UdjinM6
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1318
Merit: 1040
|
 |
February 14, 2015, 12:02:05 AM |
|
Hmm i'm having some trouble with the latest version:
PROCESSMESSAGE: INVALID MESSAGESTART
2015-02-13 23:01:12 Added time data, samples 72, offset +0 (+0 minutes)
2015-02-13 23:01:14 ERROR: ReadBlockFromDisk : Deserialize or I/O error - ReadCompactSize() : size too large
2015-02-13 23:01:14 ERROR: ReadBlockFromDisk : Deserialize or I/O error - ReadCompactSize() : size too large
2015-02-13 23:01:14 ERROR: ReadBlockFromDisk : Deserialize or I/O error - ReadCompactSize() : size too large
2015-02-13 23:01:14 ERROR: ReadBlockFromDisk : Deserialize or I/O error - ReadCompactSize() : size too large
2015-02-13 23:01:14 ERROR: ReadBlockFromDisk : Deserialize or I/O error - ReadCompactSize() : size too large
2015-02-13 23:01:14 ERROR: ReadBlockFromDisk : Deserialize or I/O error - ReadCompactSize() : size too large
2015-02-13 23:01:14 ERROR: ReadBlockFromDisk : Deserialize or I/O error - ReadCompactSize() : size too large
2015-02-13 23:01:14 ERROR: CheckProofOfWork() : nBits below minimum work
2015-02-13 23:01:14 ERROR: ReadBlockFromDisk : Errors in block header
Happened two times already, a restart with -reindex works - lets see how long it rolls this time.
Anyone else problems with crashing wallet ?
My disk is ok btw.. Just ran a check ..
Had the same on a couple of nodes, deleted peers.dat and -reindex - all good again! I did -reindex too - did not help, I deleted the blockchain and the peers now.. Lets see In case reindex fails try to sync using bootstrap https://github.com/UdjinM6/darkcoin-bootstrapEDIT: and btw, can I have debug.log please?  udjinm6@darkcoin.io |
DASH: XsV4GHVKGTjQFvwB7c6mYsGV3Mxf7iser6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The network tries to produce one block per 10 minutes. It does this by automatically adjusting how difficult it is to produce blocks.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
coins101
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 14, 2015, 12:14:12 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
TanteStefana2
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1001
|
|
February 14, 2015, 12:14:53 AM |
|
v0.11.1.25 - MANDATORY UPDATE
Due to some pools taking advantage of paying the incorrect masternodes (on purpose), enabling enforcement failed earlier today. Please update to the latest version of the software, 11.1.25, which includes a much stronger policy for enforcing masternode payments. This will also cause bans on any clients mining on the wrong chain. After the entire network updates (Pools, Exchanges, Masternodes, etc), we'll activate enforcement again.
https://www.darkcoin.io/downloads/ Do I understand this correctly? You've enabled a ban to miners (pools) for not giving proper payment as a separate thing to the spork? Does this mean, something like MasterNodes reject non-paying pools, then ban them, so that the rest of the network can get on with updating and switching enforcement on? Is that the idea? So like two sporks? Thanks for explanation  |
Another proud lifetime Dash Foundation member My TanteStefana account was hacked, Beware trading "You'll never reach your destination if you stop to throw stones at every dog that barks."Sir Winston Churchill BTC: 12pu5nMDPEyUGu3HTbnUB5zY5RG65EQE5d |
|
|
ImI
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1946
Merit: 1019
|
|
February 14, 2015, 12:27:34 AM |
|
folks, quick question. what does one MN earn per day at the moment?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
no141
|
|
February 14, 2015, 12:29:45 AM |
|
Who steals the darksend mixing collateral? I was on v...23 and I started mixing, sadly I lost my internet connection at about 85% completed and it stayed off. When I got the internet back going it would not continue. Now I have updated to v...25 and mixing got disabled.
Will I always lose collateral when the internet is lost?
|
|
|
|
oblox
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1442
Merit: 1018
|
|
February 14, 2015, 12:33:48 AM |
|
Who steals the darksend mixing collateral? I was on v...23 and I started mixing, sadly I lost my internet connection at about 85% completed and it stayed off. When I got the internet back going it would not continue. Now I have updated to v...25 and mixing got disabled.
Will I always lose collateral when the internet is lost?
The network gets collateral (miners and masternodes) and yes, if you have a shoddy internet connection, expect to lose collateral if it's mid mix. |
|
|
|
|
|
no141
|
|
February 14, 2015, 12:40:09 AM |
|
Who steals the darksend mixing collateral? I was on v...23 and I started mixing, sadly I lost my internet connection at about 85% completed and it stayed off. When I got the internet back going it would not continue. Now I have updated to v...25 and mixing got disabled.
Will I always lose collateral when the internet is lost?
The network gets collateral (miners and masternodes) and yes, if you have a shoddy internet connection, expect to lose collateral if it's mid mix. Thank you. I have to wonder why there is no warning when first hitting that 'Start Darksend Mixing' button that it will take several hours needing a stable internet connection otherwise forfeiting a large collateral(Yes 0.1DRK is large to me). Would never have proceeded, at this time, if there was. |
|
|
|
Lebubar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 14, 2015, 12:42:37 AM
Last edit: February 14, 2015, 12:53:29 AM by Lebubar |
|
folks, quick question. what does one MN earn per day at the moment?
