Bitcoin Forum
April 24, 2019, 09:06:51 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.17.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 [291] 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][RIC] Riecoin: constellations POW *CPU* HARD FORK successful, world record  (Read 660356 times)
czakris
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 10, 2018, 09:24:42 AM
 #5801

The miner is working for RiePool and XPoolX. However, there is a bug that produces many duplicate shares for powerful CPUs. This problem is present if many threads are used, but seems to disappear if mining with just 4 threads or less (and it seems possible to launch 4 instances using 4 threads for a 16 threads CPU without issue). I will investigate this.
AFAIR it can be something similar to that issue when you try to generate random numbers using loop having only one variable to store them you will get same numbers changing every second. Every CPU thread needs unique variable. I think to fix this you need to declare as many variables as possible at the very beginning of your code and then limit them to what you need.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1556140011
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1556140011

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1556140011
Reply with quote  #2

1556140011
Report to moderator
1556140011
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1556140011

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1556140011
Reply with quote  #2

1556140011
Report to moderator
1556140011
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1556140011

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1556140011
Reply with quote  #2

1556140011
Report to moderator
PttnMe
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 66
Merit: 2

rieMiner (Riecoin miner) developer


View Profile
September 10, 2018, 09:50:47 AM
Last edit: September 10, 2018, 12:55:49 PM by PttnMe
 #5802

The test units have not been updated and won't compile. To eliminate the errors you need to re-configure.

./configure --disable-tests
make

I'm not sure why it didn't work on debian sid. My plan for this week is to install ubuntu 18.04 and try to build for windows. I'll see if I get a similar error.

Oh, sorry, I missed this part of your text. So I was able to compile your wallet after disabling the testing part on Debian 9 stable, and execute it on Debian 9 Sid. It is so great to run this version of Riecoin, you did a fantastic job, and I wish you good luck for the bounties! I am also using libdb 5.3.

I am currently syncing. This is really slow for a network with very few transactions, but this seems more a CPU bottleneck than a network one, as one core is used at 100% during sync.
Do you think that the POW validation could be optimized like the miner was, in order to sync much faster?

PttnMe, can you tell me what version of OpenSSL you are using on Debian 9 (Sid)? I'm using 1.02g. Were all your errors related to bignum on Debian 9 Sid?

Bitcoin has completely removed bignum and replaced it with a custom class (arith_uint256). I used this whenever possible but couldn't use it for the prime validation code. My first thought was to use GMP, but I ended up staying with bignum so I could use the exact same validation code as in the original. I'm a little concerned now that we might have compatibility problems later on if we stick with bignum. Does anyone have any thoughts on this?

apt-cache policy gives for respectively Sid and Stretch :

Code:
openssl: Installed: 1.1.1~~pre9-1
libssl-dev: Installed: 1.1.1~~pre9-1

openssl: Installed: 1.1.0f-3+deb9u2
libssl1.0-dev: Installed: 1.0.2l-2+deb9u3

Note: I installed libssl-dev instead for Stretch (version 1.1.0f-3+deb9u3) and got Bignum errors as well.
I think that installing libssl1.0-dev in Sid will fix the problem.

I only got Bignum errors. Here is a pastebin of the errors that I got.

The miner currently uses GMP, so you might consider using it as well in the wallet and remove the Bignum usage like the Bitcoin devs did.
It should be Ok as long as the proof of work is mathematically the same: checking if n, n + 4, n + 6, n + 10, n + 12, and n + 16 are prime using Rabin-Miller primality tests (with 40 iterations if I remember correctly).
You could even take this opportunity to optimize the POW validation to speed up the syncing as I said, if possible.

Until segwit is enabled you must run with addresstype=legacy in your riecoin.conf file. Without this segwit addresses will be used. I believe the transactions will be accepted but you won't be able to spend them until segwit is enabled. When generating an address, make sure it starts with 'R' (or 'r' on testnet) and not '3' (or '2' on testnet).

Do you plan to fully support the "3"/"bc1" addresses for Riecoin, and change the prefixes (I would suggest "3" -> "T" (2nd letter after R) and "bc1" -> "bcR" (1 became R for legacy addresses))?
The closer we are to the Bitcoin features support, the easier we will be able catch up its future updates, and there will be better compatibility for exchanges listing and other services.

