Bitcoin Forum
April 20, 2019, 03:43:12 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.17.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 [300] 301 302 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN][RIC] Riecoin: constellations POW *CPU* HARD FORK successful, world record  (Read 659959 times)
gavrilo77
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 741
Merit: 500



View Profile
January 08, 2019, 08:57:17 PM
 #5981

Is it pool mining? and rieminer 0.9?

Solo mining with rieMiner 0.9, though you should earn roughly the same for both pooled and solo.

Found first block with 1700x Smiley after 4 years with rieminer 0.9

Congratulations for the block Cheesy ! Thank you for participating, keep supporting the Riecoin network!

Good all times when i mined a lot with Azure Smiley

BitSend ◢◤Clients | Source
www.bitsend.info
| Your Digital Network | 10MB Blocks
| Algo: XEVAN | DK3 | Masternodes
| BSD - Tether USDT Pair ✔
| Bittrex | C.Gather | S.Exchange
| Cryptopia | LOCALCRYPTO | Livecoin
| CoinPayments | Faucet | Bitsend Airdrop

████
 ████
  ████
   ████
    ████
     ████
      ████
       ████
        ████
       ████
      ████
     ████
    ████
   ████
  ████
 ████
████

████
 ████
  ████
   ████
    ████
     ████
      ████
       ████
        ████
       ████
      ████
     ████
    ████
   ████
  ████
 ████
████
1555731792
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1555731792

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1555731792
Reply with quote  #2

1555731792
Report to moderator
1555731792
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1555731792

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1555731792
Reply with quote  #2

1555731792
Report to moderator
100% New Software
PC, Mac, Android, & HTML5 Clients
Krill Rakeback
Low Rake
Bitcoin Poker 3.0
Bad Beat Jackpot
SwC Poker Relaunch
PLAY NOW
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1555731792
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1555731792

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1555731792
Reply with quote  #2

1555731792
Report to moderator
1555731792
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1555731792

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1555731792
Reply with quote  #2

1555731792
Report to moderator
1555731792
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1555731792

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1555731792
Reply with quote  #2

1555731792
Report to moderator
lzknr
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 16
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 11, 2019, 01:50:13 AM
 #5982

May we have some instructions for how to signal BIP's? I am mining solo and wish to vote.
cryptapus
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 608
Merit: 500



View Profile WWW
January 11, 2019, 02:11:22 AM
 #5983

May we have some instructions for how to signal BIP's? I am mining solo and wish to vote.

If PR6 is merged testing will be appreciated:

https://github.com/riecointeam/riecoin/pull/6

Or feel free to merge locally and fire away  Smiley

website | PGP fingerprint: 692C 0756 E57D 2FA1 7601 3729 010B 717F 231C E7AA | BTC Address: 1CrYPTB1o7QWc8hXqBMP2LtAJh1VMtTFBh
clo1
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 33
Merit: 1


View Profile
January 12, 2019, 03:36:04 AM
 #5984

May we have some instructions for how to signal BIP's? I am mining solo and wish to vote.

support for BIPs is indicated through the block version number. If you use rieMiner support should automatically be given.
dautay_crypto
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 446
Merit: 11

★777Coin.com★ Fun BTC Casino!


View Profile
January 12, 2019, 03:56:53 AM
 #5985

May we have some instructions for how to signal BIP's? I am mining solo and wish to vote.

If PR6 is merged testing will be appreciated:

https://github.com/riecointeam/riecoin/pull/6

Or feel free to merge locally and fire away  Smiley
When the merged testing process finished?
I wish all the best results for the merged testing.

cryptapus
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 608
Merit: 500



View Profile WWW
January 12, 2019, 02:46:11 PM
 #5986

May we have some instructions for how to signal BIP's? I am mining solo and wish to vote.

If PR6 is merged testing will be appreciated:

https://github.com/riecointeam/riecoin/pull/6

Or feel free to merge locally and fire away  Smiley
When the merged testing process finished?
I wish all the best results for the merged testing.

Merged today... so I don't see anything waiting for a rc0 release. If there are any miners that want to try pulling from the master branch and confirming you can mine some blocks feedback would be most welcome (block number would be excellent).

Will probably tag a rc0 release shortly.

website | PGP fingerprint: 692C 0756 E57D 2FA1 7601 3729 010B 717F 231C E7AA | BTC Address: 1CrYPTB1o7QWc8hXqBMP2LtAJh1VMtTFBh
PttnMe
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 66
Merit: 2

rieMiner (Riecoin miner) developer


View Profile
January 12, 2019, 10:58:26 PM
 #5987

I don't see anything waiting for a rc0 release. If there are any miners that want to try pulling from the master branch and confirming you can mine some blocks feedback would be most welcome (block number would be excellent).

