2020 Democrats

[TECSHARE]

There's no way, in the modern era, to just replace the guy that just the majority of the popular vote and delegate vote in his respective party without inciting some sort of civil war within the party and causing it to fracture.

If he steps aside willingly -- ya know, by saying that he just isn't fit for the office and that the party should do something -- that's one thing. But forcing him out while he is out in the media disputing the claim, isn't going to work. It'll force the 'Obama Democrats' (the moderates) to turn against the party.

I know he's a horrible candidate and I agree with that, but I don't think they can kick him out without hurting themself more.

Let me put it in big red letters so you can read it more clearly.

THEY DON'T CARE

They are going to do it and there isn't a damned thing anyone is going to do to stop them. Joe is going to willingly step down because he is a puppet. The Democrat party is already dead.

[1714666701]

1714666701

[1714666701]

1714666701

[1714666701]

1714666701

[1714666701]

1714666701

[1714666701]

1714666701

[1714666701]

1714666701

[TwitchySeal]

I would put money on either Michelle Obama or Killary taking his spot.

Let's go.

[TECSHARE]

I would put money on either Michelle Obama or Killary taking his spot.

Let's go.

I would be glad to take money from you retards, but gambling in the US is illegal in most states, and you would probably report me after I took your money.

[TwitchySeal]

I would put money on either Michelle Obama or Killary taking his spot.

Let's go.

I would be glad to take money from you retards, but gambling in the US is illegal in most states, and you would probably report me after I took your money.

We could just bet signatures.

No money involved.

Whoever loses has to post the signature that the winner requests.  We can figure out a specific terms if you're interested.

Perfectly open to negotiations. I realize your sig is worth more than mine.  (I would need a 'no scam ICO/casino/BCH' clause, for example - and I would expect you to require the same - maybe we could just figure out what the sigs would say before hands) and I would understand if you were only willing to risk a portion of your sig/avatar/text in exchange for mine.

Maybe take the bet with suchmoon instead.  I'd probably buy a piece of that.

It's an interesting thought no?  Let's discuss.  Make an offer.

[TECSHARE]

It's an interesting thought no?

No. I will be perfectly satisfied to laugh at you when they do replace Biden though.

[TwitchySeal]

I would put money on either Michelle Obama or Killary taking his spot.

Let's go.

I would be glad to take money from you retards, but gambling in the US is illegal in most states, and you would probably report me after I took your money.

We could just bet signatures.

No money involved.

Whoever loses has to post the signature that the winner requests.  We can figure out a specific terms if you're interested.

Perfectly open to negotiations. I realize your sig is worth more than mine.  (I would need a 'no scam ICO/casino/BCH' clause, for example - and I would expect you to require the same - maybe we could just figure out what the sigs would say before hands) and I would understand if you were only willing to risk a portion of your sig/avatar/text in exchange for mine.

Maybe take the bet with suchmoon instead.  I'd probably buy a piece of that.

It's an interesting thought no?  Let's discuss.  Make an offer.

No.

Let me know if you change your mind (again).  We could figure something out where loser has to make donation to some specified charity.

I would put money on either Michelle Obama or Killary taking his spot.

I would put money on either Michelle Obama or Killary taking his spot.

I would put money on either Michelle Obama or Killary taking his spot.

I would put money on either Michelle Obama or Killary taking his spot.

I would put money on either Michelle Obama or Killary taking his spot.

No.

No.

No.

[suchmoon]

No. I will be perfectly satisfied to laugh at you when they do replace Biden though.

No. You can laugh only if

either Michelle Obama or Killary [take] his spot

Chickenshit.

[TECSHARE]

No. I will be perfectly satisfied to laugh at you when they do replace Biden though.

No. You can laugh only if

either Michelle Obama or Killary [take] his spot

Chickenshit.

I am not the one who needs a bunch of butt buddies to be their hype beast.

[suchmoon]

I am not the one who needs a bunch of butt buddies to be their hype beast.

Oh don't start topic sliding now. You're the one who chickened out of a bet you proposed yourself.

[BADecker]

I am not the one who needs a bunch of butt buddies to be their hype beast.

Oh don't start topic sliding now. You're the one who chickened out of a bet you proposed yourself.

Besides that point, you don't even need us to be your hype beast, a good butt buddy takes on that role out of their own volition.

You jokers! A buttbuddy is someone who takes a drag off the lit end of the cigarette.

 

[squatz1]

No. I will be perfectly satisfied to laugh at you when they do replace Biden though.

No. You can laugh only if

either Michelle Obama or Killary [take] his spot

Chickenshit.

Heh, lol. I can't beleive TecShare literally is doing this right now. He's been added to my ignore list (again) after his big red letters comment, or whatever exactly that said.

Unsure on why he doesn't understand that this isn't going to happen. If it does, it'll happen WILLINGLY by Biden stepping aside, which looks a lot better then Biden just being forced out kicking and screaming.

[TECSHARE]

I am not the one who needs a bunch of butt buddies to be their hype beast.

Oh don't start topic sliding now. You're the one who chickened out of a bet you proposed yourself.

I didn't offer anyone a bet. I used a figure of speech. Another peanut fragment to add to your fecal smattered collection I am sure.

Besides that point, you don't even need us to be your hype beast, a good butt buddy takes on that role out of their own volition.

And a real man doesn't need a collection of chumps to constantly follow him around reassuring him of his convictions little girl.

No. I will be perfectly satisfied to laugh at you when they do replace Biden though.

No. You can laugh only if

either Michelle Obama or Killary [take] his spot

Chickenshit.

Heh, lol. I can't beleive TecShare literally is doing this right now. He's been added to my ignore list (again) after his big red letters comment, or whatever exactly that said.

