SCAM: Bitcoin SV (BSV) - fake team member and plagiarized white paper

[hv_]

Here are the public figures that still believe Craig is Satoshi:

Calvin Ayre
Jimmy Nguyen
John McAfee

lol - when did you fall in love with twitter 'news' trolls ?

Get some DECENT ppl - with DECENT backgrounds - not bagholgers, but why I tell ya

Can you add anybody to this list? I know simple trolling is much easier for you as it requires very little brainpower and no research.

Nope - name calling is ur business

[nutildah]

Can you add anybody to this list?

Nope

Didn't think so.

In other news, Craig got caught in another lie earlier today. This time lying about Satoshi's birthdate being attached to his vistomail email account. It wasn't. It was the date he used when creating his P2P Foundation profile.

https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1247142197323075586


Vistomail, being a privacy-centric email service, doubtfully even had a place to enter your birthday. I registered for an account just now and there was no "birth date" option (granted it has since changed owners).

How anybody can be so blind as to continue to support this guy when he gets caught in a new lie every other day is beyond me.

[hv_]

Can you add anybody to this list?

Nope

Didn't think so.

In other news, Craig got caught in another lie earlier today. This time lying about Satoshi's birthdate being attached to his vistomail email account. It wasn't. It was the date he used when creating his P2P Foundation profile.

https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1247142197323075586


Vistomail, being a privacy-centric email service, doubtfully even had a place to enter your birthday. I registered for an account just now and there was no "birth date" option (granted it has since changed owners).

How anybody can be so blind as to continue to support this guy when he gets caught in a new lie every other day is beyond me.

trolling the trolls, by feeding with usless details

you got caught again - and reacting

 meh, it even wont help telling ya.


in the mean time:

BitCoin is ready an scales - as designed
Open for enterprise business

trolls go different segregated nichy - segwit

[BitcoinFX]

Can you add anybody to this list?

Nope

Didn't think so.

In other news, Craig got caught in another lie earlier today. This time lying about Satoshi's birthdate being attached to his vistomail email account. It wasn't. It was the date he used when creating his P2P Foundation profile.

https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1247142197323075586


Vistomail, being a privacy-centric email service, doubtfully even had a place to enter your birthday. I registered for an account just now and there was no "birth date" option (granted it has since changed owners).

How anybody can be so blind as to continue to support this guy when he gets caught in a new lie every other day is beyond me.

trolling the trolls, by feeding with usless details

you got caught again - and reacting

 meh, it even wont help telling ya.


in the mean time:

BitCoin is ready an scales - as designed
Open for enterprise business

trolls go different segregated nichy - segwit

...

Was this information in his account? Where was this information originally taken from?

nothing - u got trolled by op

@hv_ You are the 'troll' here. Stop lying to people and spreading misinformation and falsehoods.

BSV is NOT Bitcoin and CSW is NOT satoshi.

...

@achach Yes the information was presented by the real satoshi (NOT CSW) at:

- http://p2pfoundation.ning.com/profile/SatoshiNakamoto

The information on that site has unfortunately been added to in recent times, however the original pages are accessible via the wayback machine ...

- https://web.archive.org/web/20110318063527/http://p2pfoundation.ning.com/profile/SatoshiNakamoto

snapshot March 18th 2011, when the real satoshi was still around and active both at ning and this forum ...

...

The ning website pages are one of the original sources where I discovered and read about Bitcoin (BTC) <2010 ...

"Re: Welcome to the new Bitcoin forum!" ...
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5.msg188#msg188

Unlike Craig Wright, I have Signed and Verified some of my 'old' BTC wallets and addresses, which are clearly related to my own history with Bitcoin and the BitcoinTalk forum ...

"Topic: Verifying my (old) zero balance wallet address for blockchain research etc.," ...
- https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4630066.0

Furthermore, I'm still here on BitcoinTalk to this very day !

This is how identity works in Bitcoin (BTC).

 

[Iamtutut]

Sugar daddy Ayre:


https://twitter.com/tututpouet/status/1247425279028613120

[tmfp]

Plagiarism is more serious than most people think. It is a criminal breach of the copyright act and is also a criminal fraud — Craig Wright, 2008

You should know, asshole.

