Bitcoin Forum
May 11, 2024, 09:23:44 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 [254] 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [POOL][Scrypt][Scrypt-N][X11] Profit switching pool - wafflepool.com  (Read 465526 times)
suchmoon
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3654
Merit: 8922


https://bpip.org


View Profile WWW
June 30, 2014, 03:39:45 AM
 #5061

@nitrocs
Well when we find a block the reward will be nice Smiley only 2 miners to divvy it up Smiley

We have X13 configs for 280x and 7950 -> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=666252.msg7590653#msg7590653

Don't get too comfortable, I'm there too with my 750Ti's  Grin
1715462624
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1715462624

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1715462624
Reply with quote  #2

1715462624
Report to moderator
"Your bitcoin is secured in a way that is physically impossible for others to access, no matter for what reason, no matter how good the excuse, no matter a majority of miners, no matter what." -- Greg Maxwell
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
utahjohn
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 30, 2014, 03:46:24 AM
 #5062

Nice Smiley might find a block soon Smiley hashrate up Smiley
utahjohn
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 30, 2014, 04:45:55 AM
Last edit: June 30, 2014, 07:16:13 AM by utahjohn
 #5063

@PW
I'm seeing "untracked stratum share"  and "Accepted untracked stratum share" fairly regularly on X13.
Additionally the hashrate graph is showing an average 2.0Mhs quite a bit lower than I'm getting on my end 2.6Mhs.  I'm guessing those Accepted untracked stratum shares are being ignored at stratum end Sad and that's why my rates shown on waffle are low.

sgminer 4.1.0 - Started: [2014-06-29 22:55:23] - [0 days 00:12:37]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(5s):2.666M (avg):2.613Mh/s | A:32  R:1  HW:16  WU:0.021/m
ST: 0  SS: 0  NB: 19  LW: 803  GF: 0  RF: 0
Connected to uswest.wafflepool.com:3330 (stratum) diff 0.008 as user 1HANJQygp3j
Block: f5636d49...  Diff:109  Started: [23:07:38]  Best share: 0.063
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[P]ool management [G]PU management ettings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
 GPU 0:  62.0C 2418RPM | OFF   / 0.000h/s | A:0 R:  0.0% HW: 0 WU:0.000/m I:18
 GPU 1:  59.0C 2220RPM | 2.623M/2.623Mh/s | A:24 R:  4.0% HW:16 WU:0.021/m I:18
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[23:05:43] Accepted 71962ab3 Diff 0.009/0.008 GPU 1 at Pool 0
[23:05:44] Accepted untracked stratum share from Pool 0
[23:06:00] Stratum from Pool 0 detected new block
[23:06:09] Accepted untracked stratum share from Pool 0
[23:06:13] Stratum from Pool 0 detected new block
[23:06:41] Stratum from Pool 0 detected new block
[23:07:14] Stratum from Pool 0 detected new block
[23:07:17] Stratum from Pool 0 detected new block
[23:07:33] Accepted 61b26999 Diff 0.010/0.008 GPU 1 at Pool 0
[23:07:38] Stratum from Pool 0 detected new block
[23:07:41] Accepted untracked stratum share from Pool 0
[23:07:50] Accepted 187068a0 Diff 0.041/0.008 GPU 1 at Pool 0
[23:07:53] Accepted 6f0512ab Diff 0.009/0.008 GPU 1 at Pool 0

Just noticed the HW errors ... backing clock down a bit.

GPU 0 is off because I'm mining Maiacoin X15 with it in another instance of sgminer.

Still getting untracked stratum share after restart with lower clock and HW 0

Notice the missing S in settings LOL it always turns on strikeout grrrrrrr
utahjohn
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 30, 2014, 06:33:47 AM
 #5064

WooHoo! first block on X13 beta testing Smiley
madian
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 57
Merit: 0


View Profile
June 30, 2014, 06:51:47 AM
 #5065

+10.5 MHs added to x13, wouldn't want you guys to be lonely Smiley

3.45 MHs / 290 card, roughly 4x scrypt. Anyone else can confirm these numbers for their cards so that I know if my config is efficient?
vm_mpn
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 605
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 30, 2014, 07:45:22 AM
 #5066

So it looks like difficulty automatically resets to 0.010 on X13 instead of taking hardcoded password (0.16) ... Is this by design while it's still in Beta?

utahjohn
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 30, 2014, 07:47:28 AM
 #5067

X13 payout seems to be working Smiley I have some in X13 earned balance now Smiley
utahjohn
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 30, 2014, 07:49:09 AM
Last edit: June 30, 2014, 07:59:17 AM by utahjohn
 #5068