Unsure on why he doesn't understand that this isn't going to happen. If it does, it'll happen WILLINGLY by Biden stepping aside, which looks a lot better then Biden just being forced out kicking and screaming.

Yes, how dare I literally challenge you with ideas you don't like or want to hear. The nerve. Funny, suddenly you seem to agree it is possible Biden will step aside. Biden has no leverage with which to kick and scream even if he wanted to. He is a puppet in a little box, and he will do as he is told, and when he is told to step aside, he will.

[suchmoon]

I am not the one who needs a bunch of butt buddies to be their hype beast.

Oh don't start topic sliding now. You're the one who chickened out of a bet you proposed yourself.

I didn't offer anyone a bet. I used a figure of speech.

So that makes you what - a figurative chicken? For somebody who's never ever wrong you're weirdly afraid to put your money where your mouth is.

[Gyfts]

Joe Biden seems to be in talks with the governor of Michigan about a potential VP spot - https://nypost.com/2020/05/19/gretchen-whitmer-in-talks-to-become-joe-bidens-vp-pick

The final results for this state in the 2016 election was Trump - 2,279,543, 47.50%, Clinton - 2,268,839, 47.27%.

It's clear Joe Biden is looking at swing states here and democrats really can't afford to lose Michigan or Wisconsin. Securing Michigan with Joe Biden's VP pick is a reasonable move but I feel democrats would have been more in tune with experienced politicians like Amy Klobuchar or Kamala Harris.

[TECSHARE]

I didn't offer anyone a bet. I used a figure of speech.

So that makes you what - a figurative chicken? For somebody who's never ever wrong you're weirdly afraid to put your money where your mouth is.

No, it makes me smart enough to not openly engage in criminal activity with people who have demonstrated very clearly they will do anything they can to attack me, interestingly enough simply because they don't agree with me.

[squatz1]

Joe Biden seems to be in talks with the governor of Michigan about a potential VP spot - https://nypost.com/2020/05/19/gretchen-whitmer-in-talks-to-become-joe-bidens-vp-pick

The final results for this state in the 2016 election was Trump - 2,279,543, 47.50%, Clinton - 2,268,839, 47.27%.

It's clear Joe Biden is looking at swing states here and democrats really can't afford to lose Michigan or Wisconsin. Securing Michigan with Joe Biden's VP pick is a reasonable move but I feel democrats would have been more in tune with experienced politicians like Amy Klobuchar or Kamala Harris.

Not susprising at all to do something like that, it's pretty typical to see a Presidential candidate do that to ensure their VP is actually useful. It's just like Trump picked Pence to lock up the evangelical vote, which was one of the key parts of his success even though he really isn't a religious person or liked by religious people -- they just associate him with Pence, and now his own pro religious policies, that he's liked enough (and more then Dems)

I'm pretty sure Biden is the swing state / battleground state candidate -- guy is pretty popular in Pennsylvania and he may pick a VP candidate (also a female, which fulfills one of his earlier promises) from Michigan.

May not work out, cause it sounds a bit too simple, but we'll see. I still can't see Biden beating Trump, that's just me though.

[TECSHARE]

No, it makes me smart enough to not openly engage in criminal activity with people who have demonstrated very clearly they will do anything they can to attack me, interestingly enough simply because they don't agree with me.

Sounds an awful lot like you are using your well-known penchant for paranoia as an excuse to chicken out.

It is not paranoia if people are really out to get you, and you floppy shoe fucks sure have proven that.

[squatz1]

It is not paranoia if people are really out to get you, and you floppy shoe fucks sure have proven that.

You believing people "are really out to get you" is a product of your own paranoia. Regardless, there's a million ways to handle a bet where you would never sacrifice your legal well-being if you were interested, not that it was ever an issue for 1 second.

I mean plus like, what prosecutor is going to go after the people betting among themselves? That's pretty much unheard of when it comes to small recreational people. They're going to go after the people using setting up gambling clubs and rings, and the people running big programs like this. No one cares (AT ALL) about the little people that are doing casual gambling.

[TECSHARE]

It is not paranoia if people are really out to get you, and you floppy shoe fucks sure have proven that.

You believing people "are really out to get you" is a product of your own paranoia. Regardless, there's a million ways to handle a bet where you would never sacrifice your legal well-being if you were interested, not that it was ever an issue for 1 second.

Yeah, I am sure your continual manufacturing of narratives about me here all around the forum have nothing to do with it, or your swarm of red nose clan members. I don't gamble. Is that good enough for you little girl?

I mean plus like, what prosecutor is going to go after the people betting among themselves? That's pretty much unheard of when it comes to small recreational people. They're going to go after the people using setting up gambling clubs and rings, and the people running big programs like this. No one cares (AT ALL) about the little people that are doing casual gambling.

I personally know people who have lost everything due to a related incident. It is just a matter of you having something they want. Ever heard of civil asset forfeiture? No prosecution needed. For some one studying finance you are pretty ignorant about how much destruction can be caused with the totalitarian financial regulations that exist in the US.

[squatz1]

I mean plus like, what prosecutor is going to go after the people betting among themselves? That's pretty much unheard of when it comes to small recreational people. They're going to go after the people using setting up gambling clubs and rings, and the people running big programs like this. No one cares (AT ALL) about the little people that are doing casual gambling.

I personally know people who have lost everything due to a related incident. For some one studying finance you are pretty ignorant about how much destruction can be cause with the totalitarian financial regulations that exist in the US.

Not saying it doesn't exist, just saying the likelihood of it happening is probably pretty low.

You can do whatever you want when it comes to gambling online and all that, honestly it doesn't bother me in any way at all. You do you man.