~snip~
I would like Suchmoon, LoyceV, Lauda, Jollygood, hilariousandco, The Pharmacist, Avirunes, owlcatz, Lutpin, TheUltraElite, Hhampuz, teeGUMES, o_e_l_e_o, TheBeardedBaby, coinlocket$, asche, Coolcryptovator, DireWolfM14, morvillz7z, TalkStar, YOSHIE, Yahoo, Little Mouse, Steamtyme, logfiles, ScamViruS, big_daddy, bL4nkcode, lovesmayfamilis, cryptoaddictchie, witcher_sense, notblox1, Alex_Sr and all those good forum users to look at the case we have here.
I wish marlboroza was online.
(Edited)
My name was mentioned in the OP so I decided to make a post here:
- I did not receive a PM from LFC_Bitcoin about this subject
- I did not receive payment from Sportsbet
~
Piss off with your retarded tone complaint. As I stated multiple times already, I think the accuser is full of shit but if they wanted to fix the flag there was nothing stopping them.
hacker1001101001 is a pathetic troll who just cannot help but poke his head inside threads to create division but refuses to post in the thread that exposed his multi-accounts to answer questions put to him:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5213922.msg54743154#msg54743154~
~snip~
Trying to go after LFC_Bitcoin for his PMs just highlights the fact that the you have no solid case. If any recipients feel those PMs were inappropriate they should report them to admin. But there are hundreds of DT members whom LFC_Bitcoin didn't PM and they can still support or oppose the flag unencumbered by whatever bias you suspect here.
You rightly pointed out just going after LFC_Bitcoin on the basis of alleged PMs is proof there is no solid case against him. When there is a whole thread about supporting/opposing flags why would alleged sending of PMs make this even be considered an issue?:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5153445.0~snip~
As for the accuser, I'm convinced he's a liar. The way he constructs his sentences and the use of certain phrases that are only common to native English speakers make it very hard for me to believe he's using a translator (like he claims.) So yeah, I think he's full of shit.
I'm astonished at the reasoning of a few members in this particular case. On one hand we have the word of a well established business with a long history and reputation of supporting our community, while on the other hand we have the word of a shady newbie, insisting he be compensated more than he deposited. Is it really that hard to understand why I would choose to side with sportsbet.io in this situation?
I agree with you there does seem to be more to this than meets the eye and the amount being contested is tiny. As LFC_Bitcoin mentioned in an earlier post, why would a company turning over multi-million USD$ per year scam a user over such a tiny amount?
