coinlocket$ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2366
Merit: 1512
#1 VIP Crypto Casino
|
|
December 05, 2018, 04:53:34 PM Last edit: December 05, 2018, 05:30:53 PM by coinlocket$ |
|
CONSIDERATIONS
- 13 Accounts are on DT 1 list
- 235 Accounts are or were on the DT2 list
- 53 Accounts has been removed/Excluded from the DT2 list
- Some people are removed even with positive Trust for whatever reason
- 182 Accounts are the DT2 list
- Even if I spent a lot of time doing this report, forgive me if there are any inaccuracies this is a manual copy-paste job
- All accounts come from the public list here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust so I hope this is updated
- The last activity for accounts have been checked between 11.00-15.00 GTM +1 on 05/12/2018
- The activity for people removed from the DT2 list is not checked since it is not shown on the default trust list
- Some people on the DT2 list have a Trust score
- One person on the DT2 list has a red trust score
- With some exceptions like alt accounts the last account added on DT2 list is the number 881377 @Hhampuz
- No Accounts with 1xxxxxx are on the DT list
- Some DT2 members have no feedbacks
- Some DT2 members have sent no feedbacks
- Some DT2 members are currently inactive for years
- Some DT2 members are active but don't send feedbacks at all
- Some DT2 members are active and send a lot of feedbacks
- I'm considering to add the trust value on the table
DT1 LIST
_____________________ | _____________________ | _____________ | ___________________________ | _____________ | PROFILE | ID NUMBER° | BPIP | LAST ACTIVITY | LAST FEEDBACK | theymos | 35 | BPIP | December04,2018,11:59:22PM | 22/03/18 | HostFat | 203 | BPIP | December05,2018,03:34:21AM | 07/06/18 | dooglus | 3420 | BPIP | December04,2018,04:45:58PM | 10/03/18 | Maged | 6347 | BPIP | March24,2016,01:43:46AM | 15/07/14 | dserrano5 | 17768 | BPIP | October17,2018,04:46:01AM | 14/02/17 | OgNasty | 18321 | BPIP | December05,2018,09:21:24AM | 01/12/18 | Tomatocage | 37522 | BPIP | May03,2018,11:46:06PM | 14/02/18 | SaltySpitoon | 38894 | BPIP | December05,2018,04:35:18AM | 27/11/18 | philipma1957 | 64507 | BPIP | December05,2018,04:00:24AM | 16/10/18 | Cyrus | 78147 | BPIP | December05,2018,02:09:57AM | 22/05/17 | Blazed | 134378 | BPIP | December04,2018,05:03:14AM | 05/11/18 | hilariousandco | 164822 | BPIP | December04,2018,09:59:17PM | 21/11/18 | OldScammerTag | 330472 | BPIP | Never | Never |
DT2 LIST NUMERICAL ORDER
_____________________ | _____________________ | _____________ | ___________________________ | _____________ | PROFILE | ID NUMBER° | BPIP | LAST ACTIVITY | LAST FEEDBACK | sirius | 4 | BPIP | January06,2018,01:12:21PM | 26/05/13 | allinvain | 198 | BPIP | December05,2018,12:00:50PM | 11/04/18 | Gavin Andresen | 224 | BPIP | October11,2018,05:08:38PM | Never | nanotube | 1268 | BPIP | July18,2018,01:31:49PM | Never | mikegogulski | 2285 | BPIP | July19,2018,02:06:48PM | 25/05/13 | casascius | 2676 | BPIP | November04,2018,08:37:10PM | 23/01/16 | Light | 2818 | BPIP | November25,2018,05:24:33AM | 16/11/15 | molecular | 3771 | BPIP | November30,2018,09:05:39PM | 04/04/15 | Raize | 4171 | BPIP | November05,2018,01:19:17AM | 02/10/15 | grue | 5797 | BPIP | August01,2018,03:00:20AM | 21/01/18 | EpiSKiNG | 7351 | BPIP | April23,2018,05:19:31PM | 05/12/17 | gmaxwell | 11425 | BPIP | December05,2018,03:47:11AM | 27/11/18 | Kluge | 11671 | BPIP | May25,2018,01:18:11PM | 16/10/14 | piotr_n | 12089 | BPIP | December04,2018,05:58:19PM | 03/10/18 | MiningBuddy | 14001 | BPIP | April04,2018,01:24:05PM | 09/04/15 | teukon | 14685 | BPIP | July09,2016,11:25:03PM | 20/12/14 | rb1205 | 14716 | BPIP | February11,2018,08:35:47PM | 13/07/13 | majamalu | 14792 | BPIP | August25,2017,05:13:53AM | 05/12/13 | BurtW | 14808 | BPIP | November09,2018,12:51:19AM | 25/08/14 | Mousepotato | 15510 | BPIP | July26,2016,09:02:53PM | 05/05/15 | jwzguy | 15540 | BPIP | December05,2017,06:16:17PM | 27/09/13 | paci | 15648 | BPIP | November05,2018,10:36:08AM | 29/12/16 | Carnth | 15682 | BPIP | August21,2015,04:20:58AM | 24/05/13 | Caesium | 15913 | BPIP | March30,2017,09:48:43AM | 02/08/14 | tysat | 17261 | BPIP | July16,2018,12:54:28PM | 27/08/17 | piuk | 17928 | BPIP | June19,2015,07:52:05PM | Never | haploid23 | 18062 | BPIP | March28,2015,04:14:50PM | 18/03/15 | phantastisch | 18312 | BPIP | November04,2018,05:00:25PM | 13/03/18 | SebastianJu | 18640 | BPIP | December05,2018,12:05:56PM | 22/11/18 | Stemby | 18953 | BPIP | November25,2018,01:56:25AM | 19/05/17 | zvs | 19897 | BPIP | November23,2018,03:30:13AM | 06/12/17 | -ck | 19971 | BPIP | December05,2018,04:22:19AM | 05/06/18 | jackjack | 21053 | BPIP | May13,2018,10:02:22AM | 23/02/17 | malevolent | 23092 | BPIP | December04,2018,05:26:20AM | 04/10/18 | yxt | 23810 | BPIP | December05,2018,07:41:42AM | 20/11/18 | qwk | 24140 | BPIP | December05,2018,09:53:42AM | 21/11/18 | the joint | 24314 | BPIP | November21,2018,06:58:56PM | 18/06/15 | aigeezer | 24674 | BPIP | December05,2018,03:05:24AM | Never | Matthew N. Wright | 24749 | BPIP | January23,2014,04:40:03AM | 13/08/13 | CrazyGuy | 25223 | BPIP | November30,2018,07:20:09PM | 10/09/16 | smoothie | 25960 | BPIP | December05,2018,11:02:15AM | 28/05/17 | sveetsnelda | 26772 | BPIP | January22,2018,06:56:46AM | 27/01/15 | naypalm | 27273 | BPIP | November06,2018,11:24:51PM | 12/02/18 | ziomik | 27427 | BPIP | December03,2018,01:30:18PM | 26/06/16 | Korbman | 29254 | BPIP | December02,2018,11:40:08PM | 25/02/15 | paraipan | 29395 | BPIP | June02,2014,01:33:58AM | 19/10/13 | Vod | 30747 | BPIP | December05,2018,11:15:37AM | 02/12/18 | John (JohnK.) | 31288 | BPIP | December05,2018,05:38:46AM | 20/05/18 | ercolinux | 31410 | BPIP | October25,2018,07:51:33PM | 23/12/16 | Michail1 | 31539 | BPIP | November28,2018,04:57:35PM | 30/12/17 | danieldaniel | 33781 | BPIP | May28,2018,12:01:01AM | 23/11/13 | Mushroomized | 34882 | BPIP | March31,2018,08:23:16PM | 21/04/17 | wallet.dat | 35123 | BPIP | July07,2015,08:50:26PM | 09/06/15 | maxmint | 36677 | BPIP | November14,2018,06:52:05PM | 16/07/16 | dree12 | 37096 | BPIP | December07,2017,05:27:02AM | 17/08/14 | ineededausername | 40007 | BPIP | December12,2016,11:36:17PM | 26/05/13 | DeaDTerra | 40976 | BPIP | October22,2018,03:26:31PM | 08/09/13 | DeathAndTaxes | 41048 | BPIP | April22,2015,11:53:28AM | 09/01/15 | BadBear | 41911 | BPIP | April02,2018,12:39:12PM | 15/04/16 | Shawshank | 42880 | BPIP | December04,2018,09:38:27PM | Never | mdude77 | 48765 | BPIP | October07,2018,01:49:47AM | 05/12/17 | Bees Brothers | 50107 | BPIP | November26,2018,06:33:37PM | 18/11/15 | mprep | 51173 | BPIP | December05,2018,01:56:30PM | 01/12/18 | Blazr | 51908 | BPIP | July06,2018,08:54:56AM | 17/02/18 | xkrikl | 53416 | BPIP | October15,2014,12:09:43PM | 24/05/13 | vgo | 53862 | BPIP | November09,2018,08:22:03PM | 18/08/17 | Cablez | 54059 | BPIP | January28,2018,02:15:37AM | 19/02/15 | BCB | 54113 | BPIP | September09,2018,06:55:36PM | 18/12/17 | Dabs | 54791 | BPIP | December01,2018,04:04:21AM | 15/02/18 | DiamondCardz | 55122 | BPIP | May13,2018,04:28:09PM | 27/05/16 | diego1000 | 57872 | BPIP | February26,2018,07:18:15PM | 18/03/14 | btharper | 58297 | BPIP | November25,2018,10:21:53PM | 30/11/13 | davecoin | 58365 | BPIP | December05,2018,06:07:19AM | 08/05/17 | burnside | 59012 | BPIP | December04,2018,07:01:19AM | 05/12/13 | DannyHamilton | 60820 | BPIP | September24,2018,01:39:55PM | 07/03/18 | LoweryCBS | 61196 | BPIP | December04,2018,01:27:30PM | 20/03/14 | bigtimespaghetti | 65317 | BPIP | November26,2018,11:44:16PM | 14/04/18 | stenkross | 66253 | BPIP | November18,2017,07:50:01AM | 22/10/16 | Benson Samuel | 66510 | BPIP | June20,2018,06:52:38AM | 29/03/15 | LuisCar | 70416 | BPIP | December02,2018,09:40:01AM | Never | KWH | 70535 | BPIP | December05,2018,12:25:32PM | 19/08/18 | kelpy | 71769 | BPIP | December05,2018,10:51:54AM | 27/02/17 | GIANNAT | 73619 | BPIP | March30,2018,11:13:20AM | 29/09/17 | bertani | 76206 | BPIP | October25,2016,07:43:56AM | 13/08/15 | Cripto | 76216 | BPIP | May19,2018,03:32:52PM | 02/11/15 | fernarios | 76332 | BPIP | November09,2018,08:47:26PM | 22/11/13 | shiftybugger | 76857 | BPIP | February10,2014,08:38:38PM | 12/06/13 | ThickAsThieves | 79242 | BPIP | September25,2016,04:29:56PM | 02/03/14 | Stunna | 81292 | BPIP | December03,2018,02:16:44AM | 29/11/18 | monkeynuts | 81962 | BPIP | December04,2018,11:44:59PM | 22/05/18 | fluidjax | 83655 | BPIP | December04,2018,06:44:17PM | Never | ioxoi | 84221 | BPIP | April03,2018,05:38:18PM | Never | Welsh | 84521 | BPIP | December05,2018,06:31:03AM | 09/07/18 | ibminer | 84866 | BPIP | December05,2018,02:25:32AM | 11/11/18 | Wardrick | 85316 | BPIP | January02,2018,03:55:11AM | 23/10/17 | byt411 | 87671 | BPIP | December03,2018,11:59:11PM | 18/05/15 | dogie | 87869 | BPIP | December05,2018,03:58:03AM | 27/04/18 | BigBitz | 95042 | BPIP | July31,2018,02:17:27PM | 21/01/15 | buysolar | 95512 | BPIP | November30,2018,07:46:31PM | 10/04/15 | binaryFate | 95738 | BPIP | November05,2018,05:10:06PM | 07/09/17 | guitarplinker | 95740 | BPIP | December05,2018,01:56:03AM | 18/04/18 | markj113 | 95989 | BPIP | December04,2018,09:49:40PM | 12/10/18 | xetsr | 101763 | BPIP | August22,2016,06:39:17AM | 03/08/16 | Xialla | 103451 | BPIP | December12,2017,01:19:01AM | 11/12/15 | TomUnderSea | 103602 | BPIP | July12,2017,09:04:41AM | 23/06/13 | dwdoc | 105603 | BPIP | January26,2018,01:46:50PM | 29/12/13 | NLNico | 107762 | BPIP | December05,2018,12:08:51PM | 05/11/18 | TookDk | 109430 | BPIP | September22,2018,07:33:29AM | 17/07/18 | Mitchell | 113670 | BPIP | December04,2018,02:58:01PM | 19/09/18 | idee2013 | 113819 | BPIP | November15,2018,08:30:29AM | 05/07/13 | Tywill | 120105 | BPIP | June14,2013,10:14:36PM | 24/05/13 | gdassori | 120714 | BPIP | April16,2018,12:59:32PM | 02/06/15 | ghibly79 | 120821 | BPIP | December03,2018,08:51:35PM | 30/08/17 | sayulita | 120945 | BPIP | February08,2018,04:42:16PM | 18/07/13 | DefaultTrust | 122551 | BPIP | Never | Never | wttbs | 123869 | BPIP | December05,2018,01:02:19PM | 19/11/18 | Taras | 125747 | BPIP | November29,2018,07:02:32AM | 15/05/18 | MarkAz | 128716 | BPIP | December05,2018,06:30:34AM | 11/07/18 | favdesu | 130350 | BPIP | December04,2018,06:47:28PM | 03/11/17 | monbux | 133846 | BPIP | August27,2018,06:08:22PM | 15/07/18 | devthedev | 136592 | BPIP | November29,2018,06:55:06PM | 04/01/17 | FiniteByDesign | 136896 | BPIP | November24,2018,11:40:26AM | 12/10/18 | BayAreaCoins | 137773 | BPIP | December05,2018,03:08:01AM | 31/10/18 | EFS | 140584 | BPIP | December05,2018,01:33:59PM | 09/02/18 | brutale2 | 151278 | BPIP | October31,2018,04:20:07PM | 16/06/17 | LazerViking | 154182 | BPIP | March10,2018,01:31:53AM | 11/03/16 | gentlemand | 155345 | BPIP | December05,2018,12:41:25PM | 13/04/15 | hedgy73 | 162384 | BPIP | December05,2018,01:12:19PM | 30/07/18 | Anon39 | 165089 | BPIP | December04,2018,05:03:56AM | 08/08/18 | EcuaMobi | 169515 | BPIP | December05,2018,02:04:07AM | 03/12/18 | MadZ | 174480 | BPIP | December05,2018,09:56:37AM | 30/12/99 | shorena | 181801 | BPIP | November03,2018,05:03:13PM | 03/03/18 | Powell | 202934 | BPIP | November28,2018,05:03:34AM | 02/02/15 | ManeBjorn | 208286 | BPIP | December05,2018,06:09:45AM | 22/05/18 | mitzie | 210680 | BPIP | December05,2018,09:23:44AM | 16/11/14 | bithalo | 224612 | BPIP | December01,2018,05:07:55AM | 20/06/17 | cryptodevil | 224980 | BPIP | December04,2018,12:23:45PM | 30/11/18 | davvo | 231686 | BPIP | April20,2018,02:52:59PM | 30/12/15 | suchmoon | 234771 | BPIP | December05,2018,12:11:05PM | 05/12/18 | mindtrip | 235982 | BPIP | November24,2018,04:35:34PM | 16/05/18 | alch1mista | 262971 | BPIP | November29,2018,09:29:18AM | 03/11/18 | Rmcdermott927 | 289011 | BPIP | December04,2018,06:22:21PM | 07/11/18 | ThePhwner | 323638 | BPIP | May25,2016,10:17:18PM | 15/01/16 | argovian | 327072 | BPIP | August22,2018,04:39:57PM | 08/10/14 | iluvbitcoins | 337097 | BPIP | December04,2018,06:13:45PM | 21/11/18 | Mexxer-2 | 341982 | BPIP | December05,2018,10:18:26AM | 19/11/18 | minerjones | 346731 | BPIP | December05,2018,02:07:08PM | 04/12/18 | sapta | 347141 | BPIP | December05,2018,02:06:10PM | 04/12/18 | Finksy | 347946 | BPIP | February14,2018,04:02:30AM | 21/02/17 | HagssFIN | 348185 | BPIP | December05,2018,08:20:53AM | 19/10/18 | Gleb Gamow | 349097 | BPIP | June16,2018,04:07:42AM | Never | generalt | 354479 | BPIP | December05,2018,03:13:16AM | 16/04/17 | yahoo62278 | 355846 | BPIP | December05,2018,02:01:04PM | 23/11/18 | MCHouston | 371885 | BPIP | December01,2018,01:49:47AM | 01/06/18 | xandry | 382413 | BPIP | December05,2018,11:08:19AM | 11/11/18 | kilo17 | 387443 | BPIP | August26,2018,09:03:46PM | 15/10/16 | Rhavar | 389331 | BPIP | December05,2018,01:24:17AM | 30/11/18 | hilariousetc | 397737 | BPIP | December03,2018,04:24:25PM | 08/10/18 | LoyceV | 459836 | BPIP | December05,2018,01:07:20PM | 04/12/18 | actmyname | 465017 | BPIP | December04,2018,10:18:13PM | 26/11/18 | The Pharmacist | 487418 | BPIP | December05,2018,01:13:04AM | 04/12/18 | DarkStar_ | 507936 | BPIP | December05,2018,05:40:50PM | 04/12/18 | Tomatocage1 | 517424 | BPIP | May31,2015,06:18:04PM | Never | Lutpin | 520313 | BPIP | December04,2018,10:50:30PM | 02/08/18 | marlboroza | 787736 | BPIP | December05,2018,12:03:46PM | 04/12/18 | Hhampuz | 881377 | BPIP | December05,2018,10:52:55AM | 02/12/18 | loshia1974 | 1294878 | BPIP | September18,2018,03:26:46AM | Never |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"In a nutshell, the network works like a distributed
timestamp server, stamping the first transaction to spend a coin. It
takes advantage of the nature of information being easy to spread but
hard to stifle." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
coinlocket$ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2366
Merit: 1512
#1 VIP Crypto Casino
|
|
December 05, 2018, 04:53:51 PM Last edit: December 05, 2018, 05:28:39 PM by coinlocket$ |
|
THE REMOVED & ESCLUDED DT2 LIST
|
|
|
|
coinlocket$ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2366
Merit: 1512
#1 VIP Crypto Casino
|
|
December 05, 2018, 04:54:07 PM Last edit: December 05, 2018, 05:04:58 PM by coinlocket$ |
|
DT2 LAST FEEDBACK SENT ORDER
_____________________ | _____________________ | _____________ | ___________________________ | _____________ | PROFILE | ID NUMBER° | BPIP | LAST ACTIVITY | LAST FEEDBACK | Carnth | 15682 | BPIP | August21,2015,04:20:58AM | 24/05/13 | xkrikl | 53416 | BPIP | October15,2014,12:09:43PM | 24/05/13 | Tywill | 120105 | BPIP | June14,2013,10:14:36PM | 24/05/13 | mikegogulski | 2285 | BPIP | July19,2018,02:06:48PM | 25/05/13 | sirius | 4 | BPIP | January06,2018,01:12:21PM | 26/05/13 | ineededausername | 40007 | BPIP | December12,2016,11:36:17PM | 26/05/13 | shiftybugger | 76857 | BPIP | February10,2014,08:38:38PM | 12/06/13 | TomUnderSea | 103602 | BPIP | July12,2017,09:04:41AM | 23/06/13 | idee2013 | 113819 | BPIP | November15,2018,08:30:29AM | 05/07/13 | rb1205 | 14716 | BPIP | February11,2018,08:35:47PM | 13/07/13 | sayulita | 120945 | BPIP | February08,2018,04:42:16PM | 18/07/13 | Matthew N. Wright | 24749 | BPIP | January23,2014,04:40:03AM | 13/08/13 | DeaDTerra | 40976 | BPIP | October22,2018,03:26:31PM | 08/09/13 | jwzguy | 15540 | BPIP | December05,2017,06:16:17PM | 27/09/13 | paraipan | 29395 | BPIP | June02,2014,01:33:58AM | 19/10/13 | fernarios | 76332 | BPIP | November09,2018,08:47:26PM | 22/11/13 | danieldaniel | 33781 | BPIP | May28,2018,12:01:01AM | 23/11/13 | btharper | 58297 | BPIP | November25,2018,10:21:53PM | 30/11/13 | majamalu | 14792 | BPIP | August25,2017,05:13:53AM | 05/12/13 | burnside | 59012 | BPIP | December04,2018,07:01:19AM | 05/12/13 | dwdoc | 105603 | BPIP | January26,2018,01:46:50PM | 29/12/13 | ThickAsThieves | 79242 | BPIP | September25,2016,04:29:56PM | 02/03/14 | diego1000 | 57872 | BPIP | February26,2018,07:18:15PM | 18/03/14 | LoweryCBS | 61196 | BPIP | December04,2018,01:27:30PM | 20/03/14 | Caesium | 15913 | BPIP | March30,2017,09:48:43AM | 02/08/14 | dree12 | 37096 | BPIP | December07,2017,05:27:02AM | 17/08/14 | BurtW | 14808 | BPIP | November09,2018,12:51:19AM | 25/08/14 | argovian | 327072 | BPIP | August22,2018,04:39:57PM | 08/10/14 | Kluge | 11671 | BPIP | May25,2018,01:18:11PM | 16/10/14 | mitzie | 210680 | BPIP | December05,2018,09:23:44AM | 16/11/14 | teukon | 14685 | BPIP | July09,2016,11:25:03PM | 20/12/14 | DeathAndTaxes | 41048 | BPIP | April22,2015,11:53:28AM | 09/01/15 | BigBitz | 95042 | BPIP | July31,2018,02:17:27PM | 21/01/15 | sveetsnelda | 26772 | BPIP | January22,2018,06:56:46AM | 27/01/15 | Powell | 202934 | BPIP | November28,2018,05:03:34AM | 02/02/15 | Cablez | 54059 | BPIP | January28,2018,02:15:37AM | 19/02/15 | Korbman | 29254 | BPIP | December02,2018,11:40:08PM | 25/02/15 | haploid23 | 18062 | BPIP | March28,2015,04:14:50PM | 18/03/15 | BensonSamuel | 66510 | BPIP | June20,2018,06:52:38AM | 29/03/15 | molecular | 3771 | BPIP | November30,2018,09:05:39PM | 04/04/15 | MiningBuddy | 14001 | BPIP | April04,2018,01:24:05PM | 09/04/15 | buysolar | 95512 | BPIP | November30,2018,07:46:31PM | 10/04/15 | gentlemand | 155345 | BPIP | December05,2018,12:41:25PM | 13/04/15 | Mousepotato | 15510 | BPIP | July26,2016,09:02:53PM | 05/05/15 | byt411 | 87671 | BPIP | December03,2018,11:59:11PM | 18/05/15 | gdassori | 120714 | BPIP | April16,2018,12:59:32PM | 02/06/15 | wallet.dat | 35123 | BPIP | July07,2015,08:50:26PM | 09/06/15 | the joint | 24314 | BPIP | November21,2018,06:58:56PM | 18/06/15 | bertani | 76206 | BPIP | October25,2016,07:43:56AM | 13/08/15 | Raize | 4171 | BPIP | November05,2018,01:19:17AM | 02/10/15 | Cripto | 76216 | BPIP | May19,2018,03:32:52PM | 02/11/15 | Light | 2818 | BPIP | November25,2018,05:24:33AM | 16/11/15 | Bees Brothers | 50107 | BPIP | November26,2018,06:33:37PM | 18/11/15 | Xialla | 103451 | BPIP | December12,2017,01:19:01AM | 11/12/15 | davvo | 231686 | BPIP | April20,2018,02:52:59PM | 30/12/15 | ThePhwner | 323638 | BPIP | May25,2016,10:17:18PM | 15/01/16 | casascius | 2676 | BPIP | November04,2018,08:37:10PM | 23/01/16 | LazerViking | 154182 | BPIP | March10,2018,01:31:53AM | 11/03/16 | BadBear | 41911 | BPIP | April02,2018,12:39:12PM | 15/04/16 | DiamondCardz | 55122 | BPIP | May13,2018,04:28:09PM | 27/05/16 | ziomik | 27427 | BPIP | December03,2018,01:30:18PM | 26/06/16 | maxmint | 36677 | BPIP | November14,2018,06:52:05PM | 16/07/16 | xetsr | 101763 | BPIP | August22,2016,06:39:17AM | 03/08/16 | CrazyGuy | 25223 | BPIP | November30,2018,07:20:09PM | 10/09/16 | kilo17 | 387443 | BPIP | August26,2018,09:03:46PM | 15/10/16 | stenkross | 66253 | BPIP | November18,2017,07:50:01AM | 22/10/16 | ercolinux | 31410 | BPIP | October25,2018,07:51:33PM | 23/12/16 | paci | 15648 | BPIP | November05,2018,10:36:08AM | 29/12/16 | devthedev | 136592 | BPIP | November29,2018,06:55:06PM | 04/01/17 | Finksy | 347946 | BPIP | February14,2018,04:02:30AM | 21/02/17 | jackjack | 21053 | BPIP | May13,2018,10:02:22AM | 23/02/17 | kelpy | 71769 | BPIP | December05,2018,10:51:54AM | 27/02/17 | generalt | 354479 | BPIP | December05,2018,03:13:16AM | 16/04/17 | Mushroomized | 34882 | BPIP | March31,2018,08:23:16PM | 21/04/17 | davecoin | 58365 | BPIP | December05,2018,06:07:19AM | 08/05/17 | Stemby | 18953 | BPIP | November25,2018,01:56:25AM | 19/05/17 | smoothie | 25960 | BPIP | December05,2018,11:02:15AM | 28/05/17 | brutale2 | 151278 | BPIP | October31,2018,04:20:07PM | 16/06/17 | bithalo | 224612 | BPIP | December01,2018,05:07:55AM | 20/06/17 | vgo | 53862 | BPIP | November09,2018,08:22:03PM | 18/08/17 | tysat | 17261 | BPIP | July16,2018,12:54:28PM | 27/08/17 | ghibly79 | 120821 | BPIP | December03,2018,08:51:35PM | 30/08/17 | binaryFate | 95738 | BPIP | November05,2018,05:10:06PM | 07/09/17 | GIANNAT | 73619 | BPIP | March30,2018,11:13:20AM | 29/09/17 | Wardrick | 85316 | BPIP | January02,2018,03:55:11AM | 23/10/17 | favdesu | 130350 | BPIP | December04,2018,06:47:28PM | 03/11/17 | EpiSKiNG | 7351 | BPIP | April23,2018,05:19:31PM | 05/12/17 | mdude77 | 48765 | BPIP | October07,2018,01:49:47AM | 05/12/17 | zvs | 19897 | BPIP | November23,2018,03:30:13AM | 06/12/17 | BCB | 54113 | BPIP | September09,2018,06:55:36PM | 18/12/17 | Michail1 | 31539 | BPIP | November28,2018,04:57:35PM | 30/12/17 | grue | 5797 | BPIP | August01,2018,03:00:20AM | 21/01/18 | EFS | 140584 | BPIP | December05,2018,01:33:59PM | 09/02/18 | naypalm | 27273 | BPIP | November06,2018,11:24:51PM | 12/02/18 | Dabs | 54791 | BPIP | December01,2018,04:04:21AM | 15/02/18 | Blazr | 51908 | BPIP | July06,2018,08:54:56AM | 17/02/18 | shorena | 181801 | BPIP | November03,2018,05:03:13PM | 03/03/18 | DannyHamilton | 60820 | BPIP | September24,2018,01:39:55PM | 07/03/18 | phantastisch | 18312 | BPIP | November04,2018,05:00:25PM | 13/03/18 | allinvain | 198 | BPIP | December05,2018,12:00:50PM | 11/04/18 | bigtimespaghetti | 65317 | BPIP | November26,2018,11:44:16PM | 14/04/18 | guitarplinker | 95740 | BPIP | December05,2018,01:56:03AM | 18/04/18 | dogie | 87869 | BPIP | December05,2018,03:58:03AM | 27/04/18 | Taras | 125747 | BPIP | November29,2018,07:02:32AM | 15/05/18 | mindtrip | 235982 | BPIP | November24,2018,04:35:34PM | 16/05/18 | John (JohnK.) | 31288 | BPIP | December05,2018,05:38:46AM | 20/05/18 | monkeynuts | 81962 | BPIP | December04,2018,11:44:59PM | 22/05/18 | ManeBjorn | 208286 | BPIP | December05,2018,06:09:45AM | 22/05/18 | MCHouston | 371885 | BPIP | December01,2018,01:49:47AM | 01/06/18 | -ck | 19971 | BPIP | December05,2018,04:22:19AM | 05/06/18 | Welsh | 84521 | BPIP | December05,2018,06:31:03AM | 09/07/18 | MarkAz | 128716 | BPIP | December05,2018,06:30:34AM | 11/07/18 | monbux | 133846 | BPIP | August27,2018,06:08:22PM | 15/07/18 | TookDk | 109430 | BPIP | September22,2018,07:33:29AM | 17/07/18 | hedgy73 | 162384 | BPIP | December05,2018,01:12:19PM | 30/07/18 | Lutpin | 520313 | BPIP | December04,2018,10:50:30PM | 02/08/18 | Anon39 | 165089 | BPIP | December04,2018,05:03:56AM | 08/08/18 | KWH | 70535 | BPIP | December05,2018,12:25:32PM | 19/08/18 | Mitchell | 113670 | BPIP | December04,2018,02:58:01PM | 19/09/18 | piotr_n | 12089 | BPIP | December04,2018,05:58:19PM | 03/10/18 | malevolent | 23092 | BPIP | December04,2018,05:26:20AM | 04/10/18 | hilariousetc | 397737 | BPIP | December03,2018,04:24:25PM | 08/10/18 | markj113 | 95989 | BPIP | December04,2018,09:49:40PM | 12/10/18 | FiniteByDesign | 136896 | BPIP | November24,2018,11:40:26AM | 12/10/18 | HagssFIN | 348185 | BPIP | December05,2018,08:20:53AM | 19/10/18 | BayAreaCoins | 137773 | BPIP | December05,2018,03:08:01AM | 31/10/18 | alch1mista | 262971 | BPIP | November29,2018,09:29:18AM | 03/11/18 | NLNico | 107762 | BPIP | December05,2018,12:08:51PM | 05/11/18 | Rmcdermott927 | 289011 | BPIP | December04,2018,06:22:21PM | 07/11/18 | ibminer | 84866 | BPIP | December05,2018,02:25:32AM | 11/11/18 | xandry | 382413 | BPIP | December05,2018,11:08:19AM | 11/11/18 | wttbs | 123869 | BPIP | December05,2018,01:02:19PM | 19/11/18 | Mexxer-2 | 341982 | BPIP | December05,2018,10:18:26AM | 19/11/18 | yxt | 23810 | BPIP | December05,2018,07:41:42AM | 20/11/18 | qwk | 24140 | BPIP | December05,2018,09:53:42AM | 21/11/18 | iluvbitcoins | 337097 | BPIP | December04,2018,06:13:45PM | 21/11/18 | SebastianJu | 18640 | BPIP | December05,2018,12:05:56PM | 22/11/18 | yahoo62278 | 355846 | BPIP | December05,2018,02:01:04PM | 23/11/18 | actmyname | 465017 | BPIP | December04,2018,10:18:13PM | 26/11/18 | gmaxwell | 11425 | BPIP | December05,2018,03:47:11AM | 27/11/18 | Stunna | 81292 | BPIP | December03,2018,02:16:44AM | 29/11/18 | cryptodevil | 224980 | BPIP | December04,2018,12:23:45PM | 30/11/18 | Rhavar | 389331 | BPIP | December05,2018,01:24:17AM | 30/11/18 | mprep | 51173 | BPIP | December05,2018,01:56:30PM | 01/12/18 | Vod | 30747 | BPIP | December05,2018,11:15:37AM | 02/12/18 | Hhampuz | 881377 | BPIP | December05,2018,10:52:55AM | 02/12/18 | EcuaMobi | 169515 | BPIP | December05,2018,02:04:07AM | 03/12/18 | minerjones | 346731 | BPIP | December05,2018,02:07:08PM | 04/12/18 | sapta | 347141 | BPIP | December05,2018,02:06:10PM | 04/12/18 | LoyceV | 459836 | BPIP | December05,2018,01:07:20PM | 04/12/18 | The Pharmacist | 487418 | BPIP | December05,2018,01:13:04AM | 04/12/18 | DarkStar_ | 507936 | BPIP | December05,2018,05:40:50PM | 04/12/18 | marlboroza | 787736 | BPIP | December05,2018,12:03:46PM | 04/12/18 | suchmoon | 234771 | BPIP | December05,2018,12:11:05PM | 05/12/18 | Gavin Andresen | 224 | BPIP | October11,2018,05:08:38PM | Never | nanotube | 1268 | BPIP | July18,2018,01:31:49PM | Never | piuk | 17928 | BPIP | June19,2015,07:52:05PM | Never | aigeezer | 24674 | BPIP | December05,2018,03:05:24AM | Never | Shawshank | 42880 | BPIP | December04,2018,09:38:27PM | Never | LuisCar | 70416 | BPIP | December02,2018,09:40:01AM | Never | fluidjax | 83655 | BPIP | December04,2018,06:44:17PM | Never | ioxoi | 84221 | BPIP | April03,2018,05:38:18PM | Never | DefaultTrust | 122551 | BPIP | Never | Never | Gleb Gamow | 349097 | BPIP | June16,2018,04:07:42AM | Never | Tomatocage1 | 517424 | BPIP | May31,2015,06:18:04PM | Never | loshia1974 | 1294878 | BPIP | September18,2018,03:26:46AM | Never |
|