The binaries are over 100 MB so they can't be placed on github. Maybe we can put them on the community site.

IGJ will certainly gladly upload the binaries on his website.

The miner is working for RiePool and XPoolX. However, there is a bug that produces many duplicate shares for powerful CPUs. This problem is present if many threads are used, but seems to disappear if mining with just 4 threads or less (and it seems possible to launch 4 instances using 4 threads for a 16 threads CPU without issue). I will investigate this.
AFAIR it can be something similar to that issue when you try to generate random numbers using loop having only one variable to store them you will get same numbers changing every second. Every CPU thread needs unique variable. I think to fix this you need to declare as many variables as possible at the very beginning of your code and then limit them to what you need.

I was thinking in this direction as well and might have found a solution.

Edit: this problem was fixed and will be commited soon.

rieMiner (https://github.com/Pttn/rieMiner) - Riecoin solo + pooled miner
military_force
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 59
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 10, 2018, 12:57:37 PM
 #5803

Your project sounds good, it looks very interesting and promising and your team work was so impressive. I hope it will be a great project in the future so keep it up guys and all the best for your bright future. Smiley
clo1
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 34
Merit: 1


View Profile
September 10, 2018, 01:56:26 PM
 #5804


I am currently syncing. This is really slow for a network with very few transactions, but this seems more a CPU bottleneck than a network one, as one core is used at 100% during sync.
Do you think that the POW validation could be optimized like the miner was, in order to sync much faster?


It took me a little over a day to sync which was a big improvement over the 5 days it took me on the original code. I think the speed improvement comes because the proof of work is only checked on 20% of blocks if the block is older than the latest checkpoint. The last checkpoint is now almost 4 years old in the original code. One possibility would be to only check each prime a single time instead of multiple times if the block is older than the latest checkpoint. In either case we should regularly add checkpoints.

I think the miner improvement comes from needing to check fewer primes, not from speeding up the checks themselves.


Do you plan to fully support the "3"/"bc1" addresses for Riecoin, and change the prefixes (I would suggest "3" -> "T" (2nd letter after R) and "bc1" -> "bcR" (1 became R for legacy addresses))?
The closer we are to the Bitcoin features support, the easier we will be able catch up its future updates, and there will be better compatibility for exchanges listing and other services.


I haven't taken anything out so if it is in Bitcoin it should be in the new code. The '3' and '2' come from the SCRIPT_ADDRESS that gatra set.
PttnMe
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 66
Merit: 2

rieMiner (Riecoin miner) developer


View Profile
September 10, 2018, 05:25:45 PM
Last edit: September 11, 2018, 08:06:07 AM by PttnMe
 #5805

The duplicate shares problem is now fixed and rieMiner seems now be usable for pooled mining. Miners, please try rieMiner and give some feedbacks.

And lucky you XPoolX, I even found a block during testing...

I haven't taken anything out so if it is in Bitcoin it should be in the new code. The '3' and '2' come from the SCRIPT_ADDRESS that gatra set.

I did not know that these "3" addresses already existed in 2014. But in this case, we should change the prefixes anyway to avoid confusion with Bitcoin "3" and "bc1" addresses.

Edit: I finished syncing and tested quickly rieMiner with your wallet via GetBlockTemplate. Unfortunately, I am getting "CheckProofOfWork() : not valid pow" messages in Testnet when finding blocks, but the miner seems to be able to extract correctly the mining information (else, it would not mine anything, yet it is actually working and finding/submitting things).

The GetBlockTemplate command in 0.16 seems to give the same results for the needed fields (previousblockhash, coinbasevalue, bits,...), so I think that the miner should still have been compatible without any changes. The version changed, but submissions are still rejected if I hard change it to 2. Can you see in your side what might have changed when the wallet receives proof of work?

rieMiner (https://github.com/Pttn/rieMiner) - Riecoin solo + pooled miner
IGJ
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 29
Merit: 2


View Profile
September 10, 2018, 05:39:29 PM
Last edit: September 10, 2018, 05:52:35 PM by IGJ
 #5806

Hello guys

Very good work clo1 !!! And to you pttn !

I wrote few words in community board about openssl 1.1 and created a patch for 16.0 you can check there in developers corner.

