Bitcoin Forum
May 26, 2024, 01:12:30 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 [25] 26 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [RE-ANN] Galaxycoin Revival! KGW, POS/POW hybrid [TRADING ON CRYPTSY]  (Read 51743 times)
Miner-TE
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 499
Merit: 500



View Profile
November 27, 2015, 07:31:41 PM
 #481

Seriously ... "difficulty" : 47.61663649,

BTC - 1PeMMYGn7xbZjUYeaWe9ct1VV6szLS1vkD - LTC - LbtcJRJJQQBjZuHr6Wm7vtB9RnnWtRNYpq
NoobKidOnTheBlock
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 500


FLY DONATION ADDRESS IN SIGNATURE


View Profile
November 27, 2015, 08:33:41 PM
 #482

Seriously ... "difficulty" : 47.61663649,

Arrrgh I hate that when someone with lots of hash mines for a bit then takes off with the difficulty still high cause that freezes the chain for the rest of us dammit

 

▇▇▇

▇▇


▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇
...
............NoobKidOnThe.BLOCK.....
 
Miner-TE
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 499
Merit: 500



View Profile
November 29, 2015, 08:10:50 AM
 #483

Coming down.
    "blocks" : 978225,
    "difficulty" : 24.20694193,


Some People need to realize how difficulty works.  Just putting a mass of hash on a coin when it's at low diff does not get you the best bang for your buck.  You just drive up difficulty to the same block timing.

Better to gradually add hash. Become some percent of nethash, start getting that percent of blocks solved and adjust/add hash as desired.

BTC - 1PeMMYGn7xbZjUYeaWe9ct1VV6szLS1vkD - LTC - LbtcJRJJQQBjZuHr6Wm7vtB9RnnWtRNYpq
NoobKidOnTheBlock
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 500


FLY DONATION ADDRESS IN SIGNATURE


View Profile
December 03, 2015, 11:44:58 AM
 #484

Coming down.
    "blocks" : 978225,
    "difficulty" : 24.20694193,


Some People need to realize how difficulty works.  Just putting a mass of hash on a coin when it's at low diff does not get you the best bang for your buck.  You just drive up difficulty to the same block timing.

Better to gradually add hash. Become some percent of nethash, start getting that percent of blocks solved and adjust/add hash as desired.

Yes 100% completely agree!! The driving the difficulty up doesn't do anything except get the chain stuck once the huge hash leaves mining Galaxycoin cause the difficulty is too high for other miners to solve.

 

▇▇▇

▇▇


▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇
▇▇▇▇▇▇
...
............NoobKidOnThe.BLOCK.....
 
Hobbyist
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 588
Merit: 503


View Profile
June 23, 2016, 01:30:46 AM
 #485

This coin is completely dead, right ?

Not completely ...

Code:
galaxycoind getpeerinfo
[
    {
        "addr" : "70.163.93.46:15521",
        "services" : "00000001",
        "lastsend" : 1466645255,
        "lastrecv" : 1466645268,
        "conntime" : 1466642372,
        "version" : 60008,
        "subver" : "/Satoshi:2.0.0/",
        "inbound" : false,
        "releasetime" : 0,
        "startingheight" : 1187512,
        "banscore" : 0
    },
    {
        "addr" : "193.68.21.36:15521",
        "services" : "00000001",
        "lastsend" : 1466645268,
        "lastrecv" : 1466645268,
        "conntime" : 1466642396,
        "version" : 60008,
        "subver" : "/Satoshi:2.0.0/",
        "inbound" : false,
        "releasetime" : 0,
        "startingheight" : 1187512,
        "banscore" : 0
    },
    {
        "addr" : "203.20.114.252:15521",
        "services" : "00000001",
        "lastsend" : 1466645398,
        "lastrecv" : 1466645256,
        "conntime" : 1466642666,
        "version" : 60008,
        "subver" : "/Satoshi:2.0.0/",
        "inbound" : false,
        "releasetime" : 0,
        "startingheight" : 1187519,
        "banscore" : 0
    },
    {
        "addr" : "37.187.96.15:15521",
        "services" : "00000001",
        "lastsend" : 1466645245,
        "lastrecv" : 1466645400,
        "conntime" : 1466642819,
        "version" : 60008,
        "subver" : "/Satoshi:2.0.0/",
        "inbound" : false,
        "releasetime" : 0,
        "startingheight" : 1187519,
        "banscore" : 0
    },
    {
        "addr" : "108.161.135.192:50107",
        "services" : "00000001",
        "lastsend" : 1466645253,
        "lastrecv" : 1466645261,
        "conntime" : 1466643291,
        "version" : 60008,
        "subver" : "/Satoshi:2.0.0/",
        "inbound" : true,
        "releasetime" : 0,
        "startingheight" : 842598,
        "banscore" : 0
    }
]