|
|
|
coinlocket$ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2366
Merit: 1512
#1 VIP Crypto Casino
|
|
December 05, 2018, 04:54:15 PM Last edit: December 05, 2018, 06:52:58 PM by coinlocket$ |
|
_____________________ | _____________ | _____________ | PROFILE | LAST ACTIVITY | LAST FEEDBACK | Tywill | 14/06/2013 22:14 | 24/05/2013 |
_____________________ | _____________ | _____________ | PROFILE | LAST ACTIVITY | LAST FEEDBACK | MatthewN.Wright | 23/01/2014 04:40 | 13/08/2013 | shiftybugger | 10/02/2014 20:38 | 12/06/2013 | paraipan | 02/06/2014 01:33 | 19/10/2013 | xkrikl | 15/10/2014 12:09 | 24/05/2013 |
_____________________ | _____________ | _____________ | PROFILE | LAST ACTIVITY | LAST FEEDBACK | haploid23 | 28/03/2015 16:14 | 18/03/2015 | DeathAndTaxes | 22/04/2015 11:53 | 09/01/2015 | Tomatocage1 | 31/05/2015 18:18 | Never | piuk | 19/06/2015 19:52 | Never | wallet.dat | 07/07/2015 20:50 | 09/06/2015 | Carnth | 21/08/2015 04:20 | 24/05/2013 |
_____________________ | _____________ | _____________ | PROFILE | LAST ACTIVITY | LAST FEEDBACK | Caesium | 30/03/2017 09:48 | 02/08/2014 | TomUnderSea | 12/07/2017 09:04 | 23/06/2013 | majamalu | 25/08/2017 05:13 | 05/12/2013 | stenkross | 18/11/2017 07:50 | 22/10/2016 | jwzguy | 05/12/2017 18:16 | 27/09/2013 | dree12 | 07/12/2017 05:27 | 17/08/2014 | Xialla | 12/12/2017 01:19 | 11/12/2015 |
|
|
|
|
Lauda
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
|
|
December 05, 2018, 05:09:22 PM |
|
For some random reason, theymos doesn't seem fond of removing inactive users (which are liabilities). It took forever to kick out DeadTerra for example.
I wonder whether this will cause flame-wars again or have people grown tired of them. It is a bit weird that a lot of people on dt are getting positive and negative trust.
Don't question the establishment and no negatives will be sent your way.
|
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks" 😼 Bitcoin Core ( onion)
|
|
|
jackg
Copper Member
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2856
Merit: 3071
https://bit.ly/387FXHi lightning theory
|
|
December 05, 2018, 05:09:28 PM |
|
I’m surprised Sirius isn’t dt1, afaik he’s still holding the domain for this site.
A lot of the people removed from dt2 were re over for food reason. I think Taf was taken off for security reasons. Atriz scammed people in icos.
It is a bit weird that a lot of people on dt are getting positive and negative trust. theymos even got a negative recently too...
|
|
|
|
The Sceptical Chymist
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3332
Merit: 6826
Cashback 15%
|
|
December 05, 2018, 05:11:20 PM |
|
People have called me a nincompoop, unintelligent, ignorant, and lots of other things and to an extent I can see how I can come off that way when discussing certain things--and man do I feel completely stupid for not knowing a lot of these things posted above, like that TMAN & owlcatz were removed from DT2 or that nullius and aTriz were even on it.
I also didn't fully realize how small the DT1 list is. I know I've seen it before, but for some reason I had the impression that it had a lot more members on it than it apparently does.
If a DT1 member trusts someone for whatever reason, I think the DT1 member is fully justified in adding the member to his trust list, thereby making that member a DT2 member. It shouldn't matter in the least if the newly-anointed DT2 member is active or leaves a lot of feedback or anything else. The point is that the DT2 member can be trusted. He's not required to be a scam buster or to use his DT status for anything if he doesn't want to. Hell, I don't recognize half the DT2 members on that list, but I wouldn't argue that they should be removed just because they're inactive.
What I worry about is inactive accounts getting hacked or sold. If you could get your hands on a DT2 account, you could probably work a decent scam and make a good chunk of change before you got caught. Wasn't there some allegation that the Master-P account was sold or something? I know it wasn't that long ago that he pulled his exit scam, but I forget the details.
I like this thread. Thanks for posting all of this data, coinlocket$.
|
. .HUGE. | | | | | | █▀▀▀▀ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █▄▄▄▄ | ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ . CASINO & SPORTSBOOK ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ | ▀▀▀▀█ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ ▄▄▄▄█ | | |
|
|
|
Lauda
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
|
|
December 05, 2018, 05:13:35 PM |
|
What I worry about is inactive accounts getting hacked or sold.
For some random reason, theymos doesn't seem fond of removing inactive users (which are liabilities). It took forever to kick out DeadTerra for example.
^this. I had to bring this case up several times.
|
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks" 😼 Bitcoin Core ( onion)
|
|
|
jackg
Copper Member
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2856
Merit: 3071
https://bit.ly/387FXHi lightning theory
|
|
December 05, 2018, 05:22:45 PM |
|
What I worry about is inactive accounts getting hacked or sold.
For some random reason, theymos doesn't seem fond of removing inactive users (which are liabilities). It took forever to kick out DeadTerra for example.
^this. I had to bring this case up several times. Maybe there should be some sort of secban in place for people who don’t log in for 30 days. Then get an automated system that validates a signed message for a stamped address from a given post id.
|
|
|
|
ibminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1819
Merit: 2792
Goonies never say die.
|
|
December 05, 2018, 05:23:00 PM |
|
- 235 Accounts are or were on the DT2 list
- 53 Accounts has been removed from the DT2 list
The Pharmacist touched on this, but if someone is excluded, it doesn't necessarily mean they were once included. I believe there are some DT1 members that have excluded accounts whom have never been included, I assume to avoid them getting easily included in the future.
|
|
|
|
coinlocket$ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2366
Merit: 1512
#1 VIP Crypto Casino
|
|
December 05, 2018, 05:28:11 PM Last edit: December 05, 2018, 05:39:53 PM by coinlocket$ |
|
The Pharmacist touched on this, but if someone is excluded, it doesn't necessarily mean they were once included. I believe there are some DT1 members that have excluded accounts whom have never been included, I assume to avoid them getting easily included in the future.
Got it, fixing the posts n°1&2.
|
|
|
|
tmfp
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1932
Merit: 1737
"Common rogue from Russia with a bare ass."
|
|
December 05, 2018, 06:08:56 PM |
|
The most recent thoughts of our Esteemed Leader that I could find about DT were in reply to a proposal to include Level 3 by default setting (as I vaguely recall it being in the Old Days). I've thought about that, but I tend to think that it'd be better to make it broader rather than deeper.
Well, the only logical way to do that would be to promote selected level D2's to D1, they in turn would bring their currently included DT3's into Level 2. It seems reasonable to think that, if you believe the overall system has value and integrity, that is the only way that any sort of quality control could be maintained. How to select which current DT2 members for upgrade from the current 200 odd is another matter. Two choices that I can see: either those currently included by the most DT1's, or by centralized dictat. For some random reason, theymos doesn't seem fond of removing inactive users (which are liabilities).
Yes. Apart from the hijack/hack danger, trust is dynamic not static.
|
Extraordinary Claims require Extraordinary Evidence
|
|
|
Coin-1
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2436
Merit: 2174
|
|
December 05, 2018, 06:15:58 PM Last edit: December 05, 2018, 06:26:20 PM by Coin-1 |
|
I recently analyzed the Marketplace Trust network and created this thread: [TOP-200] The most trusted members (DT1, DT2, DT3)I am sure that the Default Trust system is still working. I am also astonished by how many inactive members are in the DT2 list. - With some exceptions like alt accounts the last account added on DT2 list is the number 881377 @Hhampuz
As far as I know, the last account added to the DT2 list is iluvbitcoins. Anyways, good work, @OP. By the way, I need to update my thread, although there are no significant changes.
|
|
|
|
coinlocket$ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2366
Merit: 1512
#1 VIP Crypto Casino
|
|
December 05, 2018, 06:45:53 PM |
|
As far as I know, the last account added to the DT2 list is iluvbitcoins.
Anyways, good work, @OP. ~
I meant the last account created and added on the DT list (id not in base of the temporal line), so far no accounts above the account n=881377 as been added on the DT list, we have only u=1294878 loshia1974, but reading feedbacks Here is only an alt account his original account was hacked.
his new account just paid and fixed a 25 ltc mining issue on the http://ltc.tbdice.org/
pool
I am pretty sure of
loshia1974 = real
loshia = hacked
|
|
|
|
eddie13
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2296
Merit: 2262
BTC or BUST
|
|
December 05, 2018, 11:18:48 PM |
|
not required to be a scam buster
I think DT is more for placing valid scammer tags and the only sure avenu to becoming DT is to become a scambuster and leave a lot of valid negative feedback. DT positive is very conservative because you are basically staking your reputation to vouch for someone, or risking the reputation of your judgment for not much gain. Moreso adding someone to DT2 because then you are staking your judgment on them not only not to scam, but on their judgment of others not to scam. It's just much easier and safer not to, and their isn't much upside. Negatives are much more common and easier because you just prove a fact and that's it, and can't really be undone or later disproved while deserving a positive vouch can easily be undone in the future by a fact of bad action. It is widely accepted that one shouldn't leave a positive just for any successful trade because blah blah risk not proof etc. Negatives are 99.9% provable fact and positives are a judgement call, the way feedback is used. I think it also has a lot to do with benefit to the community. Scambusters and negative tags are very beneficial to the community to warn others and stop bad actors while positives are only good for what?, saving some traders some escrow fees and slight complexity in trading? Positives don't really help a person much while negatives have a massive impact. It is a lot less risky and more beneficial to add someone to DT2 that places a lot of valid scammer tags than it is to add someone who places a lot of positive feedback. This site has turned more into a place for service gigs like advertising in one form or another, work you don't really need to be trusted to do, and less p2p trading where trust between parties is key and positive feedback is beneficial. From what I see, not that I completely agree, not directed at TP, just my 2C.
|
Chancellor on Brink of Second Bailout for Banks
|
|
|
jackg
Copper Member
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2856
Merit: 3071
https://bit.ly/387FXHi lightning theory
|
|
December 05, 2018, 11:29:16 PM |
|
@eddie, I don’t like that sort of system as we have now.
I don’t think scam busters should be on dt merely for being scam busters and it’s why quite a few have gone on to scam and also why mdayonliner got negative trust too. A system in which verifiable trades get chives positive trust in return, is as I see it, a much better system. Call me old fashioned, I like people to only give trust when they’ve had something at stake and it’s paid off.
|
|
|
|
eddie13
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2296
Merit: 2262
BTC or BUST
|
@eddie, I don’t like that sort of system as we have now.
I don’t think scam busters should be on dt merely for being scam busters and it’s why quite a few have gone on to scam and also why mdayonliner got negative trust too. A system in which verifiable trades get chives positive trust in return, is as I see it, a much better system. Call me old fashioned, I like people to only give trust when they’ve had something at stake and it’s paid off.
It could be worse. The system we have isn't perfect but what system is? I am suspicious of users "Gunning for DT", I think we all should be, we need to keep an eye on them, and even they should understand that and be open to it. The merit system has made it a bit worse, or should I say increased that activity, because the same avenue is also an outstanding path to a lot of merits. But you can't just hate them. I can't blame a guy for being ambitious and some of them have turned out pretty good. But this is crypto, and the internet, and we should be suspicious of everything and keep in mind their ultimate motives. I don't think a person should be added to DT only for having left a lot of valid feedback, but should also display very good judgment in complex cases, and also be trustworthy enough not to be setting up for a long con. But leaving valid feedback is a good reason to add them. It's not like DT=Trusted escrow though. I'm not sure I would trust half of them just to not screw up and lose my coins, and be willing and able to reimburse me if they did. I understand the ideas behind wanting to leave positive feedback for all successful trades, or only trades where you took a risk, or only to those you would vouch for, or be against positive feedback left in the absence of any trade, or for it, or for or against leaving a negative with no trade. They all have pros and cons. I'm generally for anybody doing whatever they think is the right thing to do even if their ideas are not parallel. As long as they have good intentions mostly in line with my view Satoshi's vision of liberty I guess.
|
Chancellor on Brink of Second Bailout for Banks
|
|
|
Lauda
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
|
|
December 06, 2018, 05:26:09 AM |
|
A system in which verifiable trades get chives positive trust in return, is as I see it, a much better system.
All cheer for trust farming via 0.01 BTC trades. For some random reason, theymos doesn't seem fond of removing inactive users (which are liabilities).
Yes. Apart from the hijack/hack danger, trust is dynamic not static. It looks like a lot of people don't understand this here, or at least do not mention it that often. An examplatory question: If you trusted someone after a few smaller trades a few years ago, do you still trust him equally now (assuming you didn't trade with the user anymore after that e.g.)? The sensible answer would be a no. Decay and inappropriate actions should make it shift.
|
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks" 😼 Bitcoin Core ( onion)
|
|
|
LoyceV
Legendary
Online
Activity: 3304
Merit: 16596
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
|
|
December 06, 2018, 09:05:23 AM |
|
I meant the last account created and added on the DT list (id not in base of the temporal line), so far no accounts above the account n=881377 as been added on the DT list, we have only u=1294878 loshia1974, but reading feedbacks Here is only an alt account This surprised me too after seeing your sorted list. I didn't expect DT to be filled with mainly old members. The newest DT1 is more than 5 years old (I'm ignoring OldScammerTag here), and about 90% of DT2 is more than 4 years old. I would guess many of the current DT-members were much less than 4 years old when they were added, which would mean getting on DT is harder now than it was 4 years ago. Of course it doesn't help that so many new users are spammers, but the number of decent posters went up too when Bitcoin gained popularity. I think DT is more for placing valid scammer tags and the only sure avenu to becoming DT is to become a scambuster and leave a lot of valid negative feedback. I was put on DT without leaving a lot of negatives. But when I do, I try to be thorough.
|
|
|
|
jackg
Copper Member
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2856
Merit: 3071
https://bit.ly/387FXHi lightning theory
|
|
December 06, 2018, 08:55:51 PM |
|
Quick seller got caught out, why won’t others @lauda. @loycev, I’m not surprised by that at all. Generally, like gaining merit, users seem to want to focus on others’ history. It goes without saying mid you’ve been here longer you have more history and more references than someone who has been here for a much shorter amount of time.
Nullius gaining so much trust makes me think he’s a known alt of someone too. There as a core dev or at least someone around bitcoin a few years ago who went by a similar name.
|
|
|
|
theymos
Administrator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 5194
Merit: 12972
|
I don't like how the current system is working at all. It was never intended to be a top-down "decision-making body". Everyone is supposed to set a custom list, and DefaultTrust is supposed to just be a stepping stone for newbies. But what do you propose to fix it? Keep in mind that: - The #1 thing to be avoided is someone keeping illegitimate positive trust for long, since that facilitates scamming. - It's kind of OK for someone to get illegitimate negative trust, but if it's wrong then it should be removed eventually. - Other than that, it's best to have as many ratings trusted as possible. Some possibilities which have come to my mind: Force custom listsDisplay an annoying message instead of a trust score next to every post until the person sets a custom list with the assistance of the set initial trust page. Pros: - No remnant of top-down decision-making remains. Cons: - Newbies will often choose poorly, especially since the suggested list is possibly manipulable. - I've been thinking that I might want to enable trust for non-users, and that'd be impossible with this. Athenian democracyEvery month, pick ~30 random users from the set of users who meet certain fairly strict criteria. Those users are DT1 for the month. As a special exception to the normal trust network construction algorithm, distrusts in DT1 will also affect DT1; ie. if a user on DT1 has -1 or less net trusters on DT1, then they will not be considered to be on DT1 anymore. Pros: - I think that it'd end up being fairly accurate on average. - It strongly encourages people to maintain good trust lists at all times. - Since it'd be erratic, it'd encourage people to not use DefaultTrust, which I don't want people to be doing. - It's not very top-down, though in some cases major failures might require manual adjustment. - It can be used by non-users. Cons: - The stability everyone has gotten used to with DT will be gone. - Some degree of abuse is inevitable. There will be constant battles to get things working reasonably. VotingI'm not a fan of voting, especially in an environment like this where sockpuppets are impossible to prevent, but maybe it could be made to work with sufficient layers and oversight. For a while I was thinking about a complicated system in which users would self-assign themselves to "tribes", elect tribal leaders, and then the leaders would construct DT1 (plus some other stuff). I think I've decided that this particular method would be overly complicated and not sufficiently useful, though. Alternatives are possible. AlgorithmicMaybe there's some algorithmic way of looking at the universal trust graph and pulling out a DT1 which would guarantee several important properties, even in the face of manipulation. I thought about it for a while, but I couldn't figure anything out.
If you have specific suggestions for alterations to the current DT1 list, then make a topic about it. I think that the system is structurally flawed as it is now, though.
|
1NXYoJ5xU91Jp83XfVMHwwTUyZFK64BoAD
|
|
|
suchmoon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8922
https://bpip.org
|
|
December 07, 2018, 12:38:47 AM |
|
I don't see anything particularly bad about forcing custom lists. Yes, some users will choose poorly but the other options are potentially as much or more dangerous - e.g. if there's a flaw or loophole in the algorithm it would impose wrong choices on users without their knowledge or input.
Other than that - some combination of "Athenian" + "Voting" perhaps, where a certain set of users can vote? Random sounds a bit scary.
|
|
|
|
jackg
Copper Member
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2856
Merit: 3071
https://bit.ly/387FXHi lightning theory
|
|
December 07, 2018, 12:43:29 AM |
|
Maybe start with the annoying message once people reach member status or even full member. With a hint that if they don’t know who to add, then dot add anyone.
DT seems to be overvalued and seems to be made a rank in itself for some reason...
|
|
|
|
OgNasty
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4732
Merit: 4239
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
|
|
December 07, 2018, 12:53:16 AM |
|
I've always thought the trust system worked pretty well. Even in cases where users have positive trust that I don't agree with, it seemed to take community opinion over a "top-down" approach. However, I'm always open to seeing improvements. Every month, pick ~30 random users from the set of users who meet certain fairly strict criteria.
