[ANN] [BSV] [Bitcoin SV] Original Satoshi Vision

[alevlaslo]

the trend of BSV and BNB is not realistic, do people participate in determining the price?)

[Meta_Report]

First gigabyte+ blocks mined in STN stress test

On May 21st 2019 the Bitcoin SV Scaling Test Network (STN) saw its maximum mined block size record broken eight times in rapid succession. In the latest release of Bitcoin SV Node (0.2.0) one of the standout changes was lifting the hard cap block size limit from 128MB to 10GB. The reason for setting the cap so far in excess of mainnet is the stated intention of STN, which is to push the limits of Bitcoin SV software to breaking point so we can identify those breaking points well in advance.  The STN capacity is always intended to be several months ahead of mainnet.

This is very good news because it will allow you to store a lot more Tx or files on the blockchain and in a block, it's the best in terms of resilience! Thanks to the nChain teams for this great progress!!!

[ðºÞæ]

It's funny to watch this soap opera all over news media, courts, social media when it is so easy for Dr. Craig Wright to prove all of us that he is Satoshi. He just needs to move the coins from Satoshi wallets. Why doesn't he?

Signing/moving  does not proof anything except showing access at the moment of signing, aka Troll prove.

Possession of a key is not evidence of ownership. It was never the intent of Bitcoin. It is the intent of people like Greg Maxwell, James Donald, and others who seek a system that acts outside the law. If you have a stolen asset, possession doesn’t make it yours. It applies to Bitcoin equally. If bitcoin is stolen through stolen keys, they do not give the receiver ownership. They do not act as proof. In monetary law, money is fungible and transferable only when it is exchanged without knowledge of fraud or malpractice and for good consideration. It is critical. To be money, Bitcoin does not rely on the mere possession of keys, which is the aim and desire of those seeking a new version of Liberty Reserve coin or e-gold. There are some who will tell you that the mere possession of a key is definitive evidence. They are avoiding the rules of evidence and courts, and seek to alter their nature. They seek a precedent and to change the narrative to one that favours a more anarchist approach.

I will sign after I have definitively proven I created Bitcoin. Not before. The problem with the so-called “experts” is that they have no expertise. They seek to create a narrative and change reality such that it aligns with their beliefs, and believe that doing so will make them experts. Bitcoin is not bit gold, and it never will be.

‘Doing anything you want’ is not a system that is free. Freedom comes within society, and it comes with rules.

https://craigwright.net/blog/bitcoin-blockchain-tech/shades-of-black/

[hv_]

That list is not very impressive. Imagine the list ETH could produce, and even you morons know ETH is a blatant scam.
Just because lots of idiots are running around doing things, that doesn't make them worthwhile.
This does apply to 'core' too, lots of waste; but at least some of them have some technical nous.

Core can be the greatest devs ever, but this injects that they must deliver- whatever some of these think is best.

That s not Satoshi, he wanted no middle men, just some bug fixers and keep txs able to work from the very first one on to eternity.  Any dev or self disclaimed protectors are able to destroy that. See btc or bch

BSV s task is to fix that.

The copyright was granted to BSV.

Bullshit. Just wait, you'll see.

Check reality and grow up

Soooo, Craig is Satoshi? Really?
Check reality and grow up indeed.

Deny doesnt help. U trolling out of fear.

Go and dispute in real world

Ah, u cannot




Read

https://craigwright.net/blog/bitcoin-blockchain-tech/shades-of-black/

Think

Or just troll without any reason...  wait, thats just trolls task. 

[alevlaslo]

Deny doesnt help. U trolling out of fear.

Go and dispute in real world

Ah, u cannot

Excuse me, what exactly did I deny?
Of course Craig as a fraudster that he is, will try any trick on the book.
Until everything falls apart and he goes to jail. That's why I told you to wait & you'll see.

Fear of what?
Craig is not Satoshi. How can I be afraid of an imposter? He's too dumb to be Satoshi is my main argument.

but he was able to carry out the threat and bring down the BTC price from 6500 to 3200, hence he actually has a lot of bitcoins

Check reality and grow up: https://www.copyright.gov/press-media-info/press-updates.html

"As a general rule, when the Copyright Office receives an application for registration, the claimant certifies as to the truth of the statements made in the submitted materials. The Copyright Office does not investigate the truth of any statement made.

A registration represents a claim to an interest in a work protected by copyright law, not a determination of the truth of the claims therein. It is possible for multiple, adverse claims to be registered at the Copyright Office. The Copyright Office does not have an opposition procedure for copyright registrations, such as the procedures available at the Patent and Trademark Office for patents and trademark registrations."