╔══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╗
°o.O O.o° TheCryptoChat.net - Your Connection To Everything Crypto!! °o.O O.o°
╚══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════╝
almightyruler
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2268
Merit: 1092


View Profile
June 23, 2016, 03:01:49 AM
 #486

This coin is completely dead, right ?

I'm still running two 24/7 nodes, one with full time PoS.

As far as a current use for this coin... yeah, I guess that stopped when Cryptsy did. Doesn't mean it's dead, though. Smiley
almightyruler
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2268
Merit: 1092


View Profile
September 25, 2016, 04:15:41 AM
 #487

There's a bit of a problem with minting GLX at the moment:

09/25/16 03:25:05 generated 64.00
09/25/16 03:25:05 ERROR: CheckBlock() : coinbase timestamp is too early
09/25/16 03:25:05 ERROR: ProcessBlock() : CheckBlock FAILED
09/25/16 03:25:05 ERROR: BitcoinMiner : ProcessBlock, block not accepted

I think what is happening is that one node has a clock a few minutes fast, and because there's relatively few nodes, it has a much larger effect on what the network collectively agrees is the correct time. So when I find a block solution, and try to create a block with my (correct) local timestamp, it is rejected because the network time is ahead. The only solution is to restart the client, but eventually the time will slip ahead again.

Looks like 193.23.157.12 has the fast clock, because the +237 offset appears as it connects:

09/24/16 15:17:15 accepted connection 193.23.157.12:51020
09/24/16 15:17:15 send version message: version 60008, blocks=1243669, us=x.x.x.x:15521, them=193.23.157.12:51020, peer=193.23.157.12:51020
09/24/16 15:17:15 Added time data, samples 5, offset +237 (+3 minutes)

[...]

09/25/16 03:46:10 accepted connection 193.23.157.12:51757
09/25/16 03:46:10 send version message: version 60008, blocks=1244130, us=x.x.x.x:15521, them=193.23.157.12:51757, peer=193.23.157.12:51757
09/25/16 03:46:10 Added time data, samples 5, offset +237 (+3 minutes)

Check your computer's clocks, please. Smiley
almightyruler
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2268
Merit: 1092


View Profile
March 20, 2017, 08:42:50 PM
 #488

No blocks added to the chain for over 3 months. Guess this coin is done. Sad
ArchitektoR
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 217
Merit: 102


View Profile
April 07, 2017, 08:49:43 AM
 #489

No blocks added to the chain for over 3 months. Guess this coin is done. Sad

restarted my solo pool and put 3 mini gridseeds on it to support network - just 1 block was generated. Will let them mine.

If someone needs it - can reconfigure this NOMP pool to be public.
almightyruler
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2268
Merit: 1092


View Profile
April 07, 2017, 09:04:43 AM
 #490

My own little Gridseed coincidentally crashed an hour or two before your message, otherwise my coin chooser software would have resumed mining as soon as it saw the block moving.

Working now.

Just keep an eye out for consistent rejects - that most likely means the "coinbase timestamp is too early" error mentioned above...
MicroGuy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2506
Merit: 1030


Twitter @realmicroguy


View Profile WWW
April 12, 2017, 09:05:08 PM
 #491

Our team obtained many of the cryptocurrencies that were frozen on Cryptsy's servers when the exchange collapsed. The Galaxycoin wallet.dat was among those recovered.

We are now in the process of giving these wallet files back to their respective communities. The wallet has not been inspected and it's unknown if it contains any coins. If you are a developer of this coin, or a longstanding community member, you can file a request for the wallet in this thread: https://www.gldtalk.org/index.php?topic=3789.0
emdje
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 500


View Profile WWW
April 13, 2017, 12:49:35 PM
 #492

Our team obtained many of the cryptocurrencies that were frozen on Cryptsy's servers when the exchange collapsed. The Galaxycoin wallet.dat was among those recovered.

