[ANN] | SUQA | New X22i Algo | SWIFFTX | No ICO | No Pre-mine | %5 Apr Interest

[Newminer2018]

Here are the overclocking settings of single GTX1070:
GPU model: Gigabyte Extreme Gaming GTX1070, OS Win10 x64
Average power consumption is about 130W
https://i.imgur.com/rvoY0TO.jpg

Great information. I am running 6 x 1070 OC gigabyte GPU's. Is it safe to run these at the settings you have given for a long time? I always thought that you should only max out the Core Clock speed to around 1750 MHZ. Am I missing something here?

[1714819562]

1714819562

[uralcryptocoin]

....
Great information. I am running 6 x 1070 OC gigabyte GPU's. Is it safe to run these at the settings you have given for a long time? I always thought that you should only max out the Core Clock speed to around 1750 MHZ. Am I missing something here?

For me it works well for 2 days already.
It's my "universal" settings. I use them for the most algos.
Maximizing core clock increase the power consumption strong enough. And stable clocks significantly depend on GPU model.
At first I chose the PL acceptable for me and then found stable core/memory clocks for each GPU

[Newminer2018]

....
Great information. I am running 6 x 1070 OC gigabyte GPU's. Is it safe to run these at the settings you have given for a long time? I always thought that you should only max out the Core Clock speed to around 1750 MHZ. Am I missing something here?

For me it works well for 2 days already.
It's my "universal" settings. I use them for the most algos.
Maximizing core clock increase the power consumption strong enough. And stable clocks significantly depend on GPU model.
At first I chose the PL acceptable for me and then found stable core/memory clocks for each GPU

Yes that is so true. I am always fine tuning my GPU's and that is what makes so interesting as each GPU is different.

[anhong]

Here are the overclocking settings of single GTX1070:
GPU model: Gigabyte Extreme Gaming GTX1070, OS Win10 x64
Average power consumption is about 130W

Great information. I am running 6 x 1070 OC gigabyte GPU's. Is it safe to run these at the settings you have given for a long time? I always thought that you should only max out the Core Clock speed to around 1750 MHZ. Am I missing something here?

each algo is different.
what might work for one algo couldnt work at all with another algo.
So always check how people have their settings depending which coin you mine.

[SUQAFOUNDATION]

Here is a thread with 23.2K people on Reddit but they seem to have misunderstandings and calling SUQA scam.
Feel free to write some comments about the project for misunderstandings.
https://www.reddit.com/r/gpumining/comments/9oed9c/new_gpu_algo_x22i_from_the_suqa_coin_project/

[mymerlia]

Dev fee is too much, this is the biggest reason for deception claims.
These claims would not be too much if the dev fee rate was lower.
I dug up a bit, I switched to ravencoin mining. Ravencoin is safer.

[sergw]

Hello, how may i export private key(not backup) from SUQA-qt wallet?

[anhong]

Here is a thread with 23.2K people on Reddit but they seem to have misunderstandings and calling SUQA scam.
Feel free to write some comments about the project for misunderstandings.
https://www.reddit.com/r/gpumining/comments/9oed9c/new_gpu_algo_x22i_from_the_suqa_coin_project/

I dont think they very negative about it?

[freddyk]

Here is a thread with 23.2K people on Reddit but they seem to have misunderstandings and calling SUQA scam.
Feel free to write some comments about the project for misunderstandings.
https://www.reddit.com/r/gpumining/comments/9oed9c/new_gpu_algo_x22i_from_the_suqa_coin_project/

Thank you, but for example I was already announced in the Russian topic of the discord by the SUQA spammer on the salary, they said that I was advertising a scam coin, like other bloggers who were paid to everyone, of course. I am there in the discord under the nickname Bлaдимиp. Read the Russian theme, and laugh))

[amey.pro]

List of SUQA mining pools with live stats & hashrate distribution

https://miningpoolstats.stream/suqa

Only 3 pools seems active

You can find info from the pools here.
https://poolexplorer.com/coin/5401

You can find info but you can't sort the list, can't see fees or pools hashrate history.

I'm working on it

[Rabinovitch]

List of SUQA mining pools with live stats & hashrate distribution

https://miningpoolstats.stream/suqa

Only 3 pools seems active

Feel free to join to minermore.com pool. Let's distribute the SUQA hashrate.

[Rabinovitch]

Have anyone tested new RTX cards with X22i algo ?

Check Youtube for that.

[SUQAFOUNDATION]

SUQA Mac Wallet is released. https://github.com/SUQAORG/SUQA-CORE/releases/tag/v1.0

[JayDiCee]

Dev fee is too much, this is the biggest reason for deception claims.
These claims would not be too much if the dev fee rate was lower.
I dug up a bit, I switched to ravencoin mining. Ravencoin is safer.

Have you skipped over the part that there is no ICO or Pre-Mine or even the part that the Dev-Fee is locked to make sure the DEVs actually keep working on the project?
There is also a nice breakdown on what the Dev-Fee will be spent on. I think you may also want check on the Dev's of this Coin and with a little bit of research you may find that one of them have been tied to other successful projects (XCN) as well.