It sounds like the benefit of this approach would be more DT1 users, but also a rotating approach that could help point out users with poor networks who could use adjusting. Over time, I could see this being great, but would likely involve a more hands on approach from the users being selected and random is a bit scary. Why not expand the current DT1 system? It sounds like most of the complaints about it are that people aren't included. Why not take a look at how expanding the current DT1 members to 30 would effect the system and perhaps moving to a random rotating approach if that goes well?
|
..Stake.com.. | | | ▄████████████████████████████████████▄ ██ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██ ▄████▄ ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██████████ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██ ██████ ██ ██████████ ██ ██ ██████████ ██ ▀██▀ ██ ██ ██ ██████ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██████ ██ █████ ███ ██████ ██ ████▄ ██ ██ █████ ███ ████ ████ █████ ███ ████████ ██ ████ ████ ██████████ ████ ████ ████▀ ██ ██████████ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████ ██ ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██ ▀█████████▀ ▄████████████▄ ▀█████████▀ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███ ██ ██ ███▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████████████████████████████████████ | | | | | | ▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄ █ ▄▀▄ █▀▀█▀▄▄ █ █▀█ █ ▐ ▐▌ █ ▄██▄ █ ▌ █ █ ▄██████▄ █ ▌ ▐▌ █ ██████████ █ ▐ █ █ ▐██████████▌ █ ▐ ▐▌ █ ▀▀██████▀▀ █ ▌ █ █ ▄▄▄██▄▄▄ █ ▌▐▌ █ █▐ █ █ █▐▐▌ █ █▐█ ▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀█ | | | | | | ▄▄█████████▄▄ ▄██▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀▀██▄ ▄█▀ ▐█▌ ▀█▄ ██ ▐█▌ ██ ████▄ ▄█████▄ ▄████ ████████▄███████████▄████████ ███▀ █████████████ ▀███ ██ ███████████ ██ ▀█▄ █████████ ▄█▀ ▀█▄ ▄██▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██▄ ▄▄▄█▀ ▀███████ ███████▀ ▀█████▄ ▄█████▀ ▀▀▀███▄▄▄███▀▀▀ | | | ..PLAY NOW.. |
|
|
|
Anduck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1511
Merit: 1072
quack
|
|
December 07, 2018, 01:09:27 AM |
|
I’m surprised Sirius isn’t dt1, afaik he’s still holding the domain for this site.
He's not holding the domain. If a DT1 member trusts someone for whatever reason, I think the DT1 member is fully justified in adding the member to his trust list, thereby making that member a DT2 member.
This is how it should be, but in practice hasn't been like that for years. It shouldn't matter in the least if the newly-anointed DT2 member is active or leaves a lot of feedback or anything else. The point is that the DT2 member can be trusted. He's not required to be a scam buster or to use his DT status for anything if he doesn't want to. Hell, I don't recognize half the DT2 members on that list, but I wouldn't argue that they should be removed just because they're inactive.
I agree. Sadly, DT1 members do not agree with us. I've talked recently with few DT1 members (who I could contact, several of them are unresponsive or inactive) and how they describe DT is very far from your view. not required to be a scam buster
I think DT is more for placing valid scammer tags and the only sure avenu to becoming DT is to become a scambuster and leave a lot of valid negative feedback. DT positive is very conservative because you are basically staking your reputation to vouch for someone, or risking the reputation of your judgment for not much gain. Moreso adding someone to DT2 because then you are staking your judgment on them not only not to scam, but on their judgment of others not to scam. It's just much easier and safer not to, and their isn't much upside. I disagree. DT should be a list of people who are unlikely to scam others. Nothing else. It should not be used as some "ultimately trusted people" -list, as that's as real as unicorns. There have been plenty of scammers in DT. And I can tell you that scammers know their way in to that list, no matter how curated or small you want to keep it. So DT, if it has to exist, should merely act as a list of people unlikely to scam others. People should in general form their own trust networks, so I find the whole DT list largely unneeded. Negatives are 99.9% provable fact and positives are a judgement call, the way feedback is used.
Untrue. Negatives are largely based on pure opinions and incompetence. E.g. look at my trust rating received from SaltySpitoon (a DT1 member). He rated me red, because I did a vendor bid on my auction ~3 years ago. I had not stated that the auction was without reserve, as it was not without reserve. (E.g. the U.S. law states that auctions are by default with reserve and all no reserve is a special rule.) So I did this vendor bid, which is a sort of a concealed reserve price. SaltySpitoon is lying that I didn't honor the auction. I didn't back then know about the Bitcointalk auction standard, which is quite vague and not specified anywhere, but is something one just has to know. I didn't know back then that vendor bids are not cool in here. They're very commonly done in my country. In any case, vendor bids are not scamming, unethical or anything like that. So this rating by SaltySpitoon is wrecking my trust score and is listed in "trusted rating" page for all the people who trust DT, and it's based on SaltySpitoon's incompetent opinion. It's unfair, unjust and shows incredibly bad judgement, but there's nothing anyone can do about it except theymos. Nobody will go against a DT1 member publicly, Believe me, cliques and what not exist around DT. Scambusters and negative tags are very beneficial to the community to warn others and stop bad actors while positives are only good for what?, saving some traders some escrow fees and slight complexity in trading? Positives don't really help a person much while negatives have a massive impact.
Agree. And when negatives are used poorly, like they are... There have been various cases where DT members are misusing or abusing the system to boost their ego or whatever. In even more cases, the negative and positive ratings are given without proper basis. E.g. Vod rated me because I told him privately that I don't specifically trust him. Ego got hurt and shows. @eddie, I don’t like that sort of system as we have now.
I don’t think scam busters should be on dt merely for being scam busters and it’s why quite a few have gone on to scam and also why mdayonliner got negative trust too. A system in which verifiable trades get chives positive trust in return, is as I see it, a much better system. Call me old fashioned, I like people to only give trust when they’ve had something at stake and it’s paid off.
This also highlights one of the issues about DT: people have very different views about what it should be. And people in DT positions have different views too, and use them according to their own view. This makes it a bad thing. DT list should be removed completely. Right now it's acting as a "elite", "trusted people" list while that's only the perception of it. Reality may be totally different. There have been very nasty scammers on the DT list, even on DT1. It took a long time until the worst ones got removed. There are still untrustworthy people who do their shit only occasionally, so they are not removed. My point is that it's not a list I would suggest trusting. It has objectively not worked very well at protecting big scams from happening. It has and is only working to protect newbies from getting scammed in some ridiculous way. So it should be used for that purpose only. Best would be to remove the DT completely -- it would encourage people to make their own lists just like trust networks are supposed to work. Of course there's some steep curve in the beginning, but isn't there always? Also, DT1's who have added people to DT2 may have been completely inactive for years, so who will remove them? Curating is not working properly and it's in the hands of a couple people. Not good. I would guess many of the current DT-members were much less than 4 years old when they were added, which would mean getting on DT is harder now than it was 4 years ago. Of course it doesn't help that so many new users are spammers, but the number of decent posters went up too when Bitcoin gained popularity.
I asked to be included in the DT list. I've been here for years, and around the scene for years. I've also traded a lot, and so on. I've also acted as "a judge" on various cases as I've moderated e.g. Bitcoin IRC channels for years. I received mainly three kinds of responses from DT members: 1) Adding anyone who has a negative from some other DT is not possible without insane drama. This is where DT has evolved. There are tons of drama always around and obviously some people (DT1) get the heat. 2) I don't post enough positive or negative feedbacks. (one of this came from someone who is a lot less active regarding feedbacks than me, so I wonder this a little...) 3) I've rated positively someone they don't like. (and the person I have rated positively has dozens of positive ratings from various other people too, also from people on DT) Some possibilities which have come to my mind: Force custom listsDisplay an annoying message instead of a trust score next to every post until the person sets a custom list with the assistance of the set initial trust page. Pros: - No remnant of top-down decision-making remains. Cons: - Newbies will often choose poorly, especially since the suggested list is possibly manipulable. - I've been thinking that I might want to enable trust for non-users, and that'd be impossible with this. I think this is the best option. They will anyway rely on using DT (with the current system) and this is a step forward where there's no real DT, but still something (individual) that acts as such. Also new users would need to pick the users themselves, so they'd acknowledge it at that very point that they have chosen those "trusted" users themselves, and nobody did it for them. If you have specific suggestions for alterations to the current DT1 list, then make a topic about it. I think that the system is structurally flawed as it is now, though.
Here's mine: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5081293.new#new
|
|
|
|
Cashi
Member
Offline
Activity: 392
Merit: 48
|
|
December 07, 2018, 02:40:46 AM |
|
Improving the DT system is a good idea, but we should consider the consequences if we remove someone from DT or make a weak system changing every month. Don't forget about the bounty cheaters which will see a chance of getting their account rid of a red tag. When Lauda was removed from DT2 many tagged accounts were untagged. Imagine if some more DT2 are removed, the spam would go to moon Adding more members to DT1 or DT2 is inevitable in my opinion. There are so many accounts not tagged yet for bounty abuse although the proof is obvious. The few DT members tagging them are too busy and it's just unfair if most of the recently reported cheaters can still escape. I provided a proof of hacked or sold accounts abusing bounties and they are still not tagged. There are so many reports not reviewed. If all the cheaters will be tagged the spam would be reduced a lot. Therefore I would increase the DT1 members up to 30 by adding trustworthy DT2 members. This will keep the existing ratings intact and fix some issues we have right now (not enough DT to tag already reported cheaters). Edit: @OP, the link to dserrano5 is wrong, correct version is here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=17768
|
|
|
|
r1s2g3
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 742
Merit: 395
I am alive but in hibernation.
|
|
December 07, 2018, 08:23:17 AM |
|
Best way is to use your own brain and judgement while dealing with others and you do not need any custom list/forum supplied list/ or more people in DT.
|
I am alive
|
|
|
Findingnemo
|
|
December 07, 2018, 08:40:47 AM |
|
Lot of cheaters aren't getting tagged due to unavailability of DT members on this forum and only few members were constantly finding cheaters and negging them so we need to add more DT members for the system to work with full potential I believe.
|
| | . .Duelbits. | │ | ..........UNLEASH.......... THE ULTIMATE GAMING EXPERIENCE | │ | DUELBITS FANTASY SPORTS | ████▄▄▄█████▄▄▄ ░▄████████████████▄ ▐██████████████████▄ ████████████████████ ████████████████████▌ █████████████████████ ████████████████▀▀▀ ███████████████▌ ███████████████▌ ████████████████ ████████████████ ████████████████ ████▀▀███████▀▀ | . ▬▬ VS ▬▬ | ████▄▄▄█████▄▄▄ ░▄████████████████▄ ▐██████████████████▄ ████████████████████ ████████████████████▌ █████████████████████ ███████████████████ ███████████████▌ ███████████████▌ ████████████████ ████████████████ ████████████████ ████▀▀███████▀▀ | /// PLAY FOR FREE /// WIN FOR REAL | │ | ..PLAY NOW.. | |
View ArchiveReport to moderator
|
|
|
coinlocket$ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2366
Merit: 1512
#1 VIP Crypto Casino
|
|
December 07, 2018, 09:45:00 AM Last edit: December 07, 2018, 09:55:26 AM by coinlocket$ |
|
I think the idea of the current DT system is working in a good way the only problem is that is the that the list of Dt1 is stopped at 5 years ago and the list dt2 is stopped a couple of years ago. Maybe you just have to expand this list and add a couple of trusted people to the list dt1 (without shady past) and a dozen active people to the list dt2. Also, you could add to the list dt2 some people who "are taking care of the forum" and who punish the people who are abusing the forum and not only people who managing the marketplace. Or creating a new DT2 rank with any name and doing this kind of work, it's unpleasant to see that a large part of people here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.new#new and here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4695194.msg42378900#msg42378900 are not tagged for abusing since a year, since almost nobody of DT cares about them. Finally, I do not believe that a dynamic dt1 is a great idea, in the end it could be a goot trust network, but for the first months we would have trustworth people with negative rep for revenge and vice versa scammers with positive rep.
|
|
|
|
Vod
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3696
Merit: 3070
Licking my boob since 1970
|
|
December 07, 2018, 06:16:02 PM |
|
Default Trust has done a pretty good job of holding scammers at bay.
I believe without the system, the amount of scams would be several times higher.
I'm OK with pushing custom lists (I don't use them) but removing the trust system completely would be a mistake of epic proportions. People would run ponzis, promote paypal, bid on their own auctions, post fake facts, etc. etc.
Personally I have tagged over 1,300! untrustworthy people. My actions have led to the majority of scammers thinking twice about pulling a common scam.
|
https://nastyscam.com - landing page up https://vod.fan - advanced image hosting - coming soon! OGNasty has early onset dementia; keep this in mind when discussing his past actions.
|
|
|
yahoo62278
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3598
Merit: 4424
|
|
December 07, 2018, 11:42:30 PM Last edit: December 07, 2018, 11:56:53 PM by yahoo62278 |
|
I think the idea of the current DT system is working in a good way the only problem is that is the that the list of Dt1 is stopped at 5 years ago and the list dt2 is stopped a couple of years ago. Maybe you just have to expand this list and add a couple of trusted people to the list dt1 (without shady past) and a dozen active people to the list dt2. Also, you could add to the list dt2 some people who "are taking care of the forum" and who punish the people who are abusing the forum and not only people who managing the marketplace. Or creating a new DT2 rank with any name and doing this kind of work, it's unpleasant to see that a large part of people here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.new#new and here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4695194.msg42378900#msg42378900 are not tagged for abusing since a year, since almost nobody of DT cares about them. Finally, I do not believe that a dynamic dt1 is a great idea, in the end it could be a goot trust network, but for the first months we would have trustworth people with negative rep for revenge and vice versa scammers with positive rep. The current dt2 list did not stop 2 years ago. Marlboroza and the pharmacist were recently added within the last 6 months. Regardless, it does feel like a good ol boys club at times and more people need to be added to dt1 so the current lists can increase and more users have a valuable opinion as far as who is or who isnt a scammer. Right now with all the scam icos going around, you can never have enough eyes protecting the community. Doesnt matter what is done, some people will be pissed off while some will obviously be pleased. There will always be users who just do not get along. Only thing I would like to see is people consider the drama train that will arise when deciding on whom to add to either list. Choose users who can have an unbiased opinion and help the forum vs assholes who will go on a power trip. There really is no reason to create a new list every month or whatnot. The users that made dt1 have earned that prestige. They have proven they belong on the list. I do agree however that inactives or scammers should be immediately removed.
|
..Stake.com.. | | | ▄████████████████████████████████████▄ ██ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██ ▄████▄ ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██████████ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██ ██████ ██ ██████████ ██ ██ ██████████ ██ ▀██▀ ██ ██ ██ ██████ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██████ ██ █████ ███ ██████ ██ ████▄ ██ ██ █████ ███ ████ ████ █████ ███ ████████ ██ ████ ████ ██████████ ████ ████ ████▀ ██ ██████████ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████ ██ ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██ ▀█████████▀ ▄████████████▄ ▀█████████▀ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███ ██ ██ ███▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████████████████████████████████████ | | | | | | ▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄ █ ▄▀▄ █▀▀█▀▄▄ █ █▀█ █ ▐ ▐▌ █ ▄██▄ █ ▌ █ █ ▄██████▄ █ ▌ ▐▌ █ ██████████ █ ▐ █ █ ▐██████████▌ █ ▐ ▐▌ █ ▀▀██████▀▀ █ ▌ █ █ ▄▄▄██▄▄▄ █ ▌▐▌ █ █▐ █ █ █▐▐▌ █ █▐█ ▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀█ | | | | | | ▄▄█████████▄▄ ▄██▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀▀██▄ ▄█▀ ▐█▌ ▀█▄ ██ ▐█▌ ██ ████▄ ▄█████▄ ▄████ ████████▄███████████▄████████ ███▀ █████████████ ▀███ ██ ███████████ ██ ▀█▄ █████████ ▄█▀ ▀█▄ ▄██▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██▄ ▄▄▄█▀ ▀███████ ███████▀ ▀█████▄ ▄█████▀ ▀▀▀███▄▄▄███▀▀▀ | | | ..PLAY NOW.. |
|
|
|
Quickseller
Copper Member
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2870
Merit: 2298
|
|
December 08, 2018, 03:49:10 AM |
|
I tried using my own custom trust list, but was fairly quick to find problems with trust ratings within my trust network, and frequently had to research why certain people whose ratings I didn't agree with was in my trust network, and excluding many who either gave many ratings I disagreed with, or who included many people who I didn't want in my trust network.
I suspect the root cause reason why so many do not use custom trust lists is because so many people are bad at creating maintaining a custom list, and cannot be bothered to keep it updated. It only takes a small number of people whose ratings/list is 'trusted' that maintains a bad trust list to cause problems in the entire trust network.
I want to think about this topic some more....more to come on this subject
|
|
|
|
The Cryptovator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2240
Merit: 2174
Need PR/CMC & CG? TG @The_Cryptovator
|
|
December 08, 2018, 01:39:08 PM Last edit: December 08, 2018, 01:57:00 PM by Coolcryptovator |
|
I don't like how the current system is working at all. Trust system is working fine, but DT list should refresh. I have made a thread about inactive DT member list, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5025480.msg45474059#msg45474059 . There are lots if DT inactive. Especially on DT1. So if DT1 is inactive who will add new DT2? And I think there is more people's who deserve DT member's. I think list has not updated from long time. I believe list need to refresh. More DT could be add due many are inactive. I'm not a fan of voting, You can get suggestion from existing DT member's if you don't trust on voting. However current trust system should be continue due to prevent scam from forum. Just need improve with time. I think it's possible upgrade few members from DT2 to DT1 so DT1 could expand thier trust network.
|
|
|
|
jackg
Copper Member
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2856
Merit: 3071
https://bit.ly/387FXHi lightning theory
|
|
December 08, 2018, 02:37:59 PM |
|
I sense cryptocvators idea is essentially what theymos has already shunned (making dt3 viewable like 1 and 2 are).
If it goes ahead, a lot of moderation of inaccurate forefinger ,Igbo be required as dt3 members might have given some negs where a dt2 would have given a neutral for example.
|
|
|
|
eddie13
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2296
Merit: 2262
BTC or BUST
|
|
December 08, 2018, 05:01:53 PM |
|
I don't like how the current system is working at all. I don't mind the current DT system however centralized it may be because I trust and have great respect for the vast majority of those currently enlisted. I think they check eachother pretty well also when their are disagreements everyone comes together to make sense of the situation, even non-DT have a voice, and usually everyone steps away with continuing mutual respect. Everyone misunderstands or is wrong sometimes. But, if you really don't like it for being a "top down" structure I think you could scrap the appointed positions of power part and rather use an algorithm to calculate the weight of everyones sent feedback to be summed to each accounts final trust score. Something like.. [(Activity/1000)Rank](Trust/20) = Weight of left feedback Variables for "Rank" could be something like Legendary=1 Hero=0.75 Sr.=0.5 Full=0.25 with all lower ranks zero and "Trust" would be the feedback leavers current trust score. If the solution is negative (negative summed trust) weight=0 (Abuse resistance) For a 900 activity hero with a trust score of 50 leaving a positive trust [(900/1000)0.75](50/20)=1.6875 round to 2 decimals would give the feedback receiver +1.69 to their trust score. For a (very trusted old member) legendary with 2000 activity and 200 trust score giving a positive [(2000/1000)1](200/20)= 20 would leave +20 So the more established and trusted a member is, the harder their trust hits (more weight), and you would have to be atleast a full member, with net positive trust, for your feedback to carry any weight at all. A persons Trust score would be the sum of all received feedback. Negative left feedback would just be negative in the sum and subtract from the final score with equal weight. In the risked BTC column you could give the option to enter a modifier from 0 to 1 so a person could reduce the weight of their feedback if they want. He could type in "1.25 #0.5" so the legendary example above could leave only +10, or type "1.25 #0.1" to leave only +2. (for 1.25 risked BTC example) [(Activity/1000)Rank](Trust/20) (user modifier)So a person could tone down the weight of the feedback they leave if they feel it is appropriate so they wouldn't have to be so conservative with every feedback they leave which is the case now. Maybe leave it continually editable for later changes. If you wanted to keep the Time part you could add [(Activity/1000)Rank](Trust/20) (Time)(user modifier) where each month equals 0.1 maxing out in 10 months as 1 so it would grow throughout 10 months to its full strength. I'm no mathematician and I just chose my numbers to try to get a reasonably ranged result. I don't much like to make suggestions because I am just a nobody and not a genius but I think a system like this would be cool to see. I don't think this should be done but rather should be considered and brainstormed upon unless their are serious flaws in my logic I am not seeing. I would probably just leave it alone because it is a lot better than nothing. Maybe an algorithmic system like this could be implemented in parallel with the current system at first so the old system doesn't have to get completely scrapped while working out the bugs and adjusting to the new system. I don't consider this "a suggestion for alteration to the current DT1 list" so won't make an OP about it.
|
Chancellor on Brink of Second Bailout for Banks
|
|
|
Vod
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3696
Merit: 3070
Licking my boob since 1970
|
|
December 08, 2018, 06:24:41 PM |
|
Variables for "Rank" could be something like Legendary=1 Hero=0.75 Sr.=0.5 Full=0.25 with all lower ranks zero and "Trust" would be the feedback leavers current trust score. If the solution is negative (negative summed trust) weight=0 (Abuse resistance)
This forum stands out by not tying a person's trustworthiness to how often they post.
|
https://nastyscam.com - landing page up https://vod.fan - advanced image hosting - coming soon! OGNasty has early onset dementia; keep this in mind when discussing his past actions.
|
|
|
coinlocket$ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2366
Merit: 1512
#1 VIP Crypto Casino
|
|
December 10, 2018, 10:39:21 AM |
|
~ I do agree however that inactives or scammers should be immediately removed.
In the end, I agree with what you say and I don't think we need to change the DT system (but they can do, is not a big deal to me if it will be a better version of this one), we just need to add few DT1 and some DT2 with them. I think that with only adding very active people it can change the forum in a better place.
|
|
|
|
Anduck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1511
Merit: 1072
quack
|
|
December 19, 2018, 06:01:19 PM |
|
Any updates regarding this?
|
|
|
|
LoyceV
Legendary
Online
Activity: 3304
Merit: 16596
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
|
|
December 19, 2018, 10:30:20 PM |
|
Any updates regarding this?
There's this suggestion: With the introduction of reporting badges on the horizon we should consider introducing badges for other things. Most importantly I think looking at the possibly of rewarding a badge for setting a custom trust list. The trust system is wholeheartedly broken and theymos has even said himself its not working as intended. We are not sure of the positive effects that badges bring at the moment. But this is why reporting statistics should be released before the implementation of the badges and then after an initial period (3 months) we should look to see if this has increased the number of reports being made. I think it's a very good idea! A shiny badge under a name will be something others notice, and if clicking it brings you to your trust settings, more users can be encouraged to make their own list. (I haven't made my own list yet, because I want to be able to see trust the way most users see it)
|
|
|
|
suchmoon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8922
https://bpip.org
|
|
December 19, 2018, 11:54:54 PM |
|
Or we could airdrop worthless tokens Howeycoins for creating custom lists. 90% of the forum would do it overnight.
|
|
|
|
Anduck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1511
Merit: 1072
quack
|
|
December 20, 2018, 12:02:29 AM |
|
I think it's a very good idea! A shiny badge under a name will be something others notice, and if clicking it brings you to your trust settings, more users can be encouraged to make their own list. (I haven't made my own list yet, because I want to be able to see trust the way most users see it)
I agree. The link should lead to that 'suggest' page, so the custom list would really get made. Or we could airdrop worthless tokens Howeycoins for creating custom lists. 90% of the forum would do it overnight.
Actually not even that bad idea, as I am sure it would work quite nicely. But it's a bit silly... no real need for new shitcoins & it would cause loads of problems for the future to have such a bag to carry. I think that force is the best way. Just remove DT and people have no other choice than to use the 'suggest' page to make their trust list. A "personal DT" would be much better, because users would know that the list is formed by their own choices, by their hand-picked users.
|
|
|
|
coinlocket$ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2366
Merit: 1512
#1 VIP Crypto Casino
|
|
December 25, 2018, 09:45:05 PM |
|
I'm starting to have a big number of feedback sent, does it have a limit in numbers?
|
|
|
|
Vod
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3696
Merit: 3070
Licking my boob since 1970
|
|
December 25, 2018, 11:10:20 PM |
|
I'm starting to have a big number of feedback sent, does it have a limit in numbers?
You have just over 500 neg trust sent. The highest person is The Pharmacist, with almost 2,500.
|
https://nastyscam.com - landing page up https://vod.fan - advanced image hosting - coming soon! OGNasty has early onset dementia; keep this in mind when discussing his past actions.
|
|
|
The Sceptical Chymist
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3332
Merit: 6826
Cashback 15%
|
|
December 26, 2018, 09:20:01 AM |
|
You have just over 500 neg trust sent. The highest person is The Pharmacist, with almost 2,500.
So I guess that makes me the alpha negger on bitcointalk--that actually surprises me, because this is a statistic that I've never even thought about before. If you'd asked me to guess who'd given out the most negs, I would have said either you or Lauda. Interesting. If I'm not mistaken, I think most of the red trust I've given out has been for account selling or buying, so this just goes to show how bad that particular problem is on the forum.
|
. .HUGE. | | | | | | █▀▀▀▀ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █▄▄▄▄ | ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ . CASINO & SPORTSBOOK ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ | ▀▀▀▀█ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ ▄▄▄▄█ | | |
|
|
|
LoyceV
Legendary
Online
Activity: 3304
Merit: 16596
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
|
|
December 26, 2018, 11:03:06 AM |
|
I'm starting to have a big number of feedback sent, does it have a limit in numbers?
If I remember correctly, there used to be problems loading the trust page if it was too big. That's why the trust page no longer shows the status of the tagged/tagging user.
|
|
|
|
Quickseller
Copper Member
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2870
Merit: 2298
|
|
December 27, 2018, 01:56:16 AM Last edit: December 27, 2018, 02:25:42 AM by Quickseller |
|
I'm starting to have a big number of feedback sent, does it have a limit in numbers?
If I remember correctly, there used to be problems loading the trust page if it was too big. That's why the trust page no longer shows the status of the tagged/tagging user. This was because the forum server needed to calculate everyone’s trust score who appeared on someone’s trust page. This could not be done periodically globally because everyone’s trust settings, including their trust list is potentially different.
I don’t necessarily think it is a good thing to have sent a lot of negative ratings. Above all, it is important to have accurate ratings, including those that meet the definition of the description of the type of rating you are giving and that third parties are not in disagreement with. Another useful metric would include the number of people that openly dispute your ratings, although it should be acknowledged that some people will simply be unreasonable and will refuse to accept their behavior indicates they are either a scammer or will try to scam in the future. Also, uncovering a difficult to detect scam that has gone unnoticed by others is better than tagging many low hanging fruits and/or tagging after checking others’ work.
|
|
|
|
raveron
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 8
|
|
December 27, 2018, 11:31:15 AM |
|
I am totally schoked. I have never imagine that a forum can have such a fucked up trust system.
