oblox
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1442
Merit: 1018
|
 |
December 06, 2014, 04:25:46 PM |
|
Thnx quizzy need to take a try.
I've asked for a config in case where there is a protocol change so there is the need of local masternode start..
-conf=PATH_TO_CONF_FILENAME.CONF |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin addresses contain a checksum, so it is very unlikely that mistyping an address will cause you to lose money.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
superplus
|
|
December 06, 2014, 04:26:30 PM |
|
Darksend Demonstration by EduffieldI think many critics of Darkcoin have very little understanding of how Darksend works and why it is better than cryptonote or ZeroKnowledge. This post from Evan from darkcointalk summarizes it very well and demonstrates Darksend for newcomers, please bump every few pages. Good post, bump. I was reading http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/quest-for-quantum-computers-heats-up/ and it reminded me to bump. well in general quantum computers will change almost everything in IT.. all the current encryptions will be worthless, so considering this scenario we would have to talk about something else |
|
|
|
|
oblox
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1442
Merit: 1018
|
|
December 06, 2014, 04:40:58 PM |
|
Quantum/Super computers wouldn't do a damn thing to Darkcoin's anonymity through obscurity because there are too many viable funding sources at 8 rounds that it wouldn't be without reasonable doubt. Unless you can absolutely prove that address A sent payment to address Z, you haven't proved anything. That's the benefit of off-chain mixing. Coins that do on-chain privacy where the linkage is unknown due to encryption are the ones that are at risk should a quant/super-computer decrypt the cryptography behind it. Having said that, there would be far larger problems at stake if there were computers out there capable of breaking cryptography used in cryptocurrencies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drobek
|
|
December 06, 2014, 04:59:02 PM |
|
Forum Mining, Marinecoin Rewards Forum Content creators and people who reply to forum posts.
10.000 MTC (TEN THOUSAND MARINECOIN REWARD for the first 10.000 posts)
1 MTC PER FORUM POST OR REPLYDiscuss Darkcoin or any crypto coin under Alternate Cryptocurrencies Categoryto register to our fresh forum click below image. Valid Marinecoin Wallet address required to receive payouts. All users paid by the total number of content they created, spamming trash content will be deleted, payouts when 10.000th post or reply action is reached. Enjoy.
Judging by the activity on the forum this is undoubtly a very popular website  |
|
|
|
|
|
superplus
|
|
December 06, 2014, 05:31:51 PM |
|
Quantum/Super computers wouldn't do a damn thing to Darkcoin's anonymity through obscurity because there are too many viable funding sources at 8 rounds that it wouldn't be without reasonable doubt. Unless you can absolutely prove that address A sent payment to address Z, you haven't proved anything. That's the benefit of off-chain mixing. Coins that do on-chain privacy where the linkage is unknown due to encryption are the ones that are at risk should a quant/super-computer decrypt the cryptography behind it. Having said that, there would be far larger problems at stake if there were computers out there capable of breaking cryptography used in cryptocurrencies.
if you got the privatekey, you can determine all the wallets transactions.. with quantum calculations you could evaluate everybodys privatekey instantly, so it obviously won't be anonymous then.. irrespective of that, btc as we know it today would be dead anyway |
|
|
|
|
oblox
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1442
Merit: 1018
|
|
December 06, 2014, 05:39:05 PM |
|
The .21 version of darkcoind seems to break p2pool node.
Can someone check please ?
I am downgrading to .20 till it's solved.
the message in debug.log is
2014-12-06 17:33:12 partner 127.0.0.1:56198 using obsolete version 70043; disconnecting
2014-12-06 17:33:12 ProcessMessage(version, 107 bytes) FAILED
2014-12-06 17:33:12 disconnecting node 127.0.0.1:56198
Might be that p2pool code needs to be updated ?
Protocol bump: https://darkcointalk.org/threads/onyx-v3-10-17.3141/page-3#post-32442 |
|
|
|
|
|
thefrog
|
|
December 06, 2014, 05:48:08 PM |
|
The .21 version of darkcoind seems to break p2pool node.
