johnsans
|
|
May 01, 2014, 02:48:50 PM |
|
xp system and i got 4 times shut down abnormally。 first time when i send coin to another address with no mining second time ------ send coins and mining at the same time third time -------- mining then client shut down suddenly fourth time ----- when i get free coin
if necessary ,i can send the log file....
|
|
|
|
Fonzarelli
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
|
|
May 01, 2014, 02:56:29 PM |
|
just found a bug that possibly is related to your issues: If someone initiated more than one transfer within the same block then only one of them will be displayed in the blockexplorer search and - that is more important - the calculation of an addresses' balance will be wrong then as well [=counting in only one tx per block](!). We target V0.59 with minor improvements and bug fixes to be available shortly in around 24h. So I guess in your case, Fonzarelli, your local client accepts the transfer since balance is OK, but the net does not accept it since calculation of that addresses' balance is not right. You should be able to send a value <=10789.6 EXO but nothing more. Sorry for the inconveniences but I am glad to found this bug so fast. Repost - Potential Bug
OK... the transaction I sent from EXOdfsN5u5WPB4BNsswrdp21tkuyE3mWHpCmdbme to EXOdfsN5u5WPB4BNsswrdp21tkuyE3mWHpCmdbme for 5555.55 EXO appears in my transactions but NOT under the transactions when you put the recipient's address in the Block Explorer.
That's the same issue. Bug fix is easy (simply use continue instead of break in 3 lines) and will surely be available in 0.59#edit: partially wrong.. only targetAddress has been calculated wrongly - sender's addresses always calculated correctly regards eXocoin #edit: Solved in v0.59 (release tomorrow). Your 5555.55 appears now on both sides andFonzarelli's balance calculated to a sum of 20122.9 EXO - so this was not an issue within the chain itselfSounds good do me...
|
|
|
|
lovelyrice
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
May 01, 2014, 03:07:45 PM |
|
the new beta seems ok.one step closer to launch
|
|
|
|
ATC
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 49
Merit: 0
|
|
May 01, 2014, 03:27:03 PM |
|
just found a bug that possibly is related to your issues: If someone initiated more than one transfer within the same block then only one of them will be displayed in the blockexplorer search and - that is more important - the calculation of an addresses' balance will be wrong then as well [=counting in only one tx per block](!). We target V0.59 with minor improvements and bug fixes to be available shortly in around 24h. So I guess in your case, Fonzarelli, your local client accepts the transfer since balance is OK, but the net does not accept it since calculation of that addresses' balance is not right. You should be able to send a value <=10789.6 EXO but nothing more. Sorry for the inconveniences but I am glad to found this bug so fast. Repost - Potential Bug
OK... the transaction I sent from EXOdfsN5u5WPB4BNsswrdp21tkuyE3mWHpCmdbme to EXOdfsN5u5WPB4BNsswrdp21tkuyE3mWHpCmdbme for 5555.55 EXO appears in my transactions but NOT under the transactions when you put the recipient's address in the Block Explorer.
That's the same issue. Bug fix is easy (simply use continue instead of break in 3 lines) and will surely be available in 0.59#edit: partially wrong.. only targetAddress has been calculated wrongly - sender's addresses always calculated correctly regards eXocoin #edit: Solved in v0.59 (release tomorrow). Your 5555.55 appears now on both sides andFonzarelli's balance calculated to a sum of 20122.9 EXO - so this was not an issue within the chain itselfI generated 3 * 10000 coins and then sent 3 * 8888.88 coins out in several minutes, and I think those operations in one block.
|
|
|
|
msin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1004
|
|
May 01, 2014, 04:17:45 PM |
|
Can people post their Exo addresses? Need to test transactions, etc..
|
|
|
|
mr smith
|
|
May 01, 2014, 04:19:11 PM |
|
|
New Economy Movement Philosophy of Solidarity and Egalitarianism
|
|
|
alicex
|
|
May 01, 2014, 04:22:23 PM |
|
exo gonna be a great project , with a nice dev , that's really to the moon......
|
|
|
|
WarrenP
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
PHqpBmGrA3V6GqzmyQWEaQTjCMDGfSDbcn
|
|
May 01, 2014, 04:56:42 PM |
|
Looking forward to test the new version! An advice from an old c++ coder: bugfix: double-round function was not accurate enough for one comparision
Don't use floating point in a financial application! Nasty round and compare bugs ahead! Use a long or longlong and do integer division to get to the decimals. Yes that might be a good idea;-) Right now it will round it to 12 decimals accuracy and is working as well.... but we will consider changing that. Make that priority, please. Before the release date. Floating points should not be used in financial applications. +1 Make it priority! Only integer in finance. BTW, anyone with address in the recent posts will get 8888.88 exo. Coin is looking good peeps. Btw... my address is in my signature I like seeing the stuff in the window showing communication etc...
