Hardcap ICO is no guarantee that the project will succeed

[ityandsyn]

ICO is not a guarantee that the project will be successful, because most ICO projects are still limited to concepts and do not have clear references,
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?

      That's right man,  since most of ICO project are scam and not a legit , they just collecting money from investors by means of selling their coin then they will disappear completely .
      And some legit coins are go directly to the exchange then they sale it for very low price .

[1714609026]

1714609026

[1714609026]

1714609026

[1714609026]

1714609026

[tabas]

This is one of the reasons its always a good idea to invest in projects with pro teams,whatever challenges that comes they will be ready

With a known team, you can be pretty sure that the project is going to work and they are serious with what they do. Someone who's reputable on this industry will never put his reputation at stake just for the sake of money. Invest wisely and don't be too blind with the promised potential return upon investing into such ICOs. You need to be good at checking ICOs now because many of them has shown the same symptoms on what's good and bad project.

[DES_MX]

ico's hardcap has become not really a determinant associated with achievement, it is important may be the team's overall performance the way the group can function difficult therefore the bridal party has been in trade nevertheless possess great costs and never the rip-off. We regard for that accomplishment associated with softcaps, however, the group is effective, instead of attaining hardcap, however, the group does the useless as well as hazy work, lastly rip-off.

[ridha inoue]

yes you right, project with hardcap is not proof that project will success.
the first time i think is what that project is real project or just scam, then if that token or coin lauch what it will survive when Bounty hunter dump and when it survive in market what it have a good progress to build up that token.
we must extra becareful about choose what the best for me.

[deodivine1]

When a project hits hardcap, it's a good sign but never a guarantee that it's a good project or will do well.  Some projects exit scam even after hitting hardcap, some fake the hardcap, some do not hit hardcap but still do well.  I've seen a project which barely hit softcap and listed very fast on a decent exchange.

[cytpoway121]

Truth is that
Most icos do not even reach softcap; not mention hardcap

They only make the news announcement to drive the desired hypes
Sell on fomoers on exchange listing and exit away

[odukoyaewatomi27]

This is very true. The fact that a project meets its Hardcap does not automatically means it will succeed on the exchange and because a project didn't meet the Hardcap doesn't automatically mean it won't succeed on the exchange. It all depends on the exchange it lists and the demand for the project tokens.

[rafajunior99]

This is one of the reasons its always a good idea to invest in projects with pro teams,whatever challenges that comes they will be ready

With a known team, you can be pretty sure that the project is going to work and they are serious with what they do. Someone who's reputable on this industry will never put his reputation at stake just for the sake of money. Invest wisely and don't be too blind with the promised potential return upon investing into such ICOs. You need to be good at checking ICOs now because many of them has shown the same symptoms on what's good and bad project.

I never thought that a team could be a mainstay for the ICO to be good, it only exists in 2017 not for now. Well, that's why everyone believes that if their ICO project doesn't reach the specified target, there will be a refund. I think many ICOs say that in their projects but not as expected and they will disappear by themselves.

[shoreno]

This is one of the reasons its always a good idea to invest in projects with pro teams,whatever challenges that comes they will be ready

With a known team, you can be pretty sure that the project is going to work and they are serious with what they do. Someone who's reputable on this industry will never put his reputation at stake just for the sake of money. Invest wisely and don't be too blind with the promised potential return upon investing into such ICOs. You need to be good at checking ICOs now because many of them has shown the same symptoms on what's good and bad project.

I never thought that a team could be a mainstay for the ICO to be good, it only exists in 2017 not for now. Well, that's why everyone believes that if their ICO project doesn't reach the specified target, there will be a refund. I think many ICOs say that in their projects but not as expected and they will disappear by themselves.

in the year of 2017 most ico's are legit so it does not matter if thier team is compose of pro people or not but now most ico's these days are unsuccesful so chosing the best team for an ico is a must because that may increase your chances of getting a succesful ico  .

aside from checking the team , there are also other factors that we should look when choosing a good ico . few examples would be checking thier road map , checking their white paper , checking thier details , etc ....