[BitcoinFX]

Plagiarism is more serious than most people think. It is a criminal breach of the copyright act and is also a criminal fraud — Craig Wright, 2008

You should know, asshole.

"Craig Wright's 2008 Master of Laws dissertation is heavily plagiarized. This article explores the plagiarism in depth.

https://medium.com/@paintedfrog/craig-wrights-llm-dissertation-is-full-of-plagiarism-f21439ea8a47 "

- https://twitter.com/painted_frog/status/1248322472589570050

...

Dr. Mr. Craig Wright ...

...

"
"... The Northumbria University assessment regulations (ARNA, 2005) define plagiarism as:

'The unacknowledged incorporation in a student's work of material derived from the work (published or unpublished) of another.' ..."

Source: - https://cragside.northumbria.ac.uk/everyone/skillsplus/55388426/page_02.htm

https://twitter.com/NorthumbriaUni  "

- https://twitter.com/BitcoinFX_BTC/status/1248610463102853120

...

"LOL. He’s revising the paper. Those are the edits he’s making. He just submitted a revision to SSRN and it’s now under review. It’s all archived. Open your eyes
https://twitter.com/painted_frog/status/1248628432465952768 "

- https://twitter.com/painted_frog/status/1248632863332990977

...

"UPDATE: "Revision under review by SSRN"
https://web.archive.org/web/20200410145856/https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2953929 "



- https://twitter.com/painted_frog/status/1248628432465952768

...

"Craig Wright accused of plagiarizing large sections of Master’s dissertation"
- https://cointelegraph.com/news/satoshi-claimant-craig-wright-accused-of-plagiarizing-law-degree

- https://twitter.com/Cointelegraph/status/1248667946987081728

[hv_]

Lol, when was the real date of submission? You do such low trolling...

[BitcoinFX]

Lol, when was the real date of submission? You do such low trolling...

"Inb4 we see he's revised his paper to add references to these authors.

You're about 12 years too late, Craig."
- https://twitter.com/painted_frog/status/1248631004656435200

Posted: 22 Apr 2017
Last Revised: 10 Apr 2020
Date Written: April 17, 2008

...

"If you want to download the version I reviewed for the plagiarism article, right now is the time.

He's going to revise the paper and his followers will say the one I reviewed was fake. Just watch

download: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2953929 "
- https://twitter.com/painted_frog/status/1248632218412625921

Now Craig 'removed' it (or the SSRN site admins did) ...

Original ...

- https://web.archive.org/web/20200328041312/https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2953929

 

#plagiatoshi #faketoshi #fraudtoshi

Craig is NOT satoshi and BSV is NOT Bitcoin.

[TravelMug]

Earlier we have seen that some "unknown miner" is taking over the hash power.



https://twitter.com/LinaSeiche/status/1248233613008625664

Should BCH be concerned and alarmed this time? 

[JayJuanGee]

Earlier we have seen that some "unknown miner" is taking over the hash power.



https://twitter.com/LinaSeiche/status/1248233613008625664

Should BCH be concerned and alarmed this time?  

Oh?  I did look up that website, and as I type this message, it does show bcash sv as costing more to attack per hour than bcash abc, so $8,326 and $7,433 respectively.

https://www.crypto51.app/

Note also that as I type this message, bitcoin has a per hour attack cost of $544,550, ethereum $83,770 and litecoin $13,880.

[hv_]

Earlier we have seen that some "unknown miner" is taking over the hash power.



https://twitter.com/LinaSeiche/status/1248233613008625664

Should BCH be concerned and alarmed this time?  

Oh?  I did look up that website, and as I type this message, it does show bcash sv as costing more to attack per hour than bcash abc, so $8,326 and $7,433 respectively.

https://www.crypto51.app/

Note also that as I type this message, bitcoin has a per hour attack cost of $544,550, ethereum $83,770 and litecoin $13,880.

The funny thing is, despite (!) it should be such cheap, nothing happens.

Where is the logic here?