For faster sync I don't think is good idea to easier the miller-rabin test, we should keep it as close to 10.2 as possible, because this may lead to forks. miller-rabin is probabilistic test, so some nodes may accept the prime the others may reject, as many test is done more sure is, it will be accept by all.

GMPlib have high optimized miller-rabin test as far as I know, and I believe it will be faster than openssl, but strong tests will be needed to see if openssl and gmplib will give same result for all blocks we have by now.
cryptapus
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 608
Merit: 500



View Profile WWW
September 10, 2018, 06:13:57 PM
 #5807

I've posted my code on github.
https://github.com/clo-prime/riecoin-0.16

...


Greetings clo1,

Thanks for posting your code. I've skimmed it and would like to assist if possible (I can perhaps help with gitian, builds, and tests). In the interest of more easily auditing/maintenance would it be possible to add your commits on top of the latest 0.16 code from upstream, preserving the git history? Also, it might be easier to not unnecessarily rename files to ease future merges.

For instance, I've created a new github organization:

https://github.com/riecointeam/riecoin

If you put your changes on the master branch it might make things more clear. (Or gatra can update riecoin/riecoin.git master to 0.16, whatever.)

FWIW, I don't have an interest in taking a share of your rightly deserved bounty.

Nice work!

website | PGP fingerprint: 692C 0756 E57D 2FA1 7601 3729 010B 717F 231C E7AA | BTC Address: 1CrYPTB1o7QWc8hXqBMP2LtAJh1VMtTFBh
R3D5H1RT
Copper Member
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 65
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
September 10, 2018, 06:29:24 PM
 #5808

I love CPU only coins!
Pon13
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 571
Merit: 123



View Profile WWW
September 11, 2018, 09:10:37 AM
Last edit: September 11, 2018, 10:38:41 AM by Pon13
 #5809

rieMiner 0.9α3 (2018-09-09) - Stratum support added Cheesy ! You can now solo + pool mine (although Stratum support is still experimental)

Testing, feedbacks, or even contributions are welcome to fix remaining bugs and improve the miner.

The miner is working for RiePool and XPoolX. However, there is a bug that produces many duplicate shares for powerful CPUs. This problem is present if many threads are used, but seems to disappear if mining with just 4 threads or less (and it seems possible to launch 4 instances using 4 threads for a 16 threads CPU without issue). I will investigate this.

I do not have an uBlock.it account, so I was not able to test for this pool.

Pools owners are also invited to test the miner and make suggestions or contributions.

rieMiner's GitHub repository, issues
rieMiner's thread on Riecoin-Community.com forum

hi man !
just to inform you that i compiled a x64 windows version of your miner and it works perfectly in ublock.it as well !
https://imgur.com/a/tk0pfeO
https://imgur.com/a/RXjqDBj
* mine.ublock.it = mine.blockocean.com

Many thanks for your work !!

EDIT: Since compiling stuff is not my area of expertise (its been a loooong time from uni), i'd like to ask if there is a way to export the needed .dll in/from MinGW in order to have a stand alone version running straight from windows?

xpoolx
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 203
Merit: 101


View Profile
September 11, 2018, 12:24:41 PM
 #5810

Whoah! nice changes this week on riecoin.

let's see if gatra aproves the new wallet to start working on the pool implementation for it.

And thanks a lot Prtnme for the new miner. Im going to test it right now
clo1
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 34
Merit: 1


View Profile
September 12, 2018, 02:17:00 AM
 #5811


Edit: I finished syncing and tested quickly rieMiner with your wallet via GetBlockTemplate. Unfortunately, I am getting "CheckProofOfWork() : not valid pow" messages in Testnet when finding blocks, but the miner seems to be able to extract correctly the mining information (else, it would not mine anything, yet it is actually working and finding/submitting things).

The GetBlockTemplate command in 0.16 seems to give the same results for the needed fields (previousblockhash, coinbasevalue, bits,...), so I think that the miner should still have been compatible without any changes. The version changed, but submissions are still rejected if I hard change it to 2. Can you see in your side what might have changed when the wallet receives proof of work?

I think the GetBlockTemplate problem (actually it was submitblock) is fixed.
clo1
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 34
Merit: 1


View Profile
September 13, 2018, 04:10:44 PM
 #5812

I've posted my code on github.
https://github.com/clo-prime/riecoin-0.16

...


