Do you trust ICO Rating sites?

[Luxury331]

Well no one can successfully predict the exact turn out of and initial coin offering icos where it be good or bad but I think there are so ico rating site that try as much as possible to come close in there prediction

[1714762710]

1714762710

[1714762710]

1714762710

[1714762710]

1714762710

[pryzh]

I don't generally trust ico rating site. In spite of the fact that, you need to put the audit of them into thought while picking undertaking to contribute on. You likely observe distinctive rating of your task of enthusiasm from various site. In particular, take a gander at the group and their white paper to perceive how solid are the group behind the task and the substance of the white paper.

[arabellascott21]

Not really, well known that people can pay to get better ratings. Sometimes to check them to see if an ICO has got a bad review though.

[diamdirumah]

ICO rating is a website which helps us to find great quality with the ICO project. But these qualities we have to do some checking. A lot has already happened events the ICO project failed because of the scam. It makes us as a bounty hunter is certainly very disappointed. And I recommend when you make the election project you should do research on ICO.

[fritzpaulusha]

I don't trust ICO rating sites because everything is buying there (any good or excellent rate just can be bought by a startup that has a money).

But the most shocking is that even if your crypto project  is very good you will never get a good rate from such ICO trackers until you pay them-(

[alttravel]

I trust only my research, I trust the forum, my intuition, but I absolutely do not trust sites that put ratings for crypto-projects for money. Avoid these crypto projects.

[Aligab166]

They seem biased to me. A friend of mine who's doing an ICO told me that they paid 10ETH for 5 quality ratings and that's that! I noticed that some ICOs with good project, team, and good social media presence are struggling with getting good reviews.

With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?

I am very sorry to say this, some ICO rating sites are also a scam. Some of them even aid scam projects to have a very high rating thereby misleading investors and the general public. I don't trust ALL.

[tangbori]

They seem biased to me. A friend of mine who's doing an ICO told me that they paid 10ETH for 5 quality ratings and that's that! I noticed that some ICOs with good project, team, and good social media presence are struggling with getting good reviews.

With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?

I agree with you that ICO rating website is not a yardstick for choosing good ICO because most of the ICO rating website get paid in order to get good ratings. Most of the ICOs that pay ICO rating website are scam because I believe that if an ICO is credible it will surely get good rating without paying a dime.

[bittick]

They seem biased to me. A friend of mine who's doing an ICO told me that they paid 10ETH for 5 quality ratings and that's that! I noticed that some ICOs with good project, team, and good social media presence are struggling with getting good reviews.

With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?

I am very sorry to say this, some ICO rating sites are also a scam. Some of them even aid scam projects to have a very high rating thereby misleading investors and the general public. I don't trust ALL.

Despite the difficulty of knowing which one of the ICO project is scam however if the ico rating site is involved in the advertising process aswell or online marketing that should be considered as helping that scam project.
I quite know that most of that site only care about the money they got and never bother to make a real review based on technical aspect, it's hard to believe such site.

[catok broek]

of some ICO ratting sections that are the reason why they must and to be trusted, this is certainly a clear reason, because in every process of developing the ICO rating it is necessary to strengthen the assessment of its competitors. because some types of patents that are used as ratings in projects are of course the main reasons why they should be trusted.

[dgross0818]

They seem biased to me. A friend of mine who's doing an ICO told me that they paid 10ETH for 5 quality ratings and that's that! I noticed that some ICOs with good project, team, and good social media presence are struggling with getting good reviews.

With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?

No doubt this factor is important but not the most necessary one! I always watch rating in Icobench which helps me in making decisions. Ofc, I trust Icodrops which seems to be still incorruptible, and most projects having highs ratings always succeed in the market!

[dobidobi88]

They seem biased to me. A friend of mine who's doing an ICO told me that they paid 10ETH for 5 quality ratings and that's that! I noticed that some ICOs with good project, team, and good social media presence are struggling with getting good reviews.

With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?

No doubt this factor is important but not the most necessary one! I always watch rating in Icobench which helps me in making decisions. Ofc, I trust Icodrops which seems to be still incorruptible, and most projects having highs ratings always succeed in the market!

I agree. The ICO rating site can be one of the reference sources for examining ICO projects that we are interested in, but not as a decision maker to participate in the project or not.

[alttravel]

I do not trust the rating sites of ICO crypto projects. Everyone can get an excellent rating from above, all you have to do is pay the necessary amount of money.

[Kayuslawal]

I dont trust them because they might be a form of manipulation or biased after collecting money from the developer for a good review, I will better check out the project myself before investing on it.

[btcefeyigit399]

As an ico participant I benefit from a lot of sites in this regard. I find it generally successful. I trust too. i advise other participants.

[Summation]

The ICO rating website is for reference only. Anything other than your own summary can only be referenced. Rating websites are not voluntary, and they also need money to keep them running.

[sexylady13]

No,I do not trust ICO rating site. If you want to invest in ICO, the most important are check the Website, Team and Road-map of the project. After that you can investment it.  

Big mistake! It's a bad idea to totally ignore the rating system. It's better to take into account all the factors - it makes your analysis deeper! Just separate the main factors from the secondary ones, and everything will be set in its place!

[Akpuv]

They seem biased to me. A friend of mine who's doing an ICO told me that they paid 10ETH for 5 quality ratings and that's that! I noticed that some ICOs with good project, team, and good social media presence are struggling with getting good reviews.

With all that said, should it still be a factor to look at when investing in ICO?

Some ICO rating sites are as fraudulent as some of the scam ICOs they rate very high. I don't expect anyone to trust them in order to make any ICO purchase decisions. DYOR.

[NextGen52]

Make your own analysis and take a decision.

[StarBeyond521]

these are just reference site. Its not so trust able.