TT-Miner 2024.1.2 BLAKE3, KAWPOW, ETHASH, ETCHASH, EPIC, SHA512256D, SHA3D, ETI

[ouray]

@TrailingStop,
Would you please check that CTRL+C does not stop/kill the miner process.
Have to kill it from task manager.  Thanks

Will check - did you try to press 'q'?

Thanks.

Press 'q' will work but you have to add pause command before go back to loop then press CTRL+C to terminate process.
That is more than just a simple command.  Thanks

Glad to hear that it works. I will check Ctrl + C anyway.

Yes please.  In addition, if you will please add the --api-type ccminer-tcp to use your --api-bind feature.
Please keep doing the good things that you are doing now.   

[TrailingStop]

@TrailingStop,
Would you please check that CTRL+C does not stop/kill the miner process.
Have to kill it from task manager.  Thanks

Will check - did you try to press 'q'?

Thanks.

Press 'q' will work but you have to add pause command before go back to loop then press CTRL+C to terminate process.
That is more than just a simple command.  Thanks

Glad to hear that it works. I will check Ctrl + C anyway.

Yes please.  In addition, if you will please add the --api-type ccminer-tcp to use your --api-bind feature.
Please keep doing the good things that you are doing now.   

do you mean i should allow this option '--api-type ccminer-tcp' and it does nothing? Or should the miner do something different than it does now? Today the miner have a TCP interface only - nothing else (no http, no websocket)

[ouray]

@TrailingStop,
Would you please check that CTRL+C does not stop/kill the miner process.
Have to kill it from task manager.  Thanks

Will check - did you try to press 'q'?

Thanks.

Press 'q' will work but you have to add pause command before go back to loop then press CTRL+C to terminate process.
That is more than just a simple command.  Thanks

Glad to hear that it works. I will check Ctrl + C anyway.

Yes please.  In addition, if you will please add the --api-type ccminer-tcp to use your --api-bind feature.
Please keep doing the good things that you are doing now.  

do you mean i should allow this option '--api-type ccminer-tcp' and it does nothing? Or should the miner do something different than it does now? Today the miner have a TCP interface only - nothing else (no http, no websocket)

>>>Or should the miner do something different than it does now?
Yes please if you can implement this feature --api-type ccminer-tcp in your next release.
F.Y.I.
Hash-rate:
1. Algo LYRA2REV3  (TT-Miner vs CryptoDredge : CryptoDredge)
2. Algo MTP             (TT-Miner vs CryptoDredge : TT-Miner)

[somaton]

Why "LastShare" is always 0:00:00? Is it normal? Or is it because of "-PRT 0 -PRS 13"?

9:46:25 Rig-Speed[3 min]: 66.365 MH/s [A22:R1 4.3%] Uptime: 00:05:44  LastShare: 00:00:00

One more thing: Why there is three *** in accepted string? I think there is not need for those 3 stars and are you sure we need to see pool's IP every time when share get accepted? At least for me that IP info is useless (we already can see that IP when miner connected to pool), it makes line too long to fit to one line in a small window.

[TrailingStop]

Why "LastShare" is always 0:00:00? Is it normal? Or is it because of "-PRT 0 -PRS 13"?

9:46:25 Rig-Speed[3 min]: 66.365 MH/s [A22:R1 4.3%] Uptime: 00:05:44  LastShare: 00:00:00

One more thing: Why there is three *** in accepted string? I think there is not need for those 3 stars and are you sure we need to see pool's IP every time when share get accepted? At least for me that IP info is useless (we already can see that IP when miner connected to pool), it makes line too long to fit to one line in a small window.

Hi,

LastShare is always 0 if you use 2miners. It is not only lastshare that is zero but also the share count of each GPU will always be 0. They have a bug in their stratum protocol that doesn't allow me to identify the interface that found the share. So I cannot have any order and assignment for sent shares.

The three stars is a remainder from the time TT didn't have colored output - without colors it was easier to see solutions. I will remove that.

I can make the IP as an option - that is OK. some people finds it useful to see the IP of the pool.

