Bad projects equals Bad results

[suryapro]

indeed, we rarely find bounty projects that can survive as owned by tokoin and tachyon. maybe the answer that comes in will be, because both of these projects have good management products and management. thus providing great results for its users. namely bounty hunters and investors

[fvb]

This makes me remember Tokoin and tachyon protocol bounty campaign, after hunters are paid they made huge profits from this bounties and still the value are rising and not dumped, so my question is why are other bounties getting ruined after launch? Or after hunters sell their rewards? Probably because they are bad projects, hunters aren't to be blame here isn't it? Good projects will never dumped because hunters sell off

Bounty hunters have a small percentage of all project tokens issued.  And in my opinion this is a big mistake, that hunters destroy the development of the company by selling their tokens.  Most likely the project and its technological value does not have much significance for development and the need for the economy, that is, utility for users.

[Valzador]

The title is written is true.
However, this only applies to this year's campaign. Last year, good and bad projects provided that their development team could create FOMO and listings on the famous exchange at that time, even bad projects can make you earn lots of money.

[103deltafox]

That's true, I can also remember tachyon , even after hunters sold, the coin price value kept increasing same with tokoin so in my opinion, I don't think bounty hunters are the cause of a project dump, normally the effect of BTC is seen on these project but some without good use even when BTC is stable they keep loosing price value even without the token being shared to bounty hunters.

[pgbit]

Risk can be defined as an uncertain event or condition that results in a positive or negative effect on a project's objectives. Whereas, an issue can be defined as an event or condition that has already happened and has impacted or currently impacting the project objectives. The biggest challenge faced by all organisations that wish to use project management in crypto market.

[key4co.in]

This makes me remember Tokoin and tachyon protocol bounty campaign, after hunters are paid they made huge profits from this bounties and still the value are rising and not dumped, so my question is why are other bounties getting ruined after launch? Or after hunters sell their rewards? Probably because they are bad projects, hunters aren't to be blame here isn't it? Good projects will never dumped because hunters sell off

Some projects have a buy back strategy which prevent hunters from dumping and causing negative price effect. I remember REMME, an old project which placed about 1000ETH buy wall just so hunters do not make it dump hard on IDEX wayback. Tachyon really did well, even mooned hard after Bounty distribution and hunters who rushed to sell regretted. Hence, good projects come up with good strategies to limit massive dips, even though they can't completely prevent it.

[gundala]

~Hence, good projects come up with good strategies to limit massive dips, even though they can't completely prevent it.

Yes at least it can be prevented, so there is no more reason that bounty hunters are causing dumps. The development team should have prepared a good strategy to prevent the dump, didn't they also plan the bounty campaign? they should also prepare strategies to strengthen the market.

[ampere]

You are right, all bad projects end up giving bad results and this is why investors must wary , do their research and make the best of choices because often time bad projects bring profits on the short term which can be tempting.

Always avoid bad projects, don't just trade all, have a few gems and maintain your portfolio wisely

[$anounimus$]

This makes me remember Tokoin and tachyon protocol bounty campaign, after hunters are paid they made huge profits from this bounties and still the value are rising and not dumped, so my question is why are other bounties getting ruined after launch? Or after hunters sell their rewards? Probably because they are bad projects, hunters aren't to be blame here isn't it? Good projects will never dumped because hunters sell off

If I say this is the art of Project, where investors and owners must be prepared with all conditions after the launch of a project. This where they need sharp observations and it is not enough to only study theories and market conditions. Some project needs practice and requires project manager to always be flexible don't fail and to become a success future.

[lienfaye]

You are right, all bad projects end up giving bad results and this is why investors must wary , do their research and make the best of choices because often time bad projects bring profits on the short term which can be tempting.

Always avoid bad projects, don't just trade all, have a few gems and maintain your portfolio wisely

Indeed. What we can expect on bad projects? of course bad outcome.
Even the hunters dump their coins after getting the rewards, it should not be a reason for the coins to plunge and never recover back. Because good projects with high demand and real use case would not end up like that. Extensive research can help us to avoid bad projects.