On AVG = 0.25DRK No the number in drk.mn is false. ~2000 mn = 1 payment every 2000/576 = 3.47 days So you'll have 1.75 Drk / 3.47 = 0.5 Drk / day. Edit : those numbers are rounded but with enforcment on, yes we are really close to this formula! |
|
|
|
|
TanteStefana2
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1001
|
|
February 14, 2015, 12:48:09 AM |
|
Who steals the darksend mixing collateral? I was on v...23 and I started mixing, sadly I lost my internet connection at about 85% completed and it stayed off. When I got the internet back going it would not continue. Now I have updated to v...25 and mixing got disabled.
Will I always lose collateral when the internet is lost?
The network gets collateral (miners and masternodes) and yes, if you have a shoddy internet connection, expect to lose collateral if it's mid mix. Thank you. I have to wonder why there is no warning when first hitting that 'Start Darksend Mixing' button that it will take several hours needing a stable internet connection otherwise forfeiting a large collateral(Yes 0.1DRK is large to me). Would never have proceeded, at this time, if there was. I'm sorry about that. I try to ask for this stuff, but everyone's nose is so deep in the code, solving functional issues, that many niceties and informative notifications get forgotten. I still want an obvious notification that shows how your instant X transfer is going on the SEND tab. But there is an actual reason for a collateral charge. It prevents DDOS attacks, because running DarkSend then pulling out constantly to disrupt the mixing process quickly becomes expensive. So it's there to protect the network, not to harm users. Unfortunately, a bad connection can cause issues. However, if you ever have to turn DarkSend off because you want to reboot or anything, you should be able to tell by the notifications on the overview tab, when DS is idle or not mixing. It's safe to turn off then. |
Another proud lifetime Dash Foundation member My TanteStefana account was hacked, Beware trading "You'll never reach your destination if you stop to throw stones at every dog that barks."Sir Winston Churchill BTC: 12pu5nMDPEyUGu3HTbnUB5zY5RG65EQE5d |
|
|
Lebubar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 14, 2015, 12:52:36 AM |
|
Are we shure that they have ONLY ONE masternode?
even it's not the point : Just check which MN is pay for every block THEY found in this pool... Each block found by this pool go to the same unique MN. |
|
|
|
|
AzzAz
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1030
Merit: 1006
|
|
February 14, 2015, 12:54:24 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
mitchr4
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1017
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
|
|
February 14, 2015, 12:55:13 AM |
|
Support stopped the downtrend. We were supposed to break much lower for the correction to continue. We still need to get above .0135 but im leaning toward more bull movement here soon.
|
|
|
|
Lebubar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 14, 2015, 12:56:52 AM |
|
This one can be a local Multi- Node start wallet. If i remember the first adress with the 1000 vin drk will receive the payment of all within the multi.start wallet. |
|
|
|
|
AzzAz
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1030
Merit: 1006
|
|
February 14, 2015, 12:59:06 AM |
|
This one can be a local Multi- Node start wallet. If i remember the first adress with the 1000 vin drk will receive the payment of all within the multi.start wallet. TY again! Byt shouldn't funds go to each wallet instead just first one? |
|
|
|
|
Lebubar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 14, 2015, 01:04:11 AM |
|
This one can be a local Multi- Node start wallet. If i remember the first adress with the 1000 vin drk will receive the payment of all within the multi.start wallet. TY again! Byt shouldn't funds go to each wallet instead just first one? I'm not sure but hear from dev that in some case all payments go to the add of first in. I didn't make this conf because too afraid to be hacked and then loose not 1000 drk but all.  Well they go to same wallet but all to first address |
|
|
|
|
|
Walter_S
|
|
February 14, 2015, 01:09:09 AM |
|
Could be a record in the making here... 65% of MNs now on .25 within 6 hours of release... Very impressive and shows the level of commitment from the whole community.
|
|
|
|
|
thelonecrouton
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 14, 2015, 01:10:00 AM |
|
This one can be a local Multi- Node start wallet. If i remember the first adress with the 1000 vin drk will receive the payment of all within the multi.start wallet. TY again! Byt shouldn't funds go to each wallet instead just first one? I'm not sure but hear from dev that in some case all payments go to the add of first in. I didn't make this conf because too afraid to be hacked and then loose not 1000 drk but all. Well they go to same wallet but all to first address I use start-many and all my MN addresses get paid separately. |
|
|
|
|
|
Walter_S
|
|
February 14, 2015, 01:15:10 AM |
|
@thelonecrouton - Is now a good time to revisit the debate about the inherent security issues surrounding centralised mining pools...? Walter |
|
|
|
|
Lebubar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 14, 2015, 01:17:17 AM |
|
This one can be a local Multi- Node start wallet. If i remember the first adress with the 1000 vin drk will receive the payment of all within the multi.start wallet. TY again! Byt shouldn't funds go to each wallet instead just first one? I'm not sure but hear from dev that in some case all payments go to the add of first in. I didn't make this conf because too afraid to be hacked and then loose not 1000 drk but all. Well they go to same wallet but all to first address I use start-many and all my MN addresses get paid separately. There is a conf that payment arrive to one addresse I hear it at the begining of the implementation. I think you make it with import privkey of an already existing MN local. But if you create them from a new wallet with more than one 1K vin, this is happening, (or something like that, well I remember hearing this case because someone detected an address that was receiveing more than other and was explaination of Evan I think or Flare.... ).. Edit UdjinM6... HElpppp this is possible right?? |
|
|
|
|
|
