Rollbit.com | Crypto's Most Rewarding Casino 👑

[Slow death]

Hello Rollbit, where do you have your license? We would like to update our records with the correct information.

It's strange that I'm not seeing Rollbit casino listed on your website. I find it very strange because your website lists weird casinos like LTCcasino, while Rollbit, which has a good reputation, is not listed. I know that you're the one in charge of your website and I don't want to use this post to tell you what you should or shouldn't do with your website. But I can't understand why casinos like Rollbit and Duelbits are not listed on your website.

[Amphenomenon]

Yeah, as long as the team don't turn around to leave the token behind to give all of their attentions to the building the casino like what betfury did some years back before deciding to turn around after seeing that a lot of people were already complaining about them neglecting the token with which they raised a lot of money from to build the casino.

But all the same, I completely agree that rollbit has been up and doing really, their token is currently in the top 300 tokens, rank 261 at the moment on coinmarketcap, this is basically the casino token with the highest market cap if I am not mistaken, so it is indeed great and let's look forward to where this token will be in the coming five years.

Your second paragraph is among the reason I think the team won't ignore the RLB token and focus mainly on the Casino itself.

Another thing is that don't forget Rollbit also have a trading platform on their casino this innovation shows that they will likely not ignore the development of the token and they have put in more effort for it success to this point and also have learnt something from the Betfury past mistake there with their token. They have been doing well in the growth and success of the token and Casino.

[JiiBs]

Unless there's a big changes to happen then provably this might be the reason on why those CEX would list their token.

But if their performance is the same as what happen these days, I guess they would just get similar result. Unless if they pay huge for listing fee and this people want would provably happen.

Is the chances for success on casino token dependent on the huge fee paid for listing? Because if that’s really the case then, I see no reason why we wouldn’t find a lot of shit tokens using these means to introduce, pump and dump tokens once they get the profit they desire from a project.

The success of a token is mainly attributed to its use cases. In essence, we could attribute that to the performance of the casino itself and the campaigns about its token. A lot of users cares really less about this since, they could do just what they want with altcoins but, how the token is presented could change a lot of that.

[ultrloa]

Yeah, as long as the team don't turn around to leave the token behind to give all of their attentions to the building the casino like what betfury did some years back before deciding to turn around after seeing that a lot of people were already complaining about them neglecting the token with which they raised a lot of money from to build the casino.

But all the same, I completely agree that rollbit has been up and doing really, their token is currently in the top 300 tokens, rank 261 at the moment on coinmarketcap, this is basically the casino token with the highest market cap if I am not mistaken, so it is indeed great and let's look forward to where this token will be in the coming five years.

Your second paragraph is among the reason I think the team won't ignore the RLB token and focus mainly on the Casino itself.

Another thing is that don't forget Rollbit also have a trading platform on their casino this innovation shows that they will likely not ignore the development of the token and they have put in more effort for it success to this point and also have learnt something from the Betfury past mistake there with their token. They have been doing well in the growth and success of the token and Casino.

For having those buy back and burn feature for their RLB token is good indication that they are not ignoring their token and their development is continuous. Since if more supplies will be burn in future then provably there would be something great to happen so I guess we just need to have long patience with it especially if we look forward for the growth of their RLB token.

I don't know if they make BFG as basis for them not to commit mistakes for their token but for sure they have their ways on how to handle it well knowing that many people are still supporting their token since start of its existence. There would be no question that Rollbit team will exert more effort to gain more success not only for their casino but also with their token to.

[Potato Chips]

Is the chances for success on casino token dependent on the huge fee paid for listing? Because if that’s really the case then, I see no reason why we wouldn’t find a lot of shit tokens using these means to introduce, pump and dump tokens once they get the profit they desire from a project.

TBH, I think there is more to listing than paying a fee. If I think about it, suppose there is a non gambling token out there with the same performance, popularity and from a pretty successful business, I'd say it would have been listed in a tier 1 CEX by now. I would say it's likely that there could be some friction with tier 1 CEX and gamba platforms in general.