[Pirate46Mx]

actually all projects have the same goal, where they want their project to succeed and many people want to invest in it, but the cause of a project to be bad or not developed after launching due to lack of investors who are interested in their project, so that makes the price of coins more destroyed or even worthless.

[Lasky366]

Yes correctly you said!  Hunter never be reason for dump in any project.In bounty how many dollars they pay?Maximum 100k,200k or even 500k.But it's never gonna destroy any project if they have real demand & have usecase.But most of the case project failed to gain their funds, lack of investors.That's why project stopped their developing & result is known to all.Token became valueless.

[bgaf]

You are definitely right about that, bad projects equal bad results. If we would make more research about that, can see that there were much more projects that could not get any good result from own projects. No doubt these numbers were higher in 2018 than in other years. The main reason is if investors would be interested in the project, this will be successful, on the contrary, it has to die.

Thats always the case for every ICO projects. What is the percentage that these new ones will succeed? Most likely near 90% and only few survived. I witness many projects being expose on many investors and most likely they only invest on known or legit one. Airdrop and bounty is rare for these so the chance those projects rely on promotion on these hunters were probably scam one.

[BTCbengi]

I think there are two main reasons for the disruption of projects. Firstly, it is probably because the amount of tokens they sold when the ICO started was not enough to continue their project. They can still pay bounty hunters exactly for the tokens they earn. However, it cannot go on any exchange or its price is very low. It can be considered that the project has failed.
The second reason is that they do not know how to control time points so that bounty hunters can use the tokens they receive to trade. I think this is very important. Most bounty hunters will sell their tokens as soon as they receive it. That makes the price of tokens very low and makes the project fail

[thekrakennnm]

This makes me remember Tokoin and tachyon protocol bounty campaign, after hunters are paid they made huge profits from this bounties and still the value are rising and not dumped, so my question is why are other bounties getting ruined after launch? Or after hunters sell their rewards? Probably because they are bad projects, hunters aren't to be blame here isn't it? Good projects will never dumped because hunters sell off

Value and price don't depend on hunters sell-off or something similar it only depends on development process and other stuff going in exact project/with the exact coin. If the price goes down it is all because the team was not working well enough.

[Farma]

You are right, all bad projects end up giving bad results and this is why investors must wary , do their research and make the best of choices because often time bad projects bring profits on the short term which can be tempting.

Always avoid bad projects, don't just trade all, have a few gems and maintain your portfolio wisely

some bad projects have characteristics that sometimes the project has unclear goals. in fact, some projects do not have the latest news for investors. however, such a project will slowly disappear. there are enough projects like that for now, and to be honest, it's very difficult to avoid them.

[qigong13]

I agree with you on bounty hunters aren't the ones to blame if after the promotion and the coin going nowhere. But usually, the bad project can't see why they failed and take it on the others. They try to blame hunters to convince people holding their coin that the faults weren't on them. Pretty pathetic move.

[umbara ardian]

actually all projects have the same goal, where they want their project to succeed and many people want to invest in it, but the cause of a project to be bad or not developed after launching due to lack of investors who are interested in their project, so that makes the price of coins more destroyed or even worthless.

If they want to have investors, then their projects must first have quality and get products. Existing investors were too scared of paper-based projects, all of them disappeared after the end of the ICO and left a huge landfill.

[max6575]

my personal makesup project with the label of DOGEM is future plan on working with terms of development to provide mobile apk with service on tasks of social communication.

the project now is still in preparation terms as expecting to compound of more with funding with different scheme on running modulation. one of those is RAMM scheme with the listing on popular brokerage to offer returns as we manage works on initial tasks on finance.

as the future terms of service deliverance, the offers might be available for pupils of indonesia but we will not expanding work to work on wider field of service reference as focusing to manage extensive expends on appealing of more with different work on following entrance with the briefing tables with team of develoment.

rejecting and denying of worse of envyness by those developer as i am not an communist in indonesia.

greeting,

viva chesster
national patriot of libertarian

[shadowdio]

Yep hunters should not blame the dump of the tokens, they just work to promote the project let them sell the token if they want. If the project is good then we don't have to worry the price because it will bounce back and will mooning.