SCAM: Bitcoin SV (BSV) - fake team member and plagiarized white paper

[actmyname]

I ask any BSV supporters to answer this question which was ignored in their main thread:

Burning curiosity: why tack on all the extra stuff onto the chain?

Is it supposed to be a use case or a monetary transfer protocol?Before you ask about any false dichotomy, consider why merging the two would be better than having just two independent systems.

[TheNewAnon135246]

I ask any BSV supporters to answer this question which was ignored in their main thread:

Burning curiosity: why tack on all the extra stuff onto the chain?

Is it supposed to be a use case or a monetary transfer protocol?Before you ask about any false dichotomy, consider why merging the two would be better than having just two independent systems.

BeCaUsE cRaIg DeSiGnEd BiTcOiN tHaT wAy!

I also asked them how new mining farms are supposed to sync a new full node in the case that they will actually have full 1TB blocks: 1 TB per block = 144 TB per day = 1.08 PB per week.

It will literally become insanely expensive (if not impossible) to sync a full node from scratch (and continue to run one).

[actmyname]

I also asked them how new mining farms are supposed to sync a new full node in the case that they will actually have full 1TB blocks: 1 TB per block = 144 TB per day = 1.08 PB per week.

It will literally become insanely expensive (if not impossible) to sync a full node from scratch (and continue to run one).

This addresses the point:

Moore's Law is cool but what happens in the case where the data exceeds the download speed of the nodes?
How about when the uncapped block sizes result in too much data for the central locations to store?
Oh... high transaction fees will prevent that, is that right? Is that not what the point of large blocks was? To prevent high tx fees?

[BitcoinFX]

Don't sweat it. He's got the Tulip Trust to look forward to in a few short weeks, right?

Then we're all going to be reduced to cowed silence while he personally drives from door to door and forces us to inhale his red socks.

...

What ? 

CSW is not Satoshi and BSV is not Bitcoin.

Did you really believe that this is Satoshi, trolls?:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=3

Still waiting proofs

"Since early 2015 Craig Wright has been publicly touting himself as the creator of Bitcoin.

Nearly 5 years on and NOT ONE SINGLE piece of credible evidence or public proof has been provided. Nothing, nada, zilch.

Those that still believe, ask yourself why do you believe.."
- https://twitter.com/jimmy007forsure/status/1191269045531602944

...

Not *Satire*
"... "I made this" - Faketoshi meme edition "
- https://twitter.com/CryptoScamHub/status/1191221418555576326



...

"What's going to happen to Craig Wright now -- having apparently broken an agreement to settle in principle, after stringing the other side & Court along for 2 months -- is that he'll end up with a massive judgment against him & will lose every single motion in the case."
- https://twitter.com/stephendpalley/status/1191004838898917376

"Mr Hayden Otto with Dr. Craig Wright - video timestamped at infamous CSW quote. Seems very relevant and for max LOLz now "
- https://www.reddit.com/r/bitcoincashSV/comments/ciavrf/mr_hayden_otto_with_dr_craig_wright_video/

[Phinnaeus Gage]

Swap out dude on rigth with ...

[xtraelv]

https://twitter.com/CalvinAyre/status/1191284725920542720?s=19



https://coingeek.com/calvin-ayre-passes-on-buying-dave-kleiman-estate-because-it-holds-no-assets/

Perhaps someone should advise the court of this. I distinctly see CSW name on the court documents stating that "the parties" are negotiating a settlement.

So it is just a play of words. Craig may not have been present but  Ayre and his lawyers were not negotiating on his behalf ?


If they were NOT representing Craig - then did they inform the court ?  Were the plaintiffs aware that they were specifically not negotiating with Craig or anyone representing him ?

How does that work with privileged information in the USA ?

The motion granted by the court was for "the parties" to negotiate a settlement.

Latest order for more time:

[Iamtutut]

The Court is aware, settlement has failed and new witnesses have been summoned with the agreement of the Court.

Nov 5, 2019

PAPERLESS ORDER granting 290 Expedited Motion for out of state deposition. Plaintiffs are permitted to take the deposition of Mr. Wilson on November 8, 2019 in Washington D.C.. The Plaintiffs shall provide Defendant's counsel with the ability to attend the deposition via videolink. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom (BB)

[xtraelv]

The Court is aware, settlement has failed and new witnesses have been summoned with the agreement of the Court.

Nov 5, 2019

PAPERLESS ORDER granting 290 Expedited Motion for out of state deposition. Plaintiffs are permitted to take the deposition of Mr. Wilson on November 8, 2019 in Washington D.C.. The Plaintiffs shall provide Defendant's counsel with the ability to attend the deposition via videolink. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom (BB)

I was not referring to the new motions.

I was referring to the specific statement stating that Craig was in no way involved with the negotiations.
To me that appears in contradiction to what the motion stated.

[Iamtutut]

The Court is aware, settlement has failed and new witnesses have been summoned with the agreement of the Court.

Nov 5, 2019

PAPERLESS ORDER granting 290 Expedited Motion for out of state deposition. Plaintiffs are permitted to take the deposition of Mr. Wilson on November 8, 2019 in Washington D.C.. The Plaintiffs shall provide Defendant's counsel with the ability to attend the deposition via videolink. Signed by Judge Beth Bloom (BB)

I was not referring to the new motions.

I was referring to the specific statement stating that Craig was in no way involved with the negotiations.
To me that appears in contradiction to what the motion stated.

