Rewarding signature campaign, are you satisfied?

[PalindromemordnilaP]

Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.

(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.

If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.

My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?

Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?

That actually depends on the bounty manager and it's his/her prerogative. I have once participated in a bounty campaign [signature campaign] which i failed to complete the total posts required in a week (17 out of 20 posts) but still the bounty manager gave me a corresponding stake.

[Fortified]

Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.

(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.

If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.

My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?

Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?

Some managers will give a fraction of a complete stakes for one week like for example if the stakes for one week is 8 then you've posted only 9 instead of 10 per week , so they will give 7 , but  the other ICO managers will not give any considerations , if you'll not able to make 10 post per week or 15 post per week , it automatically you've got zero , but we can't do nothing about it since it is very clear on the rules .

[mukul11122]

An absolutely good question as this kind of conditions would promote unnecessary comments and that would, in turn, pollute the forum. Emphasis should be laid out on more and more constructive posts.

[tamango]

I think that the requirements are not so high, 10-15 posts7answers a week is not  an impossibile contition, there are some bonities like sylon ones that requires also more than 20 posts a week. If you don't do at least these minimum posts it's correct that you won't receive stakes.

[insidertradingeverywhere]

I am not satisfied on this matter, because sometimes part of my posts got deleted and I don't receive stakes for that week and it hurts me.
I believe this rule should be adjusted accordingly to your efforts.

[Lyd]

I think their rules are easy and with some time we can accomplish them. Anyway I am frustrated when my posts are deleted and I do not accomplish the number of posts because of that.

[felissss500@gmail.com]

10 or 15 posts per week is not much. There are requirements and higher.
and if you enter the company, you automatically accept its requirements. Do not do - it means no steaks

[ice098]

10 or 15 posts per week is not much. There are requirements and higher.
and if you enter the company, you automatically accept its requirements. Do not do - it means no steaks

Yes of course, there requirements are appropriate to the reward you will get after. Also signature campaign is one of the way to earn especially to those newbie in cryptocurrency. Also I like how they give reward because they rules are easy to do and to follow, that's why lot of people are take that opportunity to participate in signature campaign. Signature campaign is the good start to  world of cryptocurrency.

[tinystone26]

I've got your point about the task it makes me clear that bounty manager must give some coordination about the work we didn't reached. But still we read and accepted their requirements in their bounty campaign and I think that it is enough to follow their rules and regulation in order to get the given stakes after the end of the week.

[premiumproductss]

Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.

(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.

If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.

My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?

Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?

I do not have any problem with that, thats rules and we have to follow them. If you are not satisfied and you do not want to agree that rules, you can always leave the campaign. I am very thankful for bounty campaigns . So I  try to do my best to help them.

[dat.ho12492]

I am not satisfied on this matter, because sometimes part of my posts got deleted and I don't receive stakes for that week and it hurts me.
I believe this rule should be adjusted accordingly to your efforts.

They will not adjust that because it's not the fault of the manager, it's all your fault because you do not really try and work hard to help the project, you just work at the bare minimum and this laziness has hurt you. You can not complain, instead of trying to complain and encourage them to adjust, you should write more every day, that will be a guarantee for your reward and efforts, I always did so when I first faced situations where the post was deleted, the reward is always consistent with each of your actions, this is what I noticed in the signature campaign

[hardhouseinc]

Their conditions don't bother me and for me it is not a problem that we have to respect a certain number of posts. I think it is worth it.

[muddy waters]

Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.

(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.

If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.

My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?

Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?

It is absolutely fair because there are campaign rules you have to obey.
Another problem is when you make those, say, 15 posts and while the stakes are being calculated (which usually takes several days) the btt forum's moderators delete the topics you wrote in will all the comments. So you end up with 14 or 13 posts instead of 15 and are not given the reward.
That's why I usually make 2-3 posts more in order to avoid such a situation.

[conanmori]

Rules should always be so strict so people won't try to cheat. By joining the Bounty Campaign you agreed to the rules and so you should follow it. If you think making almost the amount of quota but failed to reached it should have a consideration and receive stake then Bounty will become chaotic if the manager do this. How about those people who doing the right job than you.

[doctordidi]

every project must have its own rules, we as a bounty hunter must comply with the terms and regulations of the project, if we expect a reward, so obey And do what has been determined, then you will get a Benefit, try and pray that can only we do.

[Happydd]

I regularly participate in signature campaigns to earn bonuses. Recently I was very disappointed with the signature campaigns. Paid very slowly and very little. I want when the campaign is over to receive money.

[mmo_online_1981]

I am quite satisfied with the Bounty program I have been involved in! The value is not high but I noticed it has development association!

[lihaidong198871]

I am pleased that the percentage distributed to the signature campaigns of the bounty. However, I was very disappointed when the ABLE project scoured the bounty hunter and blocked all connections to their community groups and official social networking sites.

[justsimpleram]

For me yes like the project I participating now they rewarding me or paying me a good price for my signature campaign on them. Find a project like this that they are paying you rightly so I'm very thankful that I participate on this project specially to their signature campaign. And I'm very satisfied to my signature on them.

[gerbas]

Are you participating in a signature campaign? You observe that there is a condition that you have to meet.

(a) You must make 15 constructive posts per week. (b) You must make 10 constructive posts per week! as it may apply. I am not against this condition but the next one is what I am concerned with.

If you don't reach 10/15 (as the case may be) posts before the end date, you will not receive any stake for the current week.

My question is, what happens to someone who makes 9 posts in case (a), and 13 posts in case (b)? Is it fair to deny anyone who has made more than 75% post for the week? Could there be a somewhat reward for such people?

Please share your thoughts. What will be the best way to reward signature campaign?

I think that rules is some kind of agreement that are created and should be agreed before we are join that bounty, for me that is acceptable.
And for participant that aren't meet that requirement that is absolutely won't get any stakes even if they just lacking 1 post.