Hardcap ICO is no guarantee that the project will succeed

[JuliaJi]

as we see hardcap is not gurantee that project will be not scam! I know projects that collected over 30m $ and after just stole money

[soulripper]

as we see hardcap is not gurantee that project will be not scam! I know projects that collected over 30m $ and after just stole money

I see a lot already happen in here and i just can one thing about it. Never believe what your eyes see and never take something easy if you see something that might too good to be true. Sometime yeah i did hit jackpot but almost of the time i hit shit tokens for a dozen time now.

[perla]

ICO is not a guarantee that the project will be successful, because most ICO projects are still limited to concepts and do not have clear references,
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?

Really agree, even project that in minute reach hardcap, almost die and get dumped in market. I think all of it not really depends on hardcap. Even softcap, when developer really serious on their project, it will attract new investors and make project can be better.

[acholagi]

as we see hardcap is not gurantee that project will be not scam! I know projects that collected over 30m $ and after just stole money

This supervision is indeed an important thing that must be done by many parties if you see projeck that is able to get tens of millions in ico because there are many who do not match expectations

[rijaljun]

ICO is not a guarantee that the project will be successful, because most ICO projects are still limited to concepts and do not have clear references,
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?

That's true, people invest in a project because they love the idea and they help a project to reach the hardcap. But, no one knows if the team could really deliver project development, no one knows if the team could make the dream comes true. That's why hardcap could never be a guarantee that the project will have a real use in the future.

[bering]

Lately i was seen not much ICO's projects reach to hard cap anymore even there was plenty of ICO's failed and even not reach to soft cap but indeed most of ICO's which reach to hard cap most likely will be dump after listing on the exchange and some of them even cannot bounce back again with eventually the investors cannot get profit and the worst situations is investors cannot ROI

[Ifemini]

Yes you are right
Success of a project depends on its hardwork and sheer determination
If a project is dent on running away with funds just like ironx did

Then, nothing like hardcap or softcap impacts

[--DarkSecrets--]

Lately i was seen not much ICO's projects reach to hard cap anymore even there was plenty of ICO's failed and even not reach to soft cap but indeed most of ICO's which reach to hard cap most likely will be dump after listing on the exchange and some of them even cannot bounce back again with eventually the investors cannot get profit and the worst situations is investors cannot ROI

that's right. Additional is a Hard cap is only the maximum possible amount with the tokens that they are selling. Some of the ICO now is falling or a failure to raised their required minimum amount whilst in todays ICO's might have a new variety which they could partner with the exchange and to have an IEO anyway to be talk about hardcap. This is most often basis of success and the use of the project if it has a huge potential how the token sale was been done and sold. This is just on what i've been observe and with my own experience.

[ryan992]

Yes its true that a project which reach hardcap no guarantee in the future, but a project which reach hardcap actually will develop because if you reach the hardcap its means its good project and get full support from commuity and investors

[Barbut]

ICO is not a guarantee that the project will be successful, because most ICO projects are still limited to concepts and do not have clear references,
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?

I agree thats not a guarantee, but it will make things easier for the team to invest in technology, equipment, to pay for advertising, or what ever, point is that with money everything is easier. My opinion are facts of the past, bitcoin didnt have fund raising, but look where it is, some projects have more than million dollars investments and yet they didnt show a lot for that money. There are no guarantees in crypto apparently, take everything with suspicion, ask question, think twice before you invest, be careful and you will be fine.

[trudovik]

It seems to me that if the project was assembled by hardcap, then it is, on the contrary, very bad, because very many investors have already acquired what they wanted, so it will not be beneficial to make someone an offer. It's my opinion.

[Alpinat]

Me personally. I saw many of the projects that reach their hard cap but then again it will just be turned out to be a scam. Many of the people see that If a specific project reaches hard capital it will be a success but no its not. We should all just make sure that we do proper research for us to be not scammed by these project owners.

[thamisephoenix]

I really have been thinking about this for quite a while now. There are just too many factors that actually come into play, scams being at the top of the pile. Even teams that were initially legit might get their heads turned by the amount of funds at their disposal after a successful IC

[Kaneki11]

ICO is not a guarantee that the project will be successful, because most ICO projects are still limited to concepts and do not have clear references,
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?

Most ico's that claims to have reached hardcap are later exposed as lie.. and sometimes do play an exit scam on their investors .. it's just funny

[H1N1]

ICO is not a guarantee that the project will be successful, because most ICO projects are still limited to concepts and do not have clear references,
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?

I think they didn't really hit the hardcap. There were several ICO projects that fabricated their raised money.
If they were hitting hardcap, many peoples should create the volume using their coin in the market, and the price wouldn't dropped too much.

[Yaunfitda]

Of course, it's just arbitrary numbers, what's important is that if they are going to sustained that growth or there will be incoming dumps. I've seen a lot of projects this year alone reaching hard cap but as soon as the token is listed, the price drops significantly.

On the contrary there are also some project who did good despite not having. reach their hard cap. So it really depends on the project and the team behind.

[antsam]

It is true that it is not a guarantee, but achieving Hardcap means that they have enough funds that they need to maximize their projects according to their roadmap and whitepaper. Many ICO projects that reach hardcap are serious projects and have succeeded in realizing the products they have planned

[Whosdaddy]

I also agree with you, there are some ICO that have reached hardcap but after list coin in market they have very cheap prices and their products are not released soon, I don't know that team works slowly or indeed they don't use well-collected funds

Some of their project were never really created to be carried out, they just bring up ICO, register it on exchange and abandoned the project, so that the investors can blame the loss of their fund on failed project or dumping, meanwhile they know what they were doing, they only pushed the product forward to get the attention of people to invest, and late divert their attention, while they are busy stuffing the money off their wallet into Fiat.

Right now, I am still interested in investing in the ICO market, but I am very careful with the new ones, I do thorough screening before daring to participate while I focus more on projects on the top 30 of the coinmarketcap for investment.

[Nolimitz84]

ICO is not a guarantee that the project will be successful, because most ICO projects are still limited to concepts and do not have clear references,
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?

It all depends on the project and the team.If the project has a target audience and an interested circle of people who are ready to invest in the project without an ICO, then why should it conduct an ICO?Many projects have collected Hard Cap but did not develop their project and Vice versa, many projects with a modest budget are very successful in the market.So everything is relative.

[levvv]

ICO is not a guarantee that the project will be successful, because most ICO projects are still limited to concepts and do not have clear references,
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?

Even with only reaching the softcap target, actually the ICO can go success if they keep developing the project.
The hardcap can be made up by the team to make investors join and buying more token.
Even the hardcap project could be turned into a scam project, like Titanium blockchain back then.