[...]

"In a case in which a work is registered under a pseudonym, the Copyright Office does not investigate whether there is a provable connection between the claimant and the pseudonymous author."

Quoting for readability. 
Thank you.

Bitcoin Shit Vision creator is bound for some jail time sooner or later.

but lie provides for criminal liability, do You think he took the risk of being in prison?  Why would he do that if he already have a lot of money?

when selling a house, the Bank does not verify the authenticity of the documents submitted for the seller's access to the cell with the money, the authenticity never raises suspicions because in the case of a lie, criminal liability is provided

[hv_]

Cannot be that hard to grasp, Bitcoin is only Bitcoin as Satoshi created and copyrighted it.

Why else posting here, when time of trolling is such a waste?

Hm,  fear of wrong bags?

 

[ðºÞæ]

Cryptotourist
bitcoinPsycho
nutildah
are a funny bunch
its like the cant stand some botanists talk about plants, and then go and visit the Botanical garden as much as possible to hear what is discussed.
Any rational sane person would enjoy life and go places of interrest to them

[hv_]

Cannot be that hard to grasp, Bitcoin is only Bitcoin as Satoshi created and copyrighted it.

Satoshi is gone. He is no more. If you are inferring that Craig is Satoshi I have bad news for you.

Why else posting here, when time of trolling is such a waste?

I'm asking you the same question. Why are you trolling so hard for the biggest troll coin in crypto?

Satoshi is still here, BSV is what hodls him alive.

Good u here to learn all that,

If not feel free to use nowitness crap

[hv_]

Cannot be that hard to grasp, Bitcoin is only Bitcoin as Satoshi created and copyrighted it.

Pffff

Why else posting here, when time of trolling is such a waste?

Already told you, because you fuck ups troll the Stuck Version coin on WO, confusing newbies.

Hm,  fear of wrong bags?

Not, I don't own any of this SV shit & never will.

Bitcoin did not start as a ticker, u might stay confused for ever.

[alevlaslo]

but he was able to carry out the threat and bring down the BTC price from 6500 to 3200, hence he actually has a lot of bitcoins

1. That wasn't the threat. The threat was he said BCH would trade at zero for a year. He was wrong.

2. Him and Roger don't have a lot of bitcoins anymore. They both shot their respective loads, hurting them both (as war does), and both BCH and BSV are now fragile carcasses of coins.

it was a threat, he warned that the BTC price will drop to 1000, if from he will take the name of BCH by dominating the hashrate in the same way as from he took the name of BTC in August 2017

[hv_]

Finally gmax is getting  called out, the herd of his sock puppets and trolls is already here.

Go and prove that in real live, u ll get put on ignore all otherwise

https://twitter.com/justicemate/status/1132050812530675712?s=21

[alevlaslo]

for those who do not know: the caps in the photo are BTC fans, there are a lot of them in this topic because they understand that they will soon be obliged to return the BTC name and the site bitcoin.org to its Creator

[hv_]

How "doctor like" of him!

Found it ffs:

https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/op-ed-how-many-wrongs-make-wright/

Do ya own research

BSV follows the white paper closest.

Wanna dispute that with same weak crap?

Bye

Do ya own research

BSV follows the white paper closest.

Nobody cares what you or anybody thinks follows the white paper closest.

Its a 10 (almost 11) year old document, an outline for an idea.

Bitcoin changed quite a bit even when satoshi was still in charge.

Times have changed, technology marches on.

You're stuck in the past, caught up on a tired talking point.

U can (soft) fork and airdrop as u wish and spend time for, that doesn't give u any rights to keep name, brand and claimed security of onchain Bitcoin tech.

Its u trolls misinforming others

Again, Bitcoin is more than just ur ponzi ticker. U cannot dispute this, so u need to troll harder

[ðºÞæ]

BSV has got the:
TECH : Satoshi, Protocol set in stone, Massive scaling, SPV, High profile miners security, double hash features, professional developers ...
FRICTIONLESS : government neutral/friendly, law abiding, ...
COMMERCIAL ADVANTAGES : patents (A LOT and platform agnostic), partnership (both public and private entities)
SATOSHI : Thanos snaps his fingers and the universe implode, Satoshi snaps his private key and the “competitors” disappear
COMPETENCE: Understanding of sound development methodologies -> efficiency
GOVERNANCE: Commitment to Nakamoto Consensus (no risk of hijack) -> stability
RESOURCES/BACKING: Hundreds of millions of $ fully committed and growing -> safety
VISION: Breadth and depth of understanding of Bitcoin potential unique in crypto (as contributed by Dr Craig Wright and a few others) -> durability
Great and serious leaders with skin in the game

[hv_]

There are big scaling mining corporations running datacenters for Bitcoin, just enough to stay 'decentral' enough and responsible for do the honest mining. (Read more)

[jbreher]

Now you know how I feel, when all you shills promote this crap on the Bitcoin Wall Observer thread.