Maybe because it is so big and going for such a long time?
Maybe because corruption and image is more important?
This is bad, nice for sharing this info! You have some merit from me
|
|
|
|
coinlocket$ (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2366
Merit: 1512
#1 VIP Crypto Casino
|
|
December 29, 2018, 07:46:57 PM |
|
I'm starting to think that we need an additional system that works in parallel with the actual system, I've reported over 600 accounts for abusing from newbies to legendary, only 20 has been tagged from DT members 2 DT members. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4695194.msg42378900#msg42378900
|
|
|
|
raveron
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 8
|
|
December 29, 2018, 08:38:34 PM |
|
Not really, I think what we should do is stop tagging for usefull reasons. That might be a first. Second, having a DT system based on activity and trading
|
|
|
|
Vod
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3696
Merit: 3070
Licking my boob since 1970
|
|
December 29, 2018, 09:26:59 PM |
|
I am totally schoked. I have never imagine that a forum can have such a fucked up trust system.
It worked well in your case - prevented you from scamming an innocent user.
|
https://nastyscam.com - landing page up https://vod.fan - advanced image hosting - coming soon! OGNasty has early onset dementia; keep this in mind when discussing his past actions.
|
|
|
raveron
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 8
|
|
December 29, 2018, 09:36:25 PM |
|
I am totally schoked. I have never imagine that a forum can have such a fucked up trust system.
It worked well in your case - prevented you from scamming an innocent user. Yes, I am totally agree with you. You're at this moment a reason why I think the system is wrong.
|
|
|
|
Vod
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3696
Merit: 3070
Licking my boob since 1970
|
|
December 29, 2018, 10:07:50 PM |
|
I am totally schoked. I have never imagine that a forum can have such a fucked up trust system.
It worked well in your case - prevented you from scamming an innocent user. Yes, I am totally agree with you. You're at this moment a reason why I think the system is wrong. Ok, so you would prefer a system where new users could not be prevented from scamming? Do you think that would help the forum community, or just the scammers?
|
https://nastyscam.com - landing page up https://vod.fan - advanced image hosting - coming soon! OGNasty has early onset dementia; keep this in mind when discussing his past actions.
|
|
|
raveron
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 8
|
|
December 29, 2018, 10:18:18 PM |
|
I am totally schoked. I have never imagine that a forum can have such a fucked up trust system.
It worked well in your case - prevented you from scamming an innocent user. Yes, I am totally agree with you. You're at this moment a reason why I think the system is wrong. Ok, so you would prefer a system where new users could not be prevented from scamming? Do you think that would help the forum community, or just the scammers? Oh no, obviously not. God fuck the scammers, but where is the case of scamming with a collateral? A collateral may not be valid for you, it might be valid to someone else. I just saw you red trusted someone willing to have as Collateral CRGO coin. This is so stupid and wrong, I have no idea if you are a person that understands crypto or someone with a lot of free time
|
|
|
|
|
The Sceptical Chymist
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3332
Merit: 6826
Cashback 15%
|
|
December 29, 2018, 10:38:52 PM Merited by Foxpup (2), Vod (2) |
|
A collateral may not be valid for you, it might be valid to someone else.
Here's the problem: it would be a scammer's tactic to ask for a loan with a shitcoin or token that he knows can't be sold and therefore is worthless for him to hold. In your lending thread, it looked exactly like you were just waiting for a sucker to take the bait. People were explaining to you that your token might be unsalable, and you basically kept responding "yeah well, everyone can make up their own mind". This forum is rife with examples of loan scamming where people put up either worthless collateral or collateral that they're simultaneously trying to sell. That's why you got tagged. However, I'm not calling you a scammer outright, just pointing out that there were huge red flags in your lending thread. Maybe you have too much faith in the future of GRVS, and maybe you intended to just pay back the loan honestly. Who knows? Vod called it as he saw it, and while it might seem pretty strict of him to tag you, there isn't much you can do about it unless you work out an arrangement with him. Vod is reasonable, but you have to understand that he's seen so many scams and attempted scams here that his position is to take no chances, especially with relative newbies.
|
. .HUGE. | | | | | | █▀▀▀▀ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █▄▄▄▄ | ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ . CASINO & SPORTSBOOK ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ | ▀▀▀▀█ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ ▄▄▄▄█ | | |
|
|
|
mikeywith
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2226
Merit: 6367
be constructive or S.T.F.U
|
|
December 29, 2018, 11:06:15 PM |
|
there is a good chance that you are an honest person and you were actually going to repay the loan, but honestly using a shitcoin that is not even on CMC as a collateral is as bad as going to the pawn shop with your underwear as a collateral, while you may think it worth a lot, to most people it's useless and have 0 value. and given the amount of scammers around, the smallest thing you do puts you on the scammers side. so before you try to buy/sell/lend/load you need to think 10 times before you become a scam suspect.
|
|
|
|
raveron
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 8
|
|
December 29, 2018, 11:11:55 PM |
|
Hmm very interesting point of view..I can say that at that moment I had faith in grvs, for now I still have as things are changing for good again. Scammers scammers scammers, this doesn't help, this makes people to scam. You have to stop saying this around all time because this is what creates. Whatsoever, you can look at logs, I have closed the thread before receiving any kind of trust feedback from the people, it was not my intent at all to care at least about scaming. I can't take serious someone like the description licking boobs, even if I am a very big fan of family guy. More or less, many things as this has to be changed soon enough
|
|
|
|
suchmoon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8922
https://bpip.org
|
|
December 30, 2018, 12:27:08 AM Last edit: November 30, 2020, 12:42:31 AM by suchmoon |
|
Scammers scammers scammers, this doesn't help, this makes people to scam.
It doesn't work that way. Look at Vod's received feedback: Edited 2020-11-30 to fix a broken imageHas it made him scam?
|
|
|
|
mikeywith
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2226
Merit: 6367
be constructive or S.T.F.U
|
|
December 30, 2018, 12:42:09 AM |
|
I can't take serious someone like the description licking boobs
who doesn't like licking boobs ? i sometimes's stop and stare at that profile picture, it actually has a tongue moving. . anyway if you plan to trade again on the forum, just be extra careful, offer a valid collateral if you need a loan. Good luck.
|
|
|
|
raveron
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 8
|
|
December 30, 2018, 01:23:48 AM |
|
@suchmoon, that's different, it's a mental problem there.
@mikeywith I don't like boobs, I like nipples as fact lol
|
|
|
|
fonship
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 893
Merit: 135
Bitcoin is not a currency or asset. Its a MOVEMENT
|
|
December 31, 2018, 11:13:54 PM |
|
Well, this is a feature which majority don't care and understand. I think very less attention given to this topic. Even after years, I don't understand how this trust system works. I think we need more transparency in this.
|
selling sushistake.com, send offers
|
|
|
|
fonship
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 893
Merit: 135
Bitcoin is not a currency or asset. Its a MOVEMENT
|
|
January 04, 2019, 05:33:51 AM |
|
I went through both link, simple and very good explanation. Thank you for that. Now I don't understand why despite that I have 4 ratings, they are not showing up on my profile?
|
selling sushistake.com, send offers
|
|
|
TryNinja
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2828
Merit: 6977
|
|
January 04, 2019, 05:35:09 AM |
|
I went through both link, simple and very good explanation. Thank you for that. Now I don't understand why despite that I have 4 ratings, they are not showing up on my profile?
Because they are coming from untrusted users (from the default trust point of view). Read the second thread again (How DT system works).
|
. .HUGE. | | | | | | █▀▀▀▀ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █▄▄▄▄ | ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ . CASINO & SPORTSBOOK ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ | ▀▀▀▀█ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ ▄▄▄▄█ | | |
|
|
|
S_Therapist
|
|
January 04, 2019, 01:17:36 PM Merited by coinlocket$ (2) |
|
I went through both link, simple and very good explanation. Thank you for that. Now I don't understand why despite that I have 4 ratings, they are not showing up on my profile?
TryNinja has already said that they are from untrusted networks. Now, if you go to your trust setting and include the name of those persons from whom you got feedback, you can see those in your profile. No one else will see as long as they will also be included in their trust list. For example, if I add sparkweb in my trust list, I will see the feedback. I have just added sparkweb in my trust list for showing you.
|
|
|
|
fonship
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 893
Merit: 135
Bitcoin is not a currency or asset. Its a MOVEMENT
|
|
January 06, 2019, 06:21:45 AM |
|
Now this makes sense. Got it now. So until I get trust from some very big level it won't be visible enough.
|
selling sushistake.com, send offers
|
|
|
S_Therapist
|
|
January 06, 2019, 06:45:50 AM |
|
Now this makes sense. Got it now. So until I get trust from some very big level it won't be visible enough.
There is nothing called big level although we have some members called DT. If everyone uses a custom trust list, the DT member will not be big level anymore. If you have included someone in your trust list, you will be able to see his feedback to other's profile or in your profile. I think you should again read the two threads earlier I suggested and try to understand how it works.
|
|
|
|
fonship
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 893
Merit: 135
Bitcoin is not a currency or asset. Its a MOVEMENT
|
|
January 07, 2019, 01:22:03 AM |
|
Yeah I have read it. Problem is majority users are not aware of how to use trust system and merit system So mostly for trust, its big level what i was referring to is having trust from one DT person, bcoz that will be visible to everyone. I think forum moderators can see how many poeple have custom trust setting, i assumption is that they should be very very few.
May be BT should start some area to educate or some weekly email to users with these details, or whoever sign-up few should get somehow to use this platform effectively.
|
selling sushistake.com, send offers
|
|
|
S_Therapist
|
|
January 07, 2019, 02:24:56 AM |
|
Yeah I have read it. Problem is majority users are not aware of how to use trust system and merit system So mostly for trust, its big level what i was referring to is having trust from one DT person, bcoz that will be visible to everyone. I think forum moderators can see how many poeple have custom trust setting, i assumption is that they should be very very few.
May be BT should start some area to educate or some weekly email to users with these details, or whoever sign-up few should get somehow to use this platform effectively.
It's true that custom trust list is used by only a few people. I personally am not using custom list because I trust most of the DT people and I want to see feedback from them by default. Theymos is promoting/encouraging people to use custom trust list by the forum ads slot. Check the 60th number text in factoid slots.
|
|
|
|
yahoo62278
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3598
Merit: 4424
|
|
January 07, 2019, 04:27:23 AM |
|
Now this makes sense. Got it now. So until I get trust from some very big level it won't be visible enough.
Trust score may not increase when you get feedbacks from users who are not DT, but it is still good to receive positive feedbacks from those users. Users read your feedbacks(Most should anyways) and get a sense of how reliable you are to make trades with, hire, or trust period. Another thing, when you leave feedback on others try to make sure to include a reference link so that the action or transaction has merit and cannot be viewed as a fake feedback. Hopefully others that leave you feedback do the same.
|
..Stake.com.. | | | ▄████████████████████████████████████▄ ██ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██ ▄████▄ ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██████████ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██ ██████ ██ ██████████ ██ ██ ██████████ ██ ▀██▀ ██ ██ ██ ██████ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██████ ██ █████ ███ ██████ ██ ████▄ ██ ██ █████ ███ ████ ████ █████ ███ ████████ ██ ████ ████ ██████████ ████ ████ ████▀ ██ ██████████ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████ ██ ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██ ▀█████████▀ ▄████████████▄ ▀█████████▀ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███ ██ ██ ███▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████████████████████████████████████ | | | | | | ▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄ █ ▄▀▄ █▀▀█▀▄▄ █ █▀█ █ ▐ ▐▌ █ ▄██▄ █ ▌ █ █ ▄██████▄ █ ▌ ▐▌ █ ██████████ █ ▐ █ █ ▐██████████▌ █ ▐ ▐▌ █ ▀▀██████▀▀ █ ▌ █ █ ▄▄▄██▄▄▄ █ ▌▐▌ █ █▐ █ █ █▐▐▌ █ █▐█ ▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀█ | | | | | | ▄▄█████████▄▄ ▄██▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀▀██▄ ▄█▀ ▐█▌ ▀█▄ ██ ▐█▌ ██ ████▄ ▄█████▄ ▄████ ████████▄███████████▄████████ ███▀ █████████████ ▀███ ██ ███████████ ██ ▀█▄ █████████ ▄█▀ ▀█▄ ▄██▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██▄ ▄▄▄█▀ ▀███████ ███████▀ ▀█████▄ ▄█████▀ ▀▀▀███▄▄▄███▀▀▀ | | | ..PLAY NOW.. |
|
|
|
LoyceV
Legendary
Online
Activity: 3304
Merit: 16596
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
|
|
January 07, 2019, 07:12:45 AM |
|
I think forum moderators can see how many poeple have custom trust setting, i assumption is that they should be very very few. Trust is public, you can see it too: https://bitcointalk.org/trust.txt.xzI made it so that'll update every Saturday at 02:52 UTC. -> is "trusts", and -/> is "excludes". Only people with at least 1 post are included. If someone has never touched their trust list, then their trust in DefaultTrust is not shown. I count 3890 users with a custom trust list: theymos allinvain HostFat teff LZ Elwar satamusic btchris Bimmerhead Stephen Gornick Peter Todd fabianhjr midnightmagic ColdHardMetal Chuck dishwara chmod755 Jason ryepdx Luke-Jr dooglus Astro Raize keystroke Nekrobios phantomcircuit Miner-TE spacediver GCInc. Sahtor defaced RchGrav Maged SteveB trilogy456 layer1gfx Inaba server mithrandi algaidaman Grix edd Raoul Duke luv2drnkbr topynate someguy123 Bit_Happy tabsa SgtSpike romeorickl64 wariner gmaxwell gsan Kluge Josh zapeta Mikers BookofNick jspielberg enmaku MiningBuddy wangxinxi organofcorti bitpop twmz justusranvier rb1205 Peter Lambert RyNinDaCleM Dracov Mousepotato jwzguy Soros Shorts tonto Carnth TECSHARE Caesium IIOII drrussellshane Acejam stellan0r Chefnet redcomet emersonlogan62 tysat desired_username iCEBREAKER Dacm4n dserrano5 kokojie random_cat rupy haploid23 Micon ixne Cluster2k phantastisch OgNasty Jessi RockDJ 2weiX CanaryInTheMine Oldminer SebastianJu Rudementry Stemby cc5alive AndyRossy str4wm4n Bind jamesg whirlpool -ck Haembi SyRenity newguy05 hypersire Xer0 bbit xaxistech Ente Zodiac1233 R2Pleasent themusicgod1 Schleicher SLVR4ME ullikume Lord F(r)og Ratman2050 gwillen chiliftw malevolent 2GOOD zefir Elokane dego yxt EpicFail qwk the joint Vrs goozman96 CoinBoerse.com Garr255 pankkake bluetowel oxi hendo420 leevancleef BTC-Joe smoothie preparation koopa GreekBitcoin naypalm ziomik prodigits7 fydel julz BCwinning jdebunt X68N manfred87 blizzen forexmasterja Korbman paraipan goxed BitcoinEXpress rafsoaken Lincoln6Echo mameise dlasher Northwave jaebird cocodapuf loglow John (John K.) andy3 ercolinux Unacceptable Michail1 Olly_K Anduck mc_lovin rihannafully ssateneth MsBitcoin Immuzikation abracadabra THCGroup pekv2 FCTaiChi fronti taserz epicrate Nigmar juhakall skilo wallet.dat Maidak crzr kano dscotese SgtMoth ry0t maxmint dree12 imsaguy Wobberdk rdponticelli Tomatocage arij Mushoz DrG enlightened wknight SaltySpitoon canton phantitox exxe securo misternoodle ineededausername camerali Donrulezz runeks Gyom Khanduras BadBear FreeTrade fsb4000 Eveofwar Turbor escialsped bitcoinbear juggalodarkclow ocminer Forobitcoins manic DiThi silverfuture Scott J Tinua Come-from-Beyond jddebug rudrigorc2 yo-blin mdude77 Vagnavs scintill Seal mrbubl3s Hexadecibel agibby5 wolverine.ks Frizz23 Bees Brothers dpb xqus augustocroppo nbtcminer Rubberduckie vual pidobir nlovric darkmule rini17 mprep ldrgn 01BTC10 Cranky4u af_newbie UnderGod Blazr xeerog LiteBit Lohoris Liam W LouReed MrTeal mda testconpastas2 silverbox saddambitcoin ildubbioso BCB starsoccer9 tcp_rst PsychoticBoy Dabs Varyg DiamondCardz Foxpup opentoe ShireSilver Voogru Dalkore jwplayer0 caffeinewriter thatbluedude RooKIED investr Winterfrost zinjo fhh whiskers75 b0nfire elgreco Xenophon miaviator gweedo Lethos Darkwin nimda diego1000 NereuFajardo bitcats KIDC piit79 Xian01 xuemike davecoin doothewop cantor Entropy-uc Choroid Plexus hm burnside IveBeenBit Newar adamas Brassguy Kaleidoscope bitcoinplaza Akka Bitcoines macromode BitcoinNational bixcoin lassdas DannyHamilton 420 strello Crankerer LoweryCBS AmDD Bjork CaptChadd Muis merve10495 Kivela fbastage sedric398 nemercry Gyrsur opodark Capture scalar33 Prozak MichaelBliss Joori bitdaniel Darktongue austinsimonson nameface Ebo awoland dyingdreams btcstore 2501 001sonkit Carlton Banks philipma1957 biodieselchris sLide. jborkl nlovlyn Uuno bigtimespaghetti alka66 eestimees InfiniTcell FundsMoney ekremboz1 QuantumKiwi Tak MonocleMan ApeXz Ginsley SRG Benson Samuel yrtrnc warhawk187 BTCMiners.net SLok ZuonKing buysellbitcoin sangaman bestbiz9 PatMan CoinHoarder sacko wh00per HenryRomp koelen3 polrpaul amigaman jjoshp1 omgitsmehehe kuusj98 Siturb Lab_Rat OpenYourEyes pheaonix pkarc KWH kralle eid Emergenz mnightwaffle int03h lewisrafael40 kelpy Amitabh S mirny QuestionAuthority Mikej0h whistle11 rme DebitMe soy GIANNAT alexeysh77 maco Atruk lunarboy tel BG4 subvolatil nexus6 bcboilermaker Razick Chefin Digikeys Seccour MoneypakTrader.com BTC4Amazon escrow.ms umairsaleem010 Bicknellski madpoet Walter Rothbard cptmooseinc nexusakachus uhnonamiss Kempelen Foxcool sunk818 joinmicah Trading shadowhax tom1 icey mobile Cyrus Evolyn brooksby frank0929 cjanthony ruggedman_dan agath algorista EndTheFed321 velacreations bennybong ProfMac sublime5447 n00b2013 MagicBit15 mwax321 louong hephaist0s Rawted 100x dreamliner A1ex dobetter DBG Parazyd Xqisit Wolf0 Coiner.de gates notserp flound1129 gogxmagog ny2cafuse frga13 mmitech BitcoinLady Cognitive monkeynuts PRab AU eorituz ccl Mevius e4xit sharknutzz shawshankinmate37927 erpalum chalbersma elaramus ohac durnkenWiz InvalidSnack Nemo1024 22naru badgerman hingleMC galbros bitspill temor JedWafu MWNinja portice FullLife Felipeo marto74 bitstrange Fabrizio89 dipsy Welsh shibaji zif33rs cchan BitCoinNutJob d5000 grnbrg Omen1855 reneg Wardrick BKM ahmed_bodi mycketbra pivavar Sword Smith wizzardTim kcud_dab mrbrt oldbushie hanti Abdussamad petrosc Bytas Bitcoin BEAR No 1 LeChatNoir fran2k needmoney EddyGameta MadAlpha dupeddonk xan_The_Dragon GodFatherTiZ GPK260 lazlopanaflex Neupleu spark dogie nottm28 Bitdonator CoinFeeder finlof NitrogenSports freedomno1 dchapes W-M MikeMark SamGriffin elitenoob shitaifan2013 Wolf Rainer ebloo thomashrev89 realrover chicobr Mogumodz pitchbend dnaleor mariusg marcetin ivanlabrie Chainsaw Gimpeline o3u culexevilman CharlyKa rottenchris danosphere Pokokohua! spunkybd Luckybit Exocyst gateway elchorizo RDMINER The 4ner gavrilo likl3sfuhjh WildFire.ca Sy traderman kirch M!tch Silfax Azure pisciolatzu sterob ThunderSheep Operatr gadman2 furuknap Snail2 stevendevlin rouf553 digititus klotzenhotz bitterdog bitcoinminer42 The_Catman Foofighter orymh Frost datguyian zulover Alesfatalis Ikinoki Pitchotto rammy2k2 Vigil Nucivar bitwarrior Nightowlace mr_john xrobau CheapYoutubeHits BigBitz Rub3n Swimmer63 Sophokles jimhsu Prelude bluudz mjb binaryFate guitarplinker SilentSonicBoom serge79 nst6563 Spendulus iban lerelerele Guido stfnnn lubah dacman61 tutorialevideo alexius89 axorb reb0rn21 8fold oda.krell lyno Cheshyr defcon23 radiumsoup ReCat androz nairb131 shrimpdigger TMAN Searing StarbucksShop EnJoyThis trader19 mullick webchris klabaki zackie theemstra tom04137 BRADLEYPLOOF MikeMike statdude pascal257 dzyk yayayo shakezula Gws24 Macno Lauda crazyivan klrgoten Passion_ltc helloge BitcoinBoss mmmd Blood Ninja AbraxasCcs ASIC-8Tile Mr. Jinx escalicha kwilliams Hiroaki Dragooon TomUnderSea mickeld chanberg Polyatomic Slipage stslimited Mad_Max tk1337 rascal777 td services kimosan Quartx wayner hypnos2k nomad13666 Farthom DrahogErusiel awgilyas s_stylez BitcoinDroid Vl4dim1r btcmcdizzle Vega pr0d1gy wavefan Kouye Genom cyberhacker Dunkelheit667 candidakefyr AbiTxGroup E.Sam Micky25 Wed Spjer n00bwastaken laris2 Pale Phoenix S110RE DM90 shapemaker Zich TookDk Badman0316 jlsminingcorp monocolor goose20 cptdome1 Cryptocables dmcdad chnchapters paul3 maxpower Chris_Sabian itphobia americandesi xibeijan Tursk krysta11 PeBo peonminer BitcoinCharlie dreamhouse JoeChmoe xjack Equate stevenlam Deathwing terrahash KS Vlad2Vlad Rannasha colinistheman AZIZ1977 torepia Adriano btcee BitcoinBarrel Mitchell derekleong75 Gregc1131 fisheater itod qwep Biomech FiiNALiZE MsCollec juicejoyce nightyj bitwhizz OnkelPaul BeepBeep2 Datto Entz zerocode20 macros altsay CreationLayer badalien tinus42 MExpat911 phm jonoiv leepsteer00 ibuybtc judasiscariot helipotte mrfakename aurel57 oneinamillion bitdominion pablotextoris superresistant Orngrimm elasticband gjpminingco sylpalma CryptoBullion Jamievs granathus Quark Verlaufen nkocevar halfawake copyfile Min€r Ruggito harlemx coinmaster222 Rigon guitar82 BTCat Olegcho tecscott Thrash LimLims cosacipwr Tywill Rakessh padalin vlees BitcoinBaBa gdassori Mota ghibly79 vizique slashopt zackclark70 jimmijames73 ahmedbodi bitzox Fuserleer adub mrtchipr Xaxer Breen2543 AndrewHenson cardcomm djcoin El Extranjero klintay arnbrd ~Money~ Weppel boewie OmarG Taborresen HabbyGab digit Yzord bardi.harborow stex2009 sacskate zakorus snatchmonkey edn247 piecinitup Anmol_Verma natey1 chickenfried12 hack_ Ratio n00ber demontn LottoPool Beastlymac STT feohdale mishax1 btcapparel play cryptocyprus KyrosKrane dj6230 Blazr2 MarkAz bitdigger2013 krusin JustAnotherBitcoinFan _rusty_ jacktarli gh2k cardedon Damnsammit tinyteapot michaelwang32 maursader realestone Sampey casx JonnySmithers favdesu trasla shoppingco_in wassup foroplus walletrecoveryservices rgfii mindragon scarsbergholden wwzsocki djjacket Timelord2067 Argwai96 tbly13 