Oh, that got SegWitted  

[JayJuanGee]

Earlier we have seen that some "unknown miner" is taking over the hash power.



https://twitter.com/LinaSeiche/status/1248233613008625664

Should BCH be concerned and alarmed this time?  

Oh?  I did look up that website, and as I type this message, it does show bcash sv as costing more to attack per hour than bcash abc, so $8,326 and $7,433 respectively.

https://www.crypto51.app/

Note also that as I type this message, bitcoin has a per hour attack cost of $544,550, ethereum $83,770 and litecoin $13,880.

The funny thing is, despite (!) it should be such cheap, nothing happens.

Where is the logic here?

Oh, that got SegWitted  

The logic hv_ is that you come off as almost completely incomprehensible.

The lower the cost to attack then apparently the easier to attack and the more incentive to attack, but probably there are not very many entities or individuals that really want to spend resources on attacking various shitcoins such as bcash SV or ABC - because it is NOT really a good use of resources and likely NOT really easy to profit overall or even to waste time and energies in that direction.. let those projects fail on their own.. even if it might take 20 to 50 years, because smarter people are just not going to be wasting their time involved in that crap.

Sure of course the fucktards including those two bcashes that use the same mining algorithm as bitcoin would love to spend resources to attack bitcoin, if they are able to muster up enough, because they perceive that they can benefit from that, and especially if they can attempt to strategically direct some attacks, yet it remains crazy-ass expensive to even attempt to accomplish any kind of meaningful attack on bitcoin, especially relative to any other of the coins (at least 50x more expensive than the various bcashes), as can be seen in that 51% attack website that I linked.

[juslesly]

There are many project where they take seemingly dishonest team member, but they intentionally do so to better promote their product.

[hv_]

There are many project where they take seemingly dishonest team member, but they intentionally do so to better promote their product.

Blockstream?

[TravelMug]

Bitcoin Forks Halving Epic Fail:

Fork Block Rewards Halved, Barely Anyone Noticed

The halving that matters is a little over a month away. Sometime in mid-May, Bitcoin block rewards paid to miners for discovering new blocks will drop from 12.5 BTC to 6.25 BTC.

This week, Bitcoin Cash (BCH, formerly known as BCHABC) and Bitcoin SV (BSV, formerly known as BCHSV) went through their first halving events.

They both enjoyed momentary bumps in price, by about 11 and 19% respectively. Those gains were fairly immediately wiped out, however, with their reward halvings failing to have a lasting price impact.

In fact, the ABC halving resulted in a dramatic exodus of miners. Block 630,000 triggered the reward halving to 6.25 BCH on Wednesday. It took two hours for block 630,001 to be mined. The speed of BCH is 116 transactions per second. That fell to 1.11 TPS.

The slump in network activity was predicted by Coin Metrics:

    “When Bitcoin Cash and Bitcoin SV halve their block rewards, this should force miners to direct even more hash power to Bitcoin as it will still have a 12.5 native unit block reward (instead of 6.25) for about a month longer.”

https://magazine.cointelegraph.com/2020/04/11/bitcoin-forks-halving-epic-fail-moon-lambo-nailed-it/

[hv_]

Bitcoin Forks Halving Epic Fail:

Fork Block Rewards Halved, Barely Anyone Noticed

The halving that matters is a little over a month away. Sometime in mid-May, Bitcoin block rewards paid to miners for discovering new blocks will drop from 12.5 BTC to 6.25 BTC.

This week, Bitcoin Cash (BCH, formerly known as BCHABC) and Bitcoin SV (BSV, formerly known as BCHSV) went through their first halving events.

They both enjoyed momentary bumps in price, by about 11 and 19% respectively. Those gains were fairly immediately wiped out, however, with their reward halvings failing to have a lasting price impact.

In fact, the ABC halving resulted in a dramatic exodus of miners. Block 630,000 triggered the reward halving to 6.25 BCH on Wednesday. It took two hours for block 630,001 to be mined. The speed of BCH is 116 transactions per second. That fell to 1.11 TPS.

