Request Support (or Opposition) for Flags here!

[JollyGood]

Tagged.

This was an excellent informative post, thank you: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5379400.msg59179587#msg59179587

I knew there was a thread like this.
Yesterday I created a Flag type 1 against CatenaX, please support.

I just created a flag, please support it here:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2907

Warned both CMC and CG and soon CEX will be delisted/tagged.

[1715113490]

1715113490

[1715113490]

1715113490

[1715113490]

1715113490

[Baskin198]

FLAG: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2912

It has been over 1 month now and stake is playing games with me. I have created a thread with all the details - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5383835.0

Long story short

Stake has frozen $80k ($70k originally but due to price rise is now $80k) and it has been a month and more now. They said the odds provider is doing some investigation but failed to provide any update at all neither able to provide any progress report on what they are doing and how long they will take.

The stake integrity team (which I was asked to contact) has not replied to my emails for more than 20 days and have even stopped replying to my host when she (Djiana) asks them for an update.

I am left with no option but to raise a flag against them at this stage.

Please support/oppose the flag based on facts and not their prior reputation and/or your experience because even I have immense respect for stake but what they are doing now is beyond acceptable.

[FatFork]

I created a Flag type 1 against MrCrank, please support.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2939

A so-called bounty manager promotes a fraudulent project (with plagiarized whitepaper) that takes advantage of the humanitarian crisis in Ukraine.
    
Reference: [WARNING] UKAN Plagiarized Whitepaper

[logfiles]

AccountsLegend is a serial account seller who can not be trusted and is still active making new posts and seeking account related services

A flag was opened against user by 2double0, but for some reason DiamondCardz who is now inactive opposed it 

Requesting for more support such that the type 1 flag becomes active
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=627

[shasan]

AccountsLegend is a serial account seller who can not be trusted and is still active making new posts and seeking account related services

A flag was opened against user by 2double0, but for some reason DiamondCardz who is now inactive opposed it 

Requesting for more support such that the type 1 flag becomes active
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=627

I have supported the flag and I am surprised to see that DiamondCardz has opposed the flag who is in default trusted list. It may happen by mistake, have you contacted with DiamondCardz about this fact. I have not found any reason behind opposition of the flag.

[NeuroticFish]

I am surprised to see that DiamondCardz has opposed the flag who is in default trusted list. It may happen by mistake, have you contacted with DiamondCardz about this fact. I have not found any reason behind opposition of the flag.

1. DiamondCardz is inactive for almost a year.
2. From what I see, he's trusted by 3 active accounts and 21 inactives. Maybe, just maybe (food for thought), inactives' vote should not matter in DT elections.

[Solosanz]

This was started because of many withdrawal problem comes up on Bitlucy thread and there's still on going victim who didn't get his funds back.

Request for support to warn everyone who visit their ANN to know this problem.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2984

[nullius]

I ask that at least 3 DT members support this flag (direct discussion to the relevant Scam Accusations topic):

Flag 2998 created.

Due largely to the factors mentioned in this topic, I believe that anyone dealing with Dabs is at a high risk of losing money, and guests would be well-advised to avoid doing so.  This determination is based on concrete red flags which any knowledgeable & reasonable forum user should agree with, and it is not based on the user’s opinions.

A non-exclusive summary of some facts in evidence which, when taken together, constitute concrete red flags which any knowledgeable & reasonable forum user should agree with:

