savetheFORUM
Full Member
 

Activity: 1540
Merit: 140
Bitz.io Best Bitcoin and Crypto Casino
|
 |
March 14, 2021, 06:24:20 PM |
|
 That is, I earned a rating for scam buster, activity on the forum. And eddie13 thinks these are shit ratings. Now let's see who eddie13 trusts: You started this shit on other topics, and now you are not able to answer for your words. You really think the rating from Bitcoingirl is positive? Your translator stopped working, fix it.
|
|
|
|
LoyceV (OP)
Legendary

Activity: 4074
Merit: 22089
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
|
 |
March 14, 2021, 06:45:27 PM |
|
You know you can use the "Beautify" (AKA "delete") button, right? Hey Loyce, Brother, although the conversation does not strike me off topic however you are the sailor of this topic so feel free if this seems off to you. However, I hope you find this argument the reason of distrusting someone not having a sense of proper judgement 😉 If this were my thread I would delete every post made since March 3rd. I am/was way too busy this weekend to even read all posts completely. So I'll let it play out for a while, and when I have a lot of time (and popcorn) to spare, I'll read everything (with my finger itching above the delete button). Once in a while I'll summarize posts and clean up this thread. This whole topic can be reduced to about 8 posts 
|
¡uʍop ǝpᴉsdn pɐǝɥ ɹnoʎ ɥʇᴉʍ ʎuunɟ ʞool no⅄
|
|
|
|
airfinex
|
 |
September 10, 2021, 01:27:46 PM Last edit: September 10, 2021, 02:14:39 PM by airfinex |
|
I don't trust Ratimov because: 1. There is no more egregious case of text-spinning with the help of Google translator than the case of Ratimov. —if Ratimov did not deny in principle, that publishing something in the form in which he publishes it is a bad example. —if Ratimov had not chosen to reply with an ad hominem attack against an accusation brought with evidence.
2. Constantly demonstrates extremely arrogant and devil-may-care attitude towards the community, he deleted posts but there is an archive. Thanks to RapTarX, suchmoon, icopress, The Pharmacist, Poker Player for constructive answers ON THEME. The rest of the speculation and blah blah are not interesting to me.
3. Ratimov is an inveterate liar who publishes deliberately false facts. Ratimov: More than 8 months have passed between these cases, where is the connection? Your saying would be true if I created a topic about airfinex a few days after he accused me.The Pharmacist: The timing says it all, IMO, and I'm talking about the timing between airfinex's post here and the creation of this thread.LoyceV: Just last week, airfinex posted in "~", which you responded to several times. The 8 months are irrelevant, you posted this just half an hour before you created this topic:
4. Ratimov regularly resorts to mutual exclusion on the basis of revenge, eddie13, DireWolfM14 expressed his opinion and he added him to the list of distrust. 3000+ merits for using Google translate eh? What a great method of distributing DT voting power ..
 To me this looks like a blatant attempt to attack some one who called you out. I know you've developed a few supporters here, but I suspect that they too will cease their support if you keep making these obvious retaliatory attacks. Deflection and "What-About-ism" doesn't absolve you of your sins.

5. Using feedback as a weapon, Ratimov clearly shows how far he is from understanding the foundations of the trust system. Stop trying to discredit those who allege that you're a plagiarist. The most delusional thing that can be said about this. What does this have to do with it? I got the same impression. The feedback you left airfinex doesn't help either: this looks more like a personal attack than anything based on facts:  When I read feedback like this, it makes whoever wrote it look bad, not whoever received it. (~~~) As for his accusation, if I wanted some kind of revenge, I would put him a negative trust. That would be very obvious Trust abuse. (~~~) You are incapable of defending yourself, which is why you attack those who accuse you of plagiarism.Stop deflecting, address your problems head on. It's the only way to resolve them. To me it seems like a weakness to try to defame the person who made some valid arguments. I still think the plagiarism rules should be adjusted, this shouldn't be allowed (see my reasons why). Big surprise: the guy who first posted about Ratimov's plagiarism received negative feedback the next day:  I can't help but think Ratimov was angry when he tagged those users. Here's another " brain-dead fucker". I don't know why Ratimov left them negative feedback in English, because I can't read the Russian Reference links. I see one very strong connection though: they've criticized Ratimov, so he tags them. And then you wonder why people use alt accounts? Allow me to quote myself: Be the bigger man!With great power comes great responsibility ( source unknown). Especially when you're on DefaultTrust (or if you want to be on DefaultTrust in the future), you shouldn't (ab)use that power by leaving (negative) feedback when someone does something you don't like. Your Sent feedback is what others use to judge your judgement.If someone on the internet is mean to you: boo fucking hoo! Use the Ignore button, and forget about them.
|
████████████████████ OrangeFren.com ████████████████████instant KYC-free exchange comparison████████████████████ Clearnet and onion available #kycfree + (prepaid Visa & Mastercard) ████████████████████
|
|
|
suchmoon
Legendary