[BennyK]

Of course, reaching or even surpassing the set hard cap is not a guarantee for the success of a project. It is just an indication for a successful phase of the development of the project and based on the expertise of the team, the amount raised can be squandered on unnecessary aspects which may finally lead the project hanging in the air without yielding any good results.
Lots of factors come to play for the success of a project which include the expertise level of the team, the product of the project, the demand level of the product, the road map, the community of the project etc.

[Mianae]

ICO is not a guarantee that the project will be successful, because most ICO projects are still limited to concepts and do not have clear references,
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?

The only thing which guarantees the success of a project is the development team, utility of the project and community itself. If the team is actively working on their project development delingently fulfilling their road map only then can they be successful.

[Serco]

This is one of the reasons its always a good idea to invest in projects with pro teams,whatever challenges that comes they will be ready

With a known team, you can be pretty sure that the project is going to work and they are serious with what they do. Someone who's reputable on this industry will never put his reputation at stake just for the sake of money. Invest wisely and don't be too blind with the promised potential return upon investing into such ICOs. You need to be good at checking ICOs now because many of them has shown the same symptoms on what's good and bad project.

I never thought that a team could be a mainstay for the ICO to be good, it only exists in 2017 not for now. Well, that's why everyone believes that if their ICO project doesn't reach the specified target, there will be a refund. I think many ICOs say that in their projects but not as expected and they will disappear by themselves.

if team could not reach specified target usually they will postponed the projects.and trying to get another solution for crowdfunding.and investors will be harmed with this policy , they could not request refund their money if this condition happen.

[terencio]

A  hard cap does not guarantee the success of the ICO, but not reaching hard cap does not mean a failure. Because sometimes the idea is perfect from a technical side , but the team cannot deliver it to the community.

[mayukus4life]

You are very right to say running a successful ICO (reaching hardcap) is not a guarantee that the project will succeed at the long run. Most especially, it has to do with the real life use case of the project and dedication of the project team to be focused in order to achieve its project aim(s). Projects that didn’t do ICO sometimes are serious because they put in extra effort and personal resources to see how far they can go.

[Sacramentus]

ICO is not a guarantee that the project will be successful, because most ICO projects are still limited to concepts and do not have clear references,
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?

well yea, this is quite certain, there has been many projects who claimed to reach hardcap but still not doing good in the market.  Is is very important to make some proper research on projects before going into them and not just depend on the hype.

[xysheeh03]

Yes, reaching hard cap is not a guarantee that the ico project would be successful, however it is the first step that the project has a potential to grow and develop more, even reaching only soft cap, there's a possibility that the ico project would develop.

[shark69]

ICO is not a guarantee that the project will be successful, because most ICO projects are still limited to concepts and do not have clear references,
but projects that don't make ICO or premine are usually serious and good projects.
and I also agree on this, what about your opinion?

ICO is just a way to find funds from investors, so in my opinion ICO does not guarantee the project is successful or not.
The success or failure of the project is seen from developments that are up to date and also transparent and do not exceed the specified time limit.

[rachman mahesa]

Actually it is no guarantee to succeed in the future. All that depends on the seriousness of the project team. If the project is good in ideas and succeeds in ico, but in future developments they can be said to fail, that means the project team is not serious about developing their project.

[Garrygold]

I know a lot of companies that conducted their ICO,did a hardcap , but did not go to the stock exchange , and there are those that went to the stock exchange , but immediately the price of their tokens fell . The indicator is neither the collection of money, but the team's desire for further development

[Free1bitco.in]

Actually it is no guarantee to succeed in the future. All that depends on the seriousness of the project team. If the project is good in ideas and succeeds in ico, but in future developments they can be said to fail, that means the project team is not serious about developing their project.

you are right. making a project that is also needed will be the thing that guarantees that the project can be successful. at this time, there have been several projects that I have seen getting their hardcaps, it's just that not all went well when the project was running.