• Dabs runs and actively promotes a thread whereby he takes donations, allegedly for charitable purposes and not for his own benefit.
• Dabs also runs an escrow service.
• Dabs has, thus far, three publicly revealed instances of begging behind the scenes in PMs.
• In one instance of begging, Dabs explicitly lied:  He said that he had not begged “in 30 to 40 years”.  It is now known that he had secretly begged in at least one other recent prior instance, only four months before.  (When else?  How many others?)
• Dabs sent not less than one of those begs to a total stranger with whom he had no prior connection or contact whatsoever before that day.
• Dabs sent not less than one of those begs to a total stranger who, unbeknownst to him, was actually poor.  When, with understandable irritation, the recipient of the beg essentially pointed out that it was horrible to beg shamelessly to a poor person who had never begged, Dabs’ response was arrogantly and quite callously to allege that his situation was “harder”.
• In 2019 and 2020, Dabs alleged that he “lost 95% (maybe more) of [his] coins” and “lost everything since last year”.  In 2022, one of Dabs’ apparent friends publicly claimed that Dabs “is in an uncomfortable financial situation and could use any and all help”.  Although actual, alleged, or putative poverty does not in itself constitute evidence of dishonesty or untrustworthiness, it is a red flag when combined with such behaviours as begging to strangers in PMs.  How far will Dabs go?  What else will he do, if he is in actual or alleged financial desperation?

The foregoing list of concrete red flags could already be continued.  It will thus conclude for now, to avoid excessively repetitive redundancy and waste of time.

Negative trust feedback will be issued on the same basis.

[jamyr]

Request for Opposition or Support,

i prefer you support but feel free to oppose and/or give your opinion as to why you oppose or support the flag.
Flag for Bitsler

Thank you folks.

[Jawhead999]

Request for support my flag against this newbie promoting ponzi scheme.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3006

[LoyceV]

Request a support for ponzi scheme site

You may want to rephrase that

[AB de Royse777]

Requesting to support the flag against EdenHazard.

Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3041

The account has changed hand and the original owner never paid me 0.3 btc that he took as loan from me.

[Eternad]

Requesting to support my flag against scammer that still actively selling on the marketplace section of the forum. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3061

[shasan]

Please support or oppose the flag.
Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3065
Reference: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5429186.0
User: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1016829

[Coinbox1]

There are 2 active flags for 1 already-solved case. The 2 flags are for the same case, and the case itself has been resolved, confirmed by the OP and labeled on the subject line already.

Please help to oppose the flags because a valid flag should only be "a set of pretty clear fact-statements" according to theymos. Since the case itself is resolved, the flag is no longer a "a set of pretty clear fact-statements".

Flag 1: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3066
Flag 2: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3062
Reference: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5425888.0
Profile: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2569866

[LFC_Bitcoin]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=140827#newfeedback (scroll to top of page to see flag)

yogg, degenerate gambler who stole funds.

(Proof) - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5434506.msg61586158#msg61586158

Please support the flag.
Unfortunately it’s only a type 1 flag. We need somebody who was scammed to do a red, type 3 flag. This will have to do for now though.

[LoyceV]

(scroll to top of page to see flag)

Flag link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3083

2023-01-13 Fri 09.11h
source: loyce.club

3083 Active. (Support | Oppose) LFC_Bitcoin flagged yogg (type 1, see why). Supported by LFC_Bitcoin, LoyceV, bullrun2020bro. Opposed by nobody.

[fillippone]

Trust list updated, flag supported.
Incredible to see the price for which a person is keen on betraying another’s trust. Apparently, yogg's price was 50K.

[decodx]

yogg, degenerate gambler who stole funds.
<...>

Flag supported. As I am not active on the Collectibles board, this is my first time reading about this. It would be helpful for someone to provide a brief summary or TLDR; on the Reputation board.

[GazetaBitcoin]

I also supported the flag.

Flag supported. As I am not active on the Collectibles board, this is my first time reading about this. It would be helpful for someone to provide a brief summary or TLDR; on the Reputation board.

Long story short:

- yogg is the manager of Cold Key cards project
- after a period of depression, when he did not have motivation anymore to continue the project and stalled customers' (already paid) orders he decides to resume his work though
- at some point he realizes that he kept a back-up of private keys for an entire series of cards
- for unknown reasons (some saying he is addicted to gambling) he decides to cash-out all the BTC stored on those cards (the cards were in the possession of their owners)
- someone realizes that his card was emptied and runs a topic in Reputation board: My Cold Keys Just Got Swiped! All Halving Sets!!
- yogg admits his unthinkable gesture
- according to krogoth, yogg stole 0.00625 BTC from each card, total prejudice being around 50.000$
- end of story.