[george2019]

for my rig mintpond was clear winner with hashrate of 14.3mh.sec TDP 70% + intensity 21 with 2miners i got only 0.475 zcoins (whattomine calculator showed 0.55) vs 0.60 zcoins on mintpond (whattomine calculator showed 0.545 zcoin) today i will test intensity 22 on mintpond european server for 24 hours, then default intensity 20 as well let's see which is more profitable, with intesnity 21 stability was fine, i think 22 intensity is too much for my rig (some slowdowns and rejected shares), then i will test with intensity 20 and find out which give better average hashrates 20 or 21, with intensity 20 hashrate is same as with intensity 21, intensity 22 had 15mh/sec, while intensity 20-21 both have 14.3mh/sec in miner

[stolarzz]

for my rig mintpond was clear winner with hashrate of 14.3mh.sec TDP 70% + intensity 21 with 2miners i got only 0.475 zcoins (whattomine calculator showed 0.55) vs 0.60 zcoins on mintpond (whattomine calculator showed 0.545 zcoin) today i will test intensity 22 on mintpond european server for 24 hours, then default intensity 20 as well let's see which is more profitable, with intesnity 21 stability was fine, i think 22 intensity is too much for my rig (some slowdowns and rejected shares), then i will test with intensity 20 and find out which give better average hashrates 20 or 21, with intensity 20 hashrate is same as with intensity 21, intensity 22 had 15mh/sec, while intensity 20-21 both have 14.3mh/sec in miner

It's impossible to compare day by day. One day diff is a bit higher another day a bit lower.

[george2019]

it's also luck but i compared whattomine 24 hour profit for that day and mintpond showed much better results at least for one day, actually difficulty was little bit higher when i tested mintpond, i also checked average pool hashrates and mintpond somehow showed better results, now i'm testing with default 20 intensity, maybe there's no difference in pool average hashrates VS intensity 21 let's see

[stolarzz]

it's also luck but i compared whattomine 24 hour profit for that day and mintpond showed much better results at least for one day, actually difficulty was little bit higher when i tested mintpond

Just switched my 160mh/s to mintpond, last month it was on 2miners, im going to compare it after few days

[george2019]

yes 160mh/sec is quite large hashrate, it's better to test at least 3 day (around 72 hours) to find out which give better profit, for my 14.3 mh/sec smaller rig mintpond was better, you should get around 6 zcoins daily

[TrailingStop]

yes 160mh/sec is quite large hashrate, it's better to test at least 3 day (around 72 hours) to find out which give better profit, for my 14.3 mh/sec smaller rig mintpond was better, you should get around 6 zcoins daily

Hi stolarzz & george2019,

thanks that you spend your time for sharing your insights - they are very useful for others miners - that's really fair!

Thx.

[Alexios777]

Not sure what is going on, here is the deal - with TTMiner (tried different AB and intensity settings) I barely ever get any shares found example: 8 cards in 15min only 4 cards found few shares and that's all, thus my results on pool are terrible, and completely different situation with a different miner. Am I doing something wrong? BTW hashrate in TTMiner is higher than other miners, but share problem makes it impossible for me to use TTMiner.

Hi Alexios777,

could you please share some more information so that I can try to help? I guess you are mining MTP? Can you please let me know which pool you use? Some pools start with a high diff so the it might take some time to find a share. TT-Miner shows you the diff if it receives an update from the pool. You can then calculate how long it should take in AVERAGE, until your system finds a share. If the diff from the pool is 1GH and your systems hashrate is 10MH/s it will take 1GH / 10MH/s = 100 seconds until you find a share - that is the statistical average over a long time. It can take longer and you system can also find shares faster than that.
I will add some output that gives you statistical information. So you can see if the system is low or fast - related to the diff it gets from the pool.

If you run TT-Miner with -logpool I can see if your system behaves as expected or if something is not OK and need to be fixed.

Thanks.

Mining MTP, 2miners pool, 8x1080ti, win10 not sure how to use logpool, and which intensity to use. thanks

[alivanich]

A good miner gives more hashes than cryptodredge. But he ate all my RAM!