Will probably tag a rc0 release shortly.

Block 1021045 mined successfully with Commit 545fadbc.

Version 03000020 (536870915) with vanilla rieMiner instead of 00000020 (536870912) so far with previous commits.

Should we start over Testnet? It is now saying "unknown new rules activated (versionbit 1)"

rieMiner (https://github.com/Pttn/rieMiner) - Riecoin solo + pooled miner
Raizou
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 768
Merit: 250


View Profile
January 12, 2019, 11:16:42 PM
 #5988

So, is gatra still absent? In what exchange is it possible to find Riecoin? In blockexplorer a very reasonable price on satoshis! Has the wallet been updated or are they still working on the update? In fact, Riecoin will need a lot of help from the community because without dev, things are always more difficult.
cryptapus
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 608
Merit: 500



View Profile WWW
January 12, 2019, 11:38:54 PM
 #5989

I don't see anything waiting for a rc0 release. If there are any miners that want to try pulling from the master branch and confirming you can mine some blocks feedback would be most welcome (block number would be excellent).

Will probably tag a rc0 release shortly.

Block 1021045 mined successfully with Commit 545fadbc.

Version 03000020 (536870915) with vanilla rieMiner instead of 00000020 (536870912) so far with previous commits.

Should we start over Testnet? It is now saying "unknown new rules activated (versionbit 1)"

Excellent, I see the block version as `0x20000003` which is bit `0` (CSV, BIP65, BIP66) and bit `1` (segwit) signalling via BIP9. You can check the progress of signaling via `getblockchaininfo`.

I didn't have a testnet node to connect to so I'm not sure about what has activated previously. It may be better to restart testnet before versionbit 1 signaled as it would be a testnet specific fix to remove the warning.

website | PGP fingerprint: 692C 0756 E57D 2FA1 7601 3729 010B 717F 231C E7AA | BTC Address: 1CrYPTB1o7QWc8hXqBMP2LtAJh1VMtTFBh
cryptapus
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 608
Merit: 500



View Profile WWW
January 13, 2019, 04:50:54 AM
Last edit: January 13, 2019, 04:42:00 PM by cryptapus
 #5990

Major new version (release candidate)

Binaries and source code:

https://github.com/riecointeam/riecoin/releases/tag/v0.16.3.0-rc0

if using git:

    git clone https://github.com/riecointeam/riecoin.git
    git checkout v0.16.3.0-rc0

New in this release:

* Updated to Bitcoin 0.16.3 code base
* Many bug fixes
* BIP65, BIP66, CSV, segwit signaling and support

notes:

* Although this version warns to not use for mining applications, miner feedback is critical.
* A full release is planned soon if no major issues are found.
* If you would like to build your own binaries via gitian (encouraged), you can check that the sha256sum matches these binaries.

Please report issues here:

https://github.com/riecointeam/riecoin/issues

Thanks to clo1 and Pttn for developing this major release.

Also on Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/RieCoin/comments/affy30/riecoin_v01630rc0/

website | PGP fingerprint: 692C 0756 E57D 2FA1 7601 3729 010B 717F 231C E7AA | BTC Address: 1CrYPTB1o7QWc8hXqBMP2LtAJh1VMtTFBh
Pon13
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 563
Merit: 123



View Profile WWW
January 14, 2019, 09:30:12 AM
 #5991

Major new version (release candidate)

Binaries and source code:

https://github.com/riecointeam/riecoin/releases/tag/v0.16.3.0-rc0

if using git:

    git clone https://github.com/riecointeam/riecoin.git
    git checkout v0.16.3.0-rc0

New in this release:

* Updated to Bitcoin 0.16.3 code base
* Many bug fixes
* BIP65, BIP66, CSV, segwit signaling and support

notes:

* Although this version warns to not use for mining applications, miner feedback is critical.
* A full release is planned soon if no major issues are found.
* If you would like to build your own binaries via gitian (encouraged), you can check that the sha256sum matches these binaries.

Please report issues here:

https://github.com/riecointeam/riecoin/issues

Thanks to clo1 and Pttn for developing this major release.

Also on Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/RieCoin/comments/affy30/riecoin_v01630rc0/

very very nice !! bravo and many thanks to the new ric team  Grin

ziiip
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 249
Merit: 101

uBlock.it Admin


View Profile WWW
January 14, 2019, 09:59:04 AM
 #5992

We need to set an activation time for some of these BIP's, that appears to be the only thing causing delay on the node upgrade.
Personally I don't care if we activate any of them.
 