[BlackBoss_]

TBH, I think there is more to listing than paying a fee. If I think about it, suppose there is a non gambling token out there with the same performance, popularity and from a pretty successful business, I'd say it would have been listed in a tier 1 CEX by now. I would say it's likely that there could be some friction with tier 1 CEX and gamba platforms in general.

Usually listing on centralized exchanges requires expensive listing fee and if you don't choose good exchanges with good trading volume generally, your listing fee can be spent for nothing. Your trading pair will be very in active and has very low trading volume if your token is listed on a small exchange.

If Rollbit want to list RLB token on more centralized exchanges, they will be very carefully in selection process on their next targets. They shown good dedication to build up the business, and continue development as well as support on RLB token but next steps must be assessed very thoroughly in cost and benefit.

[JiiBs]

Is the chances for success on casino token dependent on the huge fee paid for listing? Because if that’s really the case then, I see no reason why we wouldn’t find a lot of shit tokens using these means to introduce, pump and dump tokens once they get the profit they desire from a project.

TBH, I think there is more to listing than paying a fee. If I think about it, suppose there is a non gambling token out there with the same performance, popularity and from a pretty successful business, I'd say it would have been listed in a tier 1 CEX by now. I would say it's likely that there could be some friction with tier 1 CEX and gamba platforms in general.

That’s it, that’s the take for real. I wouldn’t say friction between them though, as it’s just business you know. The CEX gets to take there percent on l trades done on their exchange while the gambling platform gains from the buys and sells or utility of its token within its platform. It’s always going to be due to its use case. Let’s not forget, majority of the people that invest in cryptocurrencies, especially them altcoins are always there for their own benefits. With casino tokens having its use mainly within or on the platform, it’s often limited and so does its performance. This makes it a little difficult to find investors outside the casino patronage which in turn, affects token growth.

[Haunebu]

Another thing is that don't forget Rollbit also have a trading platform on their casino this innovation shows that they will likely not ignore the development of the token and they have put in more effort for it success to this point and also have learnt something from the Betfury past mistake there with their token. They have been doing well in the growth and success of the token and Casino.

The RLB token is definitely on top of all crypto gambling tokens currently comfortably though it would take something else for it to crack the top 100 since the competition is crazy fierce up there.

Shuffle's token is right up there close to RLB while some other tokens like FUN etc are following them closely.

[ultrloa]

Another thing is that don't forget Rollbit also have a trading platform on their casino this innovation shows that they will likely not ignore the development of the token and they have put in more effort for it success to this point and also have learnt something from the Betfury past mistake there with their token. They have been doing well in the growth and success of the token and Casino.

The RLB token is definitely on top of all crypto gambling tokens currently comfortably though it would take something else for it to crack the top 100 since the competition is crazy fierce up there.

Shuffle's token is right up there close to RLB while some other tokens like FUN etc are following them closely.

That track is so though knowing that there are lots of good altcoins out there. This is big challenge that needed to surpass by the team, but who knows right? maybe if those big changes which can help increase its demand together with those listings which people look forward to happen will came then maybe with those situation we can see RLB reach that far.

This will be a great milestone especially there's no other casino token reach that far if I'm not wrong with my statement here.

I don't follow the progress of $SHFL but let see if they could bring good competition with RLB.

[EarnOnVictor]

The Rollbit 5 years birthday celebration has started already.
5 years of doing well and becoming even better.

https://x.com/rollbit/status/1894240907790037150?t=iQhN_sajsKffYDv4pJzr9w&s=19

Time flies very fast but this news on 5 year celebration means Rollbit company started their business in online gambling 1 year before their appearance in Bitcoin forum.

5 years of operations with a lot of product developments that all show their great dedication for Rollbit brand and top-notch service for their users. In addition, it's about one market cycle since the launches of their Rollbit RLB token and Rollbots. Cryptocurrency market is in hard time but if history repeats, the peak of this market cycle will be still many months ahead.