jestronix IYFTech TheLordOfTime Mike18feb dArkjON Street Jammer batesresearch Donta cornfeedhobo Chronikka GreenBits jantenner81 sQueeZer 1base58 mstang83 Kujmandosz Cudahuda stuvwxyz99 teslaman Blazed jedimstr jnagyjr mrmueller frelex muto McLoo ashish12 hollowframe dma88 ireneorlando 33Warlord poeEDgar jprice hamburgapples IAmTheOutlander DugOutDad easynote Foebar jeremypwr J603 incognitoworker microzee twbt yorkeagle versificateur Big boss coininaction BayAreaCoins Falco00 Hagemaru TheBanksLife rigel zac2013 wedge thomas_s nrg1zer anarcho_recipe tspacepilot usamakhalid961 eneloop NineLives omegaflare soapmodem iampingu Kiwi7 Tsukene mytey slavo dukeneptun DyslexicZombei bholzer gbianchi EFS Cryptoguru yogg zeewolf millsdmb erikalui zloster nolanglenn malev nomtka lgtx bartok Lairew noviapriani mcculum0010 jogebe teddy22 ahmedjadoon HereToTrade facings kmtan Wild0wnes murraypaul xkeyscore89 Swisswatcher cryptasm SixFigures Dps23 alnoor1231 DStefanov showtimex TheQuin Hesham_3del leancuisine golikcoin mamamae Walking Glitch topminingcontracts bobsag3 abacus BadAss.Sx aksplace lclc terrapinflyer Misiak4 Boston.Miner Nixsy mjgraham monkeynutts tigerwood0432 FlensGold darkzorger ndnh vnhyp0 bits4books Btc_mogul maula bomberb17 komodovpn Buster lateblooming visiondream3 digitalgrow coin@coin jambola2 eXme Shallow justbtcme gloryninja aminorex ParmaBTC wpt1wpt1 msc Biffa crocko unotdog25 SolarWindMiningCompany palatine cintrondigital Headrix palerider jtonthebike fxkevin cinnamon_carter E.exchanger Martijnvdc toothpick Jags2ooo thejaxx dominicwin victorhing pjcltd s1lverbox geoffreyqp Gladdy subseaguru jeppe direct chaosPT CustomChickenDelivery Ilsk dfox101 JamesMorton gingpark dbshck TheNewAnon135246 jonasbits MEGAman Gridcoin www.al3ashi8.com CryptoNames bitguy101 seandaniel lnternet awahid2020 cagrund Jeffrey know_intent xephyr zolace lenkug kamrulhasan001 DahRookie dsattler bitsta davideak weatherman Spratan koshgel BryanK verloren IXC2XIC IamNotSure MoreBloodWine divinity x0rcist chiefstank adoalli der_markus chrism1 Undernoxo hdbuck canadian_bitcoin naj ajax3592 Poloherb KGBSlim hybridsole Talbot49 spin mikenekro unknownfame bitcoiner222 Evil-Knievel LanMachine Exidous railzand rico666 Julien Lucky Cris gonefishing510 Willisius AnAnarchist mentalpanda NeoSoulStar greenplastic glitchboy ammi84 Hunterk13 bitcoinicon lucky7slick CoinThinker dualminer jcoin200 atleticofa sandrig CoinManiac joeroxor Mattzees bitcoinisfurture start the art babaji.ca hedgy73 squatter ObjectInSpace mybitcoin101 btcguy38 Mikellev srknbyr no141 Jansen227 cannachris scutzi128 paperwallets R3N3 jakedeez SKEESH Mi non2 hilariousandco u9y42 Ng93 sowanted gagalady bcd Mylo LiQio jleefly bitcoinmining FuckTheDollar Gablez Timene0 NorrisK segvec btcgoods SFMiner firejuan troy112 HFPowerful thekage Ntrain2k cevirmen applesauce92 opossum Hai-Tech ItaCraft U1TRA_L0RD rgr_rgr Codemeister lynngame DieHard haggis kenji EcuaMobi subwoofer12 arulbero S-Joe luigi1111 Philll90 meowmix4jo Matt9301 jluizg MisterLG patyjm Gelbstich traderwin KriszDev kizilsakal EvilDave y_boonstra xzibits raywillet kodtycoon noashh kupidon1985 Avirunes DooMAD yumei Klazzik vikingchild ganion7 Sanglotslongs bigassboy botarnold jack80 Pry4u ArcticWolfie WiWi Nullu RoooooR crazy72 player01 Neo.op jukeee Honeypot silentgwad jjc326 pandacoin BillRizer90 DougB62 coa032 forgetme renbit montreal mdtspain andrealandia udjin123 WiiD patriot1889 fartbags WorldCoiner Dogecoin shorena RJX aleks648 kalnas iluvpie60 RGBKey 643gur cventura tm2013 ABitInterested blackraven1425 icaros mitchellmint sergiu2k myisis Acidyo ZERO_O illodin Envrin yslyung Initscri computeus ShopemNL looter artw1982 Cheeseater Chris001 trynmpo Afros iglasses meph pixmo keithers EndCiv brutal cragv escobol ravetrader pnoch buckrogers Furio machasm mortare MartiniBlanco CoinPN bitmutiny raskul BitcoinSteve SlidingHorn IIpeBeD_MeDBeD Stout_Nick opnoskatt _Miracle PyroTekNeks asenski towedunder bitbridgett Bassie alexlab51 yolocoinswag Carlos-e-spectra itsallpc MrData novaboy2k ps_jb SUPERANTONIO nero987 xploited chrisnippz titan20 icet208 blaaaaacksuit Newtobitcoins kebabman nosdi26 campycoin eduncan911 -droid- L3pje Crypto Rigs xtester itraxe flipstyle Shadow_Runner cryptotipz Hueristic emu apenzl DarKSm0ke achi72 drmagicblue SpiryGolden mckeo5514 S3cco kraizi corp asdosoasd johnngbluntzky awrelll Alvineac PerrythePlatypus DrBeer baby222 IlPresidenteX OzHSV Bono dan_and_shan spartak_t HunterS ch00dybcn Freekje BitProdigy atchoum6760 gkv9 omicron811 CryptKeeper SantaMuerte suklee blacklig Jiyome Isplendid BitcoinBobbeh Buchi-88 50cent_rapper ErikvanBreen cakir GoodDaySir eslfc1 Hermann1337 kov MickGhee Caiapfas blackheart13 robelneo Sarahiko nicolasgramlich Lesbian Cow J4bberwock Pelk MijntjeGoud Drogean henriquelb flis1986 cnioctib Codge Grrizz k2_1971 dbt1033 jubehat guigui371 ManeBjorn Freekiiee Ilan1 PaintShopPro6 BoeserKeller userpacman fuckukyo La_boutique_du_mineur sirsmokesalot erwin112 donschoe crackfoo Originality aalborg MCR hi_i_am_a_nerd CobaltPH jharkness mitzie GMPoison minerpool-de TorinT BCNext. scranagar antonlevay megashira1 Coinr88 xtrm SlimePuppy rhkazani1 uiunavie Androidicus american911 bassdude Peachy jamiecruickshank mmzzy1 valkir David48l bitcoinreviews tertius993 brian_nguyen gysca Foex the_poet MansenP Jonesd willi9974 -Greed- lokust rhino34567 mjadid micryon hashcoins Ladukas VonSpass ducatitalia coisoetal CoinFriend Cloverleaf762 Wolke edloop joksim299 waligu Vitala Freefallr Ski72 zneww bdannnn satooshi_denton One Six zodiac3011 wiffwaff S4VV4S rollingfast69 aagert Shkembe sobe-it pokeytex aizzaku Surfactant andulolika fixmod funkwerk101 Biodom cptfisher Aggressor66 activescott mynxtcoin Delaforetnoire cryptodevil Armis CoinRnr SBOSS romanornr M4cca revjp gampher CryptoGeneral Maski78 americanpegasus RitzGrandCasino ammy009 pizzaboy69696969 hustler100 nfox burnttoast chrisaka btcltcdigger ciprian220 yannis7777 kufan Smack That Ace salsamoves tifozi sunny1 hgerson CyberRat TaunSew ciocgun elianite SxC vertoe designbuyers Sumpfbiene cryptoknightt CrazyLoaf Darkwinde secousa vm_mpn cryptopaths Bitcrea cryptomite LeancyBTC paltoco mindtrip Qxw telepatheic Theo55 BohemianStalker crowetic jamesclark strasboug MrPresident rel-oad yourcatsofat wsmolive GhostPlayer Wanesst wheresmycoin Arrogantx GoldenKnight369 sorryforthat yeahright gregofdoom Akroma dload.1 compmaster kitey DonJoe8 troleybüs merakicoin Tupsu PurePwnage xploreredfusion TheCoinFinder *Sakura* boliu reesev snakey Finnminer vurezo afcobra2 ronyka77 SecondsOld BossBee jodybay LTEX neleonele sgi02 Alao melwinder eizh BtcTradeGroup vsniko Jacques21 GCforce photon_coin whisky7 qwertybytes Polycoin zzzman20 miner765 emsjvh albertin EmilioMann lowbander80 Exmoney NeuroticFish bitspender kpitti jc12345 bosman felixme Coinbuddy bitcoin-66678 plaaster CoinKombinat Diddyu einsteinium krfighter Tarjeik CryptsyJim mrflibblehat mstellar cryptojo glynbueso helpmywallet jjjohnson socal CryptoKilla buzztiaan BSIG Abraxas147 maidenvoyage Viecoin geetash mitache365 burner2014 WhatTheGox Sithra 2012dgtmgjb maccaspacca cryptovan HTMLCOIN wildduck cryptoboy.architect kubikkubik BitPhotos adaryian Daanie lorenzoasr Mirdude whywefight TheEvilOne 619mining achow101 hoop alirg BitcoinTraders BruceLee007 CryptInvest shimlbit hamza171 ACAB Vandalay23 Liquid71 ProkhorZ Guy Corem Hatcher UpcomingTruth eastendstudios starbuckz DragonDmG libivan BitHYIP mattermaster rudolsen agswinner stevej misterbones kweejee waterpile oppahdoggystyle rjbrande Ignacia finestcuts Melech walterw LovSan honghaisea Umberg OscorSimon dennislevy Sithara007 bradli Deja wakiyamaP antw081 TwipitTeam grn blackpropaganda jurov stoner19 FastSlots yonce teeGUMES stoody egghead123 danielpbarron GuyFawkes88 Zbojnik togesix NoxX silverthornne danstanit gayden owlcatz GSpgh forever21 K128kevin2 Tsquared Fullbuster getmoremonline picolo Bitcoinbikers bitkilo cryptonic21 matveevka myk3916 Borgcoin Donationcoin Campsis Steamed-Picc cathoderay AcoinL.L.C pekatete hanlieuiypm9832 jadefalke eXch.cc nutildah phosphorush MarketMagic shdvb Zz FXCI ObscureBean sparkleboy duckydonald Phore JohnUser dobbscoin java.dev riseabove88 mkc crazykamron Muhammed Zakir crypto-rainbow SuperClam DCMCo-Op gerbert3 jackfruit gorilo23 Dognutz Cryptology salventhor Pengju bitrap B4RF Bitmore meghan jstefanop korxz Joca97 go6ooo1212 carlo__ theodore d0gZpAw windows88 boost523 Prototyp andreaf83 lohveh fabske BCTS dazedfool micky123 5leepyJoe epctechno cryptohacker15 onemorebtc rkinnin jekv2 jk9694 sjc1490 Borpf Mxrider420z pummle wakhidNkcom WhiteBear ABitNut wanglihong HerbPean jyap bram_vnl thumpp chennan z0n0 turk44 szenekonzept BTCballa ingiltere designerusa Hiraga JWMutant DogeBalla CryptoDatabase jpouza naska21 CryptoGuu Vaporlock Scorpianz ZigHash Shattered cointrader83 hgfernan CryptoGore DRKLord ImCoin inigthz burre CoinCollect NaCl inkha coingamblingreviews BitLing mellon DaveyJones pixelpowered Bitcoin_Mafia_Me sky_g CryptoKenzi mexxer-2 ADARSH.V.S Alexz22 Luckycoin90 EXtremeAEX drkprincess Nalien Sickler liteon Bittclick michaeladair allforbtc Coinographic vegasguy Magic Of Nigeria Vicecity KryptoKash diks MoneroMooo JohnnyArmani naira4dollar stepmike Finksy Stars HagssFIN sandbt Casco bobby6killers uvdmnte herogold superhero manwithat allinbox bit_stacker febriyana CoinManiac1 xgold semobo conteaza eden1 paybtc solidvip Anastazy.Jaskulski irfan_pak10 Voltarius WarrEagle farmerJ CryptoCrane wlefever tmfp Sumerian astrochicken smilingloki Sterlingcoin schwab RentCute.com BitcoinPenny hawkfish007 NoobKidOnTheBlock devues9 Danoded duffles btczilla kePd8CT5 valiz Brmaster pafzlo BTCfarm markus8539 jessica-smart cobaltskky CryptShark Thule tolikkk TRICHED yahoo62278 godda04 dogevisitor quickbits L3gionario Irontiga Kashif009 lili song chilo bigD27 Fakhoury 98problems needFREElunch applesRyummy cashen charlieSeen BTC-Bank amingo51 s3v3nh4cks Quickseller bigbitmine 3x2 727miner chadwicksr polybit johnnycagewins Stinker hichamito37 thebfldoctor jalapeneo onewiseguy BITDV CPN stonehedge semidead Razerglass Jeeps leevalle Susi.D vigsun starblocks teamy5892 alexr_96 janahoch MindRoller johnleo papalegba nicehash Nomadz Luckylui smit1237 wawantaz wheelspin krigger bitbollo jjmv BehindU ggg123 LiQuidx dcct SolomonRising CPNpr kainus78 Penner A-Coin tilray 5 Guys Burgers expert4knowledge Milkcookie gazzas vvikkass bonerpanties zazarb pinoycash Undermood txbtc Zepher canary logocreator speedy1987 sandman53 AltcoinWarehouse CryptcoMiner .....Really? mavericklm CalCoins I_IZ_CEO bitcoin revo krishnapramod guiltygearz lobogil Crypto9er megahash MinerHQ ReSl P4ndoraBox7 steven.G999 Yofun Wouter Mense Grand_Voyageur fullzero mmsen singpays RussiaCoinDotInfo codenamethisNutz JSpike The Bad Guy Spidersbox stan86 le4chnation NUMORPHONE bikapata vitobeta GoRDoN-ChoU generalizethis Glucose tellitlikeitis Sanquin kralkral airwalk666 camelson Joebrann pronto deleterase iluvu143 MiningSev0 polminers.com Schnudelu Hox S.Naka yo29787 ZirconPool coindetective laxmictr895 einsteinium.biz DavidShares LFC_Bitcoin circuitsam Othat1981 Kassenzettel Solidsmart nillohit hexafraction junchronick neoneros DFS gablay12 Exther2 nasashi vm89 laura007 AleCrypt0 ZACHM Roquene hagie lifeforcepools lithiumc DropboxSeller lotfiuser Digital_Currency_LTD Sellinq Accounts GailSan jstew Neo110 nowfel Salmen hashie msdealer leen93 pikachuy AnonBitCoiner SHNICI sillug g0ldm0ney10 Berau tarsua Just Magicmann 0bert bhokor kusumadewi Shinzi Fuki Mrbutter Voidcrafter farrukh expron AndreXavier Limx Dev coldice jackbox RHavar BootstrapCoinDev Toggy kazuki49 CCW lordbaltimore antonpans chri521 sonerbo mobster marco.v88 clipman77 Roopatra SimplisticStu nomadcrypto anu940 Racey BitcoinSuisseAG zrsmith ComboChris 1DanieL cryptocoinfan Erkallys Monnt minerpage BGkockata KokiFurihata Shrishti JaredStein HITTI2 Kisokos Drax RaginglikeaBoss coolindark mltask cypher21 utbeauchamp fvs114 james.lent ezeminer Logodynamic MillionsBTCdev PurpleHairyClimber Biznesmen Magnavox Kars_Meind Abiky woodson cryptotech VeryFunnny Ninjahitoko daggerman shlep gokturk_34 glax1983 MillardFerland birhairy mycryptovault savasori Bandot ChrisPop Vadi2323 G2M KingTylerVVS Romanko antho281 gecox22 HmmMAA LegendaryGuy ProspectX bere3kin olcaytu2005 Burks Specular BTC_ISTANBUL cicciobtc bitman101 john-connor digicoinuser Devitout101 (0_0) Hosra alva5763 BenCodie cryptodojo mocacinno huynhaff rsvoter Phat Buzz Tart ca333 sloopy warningsigns Digitalmocking worthyou bestcoin_59 Kiritsugu deathdealer1252 adroitful_one Xxmodded ryanjf soosray ab619 micromen DavidSch alex2012 lottery248 MiLkz g-unit radb0900 FuckIdolPlus blizzen1 voephilisI ChangeLab muguanatos fvineyard SupaDupaDB qctechno MaoChao 24HourPonzzi n3o111 marilyn4325 rianwarcil CanadaBits clgrissom3 donalddraper shavers Miyslovenic CryptoMrM J_ROC skish85 AdamAnt101 kken01 Jesus69 trannamtan |Bitcoin| spike74563 catbref rikrikrik br41nr41n mastertrader777 Cypherious KeySeller FlossinRod psycodad btcseller2014 Mang86 LVjackpot mhanbostanci Gisado TheThreadReporter aikunsatu amazon4u MKMarvel acharias JohnStyles Bananenfrosch nasituygun renatohk CjMapope radhwane digitalgold pjeremy014 EvBitcoinFan Stellaartois transcyberian unholycactus ChicagoCoinConnection 844bankbtc gloug33 Skyenet madroller bitcoinmar bones261 Verified4you MustafaJohnMing Maximum_Overderp! EZ-as-pi HNCommunity Cash BTC LoyceV TheDogecoinDarkForker kahaiwro DogecoinDarkForkening jerowacik rizkyhiw hobo_sapien Landak thedreamer onemorexmr Da_Dice_Staff PatSNL capslock42 KocaEfe regtrade achow101_alt UltraFRS imaduck political1907 miguelmorales85 Losvienleg Woody20285 Ashan lentzaj The Wise Guy vvasabi superquaid Daintykane MAsterV1.1 FinerVapor jeffy1021 Snagglebone nano-btc The Pharmacist Shane Oakley Rahish ACP PICISI bitcoinplusorg techboy2 matete irixo10 RileyNico Riley Nico bit-dividends antiviruseller RealPhotoshoper HarryJohnson Starin yeswepump MightSellAccount hirngespenst psiataka dorik lockscreen Maicol792 toodamntired BitcoinNewsMagazine godmode3D TechBoi Funny PonZZ MonkeyCoin11 TPTB_need_war PrivacyLock Raees DARKCHANGE Redrose EdenHazard IvugeoEvolutionCoin Ruco sellstarbucks m4nki BtcCrazy1 mickelody BitcoinFriends PremiumCodeX DarkStar_ Fazbeidel XVzN BTC-BTC-BTC vCardVideo Tinker88 Zeroxal mishra1994 Quickerseller Password02 TitsiCoiner LsHallo mallard resUnioC phenam Relex joel_ THX 1138 Steamingoff Vaporware cryptosmoker BitcoinTurk Athertle Coinminer11 Mooncoin_Foundation Twiggy Smile TraderCal11 FX_Trader Amadues p3yot33at3r Insertion EinaiOraCoinDev zybik ishhstar fanwolf yougotpunk tennozer koinsever V.Lace Tomatocage1 BitcoinExpert CryptoSi Benevolentia econtact ruller SimkeTrade sojuz mapsi-fixi tifossi hakanbalta577 Lutpin Hobbyist quantumgravity antiuser1 Hesaplar FullMemberForSale Crapsy Fuzzbawls mr.relax AkaSnake Jake36 UnrealBitcoin beel Magnr TheLegendaryOne JackpotRacer koiler Firedude eeX Engg.Chaks anhkimjun jonnyking ridewithme BitMaxz carlosmnk cjmoles TheGrimm BlueYozakuraBTC bitcoinwebhosting_org d4rkwizard heya77 AlexSimion Soylent_Green cryptosun mustang01 Dreckshammel nimogsm deadlock1 ultimo_dragon raaajlucky anakinisme densmirnov eloubtc FrozenOne Speedball EurGold Gifted crendore3 rickgejr neochiny Zyro Saruman GSLynn blarneystone killerjoegreece dunnerjunge CoinRecipe TwitchySeal a7mos javierfjavier RDDRocket shapetwist CheapSerials julslet84 churiart MbccompanyX cashintor1 DONS thesmokingman btcbounty Daneal Stroto bithero HardcoreSuperstar Tortoise75 Streetdealer Arrakeen Flex_65 NastyD zoose scw manutdfan someoldcoins Isildur (official) asad777 iGold Orayt rkandrades phishead MeJIkyc Topknotbam berkbelek biggbox susila_bai TheLastTrapper acroman08 nejibens Laviathon HorusHoraha international.off Harpua BTCC_Official Jethroz BTC.addict escrowboy Uckel LightZ Kirchner Ntoskrnl Eiishman RedBullAddicted NineD EthanB UfoRia giuseppe.it SuperCarRental.xyz chr_sty QuentinA elokk jreis95 Fermion-Dev darkagentx xayan123 Beslim termo$ bekasto 1337leet user64 Free Bitcoin Expert Joel_Jantsen ShivShubh jassanpary bestbitcoins admaris SignificantOtter3 RealRimlin BiTZeD BetKing.io wikkidtt bwonwen2015 Zonnk miguelik anthonycamp Alex4J rod1234 faygo sanandreas MortonCharbo chiajw1 dontetris ClamGaming Crypt0bull iudica Mr.Beegood creditbit gluedog vilain sibnia Xeelee Strongkored Blind Legs Parker Machina_US filipwx salamyman Jabbawa benhames rogie07 RobbieRoor nid125 dunfida Zocadas BellaBitBit steinberg-bootcamp jchst Zadicar satmas Arpetuos EngiNerd CC1 sardasa Newbi3 bjbear123 iamcoolboy Noax Eyedol-X hananl1styo zfe FCDenHaag Naster nathanalexanderjeffrey mexxer-3 was chosen TheFuzzStone Nagadota brazilcoins Btcme33 mocaboss Zilara12 Stoloweld Symeave Hity1992 jlfvr Anibal Fernandez simple23227 zefrank1 PrivateKeyCo Woultries Dided1981 Dite1989 wolfsbaine Skeptical One VRobb Cryptotraider16 DigiCodes userghost lottery248 checkpoint HTHP fortunecrypto veetulabo wormat22 Kaostechno sandiman gt_addict jacko0088 masoodzia papa_face messypete shinohai AnnoBTC Xsinx Neupleu_neu Rokz MesutCan smoker36 1Ebook lvsca Sell Egift Card Deadly050 Seller3214 Shaolinsk UnsourcedAnonymous Darwin84 Xavier59 eNonymous fikihafana walwus SimplyRouge2 krisgt30 Shelltux obstinatekittens Youresioure dipkiss malkom yoji08 rush_btc zoggie seedix Longsnowsm Bit-Exo.com Rabble-rouser Ultracombo imbest Maxumark zauna35 Raja_MBZ loadbearing JumperN duvxlobisi bohokor TrueCryptoinere Litemit Meuh5598i -tK pakrulakzal iurislav zyzzyva Optimizer ShopMod akamit Slow death eduardoariasmoreno 335coin marlboroza stock999 bitpazari thewall MrBitter bittraffic Sanugarid marsibit cryptovolume PremiumAccountSeller CookieMastr LexaLore cryptoheadd AfricanBloke Newko omodz The Prince Of Egifts Best_Exchange janpowal305 TommyBitcoin waxmiguel AleScamHole dddma mm0104 HardyGoodsLtd Lafu RomerZolt digaran Bavarian Illuminati philakone Stein sfinxster eaLiTy NewkTownTN tamer3 Termie nPuBeT nyawa btcaway gerasrocha Duchess supercops SpectroCoin_support abdemtar coinmall burzuks6 dustboy pisquare HelioHash kangusmcdu2 luispooter raiblock Axente caspfun1 nathansenn Johnny00 Traxo Tred jovan85 JarvsMetalCasting xPPx Felimon Heardalis Talkerstalk xxcsu mbuk81 msar Immor108 alamin99 CoollerOne tweetious worgon12 volcano1 Xpod78 BitPotus wallet4bitcoin BingoDog christinalorine perfectmoneywallet Mkmanik hardknitted CryptoGods Aetsen cInfiniteBtcLetsShare OhGodAGirl bitcoinexplorer Nightking AioFox vein071315 corsaronero1969 IconFirm wowok aioc Lipe490 EuropeBitcoinCash ucengeah mbbtc01 vitod bkxpress2015 JessicaG winmon Redwine4 rockmoney TheHellboundHarlot SexyBits Cent21 LiskQH Mauser Omnicide24 wavesroom photonresearch udp Ooiyyy Perle Mibberz V.cash El-BitCoin TheBarMan Mexicantrader ipraerie torikan mpaycoin kingcarsen EnacDomains opdawut drakonka Bitcoin-2018 TheOnlyAndOnly kaicrypzen allohha pisston hovrah whaawh syncope3 ruben0909 whyrqa atjiat taktik swetka natka cryptohustla ssuchy NielsB17 therhslv unixcoin totothedog84 staxxd shameonscams game-protect DJ1554 cryoser CryptoTraderGuildGM Kaznachej123 Niya btcmaker21 tipto lukas_exchanger Nam3 Kalipo sayyedraza lighpulsar07 johnsmithx PancherBitCoin Hhampuz BlackRock AlehandroTheGreat megacrypton murasame2003 Zaizoun novembersky mybtcyourpaypal pacifista chiphoi famiextrem S@toshiDirect masumhossain Kyhm sabbathhawk hackrekcahxfb blurryeyed philggg stupid_footer ButterflyKnife1 Blackshadow007 nerdralph altcoinmen playerbtc maxmad_x coin-investor solteykr Oates590 SaShiRaJaVu jacktheripper2 xonecoinlovers Clement Kaliyar Boseda vino.gcs zlotycoin realbigs21024 PokemonGoArena 1blockologist Truthchanter icon73 targetmlrd PolyPanto ramzifcb47 brendongl xtraelv 131tc01n infoexchangetrade btcdamnit MRlong aws-premium paramind22 Tatsujin MrMerchant ethbits step_mike BuyingFast buwaytress sapusapu TDutch A-10 MEMEX mistonel ChiBitCTy systemist dreamer81 Bitcoin-Turkiye cisA neetu12 jekainvestor MarkGetz metalbean trust_egift Rich Richi BitsifyOfficial Lucred LuluPH zuava rmy-s CHRISBIN702 Lorilikes matt11235 Edgemaster lipochka_s namistyk matrixbank evader11 MERCATOX jooj jekjekman Juggy777 crypto-bit lanysik7 jenia1 fairbee wnj4 mstfprcn hannusolo mehmedchelebi Techie5879 Ashong Salonga kumax Lacander kiddeon123 comit starb brobbel vikec1989 mersense alexsandria Deep In The Mines LLC bitconnectcoin Terricrepo MachineZero bookseller10 John3D Bazinga! cho99 cracxme killyou73 smyslov parth1b BustyKuroNeko coinbeamer BettorChain.com iconis999 MnemonicInsomnia PhilippAlex BENBTC nakata90 Kousei23 playersfun Zavvi hromov drpacman marksteven otantizma Roydgon icqcointokenwallet Knepala EFdesigns Kubra Dam Gatorelf JohnSn0w GROKEN 1dollar bonefix fonship evakka Rogerdale Cobalt9317 Henkkaa zurylostboys divinemaniac Wrapper LaLeche R00TC0IN dean nolan Nirvana25 epicfailman AgnO5 sheld0n shillfudder eni1 ninche andrezepta chuchi118 BitcoinDomainDeals asxs_btc Tidex findblocks.com otto_diesel TheKing247 Mitarbeiter rtinedal ZeyadS jonathan555 olaf_d harrishedge farhanbu Jerry_young bestBTCdomains cedlemercier superciuk reaktor7777 Bittabs.com khalidxpert destielq BetOpen Miner2525 RESPECT46 jslee1301 supto newcoindev1 Ricky2000 ProGamerJojo btclife01 mr.zet HiDevin BitcoinWizards AWSCodes ATAK T-129 paul00 aoluain loading... adneena 116rus nhat2nhat2 ViceOfBTC21 Pitbully gafygafy moojin78 anticola Hersix Dmarti94 Fatmoo Franzen16 crypticj godrey123 coinbtc01 vanillanice Yudai coinchaser007 45systems garik100 nullius the1arty djwatt3 bzcorp znggurj mrreese tarolog An0nyMoose simplejg rohnyaz9299 tosmartak Mattthev jmigdlc99 VoskCoin quangap01 mafia15 Minimax HopeCrypto altpool-tech AUruHM stoffu Aerys2 welshcollectibles mizrak Jxnndal journeyman12 milani bubblebubble chiwalfrm Game0flife SamaelDNM shouter trexw wvihor denetci noughat daniweb krogothmanhattan anahata Ethan_Locke Sungoku Bommulunder owldeveloper Filipe543 OneNattyLitecoin Doctor.Strange koolerss TheWinnerBro Heyyyrenz 4atterbox therealNano sabathch plucking23 divedaucd GoodLuckChuck mandertherick donmiguello newfulluser Corsicoin jam22 cryptohype caisa88 NarKotix Jako0203 imabadguy iandoZ tekin_ural kabit9 bonusdeposit MCBrown10 SuperMod CREAMteam bitcoinguy123 Alexmasterbtc xenonflux Yoandy10 sparker327 dimon114 marknowen CommsTech arghabd baxxx hadorgcrypto -doubleU- Soldiernumberone Rayreddington SolidLiquid bibyfok guclu Jdavid05 bible_pay inviser93 d_eddie luffare kristjan128 oldmanjk Low Sigma ColorlessK kgeorgiev damNmad MrRig ZepaniZeppos thang long sinatrra12 SSend3r realediston xenon131 deeperx reCONNECT Krackerbush zeroarmy Bibi187 niotib peguiny Angelo38 joshua05 Django69 ByteFree Kema cuteman kokoska kewlc3s heroiccyber the_she jamesclef x23a1s Pablo598 cool4y ElectronLibre iLatios mithrim crypto freelance baba0000000000 alex_rada happy weblancer GlitchOut01 jojo1ab Doncarlos74 maf81 Bendra afm HALLASTERA phucdigan Spotika4 BMCHAIN Shah954 Mockingb1rd uarebitcoinsbox Erelas Blockbet nhanhuutam Treasurer danielogalue Nemo1985 eking657 Commie bigjee Thebestis7950 allahabadi Bakscher Maum JamesNoJosh ThatRandomDude surecoin Mhedz nezero proexcept Justice0881 derick222 Tszunami98 TucoRamirez fynxgloire Jaimz ismart1 Gambit_fr Alex_Post555 streetjammerx999 Nithanim Aditya Sharma tweetbit TheBTCAlex togoshigekata udppro cryptoico.studio PrometherioN jeff.webb mjstrand Kaffo mohieddine N-D-A AnoukiEXO11 cioloxl Marco Ambrusini bitcoinchrist learnbtc Aengus Epicyclic Trofo Bankera inblue crypto_trader#43xzEXrP thienthanb Affchain 12inchMom Don Pedro Dinero micaxel shibob amishmanish ditinhu Rainbloodz Alba solen_win2 infinity_times_nil Doovla foreverbtcland Steamtyme WeiMixer Tryam93 fulmetal08larz etherflip FrostOriginal imstillthebest John Joseph Mago headkrap texasman86 babedota Aleks_Bens bgdmxd Kaybe kirito1614 