|
|
|
|
DishCatcher
Member
Offline
Activity: 117
Merit: 10
|
|
May 01, 2014, 05:21:12 PM |
|
Looking forward to test the new version! An advice from an old c++ coder: bugfix: double-round function was not accurate enough for one comparision
Don't use floating point in a financial application! Nasty round and compare bugs ahead! Use a long or longlong and do integer division to get to the decimals. Yes that might be a good idea;-) Right now it will round it to 12 decimals accuracy and is working as well.... but we will consider changing that. Make that priority, please. Before the release date. Floating points should not be used in financial applications. +1 Make it priority! Only integer in finance. BTW, anyone with address in the recent posts will get 8888.88 exo. Coin is looking good peeps. Btw... my address is in my signature I like seeing the stuff in the window showing communication etc... i cant see the last line of ur sig.
|
|
|
|
WarrenP
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
PHqpBmGrA3V6GqzmyQWEaQTjCMDGfSDbcn
|
|
May 01, 2014, 05:22:25 PM |
|
Coin is looking good peeps. Btw... my address is in my signature I like seeing the stuff in the window showing communication etc... i cant see the last line of ur sig. Fixed
|
|
|
|
CryptKeeper
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1055
|
|
May 01, 2014, 05:26:54 PM |
|
Are you planning to enable Copy (right-click) for the transaction hashes in the Block Explorer like for eXo addresses in Transactions & Wallet?
Good idea. Going to implement that. Going to deliver a small update with the bugfix, colored amounts and display of balance sum in blockexplorer->search for EXO address in ~1 or 2 hours please replace your coin.exe with: downloadit has internally the same number (0.58). Our nodes have not been updated yet, so correct calculations can only be expected thereafter (~1-2 hours again from now). Download of beta_release_v0.58.7z is painfully slow! Could you mirror it somewhere else please.
|
Follow me on twitter! I'm a private Bitcoin and altcoin hodler. Giving away crypto for free on my Twitter feed!
|
|
|
eXo_coin (OP)
|
|
May 01, 2014, 06:34:33 PM |
|
Bug Report
I have 18519.1 EXO balance showing in Block Explorer... but 18518.60 EXO in Wallet.
Could it be that you have initiated in total 5 transactions so far? It seems that the 0.1 EXO fee * 5 are not in the calculation.. Checking that #edit: fixed in the next version
|
|
|
|
luckygenough56
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1012
|
|
May 01, 2014, 06:49:30 PM |
|
oh yeah downloading beta now, long time i wanted to try this one
|
|
|
|
eXo_coin (OP)
|
|
May 01, 2014, 07:03:11 PM |
|
#edit: fixed in the next version
Cool... only minor non-critical bugs so far... I wonder who mined the first 4 EXO... Unfortunately no one.... so lets wait for V0.59 tomorrow but system/all nodes still stable and in sync
|
|
|
|
Telmo
Member
Offline
Activity: 68
Merit: 10
|
|
May 01, 2014, 07:05:01 PM |
|
Ok! Send me some test EXOs, please.
EXOK6HS2YyhG4ftgTwaDBKKrYfndWNZucAYSdbdf
How to mine coins?
|
|
|
|
luckygenough56
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1012
|
|
May 01, 2014, 07:19:11 PM |
|
Beta is for cpu mining through wallet ?
|
|
|
|
mikesbmw
|
|
May 01, 2014, 08:15:35 PM |
|
If someone could sent me some test moolah I would be forever grateful! EXOOBa8NeFF616dsOpBx97E4b8gsOds8bYQwcmee
|
|
|
|
mikesbmw
|
|
May 01, 2014, 08:30:07 PM |
|
Bug reportSent 1234 from EXOOBa8NeFF616dsOpBx97E4b8gsOds8bYQwcmee to EXOwqyBhpSsAGMUxm5s7Uu7SGDwkk3fA5MyHdbhc, transaction was valid and appeared in the transactionlist, wallet was debited and the receiving wallet was credited. After a minute the transaction disappeared on both wallets and amounts were restored... Hmmm, just found out that you could apply for the mail give-away even if you had already bought at the 1st and 2nd round... Didn't know that, I didn't apply
|
|
|
|
eXo_coin (OP)
|
|
May 01, 2014, 08:38:55 PM |
|
Bug reportSent 1234 from EXOOBa8NeFF616dsOpBx97E4b8gsOds8bYQwcmee to EXOwqyBhpSsAGMUxm5s7Uu7SGDwkk3fA5MyHdbhc, transaction was valid and appeared in the transactionlist, wallet was debited and the receiving wallet was credited. After a minute the transaction disappeared on both wallets and amounts were restored... Hmmm, just found out that you could apply for the mail give-away even if you had already bought at the 1st and 2nd round... Didn't know that, I didn't apply Are you sure? Did you remade that transaction? I can see it in the chain with: TX65E44025AB764EEA03CA149981C8A8F624A73CDE1742CAB041565638A9076377 please check... is our client still in sync? You can try to delete the chain and see if it will appear again as well pm me with your mail and I'll add you
|
|
|
|
eXo_coin (OP)
|
|
May 01, 2014, 08:41:34 PM |
|
Hi! No multi-platform client? Windows only?
Linux is on our agenda as well (using mingw cross platform compiler and Qt - cross platform GUI framwork so everything is "ready" for linux) but we will not have that done until launch probably. Until then you can use WINE
|
|
|
|
|