Should ICOs be regulated

[mustafayasinsenturk]

90% of the capital is scam. Most of the trouble is picking up coins and running away. The number of people who have a project is very small.

[1714613215]

1714613215

[1714613215]

1714613215

[Elysio]

definitely needs to be regulate. because icos are affecting the market very badly. for example ethereum. ethereum this price of icos, icos for this price would not fall. and investors need to be protected.

[jatin729]

definitely needs to be regulate. because icos are affecting the market very badly. for example ethereum. ethereum this price of icos, icos for this price would not fall. and investors need to be protected.

I agree with your points ICOs should be regulated and registered with the govt. entity so that if something wrong happened with the project, people's money would be safe. One thing more as we know most of ICOs are scam now a days to eliminating those ICOs regulation should be there so that safe environment would be created for investors.

[Gypsy.Danger]

It is considered and most advice that all the ICO right now must be regulated. To stop the scammers of damaging good investors by making scam ico projects. With the regulation, the scammers cannot really enter into the ico ecosystem. I hope it will be soon.

[QueenCryptomarket]

I have been thinking about this for a long time and have long understood that without much control there is no future in the work of ICO. Definitely, a regulatory body will be created to test the work of the ICO and the development team. When the project fails, they will be responsible. This will attract investors and old and new.

[btcfan87]

Hi guys!

I would love to connect with your professional network. I hope you are fine.

I'm Michael Zasidkevich, co-founder TOPExperts.io. It's the first transparent rating of experts and projects in the ICO/STO market.

Please give us your feedback about usability TOPExperts - https://app.usabilityhub.com/do/81a697bcc809/936
So we can make TOPExperts ratings more convenient and understandable.

Your opinion is very important to us. Thanks

[sulis sudibyo]

ico should be arranged so that there are no more project frauds. now there are too many scams carried out by scammers and investors suffer huge losses. For this reason, a regulation to guarantee investors' funds is a must thing.

[irenegaming]

I think we want to or not, in the end they have to be regulated, that's something that has to happen for countries to start accepting them more, right now many countries see ICOs as a scam, a kind of pyramid to take their money away from the investor, and they are right, because many end up being scams, but there are also good ICOs that are worth investing in, so those regulations would help those ICOs too.

[accounting 181293]

if you see a lot of fraud in the ICO project, regulations are really needed. regulations serve to protect investor funds to be safe and make the ICO ecosystem better.

not a secret anymore ico is one of the factors that make the market situation as it is now. if there is a rule that can solve all problems, I am looking forward to it

[bitcoindusts]

ICO should be regulated.  Government have to protect these investors and stop scam and fraud in the cyrptocurrency industry.  There are lots of scam company that exploits cryptocurrency. When asked if they have the license to operate, they will answer with decentralization so it does not need to have license to operate.  So in the early years of cryptocurrency, until now, there are lots of fly by night companies, half-baked ICO's and scam ICO in the industry.  If investors always got scammed, we will see a barren land in the crypto universe, there will be no growth because people are afraid to hop in because of these scams.  So yes, ICO must be regulated.

[cryptowolfsu]

ICOs should be regulated to make investments safe. Not in terms of profitability as every
investment in crypto is risky, but in terms that the project leaders cannot abandon the project
and steel the funds. ( for example like EtherDelta scammers did )

[andika2018]

Considering the high level of scam associated with ICOs presently, many investors are at risk of loosing their investments. Bounty hunters like us are not spared as we may be rendering free services to some scammers and also risking our personal data.

I suppose a regulatory body be set up to audit the ICO process and the  founders, and if anything goes wrong or should the project fail, they will be liable. This will reduce drastically investors risk and also keep scammers away. What do you think?

I am agree that ICOs should regulated by government. Government should protect their citizen investment and many investor losing their money because many ICOs scamming public. Without regulation, there is no confident and guarantee for investor and its like a jungle market.

[aryaadikariyansyahsuwarto]

In my opinion, it is longer, like this, because it is very necessary, considering that there are many ICOs that are scam. I can't take it anymore to express it, I hope that regulation really exists ... !!

[maaldaz]

That would be better if there is a regulation for the ICO, it will be able to remove or at least minimizing the potential of any scam project that are uncontrollable these days.

[mbah]

ICO is indeed supposed to be regulating. This will have an impact on the progress of the ICO as well because it will be able to give a sense of comfort for investors to choose the ICO will they select for investment. a scam that made many investors fear will be suppressed and the dwindling of this regulation and of course the highly anticipated by many investors ICO.

[Lolox]

The proposal would indeed provide more secure security for all crypto communities, and would also further minimize the fraudulent actions of scammers. However, given the organizational structure, of course, crypto also requires a fee to give rewards to responsible managers. Of course, it can be obtained if it puts a burden on every community that follows the ICO. If the results are large it does not matter, but it will be a problem if the results obtained from the ICO are few, and are still reduced by the burden given by the ICO manager.

[rizki991]

really, ico must be tightened a lot of ico ico popping up which is not clear about the project and my scam was hit twice by ico scam.ico must be reduced and in tightening

[Tylev]

It was necessary to regulate the activities of ICO several years ago; this would not have led to such massive frauds in the ICO now. States are already far behind the reaction of massive frauds in the ICO, as hundreds of millions of dollars are being stolen by investors, these are common criminal offenses to which the state should have responded long ago. Of course, we will not solve the problem of fraud in the ICO by self-regulation. This problem can be solved only by government regulation.

[agusiska]

i think thats a good idea, if that happen maybe can reduced potential of scam ico, and also could be the best way to gain interest from investor because of regulated itself.

[glendall]

I agree with you, and I think this must be fast and facilitate investors and bounty hunters to avoid scam projects,
and I hope platforms such as bountyhive and bountysuite also don't arbitrarily accept projects, so they also choose and audit which projects are legit and which are not. and this is one of the implementations of this platform.