F2b BeEvil Mr.cryptos Bloedi mrproblem soliton Serg088 snarfbag nightpainter Felchel Atabey puraofficial sanjeevtalks Caveman-Vegas HAZZA Network nitinum JShort bitlove007 karsipan Coin-1 clip123 PhaseshiftUK Tramirostronix Captain_Planet NeonXL icopress Bruce1614 kjpd1971 September2017 BoC_2017 josephdenne Neo-Geo Tmnt581 Charlie365 rohitm idrisalomagold 10000BTC Piston_82 Airtube qualialibre Yur foxjames512 Saisher dieselfrank CHMA ashishji JollyHash Fazlurkhan.kz bumbazaka Desmozgenes 2dMoond justyourkuya CarlosR Popsuperstar NeuroticR CoolWave CloudOne1 rei_m banbu11 Backend ronypro KevinMiles raj13 zhopas Henry_Kyle2018 ferrybitcoin.1996 krypt951 Roidz92 Troilo AriannaSantosUU Direwolve735 IAMHardCoin299 reginamerry Perchlorate Sachakl coinjack1337 BitCryptex Perillo ExoticMotors 2stout ciupidos natiak482 MrHertz Dazdingo zaq130 rogerrodger Gameflip ICO rysioslaw Hracik Ziovo Markperop Suslura Ikay Socioman jekjekey Red_Panda Angi Lang09 lsafronova095 Crypto_Bro flntyey CreativeReef17 botana fxstrike Xodor Prometheu$ birolgaolga MandyViki bitcoin9999 ice_shadow Goodmens Kutz Kang Bahar FilipeHenriques Progow Theizestooke bitcoworld dadpants rachellee ico_aida_market allowance1219 attaheo frankbitcoin ice_man75 Kasliono kevinZD ETP_mining_pool dimon01 Willful_Grok fruitybatman andreizver jankeman AleksandrKosov mantoni Marrionbitcoin Becassine minas GiftService Unicorn_Heart ghavoc Agent Smith softwork-LuckyGames Arshe26 nc50lc catur_072 Cordillera ujjawalpatel budbo Pure_powa_poof dembits BitcoinHomework balehubucks ber68dclass Patron74 nazzer Xfactor06 A.Delaney kinki32 AllCoinHunter Amer12 candy69 coinminerdotcom ovcijisir rudilo Leteravian ethereumwhite walleting.services luckylauncher eristica.com astraleureka Ameador1 Bulleon nabdaredevil Effekt Ainez MinoRaiola ICOck sammsah Danil Bedrin Intellectual Romanticist sema13 Fintechbit SuperHero53 gopovcoin LoveInThisCryptoClub Leon Lee selffish aurorabitcoin.96 vietle1191 havicvotre CryptoNerd.io criptoguruBEST sidbah tsoyens01 Yolandabitcoin BulletTOKEN CoderTerganteng samy342 Erik.dev Sayedthw jasmine226 Sitesprout chipr vilj1n Denlv Uao BitNotByte BellaCruz3 Empire-Mining coinlocket$ Shitcointalk Whosull1 whis116 beerus118 randyboy slavlik vadim76 elr01 Crypto2Alt Irkytsk38rus hodl_on 1discovery Tekno2020 pksingh Mr.Coin.Shop pdahl mattcode teriaty bitcoinqueen4u HSchumann idrisi33 Serj007 CryptoHodler30 hardcod3r santapants ziga1234 crypto_altcoins Bitcoin_Talk tommy1033 stephenhodgkiss SharonBitcoin Cyrilredkeet a_skv bovineplane create rferrara41564 digitoic pettylink NataliaBorova cryptoplayernet nlcars Lhanz14 damir10 UnusualMouse highnayem34 Vinylriff new ICO RivAngE thesnat21 jendervan maximhkn dantes37 octusnw joynermucus gergovirton pietazean Razon cinaka omaro Cocojam0610 silverstar43 jerrysmith frencziver roderickniklas cruxsloane sionrolant PaypalRelieve CryptoMark2585 SparkSun Irazzzta pernikar Cryptopulos SkylaZane Hanadawa akshayshinde20 Bitcoinmining1 B3Team IVVIKUZ CryptoPG jesh2206 zeref22 chaosrift riskrocks007 paper-eddy unclear Falgorn_2 asche ibuycrypto2 CRYPTOBEX nataly. Sasha197 cabalism13 OptimusFries perova93 guy369 cryptonoel bithashx derikpower Allleeexxx coma24 BenArter sitonmybits Kate Beckett Arkadash blackmagical anonymousminer BRAHN marktanlao amit14 Jones12 Skippy12 phabulu BTCtrader9 Deancooel1 CasCollector killerbot cryptofreak42o PowerBI Maksimus ZH yesbitcoinyes Abies miningpuppets coolPenguin icroatt YaNinaMurmansk Vikhy maremostro slipersty Devawnm367 ngocthanh06 ProffCoin abhibtccc MP_SI AirShark dodm Chinese909 BrandeXMRLOVER Bilibitph Jo_chiqui Crash_Davis12 Lunes_Platform dentix boorocktworule zimne Mewnbot spacequality welpboy IonYopYop GalenResty44 alia Shikahgo crypto mania dax44 EricJH801 Mark Baum BTCCorrect voom360 millar1988 carloq Awhore Hintrues1992 Gomezo CuzoHiya Jufynonomys To The Moon And Beyond Dr.Mann wenker123 Pathfinder29 Aptekary Jeshe2217 ologoff EMANYELLE Andartis AvokadoGroup AntonPirogkov devidLeench dddlbbb BitcoinPub Monyadey vdantsev gdtatgraf CaveSpectre RajeshKarwa nibel14 thenotorious Flashstein giannicasa1 cammeoth 19nataliya12 alicia24 cryptowritedu TOTOKO maximkretov makeit VestMister DeDawn Shad0wSmurf tony.haze peperushing Tanzer128 Hwario EnJoiHenk coincrag CucakRowo darkie199 zr_advise cryptoboss99 bitfex.trade crypto_pj saddamhussain007 trdrSWAP FBR4ik Thfulted haider1234 hejioei KriptoGuruTR Nhathuy Asnan747 sample12 Coolcryptovator aehrjones1991 DamionDarrin naifyboy AlexDevICO leandrogabeh CRPA9 cryptohoe88 TonerCoin Bitex_Global pappillon LunarLink Bella.HADID CZeroMobility trendy_crypt FlyingMachine360 MKMiners prismatica007 vanessbtf39 GMT68 somovaeva25 haohuynh Richard.D.James Don_Crypto AltcoinCash lenochka22 Ryhorr Cryptov8! glockstone marinerpj dsavage mercurye joey deacon Swiffer92 whyrqa-1 K.Tumpa MSB1987 argio shimpa777 PegasusTesla AimeeJade129 JAigo CrYpTo2DAN BWhite1 nghi2018 cryptoci Luana Trade Serzh_Bounty jonfinov8 DeepuEzy bokham99 gggenerator3 Jestavett gggenerator77 gggenerator22 CTM-support ELHARAKA cryptotalk50 kingcrypto77 cpytospeak ad.crypto vyg_new Laromike Crypvent CryptoGamblingSites Ecilial crypto998 phamhoa5874613@gmail.com pirashki ZeusTrade MagicByt3 Sample2 Cabex Tenor128 XcelR New0987 tienha95a4 VaultMeX Mapz Myke500 Helana Fantazy999 CryptoCasher_bounty GermanCrypt2 MasterShipper BitsBang LostinCrypto Cubsen ZeusRecife TradeRafael RafaelCrypto flaviofla05 Aleksandra5 RookBTC taym.nour Thomsa Discord-Shop Greatdane ZappyWW blaagman OnlineGuides KORE - DEV Zerex Network mrpro81 danyyy55 TrezorMade
|
|
|
|
Anduck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1511
Merit: 1072
quack
|
|
January 07, 2019, 12:07:51 PM |
|
I count 3890 users with a custom trust list
This is very bad, worse then I thought. DT needs to go, so people can finally start using the trust system as it's intended. Either completely remove DT and start healing trust system slowly, or dilute DT which encourages people to make their own lists.
|
|
|
|
OgNasty
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4732
Merit: 4239
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
|
|
January 08, 2019, 12:33:41 AM |
|
I count 3890 users with a custom trust list
This is very bad, worse then I thought. DT needs to go, so people can finally start using the trust system as it's intended. Either completely remove DT and start healing trust system slowly, or dilute DT which encourages people to make their own lists. That list also includes people who have Default Trust included on their trust lists. It is actually a good sign and shows that thousands of people are augmenting DT with their own alterations as advised. I'd disagree with your interpretation and say this is better than I'd thought. I wonder what sort of growth is happening with users augmenting their lists?
|
..Stake.com.. | | | ▄████████████████████████████████████▄ ██ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██ ▄████▄ ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██████████ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██ ██████ ██ ██████████ ██ ██ ██████████ ██ ▀██▀ ██ ██ ██ ██████ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██████ ██ █████ ███ ██████ ██ ████▄ ██ ██ █████ ███ ████ ████ █████ ███ ████████ ██ ████ ████ ██████████ ████ ████ ████▀ ██ ██████████ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████ ██ ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██ ▀█████████▀ ▄████████████▄ ▀█████████▀ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███ ██ ██ ███▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████████████████████████████████████ | | | | | | ▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄ █ ▄▀▄ █▀▀█▀▄▄ █ █▀█ █ ▐ ▐▌ █ ▄██▄ █ ▌ █ █ ▄██████▄ █ ▌ ▐▌ █ ██████████ █ ▐ █ █ ▐██████████▌ █ ▐ ▐▌ █ ▀▀██████▀▀ █ ▌ █ █ ▄▄▄██▄▄▄ █ ▌▐▌ █ █▐ █ █ █▐▐▌ █ █▐█ ▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀█ | | | | | | ▄▄█████████▄▄ ▄██▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀▀██▄ ▄█▀ ▐█▌ ▀█▄ ██ ▐█▌ ██ ████▄ ▄█████▄ ▄████ ████████▄███████████▄████████ ███▀ █████████████ ▀███ ██ ███████████ ██ ▀█▄ █████████ ▄█▀ ▀█▄ ▄██▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██▄ ▄▄▄█▀ ▀███████ ███████▀ ▀█████▄ ▄█████▀ ▀▀▀███▄▄▄███▀▀▀ | | | ..PLAY NOW.. |
|
|
|
marlboroza
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1932
Merit: 2270
|
|
January 08, 2019, 01:59:24 AM |
|
This is very bad, worse then I thought. DT needs to go, so people can finally start using the trust system as it's intended. Either completely remove DT and start healing trust system slowly, or dilute DT which encourages people to make their own lists.
DT should be removed.
This is one of the reasons why DT should be removed completely.
The problem is that DT exists.
Just remove DT
~
Can you exclude accounts who have DT in their trust network and make a list of accounts with only custom list? Just to see how many people have removed DT from the list. How can I see someone's trust list without including them to my trust list?
|
|
|
|
|
Anduck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1511
Merit: 1072
quack
|
|
January 08, 2019, 02:21:43 AM |
|
I count 3890 users with a custom trust list
This is very bad, worse then I thought. DT needs to go, so people can finally start using the trust system as it's intended. Either completely remove DT and start healing trust system slowly, or dilute DT which encourages people to make their own lists. That list also includes people who have Default Trust included on their trust lists. It is actually a good sign and shows that thousands of people are augmenting DT with their own alterations as advised. I'd disagree with your interpretation and say this is better than I'd thought. I wonder what sort of growth is happening with users augmenting their lists? I have DT in my trust list, and I use custom trust list, and I am heavily against DT. Fact is that a really really small portion of forum users have a custom trust list. Quite small amount of users know about the trust system in the first place, but even when that is so, 4000 users having customized their trust list means that users aware of the trust system are clearly not customizing their trust lists. The heaviest reason to include DT in the customized list is that there's no real reason to remove it as it was there by default. Another reason is that people want to have some sort of overview about what the view is for most of the users. People should use custom lists and they should be encouraged and incentivized to do so. There should not be a structure like DT as it skews the whole trust system. Of course people who get something out of it tend to not find any reasons to object it, that's largely human nature. It's exactly the same thing as can be seen in the politics, but maybe by acknowledging it we can be better than that? DT list is an anomaly in the trust system/network. Such should not exist, because eventually it builds up to be like any other top-down hierarchy as the time passes. I'm happy to see that the one (also being the only one) who can truly change this DT thing doesn't like how it works either.
I am against DT and I also have DT on my custom trust list. It appears that you don't get why it is so. Maybe I or others can help you out? Feel free to PM me.
|
|
|
|
cryptohunter
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG
|
|
January 08, 2019, 02:34:02 AM Last edit: January 08, 2019, 02:46:53 AM by cryptohunter |
|
I count 3890 users with a custom trust list
This is very bad, worse then I thought. DT needs to go, so people can finally start using the trust system as it's intended. Either completely remove DT and start healing trust system slowly, or dilute DT which encourages people to make their own lists. That list also includes people who have Default Trust included on their trust lists. It is actually a good sign and shows that thousands of people are augmenting DT with their own alterations as advised. I'd disagree with your interpretation and say this is better than I'd thought. I wonder what sort of growth is happening with users augmenting their lists? I have DT in my trust list, and I use custom trust list, and I am heavily against DT. Fact is that a really really small portion of forum users have a custom trust list. Quite small amount of users know about the trust system in the first place, but even when that is so, 4000 users having customized their trust list means that users aware of the trust system are clearly not customizing their trust lists. The heaviest reason to include DT in the customized list is that there's no real reason to remove it as it was there by default. Another reason is that people want to have some sort of overview about what the view is for most of the users. People should use custom lists and they should be encouraged and incentivized to do so. There should not be a structure like DT as it skews the whole trust system. Of course people who get something out of it tend to not find any reasons to object it, that's largely human nature. It's exactly the same thing as can be seen in the politics, but maybe by acknowledging it we can be better than that? DT list is an anomaly in the trust system/network. Such should not exist, because eventually it builds up to be like any other top-down hierarchy as the time passes. I'm happy to see that the one (also being the only one) who can truly change this DT thing doesn't like how it works either. The problem with presenting such FACTS in meta is that you are sadly relating this information to 1. people who are already fully aware of this 2. People who are deriving power/advantage from the systems operating in this way. The REAL members who are likely in their ANN threads supporting their projects or on the btc discussion boards likely do not know about meta. They will only find out about it when they get hacked or something. DT and MERIT need either to be tightened up and not left open and completely subjective to the point of your like or dislike of LEMONS being responsible for you losing your ability to PAID2POST or trade. Or they need to be abolished. Need strict clear criteria for both systems. Punishment/removal from position for not meeting that criteria. Enforcing this criteria would not even be hard. Just produce the criteria and these system controllers will follow it or they will be booted out. No more voting your mates in to collude with you. There is no colluding. There is a mandate. There is criteria set. Follow it or you are gone. Why will they follow the mandate and criteria set? because they like the power. I have no issue with authority or people having power so long as that power is fairly applied to all members in a manner we all understand. Let them have some power. I mean they are likely to have been bullied and dominated in RL. So on the internets let them have some power for a change. I think everyone should sample different ends of the spectrum in all things. You will then see red trust you won't have to read to see if they like LEMONS. You will know they have demonstrated behaviour that REALLY will mean they are likely to scam you. Of course if they were stealing LEMONS then that is something you need to watch out for.
|
|
|
|
|
OgNasty
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4732
Merit: 4239
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
|
|
January 08, 2019, 03:51:48 AM |
|
I am against DT and I also have DT on my custom trust list.
Yes, you have become one of DT's biggest critics despite not having an understanding of why it exists, yet you still include it on your list. That means you are a hypocrite & DT has value even to it's biggest critics. I don't think you're making the point you're trying to make.
|
..Stake.com.. | | | ▄████████████████████████████████████▄ ██ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██ ▄████▄ ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██████████ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██ ██████ ██ ██████████ ██ ██ ██████████ ██ ▀██▀ ██ ██ ██ ██████ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██████ ██ █████ ███ ██████ ██ ████▄ ██ ██ █████ ███ ████ ████ █████ ███ ████████ ██ ████ ████ ██████████ ████ ████ ████▀ ██ ██████████ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████ ██ ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██ ▀█████████▀ ▄████████████▄ ▀█████████▀ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███ ██ ██ ███▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████████████████████████████████████ | | | | | | ▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄ █ ▄▀▄ █▀▀█▀▄▄ █ █▀█ █ ▐ ▐▌ █ ▄██▄ █ ▌ █ █ ▄██████▄ █ ▌ ▐▌ █ ██████████ █ ▐ █ █ ▐██████████▌ █ ▐ ▐▌ █ ▀▀██████▀▀ █ ▌ █ █ ▄▄▄██▄▄▄ █ ▌▐▌ █ █▐ █ █ █▐▐▌ █ █▐█ ▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀█ | | | | | | ▄▄█████████▄▄ ▄██▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀▀██▄ ▄█▀ ▐█▌ ▀█▄ ██ ▐█▌ ██ ████▄ ▄█████▄ ▄████ ████████▄███████████▄████████ ███▀ █████████████ ▀███ ██ ███████████ ██ ▀█▄ █████████ ▄█▀ ▀█▄ ▄██▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██▄ ▄▄▄█▀ ▀███████ ███████▀ ▀█████▄ ▄█████▀ ▀▀▀███▄▄▄███▀▀▀ | | | ..PLAY NOW.. |
|
|
|
LoyceV
Legendary
Online
Activity: 3304
Merit: 16596
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
|
|
January 08, 2019, 07:14:22 AM |
|
Can you exclude accounts who have DT in their trust network and make a list of accounts with only custom list? Just to see how many people have removed DT from the list. I can't, the data dump doesn't show "DefaultTrust", only individual usernames. How can I see someone's trust list without including them to my trust list? See https://bitcointalk.org/trust.txt.xz, or for the uncompressed version from 3 days ago: https://pastebin.com/3CiX1T9pIt may be interesting to see the total number of entries: 22,605. That means just a few entries per user on average, which is far from enough to replace the DT-system. People should use custom lists and they should be encouraged and incentivized to do so. Encourage them: drop a link to Trust settings once in a while
|
|
|
|
Lauda
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
|
|
January 08, 2019, 09:03:29 AM |
|
I count 3890 users with a custom trust list:
That's rather surprisingly low. Thanks for parsing that, I've always wondered how many people used custom lists!
|
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks" 😼 Bitcoin Core ( onion)
|
|
|
marlboroza
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1932
Merit: 2270
|
|
January 08, 2019, 12:05:51 PM |
|
Thanks. It may be interesting to see the total number of entries: 22,605. That means just a few entries per user on average, which is far from enough to replace the DT-system.
I completely agree. Some members are excluding accounts who negatively tagged them(I checked few accounts) and I noticed one member has removed DT from their network and excluded 3 DT members which one of them -ve them and two "neutralized" them with "begging for merit" comment. Eh, it all goes to statistics.
|
|
|
|
Anduck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1511
Merit: 1072
quack
|
|
January 08, 2019, 12:13:59 PM Last edit: January 08, 2019, 12:28:25 PM by Anduck |
|
I am against DT and I also have DT on my custom trust list.
Yes, you have become one of DT's biggest critics despite not having an understanding of why it exists, yet you still include it on your list. That means you are a hypocrite & DT has value even to it's biggest critics. I don't think you're making the point you're trying to make. I think your understanding of why DT exists differs from the original intention. Care to tell us why you think DT was made in the first place? Do you have any idea why theymos made DT and now says he doesn't like at all how it works? I am not saying that DT is worthless. I am saying that it should be gone now. Obviously a top-down structure (once again) proves to not function as intended. Also, there are a high amount of critics of DT in the forums and most of them do not care about Meta section. I include DT, because it's such a strong anomaly that the whole trust system builds around it while that anomaly exists. This is why people who fully acknowledge the possibility to make a fully custom trust list, often do not do it. I also trust almost everyone in the DT1, so it's convenient for me to add DefaultTrust instead of writing all those users there myself. I can exclude DT1 users I do not trust. Now just figure out what means that DT is a strong anomaly in the trust system.
People should use custom lists and they should be encouraged and incentivized to do so. Encourage them: drop a link to Trust settings once in a while That's not how a systematic problem gets fixed.
For the parsed format, check out https://anduck.net/files/bct_trustlists.txt. Also shows who includes/excludes who.
|
|
|
|
The Sceptical Chymist
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3332
Merit: 6826
Cashback 15%
|
|
January 08, 2019, 12:32:22 PM |
|
I include DT, because it's such a strong anomaly that the whole trust system builds around it while that anomaly exists. This is why people who fully acknowledge the possibility to make a fully custom trust list, often do not do it.
I sort of understand that statement, maybe 70% of it. The other 30% makes my head spin. Contrary to what a lot of other members think, I don't get off on being on DT2 and in fact it's a pain in the ass half the time. But since bitcointalk doesn't even moderate scammers, there needs to be some mechanism through which unwitting members can avoid being scammed and bad behavior can be punished, so to speak. I completely agree that the trust system is screwed up, and I think I've said that for as long as I've been here. If Theymos were to ditch the default trust system here tomorrow, and my feedback no longer carried as much weight, I'd be fine with that--as long as there was something in place to warn people about scammers, account dealers, identity thieves, trust abuse, extortion, etc. If you asked me how many DT2 members exist I couldn't tell you, but I know it's a lot. But there are only a handful of them active in handing out negs when they think someone deserves it. The rest are just members that some DT1 peeps trust. I'm assuming your gripe is because of Vod's feedback, and he's one of the active ones. So, if we eliminate the whole DT system right now without having a function that the active DT1/DT2 members serve, what would happen? All the cockroaches would have a field day, that's what. I hear lots of gripes but no suggestions about alternatives, and I'll admit I can't think of a different system that would be better either. I used to like the Scammer Tag thing that was in place when I was a lurker, but I do believe Theymos won't be going back to that.
|
. .HUGE. | | | | | | █▀▀▀▀ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █▄▄▄▄ | ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ . CASINO & SPORTSBOOK ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ | ▀▀▀▀█ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ ▄▄▄▄█ | | |
|
|
|
Anduck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1511
Merit: 1072
quack
|
|
January 08, 2019, 12:58:02 PM |
|
Contrary to what a lot of other members think, I don't get off on being on DT2 and in fact it's a pain in the ass half the time. But since bitcointalk doesn't even moderate scammers, there needs to be some mechanism through which unwitting members can avoid being scammed and bad behavior can be punished, so to speak.
Diluting the DT list (=adding more DT users) would reduce that PITA. I'm assuming your gripe is because of Vod's feedback, and he's one of the active ones.