Greetings clo1,

Thanks for posting your code. I've skimmed it and would like to assist if possible (I can perhaps help with gitian, builds, and tests). In the interest of more easily auditing/maintenance would it be possible to add your commits on top of the latest 0.16 code from upstream, preserving the git history? Also, it might be easier to not unnecessarily rename files to ease future merges.

For instance, I've created a new github organization:

https://github.com/riecointeam/riecoin

If you put your changes on the master branch it might make things more clear. (Or gatra can update riecoin/riecoin.git master to 0.16, whatever.)

FWIW, I don't have an interest in taking a share of your rightly deserved bounty.

Nice work!

Help in these areas would be great.

Just to be clear, is the code you listed the latest bitcoin 0.16 code? I can add my code to this, but I want to check a couple more things before I start.

Most of the filenames I changed were also changed in the original code ... images, riecoind, riecoin-cli, a few others. I might have changed a couple extra in the qt code (bitcoingui.cpp -> riecoingui.cpp).

Similarly, a lot of the changes are text substitutions of bitcoin for riecoin. This was true in the original code and given how much the code has grown since then is worse now. It would be easy for me to do a separate commit of all the text substitutions so that the main riecoin changes are more obvious.

My approach was to change all filenames and all text (except copyrights and a couple others). Let me know if this is a problem. Changing some, but not others will make things more difficult.

I'm not sure if I will get the bounty but if I do I plan to share a portion with others contributing to Riecoin.
cryptapus
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 608
Merit: 500



View Profile WWW
September 13, 2018, 05:34:33 PM
 #5813


...

Just to be clear, is the code you listed the latest bitcoin 0.16 code? I can add my code to this, but I want to check a couple more things before I start.

Most of the filenames I changed were also changed in the original code ... images, riecoind, riecoin-cli, a few others. I might have changed a couple extra in the qt code (bitcoingui.cpp -> riecoingui.cpp).

Similarly, a lot of the changes are text substitutions of bitcoin for riecoin. This was true in the original code and given how much the code has grown since then is worse now. It would be easy for me to do a separate commit of all the text substitutions so that the main riecoin changes are more obvious.

My approach was to change all filenames and all text (except copyrights and a couple others). Let me know if this is a problem. Changing some, but not others will make things more difficult.

I'm not sure if I will get the bounty but if I do I plan to share a portion with others contributing to Riecoin.


Yes, https://github.com/riecointeam/riecoin master branch should be even with upstream bitcoin 0.16 branch (now v0.16.2).

Here is a great repo that nzsquirrell put together on minimal changes necessary that I find quite good. It's for 0.14 but is very close to 0.16:

https://github.com/nzsquirrell/testcoin14/commits/master

especially this commit:

https://github.com/nzsquirrell/testcoin14/commit/3a2665eb070ed901ed28722e345ad61d75027d4c

There are surprisingly few name changes that need to be made, most of the missing ones from the above commit are in src/rpc for the rpc calls. We can always knock those out once the core logic is in place.


website | PGP fingerprint: 692C 0756 E57D 2FA1 7601 3729 010B 717F 231C E7AA | BTC Address: 1CrYPTB1o7QWc8hXqBMP2LtAJh1VMtTFBh
PttnMe
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 66
Merit: 2

rieMiner (Riecoin miner) developer


View Profile
September 14, 2018, 09:37:32 PM
Last edit: September 16, 2018, 07:58:00 PM by PttnMe
 #5814

rieMiner 0.9β1 (2018-09-14) - Benchmark mode added Cheesy ! Also, some bug fixes, and a huge code refactoring.

The miner should now be stable enough to replace the older fastrie/xptMiner without problem. There are also instructions on how to build a standalone executable on Windows.

I am waiting the official Riecoin Wallet update and letting some time to find and fix remaining bugs and do some minor refactoring before releasing the stable rieMiner 0.9. At this moment, official standalone binaries for Windows and probably Linux will be provided.

As always, feedbacks and suggestions are welcome, do not hesitate.
And to pool owners, if you could tell about rieMiner in your homepages, it would really help me and I would be grateful; we would have more people testing rieMiner.

hi man !
just to inform you that i compiled a x64 windows version of your miner and it works perfectly in ublock.it as well !
https://imgur.com/a/tk0pfeO
https://imgur.com/a/RXjqDBj
* mine.ublock.it = mine.blockocean.com

Many thanks for your work !!