The slump in network activity was predicted by Coin Metrics:

    “When Bitcoin Cash and Bitcoin SV halve their block rewards, this should force miners to direct even more hash power to Bitcoin as it will still have a 12.5 native unit block reward (instead of 6.25) for about a month longer.”

https://magazine.cointelegraph.com/2020/04/11/bitcoin-forks-halving-epic-fail-moon-lambo-nailed-it/

Last I checked btc also halves soon - and very 4 years again, but has no on-chain capacity - not even for linear growth

COVID 19 shows very hefty what happens if you dont plan for (excess) capacity - going viral

epic fail - segwit hail ?

[Iamtutut]

Craiggy forgetoshi aka perjuretoshi got a Federal slap from Judge Bloom:

Source: https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536/gov.uscourts.flsd.521536.454.0.pdf


And also:


Then again


And here comes the spanking


I expect the next episode to be very fun.

[JayJuanGee]

Bitcoin Forks Halving Epic Fail:

Fork Block Rewards Halved, Barely Anyone Noticed

The halving that matters is a little over a month away. Sometime in mid-May, Bitcoin block rewards paid to miners for discovering new blocks will drop from 12.5 BTC to 6.25 BTC.

This week, Bitcoin Cash (BCH, formerly known as BCHABC) and Bitcoin SV (BSV, formerly known as BCHSV) went through their first halving events.

They both enjoyed momentary bumps in price, by about 11 and 19% respectively. Those gains were fairly immediately wiped out, however, with their reward halvings failing to have a lasting price impact.

In fact, the ABC halving resulted in a dramatic exodus of miners. Block 630,000 triggered the reward halving to 6.25 BCH on Wednesday. It took two hours for block 630,001 to be mined. The speed of BCH is 116 transactions per second. That fell to 1.11 TPS.

The slump in network activity was predicted by Coin Metrics:

    “When Bitcoin Cash and Bitcoin SV halve their block rewards, this should force miners to direct even more hash power to Bitcoin as it will still have a 12.5 native unit block reward (instead of 6.25) for about a month longer.”

https://magazine.cointelegraph.com/2020/04/11/bitcoin-forks-halving-epic-fail-moon-lambo-nailed-it/

Last I checked btc also halves soon - and very 4 years again, but has no on-chain capacity - not even for linear growth

COVID 19 shows very hefty what happens if you dont plan for (excess) capacity - going viral

epic fail - segwit hail ?

Even though you, hv_, have concluded that bitcoin is insufficiently prepared for exponential growth of adoption (implying that there is something deficient in regards to bitcoin's ability to voluminously transact), your conclusory nonsense has largely supported that bitcoin's security remains prepared for exponential growth in securing value.  Therefore, if you look at various other aspects of bitcoin including hashpower and tendencies for hashpower, mining, nodes and other infrastructure, such as various second layers, are studied and built around bitcoin, you should be able to recognize that bitcoin is currently prepared to secure even another 100x in BTC's value. 

Sure, with another 100x increase in value, from here, BTC's system might start to show over-extension and that it needs to build and develop more, but that seems to be how bitcoin works.  There is a kind of back and forth building and hyping up and more building and hyping up, so yeah there are bottoms in there, too, but the bottoms seem to be going up as well as the tops, and I doubt that any of that is going to be true in regards to either of the bcashes.  Both of the bcashes are continuously changing their narrative and trying to attract onchain capacity, but no one really trusts either of those shitcoins because their support and security is astroturf at best... which does not appear to be the case with bitcoin.

Yeah, we will see in the coming months, and may even take a couple of years, whether bitcoin experiences another exponential growth period and to find out if bitcoin is able to secure value that is likely going to be pumped into it, in exponential ways, in the coming years.  Sure, some of the scam coins, including the two bcashes, might hang onto the security of bitcoin, but those shitcoins are NOT really adding much if any value, besides perhaps providing some avenues to attract suckers into the space and maybe, if those suckers do not become too bitter by how they got scammed by the bcashes, they will come to recognize that bitcoin is the more solid place to spending their time, efforts and money (investing).

[ScamViruS]

Bitcoinsv prove again how insidious they are. A respected member (Bruno) of the forum has died and bitcoinsv gave this feedback on his profile. Scammer are always scammer.



https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=24792