My config:
11 x RX470 mining ethereum
8 x p106-100 mining XZC
4Gb RAM
60-100gb at virtual memory (it's enough)

Cryptodredge works fine and system use 3.0-3.2 gb
TT-Miner ate 4gb memory and system crashes
I try to run only 4 card on tt-miner, and everything was fine, there was enough RAM.

PS: hashes and config
p106-100 6gb
pl63, core +100, memory +420
Cryptodredge 1250
TT-Miner (-i=20) 1350

You can get more hashes, but energy efficiency will get worse.

[Vivik]

 got out of position with nicehash, in TT-Miner.exe I replaced it using WinHex MTP -> MTP1, and MTP-100 -> MTP and now starts with CUDA10.0.
This is a temporary solution, so I corrected LYRA2V3.

[kalyanzb]

Hi dev !!!
When miner for Linux ?  

[george2019]

actually with default intensity i got even better results in 24 hours, whattominer said only 0.53 zcoin for 14.3mh/sec in last 24 hours, i got around 0.61 zcoins, so i will use default intensity, for my celeron g1840 maybe it is more optimal setting than intensity 21, so i should put around 16mh/sec in whattomine calculator, average mintpont 1 day hashrate is 16mh/sec, it's main reason that i got 0.61 vs 0.53, mintpond gives quite good 0.0010 bitcoin profit daily for my rig, luck was very good as well in last 24 hour

[ouray]

actually with default intensity i got even better results in 24 hours, whattominer said only 0.53 zcoin for 14.3mh/sec in last 24 hours, i got around 0.61 zcoins, so i will use default intensity, for my celeron g1840 maybe it is more optimal setting than intensity 21, so i should put around 16mh/sec in whattomine calculator, average mintpont 1 day hashrate is 16mh/sec, it's main reason that i got 0.61 vs 0.53, mintpond gives quite good 0.0010 bitcoin profit daily for my rig, luck was very good as well in last 24 hour

>>>mintpond gives quite good 0.0010 bitcoin profit daily for my rig
For everyone or just you? 
I am at MintPont too, can you tell where to look for that profit on the website?  Thanks

[george2019]

i use mintpond pool average daily hashrate on whattomine calculator and zcoin 24 hours earnings that mintpond statistic shows, you can look this statistic on minpond as well, for example:

https://i.imgur.com/uBKtTBw.png your daily earnings will depend both on pool luck and pool average accepted daily hashrate, well last two days luck was very good, today it is worse, daily accepted hashrate should be more or less same everyday if there's no connection problems and pool is working fine during that period, Round Est. for each block depends on average miner hashrate during that period + pool total hashrate, well more you have more you earn

[ouray]

i use mintpond pool average daily hashrate on whattomine calculator and zcoin 24 hours earnings that mintpond statistic shows, you can look this statistic on minpond as well, for example:

https://i.imgur.com/uBKtTBw.png your daily earnings will depend both on pool luck and pool average accepted daily hashrate, well last two days luck was very good, today it is worse, daily accepted hashrate should be more or less same everyday if there's no connection problems and pool is working fine during that period, Round Est. for each block depends on average miner hashrate during that period + pool total hashrate, well more you have more you earn

Thank you!

[TrailingStop]

New version 2.1.18 ready for download.

Release notes:
  - New option: -log creates a logfile that contains the screen output and
         additional information that could be helpful to find bugs.
  - New option: -luck shows a second statistic line - additional to the rig
         speed. It shows the time it may take to find a new solution(share)
         at the current difficulty. It also calculates a 'luck' value that
         show the luck in percent for the next share.
  - New option: --api-type does nothing so far, TT-Miner support TCP connections only
  - Remove the three stars in the 'Accepted share' message.
  - The meaning of the -A parameter changed slightly. If you define an algo without
  - cuda version, TT-Miner will load the algo that fits best to your installed
  - driver version - it will no longer load the algo for the last cuda version!

Please report all issues and bugs you find.

Thanks.