So it looks like difficulty automatically resets to 0.010 on X13 instead of taking hardcoded password (0.16) ... Is this by design while it's still in Beta?
pw fixed issue already
"pass" : "d=0.008"
works for me in pools section of config
vm_mpn
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 605
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 30, 2014, 07:55:05 AM
 #5069

So it looks like difficulty automatically resets to 0.010 on X13 instead of taking hardcoded password (0.16) ... Is this by design while it's still in Beta?
pw fixed issue already
"pass" : "d=0.008",
works for me in pools section of config

Hmm... Thanks John. Will give it a go.
utahjohn
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 30, 2014, 08:00:25 AM
 #5070

So it looks like difficulty automatically resets to 0.010 on X13 instead of taking hardcoded password (0.16) ... Is this by design while it's still in Beta?
pw fixed issue already
"pass" : "d=0.008",
works for me in pools section of config

Hmm... Thanks John. Will give it a go.
Dont put that comma in lol.
Basically use the same difficulty as you would for X11.  There's a table in the FAQ page.
vm_mpn
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 605
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 30, 2014, 08:47:05 AM
Last edit: June 30, 2014, 02:11:40 PM by vm_mpn
 #5071

So it looks like difficulty automatically resets to 0.010 on X13 instead of taking hardcoded password (0.16) ... Is this by design while it's still in Beta?
pw fixed issue already
"pass" : "d=0.008",
works for me in pools section of config

Hmm... Thanks John. Will give it a go.
Dont put that comma in lol.
Basically use the same difficulty as you would for X11.  There's a table in the FAQ page.

No dice 4me... Neither 0.08 nor 0.16 works... Pools automatically switch to difficulty 0.010 for some reason.
utahjohn
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 30, 2014, 09:04:19 AM
Last edit: June 30, 2014, 09:53:09 AM by utahjohn
 #5072

Just posted a optimized x13mod bin file for 7950 (and possibly 280x,290x and other 6xxx,7xxx)
compiled with sgminer 4.1.0 cat 14.6RC2 for those not wanting to upgrade to 14.6 RC2 at
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=666252.0
Please post in my thread if this works for you Smiley
atp1916
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 30, 2014, 10:08:55 AM
 #5073

Got 84 290s pointed at the x13 port, let's see what we get.
poolwaffle (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 254


View Profile
June 30, 2014, 03:08:23 PM
 #5074

So it looks like difficulty automatically resets to 0.010 on X13 instead of taking hardcoded password (0.16) ... Is this by design while it's still in Beta?
pw fixed issue already
"pass" : "d=0.008",
works for me in pools section of config

Hmm... Thanks John. Will give it a go.
Dont put that comma in lol.
Basically use the same difficulty as you would for X11.  There's a table in the FAQ page.

No dice 4me... Neither 0.08 nor 0.16 works... Pools automatically switch to difficulty 0.010 for some reason.

This is the same as all the other algorithms.  Our default is 0.01, and it will switch to whatever you passed for password on the first work change (coin switch or new block), typically about 30 seconds.
jedimstr
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 30, 2014, 03:21:40 PM
 #5075

Just posted a optimized x13mod bin file for 7950 (and possibly 280x,290x and other 6xxx,7xxx)
compiled with sgminer 4.1.0 cat 14.6RC2 for those not wanting to upgrade to 14.6 RC2 at
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=666252.0
Please post in my thread if this works for you Smiley

Baah... trying your bin for X13 and only getting around 2280KH or so at a total of 9.12MH for my 4x 7950's.  Same rig gets over 14MH on X11 with another modified bin.  

forcefedvr6
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 101
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 30, 2014, 04:56:59 PM
 #5076

Just posted a optimized x13mod bin file for 7950 (and possibly 280x,290x and other 6xxx,7xxx)
compiled with sgminer 4.1.0 cat 14.6RC2 for those not wanting to upgrade to 14.6 RC2 at
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=666252.0
Please post in my thread if this works for you Smiley

Baah... trying your bin for X13 and only getting around 2280KH or so at a total of 9.12MH for my 4x 7950's.  Same rig gets over 14MH on X11 with another modified bin.  

Not to butt in, but isn't that more or less normal?  I was expecting to see about 30% less hashrate on x13 vs. x11.   
jedimstr
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 30, 2014, 04:58:36 PM
 #5077

Just posted a optimized x13mod bin file for 7950 (and possibly 280x,290x and other 6xxx,7xxx)
compiled with sgminer 4.1.0 cat 14.6RC2 for those not wanting to upgrade to 14.6 RC2 at
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=666252.0
Please post in my thread if this works for you Smiley

Baah... trying your bin for X13 and only getting around 2280KH or so at a total of 9.12MH for my 4x 7950's.  Same rig gets over 14MH on X11 with another modified bin. 