[skeletounek]

I wouldn't call the Cryptonite (XCN) project successful. The XCN coins are worthless now (1 coin = 12 satoshi).

[uralcryptocoin]

...

Check Youtube for that.

Checked, interesting info. Trend continues. Like with Maxwell cards vs Pascal we see ~40% improvement of Turing vs Pascal at practically the same power consumption. So it could be quite interesting for mining. Will wait price stabilization 

[pallas]

I wouldn't call the Cryptonite (XCN) project successful. The XCN coins are worthless now (1 coin = 12 satoshi).

XCN was created in 2014, with a lot of innovative functions, and it's still working, being maintained and developed after more than 4 years.
The current price may seem low only because it was pumped by the chinese back in june 2017, up to 3000 sat and 3000 BTC daily volume.
I don't call this unsuccesfull, I call it a solid coin, showing new tech that is working as expected.
Unsuccessful is a coin being dropped by their own devs after a few months, like most of the coins that are created everyday.

[skeletounek]

I wouldn't call the Cryptonite (XCN) project successful. The XCN coins are worthless now (1 coin = 12 satoshi).

XCN was created in 2014, with a lot of innovative functions, and it's still working, being maintained and developed after more than 4 years.
The current price may seem low only because it was pumped by the chinese back in june 2017, up to 3000 sat and 3000 BTC daily volume.
I don't call this unsuccesfull, I call it a solid coin, showing new tech that is working as expected.
Unsuccessful is a coin being dropped by their own devs after a few months, like most of the coins that are created everyday.

Sorry, but I dont call XCN a solid coin, if there is no value of coins and there is none bigger exchange with this coin after 4 years of development. It is fine you are still developing XCN but it seems there is nothing new what this coin can offer and to be more interesting. Maybe because of this, we have now SUQA? Who knows...

[cryptotamer01]

I wouldn't call the Cryptonite (XCN) project successful. The XCN coins are worthless now (1 coin = 12 satoshi).

XCN was created in 2014, with a lot of innovative functions, and it's still working, being maintained and developed after more than 4 years.
The current price may seem low only because it was pumped by the chinese back in june 2017, up to 3000 sat and 3000 BTC daily volume.
I don't call this unsuccesfull, I call it a solid coin, showing new tech that is working as expected.
Unsuccessful is a coin being dropped by their own devs after a few months, like most of the coins that are created everyday.

Sorry, but I dont call XCN a solid coin, if there is no value of coins and there is none bigger exchange with this coin after 4 years of development. It is fine you are still developing XCN but it seems there is nothing new what this coin can offer and to be more interesting. Maybe because of this, we have now SUQA? Who knows...

A solid coin means good team with good support not price. Total Cap is 210 billion now but it was 700 billion in January. Look at the Market cap of XCN in January too. Prices increase or decrease the most important thing is when crypto goes mainstream with trillions of dollars of market cap, then the solid coins with good teams and support like XCN will have hundreds of millions of dollars of Market Cap. Considering our rapid growth i don't know where SUQA will be when the trillion dollars market cap arrives

[chrysophylax]

I wouldn't call the Cryptonite (XCN) project successful. The XCN coins are worthless now (1 coin = 12 satoshi).

XCN was created in 2014, with a lot of innovative functions, and it's still working, being maintained and developed after more than 4 years.
The current price may seem low only because it was pumped by the chinese back in june 2017, up to 3000 sat and 3000 BTC daily volume.
I don't call this unsuccesfull, I call it a solid coin, showing new tech that is working as expected.
Unsuccessful is a coin being dropped by their own devs after a few months, like most of the coins that are created everyday.

Sorry, but I dont call XCN a solid coin, if there is no value of coins and there is none bigger exchange with this coin after 4 years of development. It is fine you are still developing XCN but it seems there is nothing new what this coin can offer and to be more interesting. Maybe because of this, we have now SUQA? Who knows...

Coming from a newbie account, those comments are rich ...

Remember who you are talking to when you comment in that prose, as Pallas has been in this industry longer than you can imagine, has implemented more than you can bother to research, and has done more for the OpenSource Community than you are making out. Just because he is the Lead Developer for XCN and one of the the Developers or SUQA does NOT mean he is juggling one against the other as you inferred. In fact, most of the LEGENDARY positioned 'players' in this industry are the ones you REALLY need to take into account and listen to, as these are the people that have been around and worked more INSIDE the CryptoIndustry than you could imagine. I know, I am one.

I guess it is the way Crypto is going unfortunately, with the lack of education and knowledge by those that think they know it all. Even after Pallas explained to you, you continue on your merry way to restate what you already said.

Amazing!

XCN to this day still has tech that others have yet to even scrape the surface, so when you can actually MAKE better, we would all like to see your amazing remarks about what YOU have created and whether someone berates you in the same fashion. Just be mindful that there is little in this industry that can be called your own. So when you say 'sorry', actually BE sorry and not say it for the sake of just pushing your point again, of which is pretty much moot anyway.

#crysx