Activity: 4144
Merit: 9541
https://bpip.org
|
 |
September 10, 2021, 02:11:09 PM |
|
That would be very obvious Trust abuse. (~~~) You are incapable of defending yourself, which is why you attack those who accuse you of plagiarism.Stop deflecting, address your problems head on. It's the only way to resolve them. To me it seems like a weakness to try to defame the person who made some valid arguments. I still think the plagiarism rules should be adjusted, this shouldn't be allowed (see my reasons why). Big surprise: the guy who first posted about Ratimov's plagiarism received negative feedback the next day:  I can't help but think Ratimov was angry when he tagged those users. Here's another " brain-dead fucker". I don't know why Ratimov left them negative feedback in English, because I can't read the Russian Reference links. I see one very strong connection though: they've criticized Ratimov, so he tags them. And then you wonder why people use alt accounts? Allow me to quote myself: Be the bigger man!With great power comes great responsibility ( source unknown). Especially when you're on DefaultTrust (or if you want to be on DefaultTrust in the future), you shouldn't (ab)use that power by leaving (negative) feedback when someone does something you don't like. Your Sent feedback is what others use to judge your judgement.If someone on the internet is mean to you: boo fucking hoo! Use the Ignore button, and forget about them. Fix your fucking quote before you get banned for plagiarism. It would be immensely amusing but I'm really tired of this sockpuppeting shit-stiring drama.
|
|
|
|
|
|
airfinex
|
 |
September 10, 2021, 02:16:01 PM |
|
Fix your fucking quote before you get banned for plagiarism. It would be immensely amusing but I'm really tired of this sockpuppeting shit-stiring drama.
Thanks for pointing that out, I really did accidentally make a mistake.
|
████████████████████ OrangeFren.com ████████████████████instant KYC-free exchange comparison████████████████████ Clearnet and onion available #kycfree + (prepaid Visa & Mastercard) ████████████████████
|
|
|
|
airfinex
|
 |
October 25, 2021, 10:16:07 PM |
|
A lot of time has passed, but none of the DT paid attention to my arguments. I am sure that if these arguments were published by someone from DT, then exactly the same post would have attracted public attention.
|
████████████████████ OrangeFren.com ████████████████████instant KYC-free exchange comparison████████████████████ Clearnet and onion available #kycfree + (prepaid Visa & Mastercard) ████████████████████
|
|
|
Timelord2067
Legendary

Activity: 4438
Merit: 2369
💲🏎️💨🚓
|
 |
October 25, 2021, 10:41:18 PM |
|
I am sure that if these arguments were published by someone from DT, then exactly the same post would have attracted public attention.
Perhaps if you didn't keep deleting your prior posts (and from what I can tell, that doesn't include merited posts), then readers might feel inclined to sit up and take more notice of your ramblings (which is all they seem to be thus far). Others have already suggested you stop, yet you don't.
|
|
|
|
|
airfinex
|
 |
October 25, 2021, 10:57:52 PM |
|
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted. Timelord2067, on this forum, messages are deleted not only on personal initiative. I don't want to get personal, but if you were a little smarter, then you would not be saying stupid things, then maybe those around you would stop considering you an idiot. And few people care about your preconceived opinion, since you do not see the obvious facts, and I think this is the reason why you were kicked out of the DT.
|
████████████████████ OrangeFren.com ████████████████████instant KYC-free exchange comparison████████████████████ Clearnet and onion available #kycfree + (prepaid Visa & Mastercard) ████████████████████
|
|
|
LoyceV (OP)
Legendary

Activity: 4074
Merit: 22089
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
|
 |
October 26, 2021, 11:12:21 AM |
|
I read it, but this isn't the right topic to discuss specific users. I don't mind some discussion, but in this case you have another topic already. This is a Reference topic (which kinda failed I might add: barely anyone explained why they exclude users).
|
¡uʍop ǝpᴉsdn pɐǝɥ ɹnoʎ ɥʇᴉʍ ʎuunɟ ʞool no⅄
|
|
|
LoyceV (OP)
Legendary