Can someone check please ?
I am downgrading to .20 till it's solved.
the message in debug.log is
2014-12-06 17:33:12 partner 127.0.0.1:56198 using obsolete version 70043; disconnecting
2014-12-06 17:33:12 ProcessMessage(version, 107 bytes) FAILED
2014-12-06 17:33:12 disconnecting node 127.0.0.1:56198
Might be that p2pool code needs to be updated ?
Protocol bump: https://darkcointalk.org/threads/onyx-v3-10-17.3141/page-3#post-32442Thank you, solved the 'problem'. Thought it will be something like this simple, but did not investigate myself  Both nodes up and running. |
|
|
|
|
defunctec
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 06, 2014, 05:50:18 PM |
|
Talk about a smooth update  |
|
|
|
|
eduffield (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1036
Dash Developer
|
|
December 06, 2014, 06:02:47 PM |
|
Quantum/Super computers wouldn't do a damn thing to Darkcoin's anonymity through obscurity because there are too many viable funding sources at 8 rounds that it wouldn't be without reasonable doubt. Unless you can absolutely prove that address A sent payment to address Z, you haven't proved anything. That's the benefit of off-chain mixing. Coins that do on-chain privacy where the linkage is unknown due to encryption are the ones that are at risk should a quant/super-computer decrypt the cryptography behind it. Having said that, there would be far larger problems at stake if there were computers out there capable of breaking cryptography used in cryptocurrencies.
if you got the privatekey, you can determine all the wallets transactions.. with quantum calculations you could evaluate everybodys privatekey instantly, so it obviously won't be anonymous then.. irrespective of that, btc as we know it today would be dead anyway Actually, from the reading I've done that doesn't appear to be true. They need you to sign the private key at least once to be able to factor it. It's explained really well here: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Myths#Quantum_computers_would_break_Bitcoin.27s_securityBitcoin and Darkcoin would both work fine in that situation. You would simply store money in a brand new address after every transaction and completely empty out the old ones. It would mean Darkcoin would actually remain anonymous and it would still be completely functional. Edit: found a better link |
Dash - Digital Cash | dash.org | dashfoundation.io | dashgo.io
|
|
|
GNULinuxGuy
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
|
|
December 06, 2014, 06:06:11 PM |
|
Darksend Demonstration by EduffieldI think many critics of Darkcoin have very little understanding of how Darksend works and why it is better than cryptonote or ZeroKnowledge. This post from Evan from darkcointalk summarizes it very well and demonstrates Darksend for newcomers, please bump every few pages. Good post, bump. I was reading http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/quest-for-quantum-computers-heats-up/ and it reminded me to bump. well in general quantum computers will change almost everything in IT.. all the current encryptions will be worthless, so considering this scenario we would have to talk about something else A proper quantum computer would impact traditional asymmetric encryption algorithms. It would have little or no impact on symmetric algorithms. There are already alternative asymmetric algorithms, but they have significantly higher overhead. It's not even clear that quantum computers can scale to the level required for amazing things like breaking traditional public key systems. Although in my opinion it's just a question of time, so it would be best to continue to assume the worst (eg, the Bitcoin protocol cold storage design). |
|
|
|
|
TaoOfSaatoshi
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1014
Dash Nation Founder | CATV Host
|
|
December 06, 2014, 06:18:16 PM |
|
119 votes so far, 65 more to pass DOGE as the number 1 most popular idea! Please vote if you haven't yet, and comment if you can! |
|
|
|
Dave5
Member
Offline
Activity: 109
Merit: 10
|
|
December 06, 2014, 06:23:15 PM |
|
119 votes so far, 65 more to pass DOGE as the number 1 most popular idea! Please vote if you haven't yet, and comment if you can! Just voted and added comment! |
|
|
|
DirectBet
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1010
|
|
December 06, 2014, 06:30:02 PM |
|
DirectBet has been nominated for the Bitcoin gambling awards 2014. If we're your choice when it comes to betting with Darkcoins on sports, horse racing, dice and poker, please show your support and vote for us. Thank you. Vote for DirectBet, they are great supporters of DRK, may they become the biggest gaming site on crypto one day. Lets show some reciprocity. Thank you. We greatly appreciate your support |
|
|
|
|
kadrek
|
|
December 06, 2014, 06:48:49 PM |
|
I'm I just updated to .21 and when I grep my IP I get a :1 but up above someone said that this is a protocol update. Does this mean that a masternode start is required in the cold wallet? Also, how often does drk.mn update? It's still showing mine as .19.