Not to butt in, but isn't that more or less normal?  I was expecting to see about 30% less hashrate on x13 vs. x11.   

Maybe the numbers people were quoting on the linked thread skewed the perspective a bit... some people were getting 2600-2800 with 7950s and that bin file.

forcefedvr6
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 101
Merit: 10


View Profile
June 30, 2014, 05:13:52 PM
 #5078

Just posted a optimized x13mod bin file for 7950 (and possibly 280x,290x and other 6xxx,7xxx)
compiled with sgminer 4.1.0 cat 14.6RC2 for those not wanting to upgrade to 14.6 RC2 at
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=666252.0
Please post in my thread if this works for you Smiley

Baah... trying your bin for X13 and only getting around 2280KH or so at a total of 9.12MH for my 4x 7950's.  Same rig gets over 14MH on X11 with another modified bin. 

Not to butt in, but isn't that more or less normal?  I was expecting to see about 30% less hashrate on x13 vs. x11.   

Maybe the numbers people were quoting on the linked thread skewed the perspective a bit... some people were getting 2600-2800 with 7950s and that bin file.

I'm seeing just under 2.7 Mh/s per 7950, my config & setup is posted over there. You probably have a little headroom somewhere. 
utahjohn
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630
Merit: 500


View Profile
June 30, 2014, 05:47:22 PM
 #5079

Quote
Baah... trying your bin for X13 and only getting around 2280KH or so at a total of 9.12MH for my 4x 7950's.  Same rig gets over 14MH on X11 with another modified bin.  
You are comparing apples to oranges LOL.  X11 and X13 are different algo.  X13 is a bit slower than X11.
You have not posted what your configs are, what sgminer version, what catalyst version.
This makes it hard to take any credence from your post.  Many successes with the bin and postings in the testing thread.
jedimstr
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 1000



View Profile
June 30, 2014, 06:29:03 PM
 #5080

Quote
Baah... trying your bin for X13 and only getting around 2280KH or so at a total of 9.12MH for my 4x 7950's.  Same rig gets over 14MH on X11 with another modified bin.  
You are comparing apples to oranges LOL.  X11 and X13 are different algo.  X13 is a bit slower than X11.
You have not posted what your configs are, what sgminer version, what catalyst version.
This makes it hard to take any credence from your post.  Many successes with the bin and postings in the testing thread.

No, I understand X13 would get less than X11.  My point being that others are reporting between 2600-2800KHs with your bin and their 7950's and I'm hovering around 2260-2300KHs, so was just looking for some tips/advise.  Used most of my settings from my X11 setup, but tweaked a bit here and there to eek out a bit more.

My 4x 7950's are MSI TF IIIs.
Using PiMP 1.5.5-amd-13.12 (the 13.12 AMD drivers may be the problem here, but I thought the Linux 14.x series drivers weren't good for old cards like the 7950's)
SGMiner 4.1.0, X13mod and your bin
Conf File (minus pool info):
Code:
{
"pools" : [
{
POOL INFO STRIPPED
}
]
,
"auto-fan" : false,
"intensity" : "21",
"vectors" : "1",
"worksize" : "256",
"lookup-gap" : "2",
"thread-concurrency" : "8192",
"shaders" : "0",
"api-listen" : true,
"api-port" : "4028",
"api-allow" : "W:127.0.0.1,W:0\/0",
"gpu-threads" : "2",
"gpu-dyninterval" : "7",
"gpu-platform" : "0",
"gpu-engine" : "1110,1090,1130,1080",
"gpu-memclock" : "1250",
"gpu-powertune" : "20",
"gpu-vddc" : "0.00",
"gpu-fan" : "100,100,100,100",
"temp-hysteresis" : "3",
"temp-cutoff" : "95",
"temp-overheat" : "90",
"temp-target" : "80",
"log" : "5",
"no-pool-disable" : true,
"queue" : "0",
"expiry" : "1",
"scan-time" : "1",
"shares" : "0",
"kernel-path" : "/usr/local/bin",
"kernel" : "x13mod"
}


I tried 4 GPU threads, alternative Shaders settings (though I thought with TC you don't need shaders), different Engine and Memory settings...but so far they all had a negative effect versus what I have above (HW Errors, GPU's going SICK, or just plain lower hashrate).

And to bring this back to relevency for this thread.. yes, I'm trying out the X13 beta on Wafflepool.

Pages: « 1 ... 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 [254] 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!