Only BIP that may be worth activating is BIP 65 for CLTV, but I still don't understand how that's better than nLockTime. If it's required for certain DEX then I will support it.
Currently I see no reason to activate segwit though.

Riecoin Pool http://uBlock.it/
cryptapus
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 608
Merit: 500



View Profile WWW
January 14, 2019, 02:10:45 PM
Last edit: January 14, 2019, 02:24:05 PM by cryptapus
 #5993

We need to set an activation time for some of these BIP's, that appears to be the only thing causing delay on the node upgrade.
Personally I don't care if we activate any of them.
 
Only BIP that may be worth activating is BIP 65 for CLTV, but I still don't understand how that's better than nLockTime. If it's required for certain DEX then I will support it.
Currently I see no reason to activate segwit though.

v0.16.3.0-rc0 referenced above has set signaling of BIP9 to begin Jan 1 2019 and thus is within the time frame for signaling. BIP65 and BIP66 is coded to activate along with CSV via BIP9 bit 0, segwit on bit 1. If you operate a pool it would be most welcome to learn if there are any issues with the rc0 release. Although it warns not to use for mining it is perfectly safe to try and we have some confirmation of a few blocks trickling in (I'm guessing from solo miners and not any pools). This is the version that will be released if no one finds any issues in the near future.

Activating segwit allows a new generation of interesting transaction types. It's an optional type of transaction and since upstream already has it active and supported it would appear illogical to purposefully cripple it in the core software.

edit: I suppose a more direct response: Do you have any technical reasons for not wishing to activate segwit?

website | PGP fingerprint: 692C 0756 E57D 2FA1 7601 3729 010B 717F 231C E7AA | BTC Address: 1CrYPTB1o7QWc8hXqBMP2LtAJh1VMtTFBh
cryptapus
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 608
Merit: 500



View Profile WWW
January 14, 2019, 06:41:15 PM
 #5994


Ziiip why do you think segwit is not good for the coin ? It will not hurt to have it like functionality even to not use it or activating it right now ?
The idea with never ending riecoin is cool and I am 100% agree. The unique of riecoin is its algorithm and I think we must not put limits on this. My c++ skills are not good too but I will help you in that.

The future of the coin right now depend on us. We can have voting on the community board about the direction to where the coin should be developed.

The reasons I think segwit is unnecessary for Riecoin.
1) The blockahin is heavier (transactions require more space)
2) The fee is smaller only for some kind of tx
3) Riecoin traditionally had zero fees for transactions with fewer than 7 inputs(not positive on this number off the top of my head but zero fee is default for small size tx)
4) Since segwit tx get discounted fees by weight and Riecoin still wants 0 fee tx, it only makes sense to change this and make segwit tx more expensive since it requires more space. (this would require change to current Core implementation if segwit is adopted)

Given these points I still see how it's valuable to follow BTC code because it's easiest to merge future updates etc (probably why 99% of altcoins blindly follow it exclusively)
FWIW I really don't care if we continue with following Bitcoin Core at the end of the day these issues are very minor since the chain is not likely to see high use such as the bitcoin chain.

I personally like what Bitcoin Unlimited is doing, primarily with graphene and other improvements to help block propagation, further reduce orphan rates. But I'm not married to that solution, just decided to play around with the idea.

Hopefully that answers your question. I don't intend to have a huge debate about it, but I think the fee situation should at least be given special attention, unless of course everyone is fine with ditching 0 fee tx.


Ah, I think I found some of your technical issues... My impression is that I don't think transaction size should be any issue for Riecoin since we will most likely never approach scaling issues like upstream. I wasn't aware of any issue with zero-fee transactions and segwit, if a miner wishes to mine them I don't see a reason why that is not allowed (that would be a pool or miner setting, correct?).

Segwit's benefits for Riecoin are beyond scaling though, Script versioning and MAST, Schnorr, others come to mind.

website | PGP fingerprint: 692C 0756 E57D 2FA1 7601 3729 010B 717F 231C E7AA | BTC Address: 1CrYPTB1o7QWc8hXqBMP2LtAJh1VMtTFBh
ziiip
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 249
Merit: 101

uBlock.it Admin


View Profile WWW
January 14, 2019, 07:59:10 PM
 #5995


Ah, I think I found some of your technical issues... My impression is that I don't think transaction size should be any issue for Riecoin since we will most likely never approach scaling issues like upstream. I wasn't aware of any issue with zero-fee transactions and segwit, if a miner wishes to mine them I don't see a reason why that is not allowed (that would be a pool or miner setting, correct?).