If it were the BTC Wall Observer thread, you might have a valid point.

How "doctor like" of him!

Found it ffs:

https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/op-ed-how-many-wrongs-make-wright/

Do ya own research

BSV follows the white paper closest.

Wanna dispute that with same weak crap?

Bye

LOL, seems like you never read the WP...


In the whitepaper: "7.Reclaiming Disk Space" https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf


A  block   header   with   no   transactions   would   be   about   80   bytes.     If   we   suppose   blocks   aregenerated every 10 minutes, 80 bytes * 6 * 24 * 365 = 4.2MB per year.  With computer systemstypically selling with 2GB of RAM as of 2008, and Moore's Law predicting current growth of 1.2GB   per   year,   storage   should   not   be   a   problem   even   if   the   block   headers   must   be   kept   in memory."

So according to the whitepaper, Bitcoin should be light enough so that anyone with a standard computer can store the blockchain.


BSV "vision" of the whitepaper ?
https://bitcoinsv.io/vision/

2 – Scalability
[...]

"Massive scaling is also important to convince enterprises to use BSV for their blockchain applications – which will require big blocks and large throughput capacity."


Big blocks are in no way the vision of the real Satoshi. His vision is the average Joe being able to run a full node on an everyday computer.




Moreover, what's the very title of the whitepaper ?  "Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System"

NO smart contracts, Bitcoin was not designed to be Ethereum, there is not a single reference to "smart contracts".

Amazing that you read all that without understanding that it explicitly says that Moore's (so-called) Law will allow us to process big blocks (your emphasis) while storage   should   not   be   a   problem (again, your emphasis).

Now you know how I feel, when all you shills promote this crap on the Bitcoin Wall Observer thread.

If it were the BTC Wall Observer thread, you might have a valid point.

It is.

When was it renamed? That certainly isn't the name under which Adam opened it.

Have a nice life.

Thanks. So far, so good.


Interesting article from Crypto Law Review:

https://medium.com/cryptolawreview/bitcoin-battle-668349176b38

Reads as though they were likely already convinced of SV's superiority before they wrote the article. But even read with such a bias in mind, it contains useful insights on the battle between BTC, BCH and SV in the hearts and minds of the people.

[hv_]

Censorship with hidden agendas is everywhere
https://twitter.com/Lauren_Southern/status/1132290700773429249?s=20

Streamanty not affected

[ðºÞæ]

Check this out
Any troll allowed to participate in a chat as long es they pay in BSV. no pay no say.
https://metatalk.io/


Getting better by the minute
https://dir.sv/

fair to say bottom been in
https://dir.sv/#76ef4c9419e9de528009ea8ee7c43c669e3837db8edc7df0f961c6d0c490a2bd

[hv_]

Consider that as announced

https://twitter.com/calvinayre/status/1132660809652428800?s=21

[jbreher]

You mentioned/implied on WO, that exchanges make money using BCH (if I remember correctly).
Interesting view point. I mean why not any other coin, or just the fees. Care to elaborate?

If I know of which comment it is to which you refer, it would be my reply to someone who thought exchanges would be well served by delisting BSV. My reply was something along the lines of 'That would reduce profits. Hint: it is in the name'.

My reply was not BSV specific. It was merely pointing out the futility of exchanges delisting ANY coin. Especially one of the top market cap coins such as BSV. Picture an exchange that delists all but one asset. No trading can be accomplished. As the exchanges make a percentage of each trade, if no trading can be accomplished, then no profits.

Delisting any coin carries the price of not making a profit on exchanges of that asset. Pretty basic, that.

Now you know how I feel, when all you shills promote this crap on the Bitcoin Wall Observer thread.

If it were the BTC Wall Observer thread, you might have a valid point.

It is.

When was it renamed? That certainly isn't the name under which Adam opened it.

http://web.archive.org/web/20131110204535/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg1858442
so he musta renamed it in the first ~6 months?
he was already plotting against us then? certain?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=85687
His first go-round doesn't help either way

Again. If he had named it BTC Wall Observer, then you may have a point. But he did not. So neither do you.