EDIT: Since compiling stuff is not my area of expertise (its been a loooong time from uni), i'd like to ask if there is a way to export the needed .dll in/from MinGW in order to have a stand alone version running straight from windows?

Great! Thank you for letting me know that it also works on uBlock.it. It should also be the case for rieMiner 0.9β1. And now, you have an answer about including the Dlls when building.

Whoah! nice changes this week on riecoin.

let's see if gatra aproves the new wallet to start working on the pool implementation for it.

And thanks a lot Prtnme for the new miner. Im going to test it right now

I hope that you are satisfied with rieMiner. Else, please report bugs to improve the software until the stable release. Some were fixed in 0.9β1.

I think the GetBlockTemplate problem (actually it was submitblock) is fixed.

I confirm this, solo mining with GetBlockTemplate via your wallet seems to work fine now.

rieMiner (https://github.com/Pttn/rieMiner) - Riecoin solo + pooled miner
czakris
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 15, 2018, 02:53:44 PM
 #5815

Hi PttnMe,
Right now I am testing your miner using fx8350, 32GB of RAM and W7 64bits trying solo mining with these rieMiner.conf settings:
Quote
Host = 127.0.0.1;
Port = 28332;
User = (my wallet address);
Pass = (my password);
Protocol = GetBlockTemplate;
Address =  (my wallet address);
Tuples = 6;
Threads = 8;
Sieve = 4073741824; (because why not?  Grin )
Refresh = 30;
Miner works fine, trashing my CPU  Cool at full speed, but still, I am unable to switch into GetBlockTemplate Protocol. (Benchmark only). Any idea how to turn it on?
PttnMe
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 66
Merit: 2

rieMiner (Riecoin miner) developer


View Profile
September 15, 2018, 05:05:05 PM
 #5816

Now, rieMiner 0.9β1.5 (2018-09-15) drops GetWork support and proposes a better Standard Benchmark. I will publish some results soon.

Hi PttnMe,
Right now I am testing your miner using fx8350, 32GB of RAM and W7 64bits trying solo mining with these rieMiner.conf settings:
Quote
Host = 127.0.0.1;
Port = 28332;
User = (my wallet address);
Pass = (my password);
Protocol = GetBlockTemplate;
Address =  (my wallet address);
Tuples = 6;
Threads = 8;
Sieve = 4073741824; (because why not?  Grin )
Refresh = 30;
Miner works fine, trashing my CPU  Cool at full speed, but still, I am unable to switch into GetBlockTemplate Protocol. (Benchmark only). Any idea how to turn it on?

Remove the ; at the end of each line.
Normally, rieMiner told you "Invalid Protocol", and the Benchmark Mode is the default "Protocol".

rieMiner (https://github.com/Pttn/rieMiner) - Riecoin solo + pooled miner
xandry
Staff
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1596
Merit: 1108



View Profile
September 15, 2018, 06:21:20 PM
 #5817

One standalone binary for Windows 64 bits is provided for rieMiner 0.9β1, but was not much tested. It should work on Core 2 Duo computers and higher. I even got it working on Wine! You can download it in the rieMiner GitHub release page.
How can i setup it to riepool.ovh?

.FORTUNE.JACK.
      ▄▄███████▄▄
   ▄████▀▀ ▄ ██████▄
  ████ ▄▄███ ████████
 █████▌▐███▌ ▀▄ ▀█████
███████▄██▀▀▀▀▄████████
█████▀▄▄▄▄█████████████
████▄▄▄▄ █████████████
 ██████▌ ███▀████████
  ███████▄▀▄████████
   ▀█████▀▀███████▀
      ▀▀██████▀▀
         
         █
...FortuneJack.com                                             
...THE BIGGEST BITCOIN GAMBLING SITE
       ▄▄█████████▄▄
    ▄█████████████████▄
  ▄█████████████████████▄
 ▄██
█████████▀███████████▄
██████████▀   ▀██████████
█████████▀       ▀█████████
████████           ████████
████████▄   ▄ ▄   ▄████████
██████████▀   ▀██████████
 ▀██
█████████████████████▀
  ▀██
███████████████████▀
    ▀█████████████████▀
       ▀▀█████████▀▀
#JACKMATE
WIN 1 BTC
▄█████████████████████████▄
███████████████████████████
███████████████████████████
██████████▀█████▀██████████
███████▀░░▀░░░░░▀░░▀███████
██████▌░░░░░░░░░░░░░▐██████
██████░░░░██░░░██░░░░██████
█████▌░░░░▀▀░░░▀▀░░░░▐█████
██████▄░░▄▄▄░░░▄▄▄░░▄██████
████████▄▄███████▄▄████████

