Should ICOs be regulated

[jets567]

For now this are the stand of most existing sectors in order for the cryptocurrencies to be recognize as legal and scam free. As of now if you look at the things that happening there are ICO's which are fully regulated but focuses only on the security tokens which are the STO's. As you can see those sto's are very successful after crowd funding if you apply a similar thing to ICO's i think it would be a great thing because less and less scams will be coming to market up to the point that it will be fully filtered.

[mistanama]

It should be regulated by the sectors of the government in order to assure the people that everything is good and there is nothing to worry about investing in ICOs because way back from the past, it is a dark experience for the investors for jumping into ICOs because it is like a gambling that they just invest without any assurance.

[memecoin]

Of course, I know that many people do not want to hear about regulations, but this free market is more and more dangerous for investors, more and more scams are created to get quick money. Is that right?

That's right, for things that were created recently to combat scams, but the more layers of protection the scammers get more sophisticated and they don't stop 

[Thermytee]

For me the concept of decentralization in itself is confusing. If the blockchain that's meant to be open and accessible is being used to carry out scams, will existing and new project accept regulations as list of them has hidden details far away from the public eye. No doubt there's need for regulations to protect client's funds and sanitise the industry but who will bail the cat?

[casternetwork]

       I think there should be an ICO regulation to protect investor investment. There are many SCAM projects and it is increasingly difficult to realize that the project is viable or not. I think there should be a system for the project team like KYC. I think it would be necessary and many ICO SCAM projects would be removed.

I agree that it should be regulated and determined quickly. But it is difficult to do right now, I can only expect that in the near future it can do because too many fraud projects in here

[mammoniter]

Yes I think so. If by regulation means eliminating the scam project and minimizing the failure of an ICO, then I guess its really needed. Nowadays more and more ICOs end up as a failure and most of them are just scamming people around and its happening because there is no clear rules and regulations that prevent the ICO from doing that.

[Crypto24hrs]

No doubt initial coin offering (ICO) arguably have become an indispensable factor for fundraising. The legal and regulatory treatment of Initial Coin Offerings is however, often complex and unclear. Since token offerings generally involve multiple jurisdictions, that complexity is compounded by the number of jurisdictions involved, however after proper consultation and analysis i opine it should be regulated for good.

[monineklutak]

it is very necessary because it will minimize the scammer, but it will be difficult to make it happen, but even without that ICO is actually still good and will still be in demand because even though the risk is high but there will always be people who like challenges, as long as the possibility of success is still there there are always people who are interested in ICO, either as an investor or as a bounty hunter like me, because ICO is a good way to make money, so no matter how difficult, I will never go away from all this

[harbin55]

I think all things in this world should regulated in order to promote common good and equal interest of every individual. The fact ICO will be regulated it will lessen all fraudulent scams and other illegal activities in this community which is great thing for us.

[Cianix]

Yes, ICOs should be regulated, but the laws on how securities are defined, at least in the U.S., need to be updated. It doesn't seem to make much sense that laws drafted in the early 20th century are being applied to digital assets created today. There needs to be more regulatory clarity on cryptocurrencies, with of course some room to allow them to flourish without unnecessary government interference.

Without regulations, scammers and fraudsters start to proliferate and damage the space.

I think it does not matter will it be regulated or not , now all switched to io and everything is fine and works great , but adjusting of course I would like

[nadyn]

The most correct decision, regulated by ICO, the investor will be protected from fraudulent actions of the team, which will be responsible for their project and its promotion on the roadmap.

[Estehmanis]

I really agree with you, solving the problem with a good solution, with the audit ico will be more secure and comfortable for investors and bounty hunters, the question is who wants to be or pay for the ico audit?

[Dennicex]

I really agree with you, solving the problem with a good solution, with the audit ico will be more secure and comfortable for investors and bounty hunters, the question is who wants to be or pay for the ico audit?

It seems to me that the audit of projects and companies should become mandatory. Then the percentage of fraudsters and scam projects decreases dozens or even hundreds of times.

[EducoinVietnam]

I am fully confident that with time various methods of regulating the ICO market will appear. Such changes will increase the credibility of the crypto market, investors will be better protected from the activities of various scammers.

[Fedots83]

I am sure that now all participants in the crypto market understand the need to prepare regulatory methods and control the situation on the ICO market. After all, this approach will help maintain a stable market development, maintain attention and trust among investors.

[taktik]

I am sure that now all participants in the crypto market understand the need to prepare regulatory methods and control the situation on the ICO market. After all, this approach will help maintain a stable market development, maintain attention and trust among investors.

I think that the approach to the implementation of all issues regarding the ico market of a company should be approached very carefully and carefully, since we see a real rush around IEO, which attracts more investors because there are certain guarantees for investments.  Any trade exchanges, before providing hardwood for a coin, do a certain check of everything.  Because of this, the company's ico market should be regulated.

[Zythiphill]

If earlier ico could regulate it could be still popular , even iso could not replace it , and now I doubt that regulation will help ico

[CaVO32]

If earlier ico could regulate it could be still popular , even iso could not replace it , and now I doubt that regulation will help ico

and since ICOs are dying, no need to regulate them. people learned their hard lessons so very few are now engaging in investing in ico projects. they found the trick. buy a promising token once it hit in exchanges. you can get a very good deal from the dumpers.

[Adriano2010]

Indeed now ICOs are dying and slow will be replaced by IEOs and maybe on future by another way of buying coins, but now no one will try to regulate the ICOs, this should happen before of launching ICO, and maybe then not was so much scams.

[Xalata]

The huge number of scam projects that are circulating in the cryptosphere tells us that men are surely not angels hence the need to make rules and laws. It has come to the time that we surely need some regulations to get rid of all those scam projects that are ruining some crypto nivestors.