Activity: 4074
Merit: 22089
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
|
 |
June 06, 2023, 07:18:27 AM |
|
Bump with an update that will also count as my Reference link for neutral feedback: ~ Timelord2067I've hesitated to exclude this user for a long time. That moment has arrived: he's too stubborn to admit he was wrong leaving negative feedback to 2 users while he was on DT2. Even after locking his topic and adding neutral feedback (with the same incorrect claims) he hasn't removed his negative feedback. It's unfortunate he removes the importance of all his good ratings by leaving ratings that are objectively incorrect.
|
¡uʍop ǝpᴉsdn pɐǝɥ ɹnoʎ ɥʇᴉʍ ʎuunɟ ʞool no⅄
|
|
|
LoyceV (OP)
Legendary

Activity: 4074
Merit: 22089
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
|
For the first time in 3 years, I'm excluding 2 more users from my Trust list: ~ KruwThis user has many Trust exclusions and is far from DT, but his feedback recently started showing by default based on my own custom Trust list: I have gmaxwell on my Trust list, but I don't know why he included Kruw. I don't expect gmaxwell to include him because of the positive feedback he received: " Smart guy :)", so I hope he'll weigh in here. ~ Satofan44Starting today, Satofan44's massive Trust abuse also showed up by default based on my own custom Trust list. The inclusion that caused this isn't showing in last Saturday's Trust list viewer yet: The massive distrust is there for a good reason, so it was disappointing to see it show up. Based on Trust settings Hierarchical view, Satofan44 too was included by gmaxwell. My guess is he was added based on his technical knowledge, while ignoring his Trust abuse. Satofan44 shouldn't be included.
Because of these 2 bad inclusions, I've removed (not excluded) gmaxwell from my own Trust list. That's a pity, he was one of the first users on my Trust list. I'll mention anyone who includes gmaxwell so they can read this post:
|
¡uʍop ǝpᴉsdn pɐǝɥ ɹnoʎ ɥʇᴉʍ ʎuunɟ ʞool no⅄
|
|
|
LoyceV (OP)
Legendary

Activity: 4074
Merit: 22089
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
|
 |
June 16, 2026, 08:13:51 AM |
|
|
¡uʍop ǝpᴉsdn pɐǝɥ ɹnoʎ ɥʇᴉʍ ʎuunɟ ʞool no⅄
|
|
|
Pmalek
Legendary

Activity: 3528
Merit: 9316
|
 |
June 16, 2026, 03:16:20 PM |
|
For the first time in 3 years, I'm excluding 2 more users to my Trust list: ~ KruwKruw is one of the worst human beings I have had the displeasure of meeting (virtually) on this forum. Filth and garbage are two words that spring to mind when I think of him. I have no idea what possessed gmaxwell to add him to his trust list. I don't know much about Satofan44. I have seen him around and he seems knowledgeable. I can't comment on his trust abuse because I have never looked into it.
|
| EARNBET | | | ⚽ 🏀 🏈 🏓 🎯 🥊 |
| ⚾ 🎾 ⛳ 🏐 🏏 🏎️ | | |
███████▄▄███████████ ████▄██████████████████ ██▄▀▀███████████████▀▀███ █▄████████████████████████ ▄▄████████▀▀▀▀▀████████▄▄██ ███████████████████████████ █████████▌████▀████████████ ███████████████████████████ ▀▀███████▄▄▄▄▄█████████▀▀██ █▀█████████████████████▀██ ██▀▄▄███████████████▄▄███ ████▀██████████████████ ███████▀▀███████████ | ....HIGHEST.... VIP REWARDS ✔ G U A R A N T E E D
| | | 🜲 | KING OF THE CASTLE $200K in prizes | | | ..PLAY NOW.. |
|
|
|
LoyceV (OP)
Legendary

Activity: 4074
Merit: 22089
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
|
I don't know much about Satofan44. I have seen him around and he seems knowledgeable. I can't comment on his trust abuse because I have never looked into it. He wastes his technical talent by trolling the Trust system, I don't know why: he probably wants his image to be a sort of like a BitcoinTalk "top developer/technical guru". He's just trolling. His technical knowledge is useless if he drags his drama to the tech boards. I already ignored him a long time ago from his drama on the Reputation board. If it hits the tech board, I don't read it, but if you see drama, just report it. If you want to have a laugh, see how many reputable forum members he tagged in his sent feedback: 
|
¡uʍop ǝpᴉsdn pɐǝɥ ɹnoʎ ɥʇᴉʍ ʎuunɟ ʞool no⅄
|
|
|
Pmalek
Legendary