Ah, ok. Well, usual fraudtoshi lies.

[TheNewAnon135246]

Perhaps someone should advise the court of this. I distinctly see CSW name on the court documents stating that "the parties" are negotiating a settlement.

Ira's lawyers are following everything that happens on Twitter/Coingeek etc. They have replied to tweets about Craig's contradictions/forgeries/lies in the past .

[Iamtutut]

No wonder why fraudtoshi and Calvin Ayre go along so well. They're a bunch of pathological liars.
https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1192464845641269248

[gentlemand]

No wonder why fraudtoshi and Calvin Ayre go along so well. They're a bunch of pathological liars.
https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1192464845641269248

Even if Kleiman had anything to do with BTC, and there's zilch to suggest he did, there's no way someone with his level of expertise would leave behind machinery with anything anyone could access without his assent.

Craigy suggesting they fish out his his Commodore 64 from the cupboard and cheerfully cut and paste all those wallet.dats is laughable.

[mosprognoz]

I have reasons to believe that there was a hidden premine of BSV. The scenario was the same with BTG (Bitcoin Gold)

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2253633.0

Craig is a super greedy idiot and he would not miss such a chance of a Get Rich quickly scheme. 

[TheNewAnon135246]

I have reasons to believe that there was a hidden premine of BSV. The scenario was the same with BTG (Bitcoin Gold)

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2253633.0

Craig is a super greedy idiot and he would not miss such a chance of a Get Rich quickly scheme. 

Care to share those reasons?

[mosprognoz]

I have reasons to believe that there was a hidden premine of BSV. The scenario was the same with BTG (Bitcoin Gold)

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2253633.0

Craig is a super greedy idiot and he would not miss such a chance of a Get Rich quickly scheme.  

Care to share those reasons?

Same dudes that were shilling for BTG scam are shilling now for BSV. There are a lot of similarities between that shitcoins. Even the websites have some similarities.

https://bitcoingold.org/

https://bitcoinsv.io/

BTG had a 200 000 hidden premine. Some scammers became millionaires in one week after listing. Craig would never miss such possibility.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2253633.0

[tmfp]

themos, please help, close this troll's topic

What are you doing with the forum name Bitcoin SV anyway? Are you pretending to be some official representative and not just the two bit invested shill that you are?
SV seems to be riddled with people pretending to be something they aren't.
Fuck off.

[gentlemand]

themos, please help, close this troll's topic

What's with these whiny bitch appeals to authority? Is that not the antithesis of what Bitcoin stands for? Are you not men?

Why not pay the OP 100 BTC to close it? I'd do it for that amount, but I would add who paid me to and why. Good honest market forces in action.

Please note that would be actual Bitcoin, not any pisspoor imitation.

[Last of the V8s]

https://twitter.com/beincrypto/status/1192855638377938946

Unbelievable scenes at #AIBCsummit as @RichardHeartWin confronts Craig Wright during his $BSV talk #blockchainisland

As CSW finished his talk and began walking off stage, Richard Heart shouted: “Why did you lie about being Satoshi?”. Wright then walked back on stage, @RichardHeartWin was handed a mic by staff and the conversation began. That’s where the first video starts.

Staff then cue music after a couple of minutes and Craig is escorted off stage. People were shaking hands and taking selfies with Richard once this happened, calling him a “hero” and a “legend”.

https://beincrypto.com/craig-wright-confronted-by-richard-heart-at-aibc-summit-staff-pulls-plug/
aka: a shitshow


https://twitter.com/alistairmilne/status/1192887820685328385

So @Tether_to just announced they are supporting @PeterMcCormack in his defence against Craig Wright

[nutildah]

https://twitter.com/beincrypto/status/1192855638377938946

Unbelievable scenes at #AIBCsummit as @RichardHeartWin confronts Craig Wright during his $BSV talk #blockchainisland

As CSW finished his talk and began walking off stage, Richard Heart shouted: “Why did you lie about being Satoshi?”. Wright then walked back on stage, @RichardHeartWin was handed a mic by staff and the conversation began. That’s where the first video starts.

Staff then cue music after a couple of minutes and Craig is escorted off stage. People were shaking hands and taking selfies with Richard once this happened, calling him a “hero” and a “legend”.

https://beincrypto.com/craig-wright-confronted-by-richard-heart-at-aibc-summit-staff-pulls-plug/
aka: a shitshow

This is great.

"You're only a public figure because you cosplay as Satoshi."

LOL

[dragonvslinux]

I have reasons to believe that there was a hidden premine of BSV. The scenario was the same with BTG (Bitcoin Gold)

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2253633.0

Craig is a super greedy idiot and he would not miss such a chance of a Get Rich quickly scheme.  

Care to share those reasons?

Same dudes that were shilling for BTG scam are shilling now for BSV. There are a lot of similarities between that shitcoins. Even the websites have some similarities.

https://bitcoingold.org/

https://bitcoinsv.io/

BTG had a 200 000 hidden premine. Some scammers became millionaires in one week after listing. Craig would never miss such possibility.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2253633.0

That sounds like you've got a "hunch" rather than evidence. BSV doesn't need a premine in order to be a scam, Craig's fraudulent behavior is more than enough. I don't think it's helpful slandering the project like this either, it only helps to weaken the well-referenced scam accusation against this project.

...likely to make allegations without references that would be damaging to current or future scam accusations. Doesn't appear to understand that you can't make false accusations, even if a project is scam, or accused of such.