Vod threatened to red-rate me unless I changed my rating. Threatening to abuse DT position, and then abusing it, has nothing to do with one's activity. DT are currently free to abuse as long as they keep it mild and "legit", and sadly some DT members take advantage of that possibility. Be a friend of 100, bully 1, and those 101 will be sticking together and ignore the wrongdoing (or find some unreasonable excuse). It's exactly the same as in politics. Nobody would care if that structure was not pushed on people by default. Such a structure should not exist in trust system, as trust system should not have any means of top-down authority whatsoever. This sort of mixture of trust network and moderation, that the current trust system sadly is, is not excelling at being a trust system or functional moderation. So, if we eliminate the whole DT system right now without having a function that the active DT1/DT2 members serve, what would happen? All the cockroaches would have a field day, that's what. I hear lots of gripes but no suggestions about alternatives, and I'll admit I can't think of a different system that would be better either. I used to like the Scammer Tag thing that was in place when I was a lurker, but I do believe Theymos won't be going back to that.
I think the " Force custom lists" idea by theymos is the best step forward. I think that a less dramatic change would be to dilute DT, add a lot more DT1 members, and see what happens.
|
|
|
|
S_Therapist
|
|
January 08, 2019, 01:05:35 PM |
|
I think the " Force custom lists" idea by theymos is the best step forward. I think that a less dramatic change would be to dilute DT, add a lot more DT1 members, and see what happens. A forced custom list will solve the problem you are talking about but what will happen to the newbies? It has been mentioned by theymos too. What DT exactly is doing? Trying to save people like us a.k.a people who are not familiar with the forum. The majority of the persons will be harmed by either way if no DT is there, IMO. I guess account aged 1 year don't know how the trust system works, in some cases, even some Legendary too. How newbie will save them then?
|
|
|
|
The Sceptical Chymist
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3332
Merit: 6826
Cashback 15%
|
|
January 08, 2019, 01:18:57 PM |
|
Diluting the DT list (=adding more DT users) would reduce that PITA.
Please explain to my pea brain how this would be so. Also, how would this affect the ability of DT members to warn others? Also also, I thought you wanted to get rid of the DT system altogether. Vod threatened
Yes, I know you've said this ad nauseam across multiple threads. Sorry I brought it up. I think the " Force custom lists" idea by theymos is the best step forward. I think that a less dramatic change would be to dilute DT, add a lot more DT1 members, and see what happens. I did see that thread, and I'm not sure how forcing newbies to create a trust list would work, and they're the ones most likely to fall for scams around here, IMO. As to adding more DT1 members--did I miss how those would be chosen? Theymos would have to pick them, since he doesn't like the voting strategy, so it just seems like the DT system would end up being more of a clusterfuck than it already is, unless the DT1 members had to keep very strict trust lists. Diluting the DT2 pool seems like it would end up with more people with more power, more headaches, more internecine squabbles, more bitching about wrongly-left feedback, and more chaos. Or have I got my math wrong again?
|
. .HUGE. | | | | | | █▀▀▀▀ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █▄▄▄▄ | ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ . CASINO & SPORTSBOOK ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ | ▀▀▀▀█ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ ▄▄▄▄█ | | |
|
|
|
Anduck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1511
Merit: 1072
quack
|
|
January 08, 2019, 01:19:10 PM |
|
I think the " Force custom lists" idea by theymos is the best step forward. I think that a less dramatic change would be to dilute DT, add a lot more DT1 members, and see what happens. A forced custom list will solve the problem you are talking about but what will happen to the newbies? It has been mentioned by theymos too. What DT exactly is doing? Trying to save people like us a.k.a people who are not familiar with the forum. The majority of the persons will be harmed by either way if no DT is there, IMO. I guess account aged 1 year don't know how the trust system works, in some cases, even some Legendary too. How newbie will save them then? There have been scammers in DT. It amplifies their scamming power a lot when almost everyone sees them as "trusted" only because someone chose that e.g. a long time ago. Account sales happen too, which make this even worse. DT accounts are traded constantly, so how correct is that perceived trust given by DT then? Also, as I said before, scumbags will find their way on to any curated or however small list, if it gives them a position they want. It's how it works. We've seen this happening on DT, too. One solution, the one I mentioned in that quote, is to dilute DT list heavily. Also the sole purpose of it should be defined strictly. If such a default list structure exists, it should solely be a list of people unlikely to scam others, it should be nothing more, nothing less. This would then encourage people to make their own custom trust lists while also securing newbies from getting scammed. It's not for the forum staff / theymos to tell people who to trust. Giving an option to opt-out of that doesn't change this reality where DT has this power.
|
|
|
|
S_Therapist
|
|
January 08, 2019, 01:29:54 PM Last edit: January 08, 2019, 01:53:59 PM by S_Therapist |
|
There have been scammers in DT. It amplifies their scamming power a lot when almost everyone sees them as "trusted" only because someone chose that e.g. a long time ago. Account sales happen too, which make this even worse. DT accounts are traded constantly, so how correct is that perceived trust given by DT then? Also, as I said before, scumbags will find their way on to any curated or however small list, if it gives them a position they want. It's how it works. We've seen this happening on DT, too.
You can call me a newbie as I have joined the forum earlier on October 4, 2018. But I didn't see what you have mentioned, maybe I have missed those since the forum is bigger than we think. But I didn't miss the chance to read all the thread related to Gleb Gamow/ YuTü.Co.in/ Phinnaeus Gage and I know suchmoon has paid for the account too just to prevent any kinda scam issue. I have mentioned it here because I read the history with a lot of interest but I didn't get anywhere what you have mentioned. Why don't you just post everything with a dedicated thread in reputation? I believe that will be worthy for sure. Everyone will see what is happening here in the name of DT. You should post the proof. Edit- Go read the Reputation and Scam accusations boards. Dive deep into the history. Feel free to compose a list of all the DT'ers who scammed and also try to find out when they were removed from DT if at all. Would really appreciate having some links. Since you are an old member here, it will be pretty easier for you to link up.
|
|
|
|
Anduck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1511
Merit: 1072
quack
|
|
January 08, 2019, 01:32:21 PM Last edit: January 08, 2019, 02:35:05 PM by Anduck |
|
Diluting the DT list (=adding more DT users) would reduce that PITA.
Please explain to my pea brain how this would be so. Also, how would this affect the ability of DT members to warn others? Also also, I thought you wanted to get rid of the DT system altogether. If there were more DT members, the chances that someone else had already tagged a scammer increase, etc. I assume that the "workload" for DT'ers is the source for the pain in your ass. Whoever trusts DT would still see your warnings as "trusted feedback". I'd prefer ditching DT completely. That doesn't mean that I couldn't suggest changes to DT. Vod threatened
Yes, I know you've said this ad nauseam across multiple threads. Sorry I brought it up. It's an example of what sort of "mild, unpunishable" wrongdoings are done by DT members. I can find out many more. Often these things are discussed to the point where it's only frustrating to everyone, so maybe this fresh experiment is enough to get the point? I could bring up cases regarding or brought up by e.g. Deadterra, Lauda, mexxer-2, Lutpin, OgNasty, escrow.ms, etc. etc., but it would only end up like discussions regarding those cases ended before: in frustration, no changes (or small changes after insane amount of arguing), and wasted time. I think the " Force custom lists" idea by theymos is the best step forward. I think that a less dramatic change would be to dilute DT, add a lot more DT1 members, and see what happens. I did see that thread, and I'm not sure how forcing newbies to create a trust list would work, and they're the ones most likely to fall for scams around here, IMO. As to adding more DT1 members--did I miss how those would be chosen? Theymos would have to pick them, since he doesn't like the voting strategy, so it just seems like the DT system would end up being more of a clusterfuck than it already is, unless the DT1 members had to keep very strict trust lists. Diluting the DT2 pool seems like it would end up with more people with more power, more headaches, more internecine squabbles, more bitching about wrongly-left feedback, and more chaos. Or have I got my math wrong again? It could go as you describe, but I doubt it. I'd argue that more decentralization in the DT would end up in more balanced outcome. More people with more power would mean less power per single DT user. The current amount of power that DT'ers carry is way too much compared to what is needed to simply warn newbies about scammers.
Why don't you just post everything with a dedicated thread in reputation? I believe that will be worthy for sure. Everyone will see what is happening here in the name of DT. You should post the proof.
Go read the Reputation and Scam accusations boards. Dive deep into the history. Feel free to compose a list of all the DT'ers who scammed and also try to find out when they were removed from DT if at all.
Would really appreciate having some links. Since you are an old member here, it will be pretty easier for you to link up.
For example check out https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1995886.0, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1306301.0 and https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1359877.0 where a DT user scammed. There are loads and loads of cases there. It's not hard to find DT abuse (not just scams) in there. It just takes time to really go through this stuff. There are only like 60-70 pages in Reputation where this material mostly resides. Scam accusations board is the other one.
|
|
|
|
LoyceMobile
|
|
January 08, 2019, 02:39:51 PM Last edit: January 08, 2019, 03:09:52 PM by LoyceMobile |
|
One solution, the one I mentioned in that quote, is to dilute DT list heavily. Also the sole purpose of it should be defined strictly. If such a default list structure exists, it should solely be a list of people unlikely to scam others, it should be nothing more, nothing less.
I disagree: I want people with good judgement on DT. Not being a scammer isn't enough. Example: I don't think cryptohunter is a scammer, but he has terrible judgement.
|
|
|
|
cryptohunter
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG
|
|
January 08, 2019, 03:00:52 PM Last edit: January 08, 2019, 04:09:56 PM by cryptohunter |
|
One solution, the one I mentioned in that quote, is to dilute DT list heavily. Also the sole purpose of it should be defined strictly. If such a default list structure exists, it should solely be a list of people unlikely to scam others, it should be nothing more, nothing less.
I disagree: I want people with good judgement on DT. Not being a scammer isn't enough. Example: I don't think cryptohunter is a scammer, but he had terrible judgement. Bring evidence now ................... I don't think you will. Where is my judgement terrible that makes me untrustworthy? Where as I can demonstrate that you do not have the capacity or critical reasoning required to be a merit source. I mean how can anyone be left to judge others posts who is observably suffering from a broken mind? Just from some of the statements you and other merit sources make you can tell that they are pretty much low functioning. If you want me to bring examples just ask and I will provide. Actually my entire post history from.. uncovering, fighting, damaging huge huge scams and fighting for fairer distribution (even though I would have gained much more from leaving it as it was) of huge projects only to be shouted down by a bunch of idiots who all later start complaining about how it went down and suggesting things I had presented to start with (bunch of fools). I help the very most weak where you and the pharmacist were trying to bully around and get banned and I know full well all of my actions will cost me probably red trust and merit withholding and could not give one shit because it just backs up my case that these systems needs to be tightened up or destroyed. Helping people with nothing become millionaires by helping to push forward only the projects that I see as filling in the missing pieces of the end to end fully decentralised or trustless arena we all want to see. Being asked to hold large amounts of coins for projects because they can trust me not to dump them like the dev did previously. Honestly I would ask you to bring forth one person on the entire board with more relevant credentials for global mod or dt. Fairness and honesty and robustness against caving against pressure against other system controllers are key here. Not that I ask for any positions here because I am certain that where there is still free speech even one person can make a huge difference without being given positions of power. If you can present one person with better proven judgement over these years... and as hard as all the scammers and loud mouth turn coats have scoured my closet for skeletons they find nothing. I have been told many times projects have financed people searching for anything to discredit me as their only hope for stopping my relentless slamming of their scams. They came up with NOTHING to demonstrate I committed any wrong doing. I don't even just mean the gang in meta i mean every scammer and scam project who have talked trash about me but never produced ANY evidence of any wrong doing at all. All you will find from the start is helping the weak, criticising huge scams and scammy distributional methods, pointing out and highlighting the biggest scam promoters and enablers, giving everyone fair chance of find the most profitable projects ever (that were not scams) freely and before they took off. Fighting for increased fairness and freedom for all. Yeah terrible judgement. You have done nothing like any of that you dumb fool.. you pull stats and also try to bully the weak from what I can see... that is it and get paid to spam it all over the place..and you criticise my judgement? You are a poster boy for why the merit system is broken I could not ask for a better example. I mean you have done nothing of note, your logic is a fail over and over and you have the most earned merit on this board. Anyway sorry to go off topic but since I am being named and accused of having judgement that makes me untrustworthy with no evidence I reserve the right to ask it is provided or it is observable he is talking nonsense. I can not wait for this bad judgement that would preclude me from a trust position (I never asked for dt or merit source ever anyway).
|
|
|
|
Vod
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3696
Merit: 3070
Licking my boob since 1970
|
|
January 08, 2019, 03:30:18 PM |
|
Vod threatened to red-rate me unless I changed my rating.
I red rated you because you scammed.
|
https://nastyscam.com - landing page up https://vod.fan - advanced image hosting - coming soon! OGNasty has early onset dementia; keep this in mind when discussing his past actions.
|
|
|
Anduck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1511
Merit: 1072
quack
|
|
January 08, 2019, 03:34:41 PM Last edit: January 08, 2019, 03:45:41 PM by Anduck |
|
Vod threatened to red-rate me unless I changed my rating.
I red rated you because you scammed. Don't lie. I decided what you did wasn't untrustworthy to me
After this, you started power tripping when I provoked you. You illogically "misunderstood" me to reason your further wrongdoings and power tripping. Stop being dishonest. Here's the real reason for you red-rating me: I have made it neutral. You have made yours negative. Once of us will have to change it. :/
Which means that you gave me the option to 1) remove my rating to you or 2) be red-rated. I did not remove the rating, so you proceeded with option 2). Source: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3869593.msg37486761#msg37486761It's also bamboozling how you still haven't shown any acknowledgement of your illogical misunderstanding, even though it has been opened up to you various times.
|
|
|
|
o_e_l_e_o
In memoriam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2268
Merit: 18509
|
|
January 08, 2019, 03:49:14 PM |
|
I do think we could use more DT1 and, by extension, DT2 members, but we shouldn't be adding people just because we need more people. We should be adding people who would be an asset to the system, regardless of your feelings about the system in general. If such a default list structure exists, it should solely be a list of people unlikely to scam others, it should be nothing more, nothing less. Surely that's what green trust is for? Green trust means you are unlikely to scam others. Being unlikely to scam isn't enough to warrant a place on DT if all your trust ratings are nonsense.
I understand you want DT either diluted, changed or removed, but if you are going to derail every discussion about it back on to your personal beef with Vod, then nothing is going to change.
|
|
|
|
Vod
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3696
Merit: 3070
Licking my boob since 1970
|
|
January 08, 2019, 03:51:54 PM |
|
Vod threatened to red-rate me unless I changed my rating.
I red rated you because you scammed. Don't lie. Blah blah blah. You scammed an auction. I left you negative trust. You sure are a crybaby hypocrite. I understand you want DT either diluted, changed or removed, but if you are going to derail every discussion about it back on to your personal beef with Vod, then nothing is going to change.
He seems to be oblivious to this. He doesn't want DT gone - he wants his red trust removed.
|
https://nastyscam.com - landing page up https://vod.fan - advanced image hosting - coming soon! OGNasty has early onset dementia; keep this in mind when discussing his past actions.
|
|
|
Anduck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1511
Merit: 1072
quack
|
|
January 08, 2019, 04:07:45 PM |
|
This is so totally offtopic, but I feel like I need to respond anyway. This Vod user just doesn't stop his harassing. Blah blah blah. You scammed an auction. I left you negative trust.
I've never scammed anyone. I've honored all my auctions and other business perfectly. Off you go, liar!
|
|
|
|
suchmoon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8922
https://bpip.org
|
|
January 08, 2019, 04:22:02 PM |
|
Diluting the DT list (=adding more DT users) would reduce that PITA.
You keep saying that and you even "applied" to DT yourself but in the last year or so you posted around a dozen trust ratings, 2 (perhaps 2.5) of which are retaliatory and others have no reference links. That's a horrible contribution to the trust system and you should not be anywhere near DT nor have any say in how it should be changed.
|
|
|
|
Vod
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3696
Merit: 3070
Licking my boob since 1970
|
|
January 08, 2019, 04:31:59 PM |
|
I've never scammed anyone. I've honored all my auctions and other business perfectly. Off you go, liar!
I'm not going to let a scammer call me a liar, bozo.
|
https://nastyscam.com - landing page up https://vod.fan - advanced image hosting - coming soon! OGNasty has early onset dementia; keep this in mind when discussing his past actions.
|
|
|
Anduck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1511
Merit: 1072
quack
|
|
January 08, 2019, 04:53:24 PM |
|
Diluting the DT list (=adding more DT users) would reduce that PITA.
You keep saying that and you even "applied" to DT yourself but in the last year or so you posted around a dozen trust ratings, 2 (perhaps 2.5) of which are retaliatory and others have no reference links. That's a horrible contribution to the trust system and you should not be anywhere near DT nor have any say in how it should be changed. If I was Satoshi, would you then listen to these ideas I present? Look at the first post of this thread. See what makes this DT list and what the DT users do. DT should not be a group that requires whatever active spam/scambusting you're looking for.
|
|
|
|
suchmoon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8922
https://bpip.org
|
|
January 08, 2019, 05:08:42 PM |
|
If I was Satoshi, would you then listen to these ideas I present? Look at the first post of this thread. See what makes this DT list and what the DT users do. DT should not be a group that requires whatever active spam/scambusting you're looking for. Don't put words in my mouth. I'm talking about (1) abuse/retaliatory feedback and (2) feedback predominantly without references. This is useless and harmful to the trust system. Nothing to do with satoshi or scambusting. If you got nothing to contribute to the system then don't. But if you're making a mockery of it - I think that disqualifies your opinion on the subject, just like a bounty shitposter isn't qualified to provide input on post quality and merits.
|
|
|
|
Anduck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1511
Merit: 1072
quack
|
|
January 08, 2019, 05:15:13 PM |
|
If I was Satoshi, would you then listen to these ideas I present? Look at the first post of this thread. See what makes this DT list and what the DT users do. DT should not be a group that requires whatever active spam/scambusting you're looking for. Don't put words in my mouth. I'm talking about (1) abuse/retaliatory feedback and (2) feedback predominantly without references. This is useless and harmful to the trust system. Nothing to do with satoshi or scambusting. If you got nothing to contribute to the system then don't. But if you're making a mockery of it - I think that disqualifies your opinion on the subject, just like a bounty shitposter isn't qualified to provide input on post quality and merits. I'm not putting words in your mouth? Wtf. Is that a default line you open up with when you want to make an insulting reply? My ratings are not sent because of received feedback itself. Hence not retaliatory, I've told you this already, but you keep calling them retaliatory. Reference is not required. Many times the reasons for a rating are complex and not referenceable. Trust system is used in so many ways. Another reason why DT is skewing it up, as the same applies to DT.
|
|
|
|
cryptohunter
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG
|
|
January 08, 2019, 05:27:13 PM Last edit: January 08, 2019, 11:50:46 PM by cryptohunter |
|
Diluting the DT list (=adding more DT users) would reduce that PITA.
You keep saying that and you even "applied" to DT yourself but in the last year or so you posted around a dozen trust ratings, 2 (perhaps 2.5) of which are retaliatory and others have no reference links. That's a horrible contribution to the trust system and you should not be anywhere near DT nor have any say in how it should be changed. Who says? you? LOL I would say ANY person fighting against the systems being improved to be fairer, more reliable and producing valuable data for analysis are the people that should be kept away from trust positions in the first place. What possible motive can anyone have for fighting against making the systems more robust and reliable and transparent. Now if there were strict criteria for DT to follow it none of these arguments would be happening. First time they don't abide with the criteria and mandate boom they are gone. Of course they would need to be legends or heros and have a long history of fair behaviour and trustworthy behaviour. Any grey area squabbles would be too risky to start handing out red because unless you actually got scammed or have a clear case to provide that demonstrates they are untrustworthy then it will not be worth losing your DT over. There should not be persons saying or having opinions on how it should be changed or not changed. There should be proposals that are weighed on their merit. There needs to be systems proposed and then debate on whether and why they are an improvement and if they can be coded into the design of the forum. "Many times the reasons for a rating are complex and not referenceable" - suchmoon anduck Give an example?? "just like a bounty shitposter isn't qualified to provide input on post quality and merits" -such moon 100% agree with most of that and that ANYONE GETTING PAID2POST should not be allowed into a position of power controlling PAID2POST through merit and trust. That is a good move for a start. That takes out most of the sig spammers in meta here. I always love it when you pop up to help confirm the we need to debate ways to improve the systems you and others seem to control right now. Stick around suchmoon your contributions are sorely missed in meta lately. Bring the others back here too that are poster boys for the fact the systems of control need criteria and a mandate or be abolished.
|
|
|
|
suchmoon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8922
https://bpip.org
|
|
January 08, 2019, 05:29:37 PM |
|
I'm not putting words in your mouth? Wtf. Is that a default line you open up with when you want to make an insulting reply?
whatever active spam/scambusting you're looking for.
Where did I say that I'm looking for that? Rhetorical question. I didn't say that. My ratings are not sent because of received feedback itself. Hence not retaliatory, I've told you this already, but you keep calling them retaliatory.
LOL yeah these ratings completely accidentally just happened after you got into fights with these users. Reference is not required. Many times the reasons for a rating are complex and not referenceable.
Trust system is used in so many ways. Another reason why DT is skewing up it, as the same applies to DT.
I'm not saying you can't use the trust system that way. Knock yourself out. Anything short of massive spam is allowed. I'm saying you shouldn't be in DT and your opinion on the subject is quite useless due to your abuse and bias. I don't expect you to see it that way, so carry on. "Many times the reasons for a rating are complex and not referenceable" -suchmoon
Give an example??
Are you drunk? Edit: LOL, don't answer that. I just realized who I replied to. Another moron unable to figure out who said what, easy to get confused.
|
|
|
|
Anduck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1511
Merit: 1072
quack
|
|
January 08, 2019, 05:38:39 PM Last edit: January 08, 2019, 06:11:11 PM by Anduck |
|
Reference is not required. Many times the reasons for a rating are complex and not referenceable.
Trust system is used in so many ways. Another reason why DT is skewing up it, as the same applies to DT.
I'm not saying you can't use the trust system that way. Knock yourself out. Anything short of massive spam is allowed. I'm saying you shouldn't be in DT and your opinion on the subject is quite useless due to your abuse and bias. I don't expect you to see it that way, so carry on. See the trust system guidelines here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=211858.msg2221664#msg2221664
I'm not putting words in your mouth? Wtf. Is that a default line you open up with when you want to make an insulting reply?
whatever active spam/scambusting you're looking for.
Where did I say that I'm looking for that? Rhetorical question. I didn't say that. To me, it sounds like you're implying that DT'ers need to have loads of rating activity / spam/scambusting. So you brought up how I have only "around a dozen trust ratings" and therefore not qualified. Why did you mention my "around a dozen" ratings when you talked about how I am not qualified, if you don't mean that more ratings activity is needed for DT member? If you want to answer, you can answer me via PM. We should stop derailing this thread.
|
|
|
|
cryptohunter
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG
|
|
January 08, 2019, 05:43:16 PM Last edit: January 11, 2019, 03:05:13 PM by cryptohunter |
|
I'm not putting words in your mouth? Wtf. Is that a default line you open up with when you want to make an insulting reply?
whatever active spam/scambusting you're looking for.
Where did I say that I'm looking for that? Rhetorical question. I didn't say that. My ratings are not sent because of received feedback itself. Hence not retaliatory, I've told you this already, but you keep calling them retaliatory.
LOL yeah these ratings completely accidentally just happened after you got into fights with these users. Reference is not required. Many times the reasons for a rating are complex and not referenceable.
Trust system is used in so many ways. Another reason why DT is skewing up it, as the same applies to DT.
I'm not saying you can't use the trust system that way. Knock yourself out. Anything short of massive spam is allowed. I'm saying you shouldn't be in DT and your opinion on the subject is quite useless due to your abuse and bias. I don't expect you to see it that way, so carry on. "Many times the reasons for a rating are complex and not referenceable" -suchmoon
Give an example??
Are you drunk? Edit: LOL, don't answer that. I just realized who I replied to. Another moron unable to figure out who said what, easy to get confused. LOL although you can not see the perfect irony in that last statement. I find it quite hilarious. Thank you again for all the smiles you bring me.Typical suchmoon tactic. 1. yes I was skimming this thread whilst writing out another reply to another thread. So all you need to say is I did not say that it was anduck have a look. I will say okay yes. I agree it was not you. I take back that you said it. There you go.... answered later in post scroll down. NOW though. You seem to have read my entire post but like suchmoon always does is just ignore the central and most important point that he does not want to answer. So I will ask him again so there can be no missing it. WHY WOULD YOU NOT WANT THE SYSTEMS OF MERIT AND TRUST GIVEN A MANDATE AND CRITERIA SO THAT THEY PROVIDE RELIABLE, VALUABLE DATA THAT IS FAIRLY APPLIED TO ALL. WHY WOULD YOU NOT WANT TO SEE THESE SYSTEMS IMPROVED? Keep in mind your post regarding good poster is meaningless without clear definition. Now feel free to accept my public apology that I misread that other quote as yours . I still think that is wrong... if you can not say exactly why they got red trust you must not leave red trust especially in such a subjective system. So I am in agreement on that part. After you have done that answer my central point in uppercase above. I am guessing you will NOT. Anduck stop being such a pussy as soon as suchmoon confronts you. This is not derailing the topic. These are examples of the DT system in action. It should all be discussed here not on PM. Well that is if you believe you are telling the truth and that is it relevant to the discussion in the manner you are presenting it does. Of course alone they are only individual experiences but if true can demonstrate that improvements can and must be made. If you think you are right. Then no need to slink away to PM. If you are right you are right. Simple as that. Transparent open discussion is key to this board. Derailing how?? how much more relevant can prime examples concerning the DT system be to this thread? we are discussing if we can improve the system right? Suchmoon has no real power on an open discussion board because nobody does ..only the truth has power. If you get red trust, if you get no merits if you get banned. It does not really matter because you still exist and so does the truth so it can never stop being presented either by yourself or by close friends who can join who will insist on the truth being heard. Now I agree being bogged down in to much anecdotal individual experience is not giving the full picture if you are presenting something you believe is true and both relevant to the topic then no need to slink off to PM just because suchmoon turns up. We need to find the issues and devise a solution to these issues.
|
|
|
|
OgNasty
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4732
Merit: 4239
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
|
|
January 08, 2019, 06:51:22 PM |
|
Diluting the DT list (=adding more DT users) would reduce that PITA.