Activity: 3528
Merit: 9316
|
 |
June 18, 2026, 07:19:40 AM |
|
If you want to have a laugh, see how many reputable forum members he tagged in his sent feedback: Wow. Many people would love to belong to such a prestigious group of pajeets and scammers as the individuals mentioned in that screenshot. It seems like if you disagree with him or criticize him, then you are a third-world pajeet and scammer. How convenient. In that regard, he has things in common with the first person you excluded from your trust list.
|
| EARNBET | | | ⚽ 🏀 🏈 🏓 🎯 🥊 |
| ⚾ 🎾 ⛳ 🏐 🏏 🏎️ | | |
███████▄▄███████████ ████▄██████████████████ ██▄▀▀███████████████▀▀███ █▄████████████████████████ ▄▄████████▀▀▀▀▀████████▄▄██ ███████████████████████████ █████████▌████▀████████████ ███████████████████████████ ▀▀███████▄▄▄▄▄█████████▀▀██ █▀█████████████████████▀██ ██▀▄▄███████████████▄▄███ ████▀██████████████████ ███████▀▀███████████ | ....HIGHEST.... VIP REWARDS ✔ G U A R A N T E E D
| | | 🜲 | KING OF THE CASTLE $200K in prizes | | | ..PLAY NOW.. |
|
|
|
GazetaBitcoin
Legendary

Activity: 2464
Merit: 9860
Fully-fledged Merit Cycler|Spambuster'23|Pie Baker
|
 |
June 18, 2026, 08:25:21 AM |
|
If you want to have a laugh, see how many reputable forum members he tagged in his sent feedback: I almost spilled my coffee on me while reading this  I guess only satoshi, sirius and theymos are missing from that select list, don't they?
|
| bustabit | ██████▄█▀ ███▄███▀ ██▀██▄▄▄ ▄███▀▀▀ ▀█▄█▄▄▄ █▀██▀▀ █▄▐▌▄█ ▀████▀ ██▀▀███▄ ██▄▄█████▄ █▀██████▄██ ██████████▀ ████▀███▀▀▄ | THE ORIGINAL CRASH GAME .....S I N C E 2 0 1 4..... | ▀█▄██████ ▀███▄███ ▄▄▄██▀██ ▀▀▀███▄ ▄▄▄█▄█▀ ▀▀██▀█ █▄▐▌▄█ ▀████▀ ▄██▄█▀██ ▄███▄██▄██ ██▄██████▀█ ▀██████████ ▄▀▀███▀████ | █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ ▀ | HOUSE EDGE 1% | █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ ▀ | WAGERED BTC200M+ | █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ ▀ | MAX PROFIT BTC5+ | █ █ █ █ █ █ █ █ ▀ | PLAY NOW |
|
|
|
examplens
Legendary
Online
Activity: 4046
Merit: 4709
|
 |
June 18, 2026, 09:57:57 AM |
|
~ Satofan44Starting today, Satofan44's massive Trust abuse also showed up by default based on my own custom Trust list. The inclusion that caused this isn't showing in last Saturday's Trust list viewer yet: Despite your well-known neutrality and attempts to be as rational as possible, I must say that I am somewhat surprised at how long it took you to react like this. It was obvious a long time ago, regardless of whether Satofan44 is trolling the Trust system or really thinks as he shows through the feedback he leaves. I think the pats on the back for technical knowledge only encouraged him to act like an omniscient god.
|
|
|
|
LoyceV (OP)
Legendary

Activity: 4074
Merit: 22089
Thick-Skinned Gang Leader and Golden Feather 2021
|
 |
June 18, 2026, 10:05:43 AM |
|
I must say that I am somewhat surprised at how long it took you to react like this. There was no point in (also) excluding him when he was already far from DT and his feedback didn't show up.
|
¡uʍop ǝpᴉsdn pɐǝɥ ɹnoʎ ɥʇᴉʍ ʎuunɟ ʞool no⅄
|
|
|
examplens
Legendary
Online
Activity: 4046
Merit: 4709
|
 |
June 18, 2026, 12:12:30 PM |
|
There was no point in (also) excluding him when he was already far from DT and his feedback didn't show up.
A larger number of exclusions is especially necessary in such cases so that a situation where the user is on a seesaw with an equal number of inclusions and exclusions does not occur by chance. The thing with gmaxwell is your confirmation that some members are guided by a different idea of editing the trust list. If you add the entire collectible gang to that, someone can easily manipulate the system if there are not enough exclusions.
|
|
|
|
JeromeTash
Legendary

Activity: 2912
Merit: 1550
Heisenberg
|
 |
June 18, 2026, 12:47:05 PM |
|
If you want to have a laugh, see how many reputable forum members he tagged in his sent feedback: I almost spilled my coffee on me while reading this  I guess only satoshi, sirius and theymos are missing from that select list, don't they? He probably wants to create a record by matching up or beating lauda's numbers in terms of sent negative feedback  Some people just forget that we found the forum and we shall one day leave it, and life in the forum will move on like you never existed. Most of the unnecessary actions by some members in the forum are due to untamable, fragile egos.
|
|
|
|
|