We are now in the process of giving these wallet files back to their respective communities. The wallet has not been inspected and it's unknown if it contains any coins. If you are a developer of this coin, or a longstanding community member, you can file a request for the wallet in this thread: https://www.gldtalk.org/index.php?topic=3789.0

Great job you guys, some good news in all the bad around Cryptsy.

Wish I had my Cryptsy trading and deposid/withdrawal history backed up  Sad
Don't know what I had on there anymore  Embarrassed
Stouse49
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 209
Merit: 100



View Profile
April 25, 2017, 02:07:53 AM
 #493

Our team obtained many of the cryptocurrencies that were frozen on Cryptsy's servers when the exchange collapsed. The Galaxycoin wallet.dat was among those recovered.

We are now in the process of giving these wallet files back to their respective communities. The wallet has not been inspected and it's unknown if it contains any coins. If you are a developer of this coin, or a longstanding community member, you can file a request for the wallet in this thread: https://www.gldtalk.org/index.php?topic=3789.0

Great job you guys, some good news in all the bad around Cryptsy.

Wish I had my Cryptsy trading and deposid/withdrawal history backed up  Sad
Don't know what I had on there anymore  Embarrassed

I was working on getting the wallet up and running from Cryptsy, but can't find the source code for the wallet.  Are there any miners or block explorers?

BTC:
almightyruler
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2268
Merit: 1092


View Profile
April 25, 2017, 12:51:24 PM
 #494

I was working on getting the wallet up and running from Cryptsy, but can't find the source code for the wallet.  Are there any miners or block explorers?

I'm running a miner.

I've uploaded the last source I have (grabbed from github on 2nd July 2014) here: http://www.almightycoins.org/download/galaxycoin-master.zip
Ivanech
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 808
Merit: 1014


View Profile
April 25, 2017, 02:10:45 PM
 #495

I was working on getting the wallet up and running from Cryptsy, but can't find the source code for the wallet.  Are there any miners or block explorers?

I'm running a miner.

I've uploaded the last source I have (grabbed from github on 2nd July 2014) here: http://www.almightycoins.org/download/galaxycoin-master.zip

Sounds good.

In addition, could you provide a list of actual peer nodes to sync wallet (getpeerinfo output)?
almightyruler
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2268
Merit: 1092


View Profile
April 26, 2017, 03:52:46 PM
 #496

# coin: galaxycoin
addnode=193.68.21.36
addnode=203.20.114.252
addnode=85.236.188.28
Stouse49
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 209
Merit: 100



View Profile
April 28, 2017, 03:50:18 AM
 #497

Thanks for the link to the wallet source and the addnodes.  Unfortunately the cryptsy wallet that I had was only about 48Kb in size and had no balance.

BTC:
almightyruler
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2268
Merit: 1092


View Profile
April 28, 2017, 02:40:54 PM
 #498

Thanks for the link to the wallet source and the addnodes.  Unfortunately the cryptsy wallet that I had was only about 48Kb in size and had no balance.

48k sounds too small - a freshly created "empty" wallet.dat is already 128k in size.

Have you tried the -salvagewallet commandline option? (Make a backup of the existing wallet.dat first)
Stouse49
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 209
Merit: 100



View Profile
April 29, 2017, 03:08:32 AM
 #499

Thanks for the link to the wallet source and the addnodes.  Unfortunately the cryptsy wallet that I had was only about 48Kb in size and had no balance.

48k sounds too small - a freshly created "empty" wallet.dat is already 128k in size.

Have you tried the -salvagewallet commandline option? (Make a backup of the existing wallet.dat first)

I tried the -salvagewallet, but still there were no coins in this wallet.  Must have been a dud.

BTC:
almightyruler
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2268
Merit: 1092


View Profile
April 29, 2017, 07:33:00 AM
 #500

Thanks for the link to the wallet source and the addnodes.  Unfortunately the cryptsy wallet that I had was only about 48Kb in size and had no balance.

48k sounds too small - a freshly created "empty" wallet.dat is already 128k in size.

Have you tried the -salvagewallet commandline option? (Make a backup of the existing wallet.dat first)

I tried the -salvagewallet, but still there were no coins in this wallet.  Must have been a dud.

I can have a poke around if you like. Send me a copy? A 'proper' wallet.dat contains some recognizable clear text strings, so if this wallet also contains them, it may be possible to reverse engineer from that point, and figure out the offsets of private keys.

Maybe even something brute forcish like importing every possible 20 byte sequence in the file as a private key may work... to do this with a 48k file would generate around a million potential keys.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 [25] 26 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!