",\"vout\":1}]"] }' -H 'content-type: text/plain;' http://127.0.0.1:9998/

[TaoOfSaatoshi]

The weak hands continue to exit the building on Cryptsy...

[coins101]

-snip-
OMG that was like visual Viagra :-D

Visual viagra?  lol.

WTF (pun intended) does that mean?

[tungfa]

 

[oaxaca]

Andreas Antonopoulos @ MIT Bitcoin Club

If you start at the 23:40 mark, you will hear him answer the first question.  Yes, it's regarding anonymity.  No, he does not mention Darkcoin by name.  You can see that he wants to say Darkcoin...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J8y_GypCWf4&feature=youtu.be

[tungfa]

 

*Privacy 

tx raze
(too fast for my own good again)

i think you have a spelling mistake in your post
 

[raze182]

 

*Privacy 

tx raze
(too fast for my own good again)

i think you have a spelling mistake in your post
 

Post? What post? I didn't post anything.

[stealth923]

Looking Sexy as ever

[xxxgoodgirls]

Andreas Antonopoulos @ MIT Bitcoin Club

If you start at the 23:40 mark, you will hear him answer the first question.  Yes, it's regarding anonymity.  No, he does not mention Darkcoin by name.  You can see that he wants to say Darkcoin...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J8y_GypCWf4&feature=youtu.be

Ahah that's true

[RenegadeMan]

Looking Sexy as ever

Except, it should be noted that the "0.23 DRK/day" number in drk.mn is incorrect.
2112 masternodes = 1 payment every 2112/576 = 3.666666~
So you'll have 1.75 Drk / 3.666666 = 0.48 Drk / day.

[tungfa]

 

*Privacy 

tx raze
(too fast for my own good again)

i think you have a spelling mistake in your post
 

Post? What post? I didn't post anything.

Heheeeee
nearly got you there !
 

[splawik21]

Andreas Antonopoulos @ MIT Bitcoin Club

If you start at the 23:40 mark, you will hear him answer the first question.  Yes, it's regarding anonymity.  No, he does not mention Darkcoin by name.  You can see that he wants to say Darkcoin...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J8y_GypCWf4&feature=youtu.be

Ahah that's true

Did I hear darkcoin?
Well saying other altcoins he meant darkcoin for sure.
Time: 25:25s
Great speach! Thnx 4 that.

[no141]

I've been thinking and reading some things, and another part of anonymity is having old unneeded tracks disappear. Is there anything in darkcoin that auto-prunes the blockchain of blocks that have no unspent coin in them? Or maybe superblocks every so often that collimate all the unspent coins into one block that then the history could be deleted? Anything like this in the works or already around?

[anonymousxx1503]

Darkcoin

[TanteStefana2]

Andreas Antonopoulos @ MIT Bitcoin Club

If you start at the 23:40 mark, you will hear him answer the first question.  Yes, it's regarding anonymity.  No, he does not mention Darkcoin by name.  You can see that he wants to say Darkcoin...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J8y_GypCWf4&feature=youtu.be

Actually, I got the creepy feeling in this talk, that I haven't felt before, that Andreas was "speaking" the Bitcoin party line, not acknowledging how dangerous Bitcoin is, that they're not fungible, etc...  I mean just what Coinbase is doing with not accepting coins that have been through known gambling sites alone, is a failure point for Bitcoin, and Andreas glossed over that.

You're right, I felt like he did not say what he knew he should say, IMO.  Why is it? is what I wonder.  Has he sold his soul?  I'm a bit worried at this point.  Perhaps it was his audience?  Perhaps it was who paid for this talk?  

I just got a creepy feeling... he seemed conflicted.  g2g thought, so I don't know how the whole talk went...

[bigrcanada]

Andreas Antonopoulos @ MIT Bitcoin Club

If you start at the 23:40 mark, you will hear him answer the first question.  Yes, it's regarding anonymity.  No, he does not mention Darkcoin by name.  You can see that he wants to say Darkcoin...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J8y_GypCWf4&feature=youtu.be

Actually, I got the creepy feeling in this talk, that I haven't felt before, that Andreas was "speaking" the Bitcoin party line, not acknowledging how dangerous Bitcoin is, that they're not fungible, etc...  I mean just what Coinbase is doing with not accepting coins that have been through known gambling sites alone, is a failure point for Bitcoin, and Andreas glossed over that.

You're right, I felt like he did not say what he knew he should say, IMO.  Why is it? is what I wonder.  Has he sold his soul?  I'm a bit worried at this point.  Perhaps it was his audience?  Perhaps it was who paid for this talk?  

I just got a creepy feeling... he seemed conflicted.  g2g thought, so I don't know how the whole talk went...

I certainly got the feeling he was conflicted... The fact that he said you would need "another"  coin to do anon tx was revealing.  That he mentioned that btc would probably never be anon... Then spent several minutes going on about how super important anonymity was ....was well Ummmm telling. I'm thinking this is a turning point... BTC core is now admitting that there is a serious hole in btc...listening to him trying to say it will be like "gold"  and a store of value sounded weak and in lieu of the lack of anon... Seemed hollow.  They know it... Why hold Ur "gold"  where everyone could see it and trace it?

[someredguy]

https://github.com/darkcoin/darkcoin/commit/07e9678f093dc760e6d6e5c5b618f3a2ba006753

Fuck. Yeah.

Great news!   When will the innovation end?

Once you stop moving you're dead.

Too funny.

Perhaps you'll accept a diff:

-            error = _("This is not a masternode.");
+            error = _("This is not the masternode you are looking for.");

[Terzo2]

Like always , Darkcoin getting dumped !