Segwit's benefits for Riecoin are beyond scaling though, Script versioning and MAST, Schnorr, others come to mind.

I agree, it's easier to just follow the core code than try and change something like segwit.
The current software defaults to zero fee tx if 6 inputs or less, this will change after everyone is upgraded and there will be no zero-fee default.

I'm fine with this, miners can choose to mine 0 fee tx if they want. My beef with segiwt was supposing we keep 0 fee tx, it would make no sense to allow 0 fee segwit tx as they require more space but this is a moot point as it is up to the miners which tx to include (as it should be)

uBlock.it will upgrade it's nodes to this RC as soon as possible.
My only worry is that "All Others" miner goes along with the upgrade as well, since they do not publicly discuss anything we'll have to keep a close eye on if/when they signal support.

Riecoin Pool http://uBlock.it/
cryptapus
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 608
Merit: 500



View Profile WWW
January 14, 2019, 08:20:59 PM
 #5996


...


...

My only worry is that "All Others" miner goes along with the upgrade as well, since they do not publicly discuss anything we'll have to keep a close eye on if/when they signal support.


We discussed this a bit on github, our current BIP9 consensus threshold is 95%. If we can prove that we can at least get a vast majority of hashrate to signal and are blocked by a minority we can perhaps address that ratio using bit 2.

website | PGP fingerprint: 692C 0756 E57D 2FA1 7601 3729 010B 717F 231C E7AA | BTC Address: 1CrYPTB1o7QWc8hXqBMP2LtAJh1VMtTFBh
Mathieu86
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 8
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 14, 2019, 11:10:04 PM
 #5997

Thank you for this incredible work !
gavrilo77
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 741
Merit: 500



View Profile
January 15, 2019, 03:33:27 AM
 #5998

Solo mining on the new release works without problem

BitSend ◢◤Clients | Source
www.bitsend.info
| Your Digital Network | 10MB Blocks
| Algo: XEVAN | DK3 | Masternodes
| BSD - Tether USDT Pair ✔
| Bittrex | C.Gather | S.Exchange
| Cryptopia | LOCALCRYPTO | Livecoin
| CoinPayments | Faucet | Bitsend Airdrop

████
 ████
  ████
   ████
    ████
     ████
      ████
       ████
        ████
       ████
      ████
     ████
    ████
   ████
  ████
 ████
████

████
 ████
  ████
   ████
    ████
     ████
      ████
       ████
        ████
       ████
      ████
     ████
    ████
   ████
  ████
 ████
████
Pon13
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 563
Merit: 123



View Profile WWW
January 15, 2019, 07:43:39 AM
 #5999

yesterday, i've upgraded wallet to the latest version (rc) mined a few rics without a problem from ublock.it meaning that are shown in the new wallet normally.
everything seems to work like a charm  Grin

clo1
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 33
Merit: 1


View Profile
January 15, 2019, 07:04:52 PM
 #6000


Ah, I think I found some of your technical issues... My impression is that I don't think transaction size should be any issue for Riecoin since we will most likely never approach scaling issues like upstream. I wasn't aware of any issue with zero-fee transactions and segwit, if a miner wishes to mine them I don't see a reason why that is not allowed (that would be a pool or miner setting, correct?).

Segwit's benefits for Riecoin are beyond scaling though, Script versioning and MAST, Schnorr, others come to mind.

The issue of zero-fee transactions is independent of segwit. I don't think they are possible, but they can be set to .00000001.

Here is what I wrote a couple months ago.

Quote
I looked into transaction fees a a bit. I think there is enough flexibility through configuration options that we don't need to add a zero transaction fee capability. The parameters are:
mintxfee           - the minimum transaction fee in RIC/kB
minrelaytxfee  - the minimum transaction fee for a node to relay the transaction in RIC/kB
blockmintxfee  - minimum fee for a transaction to be included in blocks created by mining code, in RIC/kB

The defaults are all 0.00001000 RIC/kB. The smallest value is .00000001.

-mintxfee=.00000001 -minrelaytxfee=.00000001 -blockmintxfee=.00000001 will allow transactions of 1 satoshi (or gatra). I have tested this on testnet.

This way we allow users, nodes, and miners to determine what rates should be instead of fixing it in code and we stay consistent with bitcoin.

I could see possibly lowering the defaults.

Two other values that might be useful:
fallbackfee           - the standard fee, defaults to 0.00020000 RIC/kB
m_discard_rate    - any change smaller than this is considered dust and is added to the transaction fee, default is .00010000
Pages: « 1 ... 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 [300] 301 302 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!