Rewarding signature campaign, are you satisfied?

[Omparkash72]

I think this is a matter of debate someone will tell you that you are right but others will tell you that you are wrong. My opinion it is totally depends on the team of that project what they want . They want 15 post in particular week then right you have to do and it is their right if you did 14 post in that week instead of 15, whether they entertain you or not . So for me that is there right and after completing 15 post you didn't get your stakes then this is your right to get your stakes. You have to follow their norms.

[Russlenat]

The signature bounty rules is very simple and we must follow that in order to have the stakes for the week, rules is rules to be follow and it always easy to do just divide your target total post for the week or make 3 post per day I think it is enough and easy.

[abstractednerve]

Answer me one question: "You go to the store to buy ice cream, you choose the ice cream you like, take it and go to the cashier.The seller says that you need to pay 2 dollars, but you say that I only have 1 dollar and ask for sell 50 percent of the ice cream.The seller refuses to sell you ice cream. " Tell me, the seller is not right?

A great example and it is quite right with the question that this topic has given. I see everyone doing more than the minimum number of posts required per week. And those who did not follow the rules will surely never receive rewards

[KobbyC]

Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.

(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.

If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.

My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?

Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?

Good post really makes a lot of sense. I think that if a participant is able is able to make 75%+ post there should be a reward for that. However, some managers will give you half of the stakes which are fair. The policy which doesn't reward such people is really bad and must be stopped.

[caisa88]

In my opinion the rules for the signature campaigns are simple and fair. It's not a hard thing to make 15 posts per week, it's enough to just make 2-3 posts per day.

[KXC247]

I tend to accept my faith if I do not follow the bounty rules and miss out on my stakes. I do not blame anyone except myself. This is why, I follow all the rules carefully and abide by it. Am satisfied with all the bounty rules

[testadimerlo]

Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.

(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.

If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.

My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?

Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?

It depends on the bounty management, ultimately from the people you deal with, as always. My advice is to read the requirements very well before engaging your time.

[Kryten12]

If you do not do the requried work you get Zero stakes and that is all you deserve. The rules are there so people actually make the effort 10 posts is less than 2 per day and anyone that cannot manage that is not trying hard enough. I am statisfied with the current rules and have never failed to do the required work.

[umrohyuk]

Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.

(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.

If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.

My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?

Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?

I don't think that someone even has finished and made more than 75% of the posts should be rewarded by stakes or etc. It means that he/she has not done the tasks yet, or even they were not responsible of the jobs. While they has been fill the form of any signature campaign, they should read the rules and they do it. The reward should be given for them who can finish and follow the rules well. It is like an agreement of work.

[Hanebel]

Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.

(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.

If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.

My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?

Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?

Well, since the rule or condition says you have to complete 10 or 15 posts in a week, and not completing the requirement will result to no stakes, those who don't complete should not get rewarded may it sound too harsh. I guess this is still the best ways to reward signature participants.

Answer me one question: "You go to the store to buy ice cream, you choose the ice cream you like, take it and go to the cashier.The seller says that you need to pay 2 dollars, but you say that I only have 1 dollar and ask for sell 50 percent of the ice cream.The seller refuses to sell you ice cream. " Tell me, the seller is not right?

I don't think the story is parallel to the topic. But still, I get your point.

[bellaayu]

Regulation of gifts I think is not difficult. And the regulation already clearly suppose that rules, the gift of reads every participant must post a minimum of 10 posts. Means we have to do a total of 10 posts if it does not reach the figure is certainly not going to get the value.

[kier010]

it is a condition that the bounty hunters must follow. it is not the problem of the campaign but the bounty hunter. bounty hunters should be responsible to their work. i joined signature campaign and i give my best effort to meet the condition.

[GhostWithin]

Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.

(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.

If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.

My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?

Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?

You cannot jump just half the pit. You either jumped it completely or didn't jump at all. There is no third option.

[Nidhi Bhatia]

As a junior member, i am not at all satisfied. Bounties are paying very less stakes to junior members.I wear projects signature for two to three months and after that i got very less total stakes. That s why i feel bad many times.

[hoavantathan]

I think it's not a problem. Nowaday bounty hunters are more. And some projects need real value from bounty campains. Hard condition make sure the manager team can choose hard-working people. The less people join, the more reward you gain.

[baureksa]

Whatever we do, moreover we do it with sweat and our own thoughts will certainly be more satisfied. If not satisfied, the person is usually cheating and dishonest in doing the work.
As in the gift, we are required to be more qualified and have a good grammar so that whatever posts we do will be in accordance with our performance.

[CAPT.DEADPOOL]

many cheaters in the bounty especially those who are joining and multiple registrations should really look at the manager for nothing to happen because the cheaters are in excess of the bounty especially in the youtube and social campaign but it's easy to see if cheater or do not make it fair to other bounties and not to our neighbors.

[Bitcoinjheta]

It is really important to follow protocols or else your effort will go to nothing.It is stated in the requirements before you apply the project and beforehand you are already informed of what they need from you. It may sound unfair but that is something you need to religiously comply with.

[futuristishe]

Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.

(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.

If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.

My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?

Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?

I did not face the same conditions. I've mostly been texting 15 times a week.. Need to strictly fulfill 15. And not two days in a week. I am completely satisfied with this condition. And rewards sign for me, too, until satisfied.

[spike420211]

That's why I do not 10 or 15 but 12 or 17 posts. 2 more than necessary. So I'm re insured if any of my messages are deleted.