You keep saying that and you even "applied" to DT yourself but in the last year or so you posted around a dozen trust ratings, 2 (perhaps 2.5) of which are retaliatory and others have no reference links. That's a horrible contribution to the trust system and you should not be anywhere near DT nor have any say in how it should be changed. If I was Satoshi, would you then listen to these ideas I present? Look at the first post of this thread. See what makes this DT list and what the DT users do. DT should not be a group that requires whatever active spam/scambusting you're looking for. We listen to your ideas now. However, you could be the Queen of Sheba and we’d still say they were misguided.
|
..Stake.com.. | | | ▄████████████████████████████████████▄ ██ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██ ▄████▄ ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██████████ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██ ██████ ██ ██████████ ██ ██ ██████████ ██ ▀██▀ ██ ██ ██ ██████ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██████ ██ █████ ███ ██████ ██ ████▄ ██ ██ █████ ███ ████ ████ █████ ███ ████████ ██ ████ ████ ██████████ ████ ████ ████▀ ██ ██████████ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████ ██ ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██ ▀█████████▀ ▄████████████▄ ▀█████████▀ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███ ██ ██ ███▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████████████████████████████████████ | | | | | | ▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄ █ ▄▀▄ █▀▀█▀▄▄ █ █▀█ █ ▐ ▐▌ █ ▄██▄ █ ▌ █ █ ▄██████▄ █ ▌ ▐▌ █ ██████████ █ ▐ █ █ ▐██████████▌ █ ▐ ▐▌ █ ▀▀██████▀▀ █ ▌ █ █ ▄▄▄██▄▄▄ █ ▌▐▌ █ █▐ █ █ █▐▐▌ █ █▐█ ▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀█ | | | | | | ▄▄█████████▄▄ ▄██▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀▀██▄ ▄█▀ ▐█▌ ▀█▄ ██ ▐█▌ ██ ████▄ ▄█████▄ ▄████ ████████▄███████████▄████████ ███▀ █████████████ ▀███ ██ ███████████ ██ ▀█▄ █████████ ▄█▀ ▀█▄ ▄██▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██▄ ▄▄▄█▀ ▀███████ ███████▀ ▀█████▄ ▄█████▀ ▀▀▀███▄▄▄███▀▀▀ | | | ..PLAY NOW.. |
|
|
|
Anduck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1511
Merit: 1072
quack
|
|
January 08, 2019, 07:58:00 PM |
|
We listen to your ideas now. However, you could be the Queen of Sheba and we’d still say they were misguided.
My ideas largely align with theymos' ideas. (e.g. here). Main thing being that DT needs to change or go. How am I misguided?
|
|
|
|
o_e_l_e_o
In memoriam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2268
Merit: 18509
|
|
January 08, 2019, 08:07:10 PM |
|
Because theymos wants to change the system to improve it for everyone. You want to change the system so you are no longer red-tagged.
|
|
|
|
OgNasty
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4732
Merit: 4239
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
|
|
January 08, 2019, 08:14:53 PM |
|
We listen to your ideas now. However, you could be the Queen of Sheba and we’d still say they were misguided.
My ideas largely align with theymos' ideas. (e.g. here). Main thing being that DT needs to change or go. How am I misguided? You think anyone who is trustworthy should be in default trust. That shows you don’t even understand the system. Trustworthy people have a high trust rating, while those with GOOD JUDGEMENT IN THEIR RATINGS should be in the default trust network. You’ve been shown to have questionable views in regards to auctions and also poor judgement in giving feedback. You’re now lashing out at the system because you refuse to see those 2 truths regardless of how many people take the time to try to point it out to you, further demonstrating your reason for exclusion and the functionality of the current system.
|
..Stake.com.. | | | ▄████████████████████████████████████▄ ██ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██ ▄████▄ ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██████████ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██ ██████ ██ ██████████ ██ ██ ██████████ ██ ▀██▀ ██ ██ ██ ██████ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██████ ██ █████ ███ ██████ ██ ████▄ ██ ██ █████ ███ ████ ████ █████ ███ ████████ ██ ████ ████ ██████████ ████ ████ ████▀ ██ ██████████ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████ ██ ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██ ▀█████████▀ ▄████████████▄ ▀█████████▀ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███ ██ ██ ███▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████████████████████████████████████ | | | | | | ▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄ █ ▄▀▄ █▀▀█▀▄▄ █ █▀█ █ ▐ ▐▌ █ ▄██▄ █ ▌ █ █ ▄██████▄ █ ▌ ▐▌ █ ██████████ █ ▐ █ █ ▐██████████▌ █ ▐ ▐▌ █ ▀▀██████▀▀ █ ▌ █ █ ▄▄▄██▄▄▄ █ ▌▐▌ █ █▐ █ █ █▐▐▌ █ █▐█ ▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀█ | | | | | | ▄▄█████████▄▄ ▄██▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀▀██▄ ▄█▀ ▐█▌ ▀█▄ ██ ▐█▌ ██ ████▄ ▄█████▄ ▄████ ████████▄███████████▄████████ ███▀ █████████████ ▀███ ██ ███████████ ██ ▀█▄ █████████ ▄█▀ ▀█▄ ▄██▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██▄ ▄▄▄█▀ ▀███████ ███████▀ ▀█████▄ ▄█████▀ ▀▀▀███▄▄▄███▀▀▀ | | | ..PLAY NOW.. |
|
|
|
Anduck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1511
Merit: 1072
quack
|
|
January 08, 2019, 08:26:42 PM |
|
You think anyone who is trustworthy should be in default trust. That shows you don’t even understand the system. Trustworthy people have a high trust rating, while those with GOOD JUDGEMENT IN THEIR RATINGS should be in the default trust network. You’ve been shown to have questionable views in regards to auctions and also poor judgement in giving feedback. You’re now lashing out at the system because you refuse to see those 2 truths regardless of how many people take the time to try to point it out to you, further demonstrating your reason for exclusion and the functionality of the current system.
My view of what DT should be has nothing to do with my understanding of how it works currently. Also I am not "lashing out at the system" as you describe. I have given out perfectly reasonable feedbacks. Feel free to PM if you feel that some feedback I've sent is unjust, we can talk about it. And that "questionable views in regards to auctions" -- well, vendor bidding really is a common thing in various auctions around the world. I guess you can call it "questionable", but for some reason it still remains to be an acceptable thing in various auction standards. Not in Bitcointalk auction standard, obviously.
|
|
|
|
OgNasty
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4732
Merit: 4239
Leading Crypto Sports Betting & Casino Platform
|
|
January 08, 2019, 08:32:49 PM |
|
I have given out perfectly reasonable feedbacks.
SaltySpitoon 2018-12-24 If you do business with SaltySpitoon, be careful. Expect problems especially if anything disputable or surprising happens. This person uses twisted logical argumentation when it suits him. Believes prejudice in the face of facts. Finds reasoning to justify whatever activity, regardless of resulting low level of reasonableness, coherence, fairness or even correctness. Applies double standards. Portrays himself as fair and conscientious -- don't fall for that. I've not done business with SaltySpitoon. I think the situation with Salty could have been handled more reasonably. Not in Bitcointalk auction standard, obviously.
Then why are you trying to upend the entire trust network to suit what you believe DT should be as a result of you not adhering to the Bitcointalk auction standard as you understand it?
|
..Stake.com.. | | | ▄████████████████████████████████████▄ ██ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██ ▄████▄ ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██████████ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██ ██████ ██ ██████████ ██ ██ ██████████ ██ ▀██▀ ██ ██ ██ ██████ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██ ██████ ██ █████ ███ ██████ ██ ████▄ ██ ██ █████ ███ ████ ████ █████ ███ ████████ ██ ████ ████ ██████████ ████ ████ ████▀ ██ ██████████ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████ ██ ██ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ ██ ▀█████████▀ ▄████████████▄ ▀█████████▀ ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄███ ██ ██ ███▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ ██████████████████████████████████████████ | | | | | | ▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄ █ ▄▀▄ █▀▀█▀▄▄ █ █▀█ █ ▐ ▐▌ █ ▄██▄ █ ▌ █ █ ▄██████▄ █ ▌ ▐▌ █ ██████████ █ ▐ █ █ ▐██████████▌ █ ▐ ▐▌ █ ▀▀██████▀▀ █ ▌ █ █ ▄▄▄██▄▄▄ █ ▌▐▌ █ █▐ █ █ █▐▐▌ █ █▐█ ▀▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▀█ | | | | | | ▄▄█████████▄▄ ▄██▀▀▀▀█████▀▀▀▀██▄ ▄█▀ ▐█▌ ▀█▄ ██ ▐█▌ ██ ████▄ ▄█████▄ ▄████ ████████▄███████████▄████████ ███▀ █████████████ ▀███ ██ ███████████ ██ ▀█▄ █████████ ▄█▀ ▀█▄ ▄██▀▀▀▀▀▀▀██▄ ▄▄▄█▀ ▀███████ ███████▀ ▀█████▄ ▄█████▀ ▀▀▀███▄▄▄███▀▀▀ | | | ..PLAY NOW.. |
|
|
|
Anduck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1511
Merit: 1072
quack
|
|
January 08, 2019, 08:51:23 PM |
|
I have given out perfectly reasonable feedbacks.
SaltySpitoon 2018-12-24 If you do business with SaltySpitoon, be careful. Expect problems especially if anything disputable or surprising happens. This person uses twisted logical argumentation when it suits him. Believes prejudice in the face of facts. Finds reasoning to justify whatever activity, regardless of resulting low level of reasonableness, coherence, fairness or even correctness. Applies double standards. Portrays himself as fair and conscientious -- don't fall for that. I've not done business with SaltySpitoon. I think the situation with Salty could have been handled more reasonably. Possibly. Not in Bitcointalk auction standard, obviously.
Then why are you trying to upend the entire trust network to suit what you believe DT should be as a result of you not adhering to the Bitcointalk auction standard as you understand it? These two things are unrelated. The feedbacks I've received merely increased my motivation to get BCT trust system improved. DT people have way too much power. Also FWIW, I've been against DT-including trust system since it was implemented, just not very vocal about it. (See #bitcoin-otc logs.) About that auction issue, I learned about Bitcointalk auction standard regarding vendor bids in that auction. Back then, ~3 years ago, I did not know that vendor bids are not cool here. The bitcointalk auction standard is vague and not even described anywhere. I've held countless auctions since, with no complaints. Now two DT'ers are stepping in to rate me for that vendor bid (at least publicly they state that as the reason). Do you see that as reasonable and justified? "Warning! Trade with extreme caution!"
|
|
|
|
suchmoon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8922
https://bpip.org
|
|
January 08, 2019, 09:07:10 PM |
|
I learned about Bitcointalk auction standard regarding vendor bids in that auction. Back then, ~3 years ago, I did not know that vendor bids are not cool here. The bitcointalk auction standard is vague and not even described anywhere. I've held countless auctions since, with no complaints. Now two DT'ers are stepping in to rate me for that vendor bid (at least publicly they state that as the reason). Do you see that as reasonable and justified? "Warning! Trade with extreme caution!"
Your trust rating has not so much to do with your self-bidding but rather with you being stubbornly defiant about it. Any reasonable person would have said "shit, I didn't realize that, sorry" and moved on whereas you're never wrong. This speaks to your poor ability to handle disputes or even minor disagreements. You're lucky to get away with two red trusts (so far). Here we are derailing the thread again . How about you stick to your cockamamie ideas of destroying DT, those are easier to ignore.
|
|
|
|
Anduck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1511
Merit: 1072
quack
|
|
January 08, 2019, 09:13:05 PM |
|
I learned about Bitcointalk auction standard regarding vendor bids in that auction. Back then, ~3 years ago, I did not know that vendor bids are not cool here. The bitcointalk auction standard is vague and not even described anywhere. I've held countless auctions since, with no complaints. Now two DT'ers are stepping in to rate me for that vendor bid (at least publicly they state that as the reason). Do you see that as reasonable and justified? "Warning! Trade with extreme caution!"
Your trust rating has not so much to do with your self-bidding but rather with you being stubbornly defiant about it. Any reasonable person would have said "shit, I didn't realize that, sorry" and moved on whereas you're never wrong. This speaks to your poor ability to handle disputes or even minor disagreements. You're lucky to get away with two red trusts (so far). This narrative that I did not do this "shit, didn't realize that" is misleading. Go look up how it went and stop believing in third hand stories. I am not defiant about it, why would I be. Aren't my actions speaking louder? I've not done a vendor bid since that auction! So stop spreading that bullshit narrative, it has nothing to do with reality.
|
|
|
|
suchmoon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8922
https://bpip.org
|
|
January 08, 2019, 09:31:27 PM |
|
This narrative that I did not do this "shit, didn't realize that" is misleading. Go look up how it went and stop believing in third hand stories. I am not defiant about it, why would I be. Aren't my actions speaking louder? I've not done a vendor bid since that auction! So stop spreading that bullshit narrative, it has nothing to do with reality.
I don't need to go anywhere, I have followed your whole 20+ page thread any many detours into other threads. The overwhelming consensus has been that you're wrong but you insist that you're potentially honest somewhere outside of Bitcointalk where self-bidding is acceptable so you must be accepted as being honest here as well. I don't think that's how it works. Your self-bid was a dishonest way to cancel the auction without explicitly cancelling it, regardless of what other auction places may or may not allow.
|
|
|
|
Anduck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1511
Merit: 1072
quack
|
|
January 08, 2019, 09:34:36 PM |
|
This narrative that I did not do this "shit, didn't realize that" is misleading. Go look up how it went and stop believing in third hand stories. I am not defiant about it, why would I be. Aren't my actions speaking louder? I've not done a vendor bid since that auction! So stop spreading that bullshit narrative, it has nothing to do with reality.
I don't need to go anywhere, I have followed your whole 20+ page thread any many detours into other threads. The overwhelming consensus has been that you're wrong but you insist that you're potentially honest somewhere outside of Bitcointalk where self-bidding is acceptable so you must be accepted as being honest here as well. I don't think that's how it works. Your self-bid was a dishonest way to cancel the auction without explicitly cancelling it, regardless of what other auction places may or may not allow. That's quite an unfair description of what has happened.
|
|
|
|
SaltySpitoon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2590
Merit: 2154
Welcome to the SaltySpitoon, how Tough are ya?
|
I have given out perfectly reasonable feedbacks.
SaltySpitoon 2018-12-24 If you do business with SaltySpitoon, be careful. Expect problems especially if anything disputable or surprising happens. This person uses twisted logical argumentation when it suits him. Believes prejudice in the face of facts. Finds reasoning to justify whatever activity, regardless of resulting low level of reasonableness, coherence, fairness or even correctness. Applies double standards. Portrays himself as fair and conscientious -- don't fall for that. I've not done business with SaltySpitoon. I think the situation with Salty could have been handled more reasonably. It really could not have. We resolved things the absolute best we could. We exchanged probably over 30 messages, and spoke in depth for well over a week regarding various matters. Neither of us have any misunderstandings of each other, and we both left each other appropriate feedback. I believe that this is a perfectly acceptable outcome. Those who think my judgement is wrong, likely understand Anduck's point of view, and his feedback may be exactly what those people would want to know about me. Likewise in the opposite direction. People who dont care about any of our points of view will ignore each others warnings. For the most part, the DT system works exactly how the users want it to work. The tool in of itself is just a hierarchical post it note. The people that bring up a cause in Meta or the Reputation sections are who define what the system is used for. Why its become accepted to give negative trust to Scammers, Spammers, Account Farmers, etc are all because of years of history of people asking questions. Debates have been had over, for example, why its ok to give account farmers negative trust. Theymos didn't put any rules anywhere that said, You must mark account farmers with red feedback. Who did they scam? No one. Why is it ok to give them red trust? Well, because people find their actions undesirable and untrustworthy when it comes to accountability and building a community. That resolution came out of a lot of discussion though. The system changes that Theymos would enact are making DT as a tool more flexible for its users, not creating some sort of regulation around it. As far as I know, the only rule when it comes to DT and the Feedback system, is that you may not spam people's feedback. Everything else is user created. When the community as a whole like like to see something change, it'll change in that direction. That doesn't mean people having a tantrum will get their way however.
|
|
|
|
The Sceptical Chymist
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3332
Merit: 6826
Cashback 15%
|
|
January 09, 2019, 04:41:47 PM |
|
That's quite an unfair description of what has happened.
I hate to keep feeding this discussion about your neg from Vod, but what suchmoon said is completely accurate--it's just not complete, leaving out your private conversation with Vod about feedback removal. That's a separate matter, but the self-bidding description is on point. I've already said my piece about both things, so I'm not going to continue flogging that poor dead horse. Consensus pretty much is that self-bidding on an auction here is not cool. That's what reserve prices are for.
|
. .HUGE. | | | | | | █▀▀▀▀ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █▄▄▄▄ | ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ . CASINO & SPORTSBOOK ▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄ | ▀▀▀▀█ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ ▄▄▄▄█ | | |
|
|
|
Anduck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1511
Merit: 1072
quack
|
|
January 09, 2019, 07:58:22 PM |
|
Neither of us have any misunderstandings of each other No lies, please. You misunderstood me heavily. I told you this (2+ times), and tried to explain what I meant, but you stick to your prejudice. You refused to truly listen to what I had to say, and you kept deliberately understanding my words in the worst possible way. Consensus pretty much is that self-bidding on an auction here is not cool.
I know this and agree completely. I've done all my auctions without vendor bids since I learned that it's not cool here.
|
|
|
|
suchmoon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3654
Merit: 8922
https://bpip.org
|
|
January 09, 2019, 09:00:15 PM |
|
Neither of us have any misunderstandings of each other No lies, please. You misunderstood me heavily. I told you this (2+ times), and tried to explain what I meant, but you stick to your prejudice. You refused to truly listen to what I had to say, and you kept deliberately understanding my words in the worst possible way. Unless there was some hidden discussion that I'm not aware of, this doesn't make any sense. Disagreeing with you doesn't mean your opponent misunderstands you. From what I've seen Salty understood you perfectly well and engaged in a lengthy discussion with you.
|
|
|
|
SaltySpitoon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2590
Merit: 2154
Welcome to the SaltySpitoon, how Tough are ya?
|
|
January 09, 2019, 09:02:05 PM Last edit: January 09, 2019, 10:29:01 PM by SaltySpitoon |
|
Neither of us have any misunderstandings of each other No lies, please. You misunderstood me heavily. I told you this (2+ times), and tried to explain what I meant, but you stick to your prejudice. You refused to truly listen to what I had to say, and you kept deliberately understanding my words in the worst possible way. Consensus pretty much is that self-bidding on an auction here is not cool.
I know this and agree completely. I've done all my auctions without vendor bids since I learned that it's not cool here.
There would have been zero discussion about the matter for the last few years if the bolded statement was true. People make mistakes, they take actions to fix them, and its done. Unless they constantly defend their mistakes. You don't get to say, hey I'm sorry I was wrong, but actually I was right you just don't understand. I can almost guarantee there would never have been a problem with Vod, or me now, had you just said, "yeah, it was my mistake" when someone called you on it. I absolutely completely understood your justification to me. And thought it was wrong. Its not prejudice, there are just inconsistencies in the story which lead me to believe you are not being truthful. If you are being truthful, it doesn't change anything, because it still makes me question your ability to rectify your mistakes. Being able to convince yourself that you are the victim for screwing someone else over is WAYYY more alarming to me than making a mistake due to a cultural difference. I've been trying to avoid telling you what the correct answer to the situation would have been, on the off chance that figuring it out on your own would have given a possibility of redemption. The analogy I told you about the tourist giving people the middle finger, and whether it made sense for them to continue giving people the finger after being told of the cultural difference in meaning, was meant to spark the idea that you should have stopped defending yourself and simply given up on the idea that its ok to do something untrustworthy because of a cultural difference. When you find out you made a mistake due to a cultural difference, you say, hey sorry, this is why I thought this was ok, but I understand its different here. I'm sorry. You don't go on defending your actions and calling others out because they are misunderstanding your culture. Making a mistake and fixing it isn't a big deal. Making a mistake and continuing to try and justify your mistake for years says something about your character. The reason I was so sure of my decision was because we fully discussed everything. I got an inside look at how your thought processing works, and thats where I found the problem. My feedback isn't meant to warn people that you are a dishonest scammer, its that there is the possibility of them getting screwed over by you, because you are exceptionally able to warp and twist what most would call common sense in order to justify your own actions, even when not a single person is on your side. I have absolutely nothing invested in my negative feedback to you. Its not a fight I need to win, power tripping, or a matter of pride. If I had to say I had any attached emotion, it'd be that I'm a little irritated that you think I'm being hasty, when we've spent so much time talking. Claiming I'm misunderstanding the situation when I've given you ample time to clear up any misunderstanding, and even responded back on any unclear points I might have had is a little demeaning. TLDR: My tie in to why this is relevant to this thread, is that DT takes effort. I don't leave someone a negative on something iffy, and many other DT members do the same. It took hours of discussion with you before I felt comfortable doing so. I absolutely believe I gave you a fair shake and put in far more effort than is reasonably expected to coax your true intentions out. That said, DT's purpose is to give accurate/reliable feedback. You might disagree with me, but I gave people resources to investigate my claim for themselves. If they don't agree with me, they don't need to heed my advice. Thats essentially all there is to it. The same is true to your feedback about me, if they don't agree with your claim, they are free to ignore your feedback. Thats how it works, DT is just a good starting point for those who don't know who to trust yet. Give a member a few months here, and they create their own weighted trust lists, at least in their head if not by physically altering their list. We are not going to agree with one another, and I'm perfectly alright with that. I just hope that we can agree that each other's feedback will only matter those those who choose to value it based on their own perception of its merit. *edit* Quoting for my own future reference... Unless they constantly defend their mistakes
I am solely saying that vendor bidding is not unethical, scam, untrustworthy or bad behavior in general, when it's applicable. Vendor bidding is done in various auctions around the world. I fully understand that it is not part of Bitcointalk auctions. I told you this many many times, but you just refuse to listen. I don't defend my mistake. (This is obvious from my very first message regarding this.) I defend myself when people call me a scammer, because I've not scammed anyone. Vod told me that he doesn't see anything untrustworthy in how the auction went. Even though his rating mentions the vendor bid. He misunderstood me illogically, and didn't listen when I told him how he read my words illogically. See this. You're talking about my thought process with quite a confidence. Your description of why you're rating me is not in line with your other output. For example, you implied that your DT position played a significant role in that event, as you felt that by rating me negatively I wouldn't need to "worry about Vod anymore". Also, you're applying double standards as you're not red-rating someone who changed auction rules mid-auction. Yet you do a fresh red-rating to someone who didn't know about bitcointalk auction standard (and didn't change auction rules.)
|
|
|
|
Anduck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1511
Merit: 1072
quack
|
|
January 09, 2019, 09:15:23 PM Last edit: January 10, 2019, 02:22:13 AM by Anduck |
|
Unless they constantly defend their mistakes
I am solely saying that vendor bidding is not unethical, scam, untrustworthy or bad behavior in general, when it's applicable. Vendor bidding is done in various auctions around the world. I fully understand that it is not part of Bitcointalk auctions. I told you this many many times, but you just refuse to listen. You just keep on telling me how you think that vendor bidding is absolutely dishonest and that I'm bullshitting you when I say that it's actually quite common practice. I presented you various sources where you can go and educate yourself, but you refused and instead believe your prejudice. I don't defend my mistake. (This is obvious from my very first message regarding this.) I defend myself when Vod (and you?) call me a scammer, because I've not scammed anyone. Vod told me that he doesn't see anything untrustworthy in how the auction went. Even though his rating mentions the vendor bid. He misunderstood me illogically, and didn't listen when I told him how he read my words illogically. See this. You're talking about my thought process with quite a confidence. Your description of why you're rating me is not in line with your other output. For example, you implied that your DT position played a significant role in that event, as you felt that by rating me negatively I wouldn't need to "worry about Vod anymore". That is abuse of position and so called "power tripping". Also, you're applying double standards as you're not red-rating someone who changed auction rules mid-auction. Yet you do a fresh red-rating to someone who didn't know about bitcointalk auction standard (and didn't change auction rules.)
Consensus pretty much is that self-bidding on an auction here is not cool.
I know this and agree completely. I've done all my auctions without vendor bids since I learned that it's not cool here.
There would have been zero discussion about the matter for the last few years if the bolded statement was true. Have a try at explaining how the bold statement is untrue? I've not done a vendor bid since that auction ~3 years ago. Bitcointalk auction standard doesn't include vendor bidding. Anyway, your logic is flawed and your attempts at steering opinions or whatever with such no content sentences are pathetic.
My feedback isn't meant to warn people that you are a dishonest scammer, its that there is the possibility of them getting screwed over by you, because you are exceptionally able to warp and twist what most would call common sense in order to justify your own actions, even when not a single person is on your side.
This makes no sense. What's your beef with me? Your prejudice is what you call "common sense", now? How about digging up real common sense and stop harassing me.
|
|
|
|
Timelord2067
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3668
Merit: 2217
💲🏎️💨🚓
|
|
January 10, 2019, 10:32:40 AM |
|
Have just come across this thread. Who do I have to thank for removing or excluding me from DT2?
|
|
|
|
Lauda
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
|
|
January 10, 2019, 10:37:04 AM |
|
Have just come across this thread. Who do I have to thank for removing or excluding me from DT2?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;full shows: hilariousandco, Lutpin, DarkStar_, Tomatocage, EcuaMobi have you excluded. I don't think it's an exclusion problem, but rather an inclusion one. Whoever had you included, removed the inclusion from what I can tell. Wrong thread though?
|
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks" 😼 Bitcoin Core ( onion)
|
|
|
Timelord2067
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3668
Merit: 2217
💲🏎️💨🚓
|
|
January 10, 2019, 10:50:27 AM |
|
Have just come across this thread. Who do I have to thank for removing or excluding me from DT2?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;full shows: hilariousandco, Lutpin, DarkStar_, Tomatocage, EcuaMobi have you excluded. I don't think it's an exclusion problem, but rather an inclusion one. Whoever had you included, removed the inclusion from what I can tell. Wrong thread though? Thanks for the info, I don't believe it's the wrong thread as my UID details etc form the basis of one entry of the list the tread is based around. Tom & Hilarious are understandable. Lupin is a supprise. Dark Star & Ecuai - no idea.
|
|
|
|
LoyceV
Legendary
Online
Activity: 3304
Merit: 16596
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
|
|
January 10, 2019, 01:27:21 PM |
|
I will probably do an update Let me archive this thread, so we have a copy of DT1 and 2 before the changes.
|
|
|
|
|
|