|
SWIPE │ │ │ Monetizing mobile engagement data, on the blockchain [ SWIPE . WHITEPAPER ] TELEGRAM TWITTER MEDIUM REDDIT |
|
|
TaoOfSaatoshi
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1014
Dash Nation Founder | CATV Host
|
|
December 06, 2014, 06:51:00 PM |
|
I'm I just updated to .21 and when I grep my IP I get a :1 but up above someone said that this is a protocol update. Does this mean that a masternode start is required in the cold wallet? Also, how often does drk.mn update? It's still showing mine as .19.
It's NOT a protocol update. A local wallet restart is not needed. |
|
|
|
TaoOfSaatoshi
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1014
Dash Nation Founder | CATV Host
|
|
December 06, 2014, 06:52:22 PM |
|
Update: This idea is now "Under Review"! Keep those votes coming! |
|
|
|
|
kadrek
|
|
December 06, 2014, 06:54:34 PM |
|
I'm I just updated to .21 and when I grep my IP I get a :1 but up above someone said that this is a protocol update. Does this mean that a masternode start is required in the cold wallet? Also, how often does drk.mn update? It's still showing mine as .19.
It's NOT a protocol update. A local wallet restart is not needed. Okay, thanks! |
SWIPE │ │ │ Monetizing mobile engagement data, on the blockchain [ SWIPE . WHITEPAPER ] TELEGRAM TWITTER MEDIUM REDDIT |
|
|
GilAlexander
Member
Offline
Activity: 68
Merit: 10
|
|
December 06, 2014, 07:23:51 PM |
|
Also, how often does drk.mn update?
There's a timer right after port state. |
|
|
|
|
oblox
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1442
Merit: 1018
|
|
December 06, 2014, 07:31:53 PM |
|
I'm I just updated to .21 and when I grep my IP I get a :1 but up above someone said that this is a protocol update. Does this mean that a masternode start is required in the cold wallet? Also, how often does drk.mn update? It's still showing mine as .19.
It's a protocol update from 10.16.16 to 10.17.19. From 19 to 21, it's the same. |
|
|
|
|
|
innergy
|
|
December 06, 2014, 07:49:59 PM |
|
...
in target of shortcut :
D:\DarkcoinMN\darkcoin-qt.exe -datadir=D:\DarkcoinMNData -wallet=XXXX
Blockchain will be in specific location on different drive (D drive in this case) using commandline -datadir
wallet.dat needs to be renamed as XXXX to work..
Yes, someone can start his multiple masternodes with different shortcuts Shortcut1 target - C:\Users\Administrator\Desktop\darkcoin-qt.exe -datadir=D:\Darkcoin -conf=mn1.conf -wallet=mn1.dat Shortcut2 target - C:\Users\Administrator\Desktop\darkcoin-qt.exe -datadir=D:\Darkcoin -conf=mn2.conf -wallet=mn2.dat Shortcut3 target - C:\Users\Administrator\Desktop\darkcoin-qt.exe -datadir=D:\Darkcoin -conf=mn3.conf -wallet=mn3.dat ... Where mn1, mn2, mn3.dat.. are the masternode wallets and mn1, mn2, mn3.conf are their config files. |
|
|
|
|
|