███████████████████████████
███████████████████████████
▀█████████████████████████▀
PttnMe
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 66
Merit: 2

rieMiner (Riecoin miner) developer


View Profile
September 15, 2018, 09:58:41 PM
 #5818

I just published some rieMiner Benchmark results here, so people can compare and have an idea of mining speeds. Do not hesitate to benchmark and submit your result too. Be sure to use the Standard or Easy Benchmark parameters.

One standalone binary for Windows 64 bits is provided for rieMiner 0.9β1, but was not much tested. It should work on Core 2 Duo computers and higher. I even got it working on Wine! You can download it in the rieMiner GitHub release page.
How can i setup it to riepool.ovh?

Create a rieMiner.conf file next to the executable containing:

Code:
Host     = riepool.ovh
Port     = 8000
User     = User.Worker
Pass     = Password
Protocol = Stratum
Threads  = 8

Change User, Pass, and Threads fields to what they should be. Read the README.md file in the source code/project's page for more options.

For XPoolX:

Code:
Host     = mining.xpoolx.com
Port     = 5000
User     = User.Worker
Pass     = Password
Protocol = Stratum
Threads  = 8

For uBlock.it:

Code:
Host     = mine.ublock.it
Port     = 5000
User     = User.Worker
Pass     = Password
Protocol = Stratum
Threads  = 8

For solo mining (change Host and Port if needed, and set the User, Pass, Address, and Threads to what they should be):

Code:
Host     = 127.0.0.1
Port     = 28332
User     =
Pass     =
Protocol = GetBlockTemplate
Address  =
Threads  = 8

rieMiner (https://github.com/Pttn/rieMiner) - Riecoin solo + pooled miner
xandry
Staff
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1596
Merit: 1108



View Profile
September 16, 2018, 07:41:15 AM
 #5819

Create a rieMiner.conf file next to the executable containing:

Code:
Host     = riepool.ovh
Port     = 8000
User     = User.Worker
Pass     = Password
Protocol = Stratum
Threads  = 8
All options is ignoring as ill formed configuration line. Screenshot:


.FORTUNE.JACK.
      ▄▄███████▄▄
   ▄████▀▀ ▄ ██████▄
  ████ ▄▄███ ████████
 █████▌▐███▌ ▀▄ ▀█████
███████▄██▀▀▀▀▄████████
█████▀▄▄▄▄█████████████
████▄▄▄▄ █████████████
 ██████▌ ███▀████████
  ███████▄▀▄████████
   ▀█████▀▀███████▀
      ▀▀██████▀▀
         
         █
...FortuneJack.com                                             
...THE BIGGEST BITCOIN GAMBLING SITE
       ▄▄█████████▄▄
    ▄█████████████████▄
  ▄█████████████████████▄
 ▄██
█████████▀███████████▄
██████████▀   ▀██████████
█████████▀       ▀█████████
████████           ████████
████████▄   ▄ ▄   ▄████████
██████████▀   ▀██████████
 ▀██
█████████████████████▀
  ▀██
███████████████████▀
    ▀█████████████████▀
       ▀▀█████████▀▀
#JACKMATE
WIN 1 BTC
▄█████████████████████████▄
███████████████████████████
███████████████████████████
██████████▀█████▀██████████
███████▀░░▀░░░░░▀░░▀███████
██████▌░░░░░░░░░░░░░▐██████
██████░░░░██░░░██░░░░██████
█████▌░░░░▀▀░░░▀▀░░░░▐█████
██████▄░░▄▄▄░░░▄▄▄░░▄██████
████████▄▄███████▄▄████████

███████████████████████████
███████████████████████████
▀█████████████████████████▀
millepag
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 12
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 16, 2018, 08:21:53 AM
 #5820

I've had rieMiner 0.9β1 running on uBlock for about 12 hours now, and it seems to be working just fine Cool
Pages: « 1 ... 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 [291] 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!