I think we can expect even more in the coming market cycle for the RLB token, the marketing strategy and over all efforts that the team has put on this project is already paying and we are going to see more. I won't be surprised that with time a big CEX may list the RLB token because we have already seen some other casino even having the RLB token. Good job, this 5 years has really shown a lot of positive growth from the effort they have put to make this casino a top one and another 5 years will even make it more remarkable, bigger and better.

I don't know where this is coming from, if big CEX didn't list it for the brilliant performance before now, why did you think they would list it now? Better tokens and even coins are yearning for listing by big exchanges but have not succeeded. This makes me know that it takes more than good performance and sentiment for some exchanges to list them because there are coins/tokens lower than RLB in the CMC (#255) ranking that have been well-listed for long.

Unless there's a big changes to happen then provably this might be the reason on why those CEX would list their token.

But if their performance is the same as what happen these days, I guess they would just get similar result. Unless if they pay huge for listing fee and this people want would provably happen.

I didn't say what I said to justify what exchanges are doing, they could be idiotic at times and political for whatever reason they have. Lately, people started calling out those big exchanges regarding $Pi and even Coinmarketcap because, for about 2 weeks now, $Pi has been unjustly rated.

At a point, it was at over #3200 position despite holding a self-reporting $10B MC, which got to over $17B at a point. It is now $11B and still ranked #201 at the time of writing. Holding as low as that for that long is not justified.

The same goes for CEXs, for their peculiar reasons, they list nonsense coins/tokens and do not list better ones. You can imagine when TON was listed on Binance compared to the time it was launched and doing well in the market. It's beyond any factor we can think of.

[Catenaccio]

I didn't say what I said to justify what exchanges are doing, they could be idiotic at times and political for whatever reason they have. Lately, people started calling out those big exchanges regarding $Pi and even Coinmarketcap because, for about 2 weeks now, $Pi has been unjustly rated.

At a point, it was at over #3200 position despite holding a self-reporting $10B MC, which got to over $17B at a point. It is now $11B and still ranked #201 at the time of writing. Holding as low as that for that long is not justified.

The same goes for CEXs, for their peculiar reasons, they list nonsense coins/tokens and do not list better ones. You can imagine when TON was listed on Binance compared to the time it was launched and doing well in the market. It's beyond any factor we can think of.

Pi is a scam coin in a way how it was created, shilled in communities, and many activities so far.

Do anyone see it is very ironicallly that how a scam coin team and its communities borrow an exchange listing to say it is not a scam coin?
And they use another reason, it has a main net launch after years of development, and say it is not a scam coin, another hilarious explanation.

With open source code, it's easy to create a  scam coin, and their let's say 'main net blockchain' is like shit.

It plus with a basic Ponzi scheme of Pi coin, gives me enough reason to conclude that is a scam coin, forever scam coin.

Don't forget scam coins like Bitconnect or Onecoin. Pi coin is one of such Ponzi scam coin and it's uncomparable with RLB token built and supported by Rollbit.

[EarnOnVictor]

I didn't say what I said to justify what exchanges are doing, they could be idiotic at times and political for whatever reason they have. Lately, people started calling out those big exchanges regarding $Pi and even Coinmarketcap because, for about 2 weeks now, $Pi has been unjustly rated.

At a point, it was at over #3200 position despite holding a self-reporting $10B MC, which got to over $17B at a point. It is now $11B and still ranked #201 at the time of writing. Holding as low as that for that long is not justified.

The same goes for CEXs, for their peculiar reasons, they list nonsense coins/tokens and do not list better ones. You can imagine when TON was listed on Binance compared to the time it was launched and doing well in the market. It's beyond any factor we can think of.

Pi is a scam coin in a way how it was created, shilled in communities, and many activities so far.

Do anyone see it is very ironicallly that how a scam coin team and its communities borrow an exchange listing to say it is not a scam coin?
And they use another reason, it has a main net launch after years of development, and say it is not a scam coin, another hilarious explanation.

With open source code, it's easy to create a  scam coin, and their let's say 'main net blockchain' is like shit.

It plus with a basic Ponzi scheme of Pi coin, gives me enough reason to conclude that is a scam coin, forever scam coin.

Don't forget scam coins like Bitconnect or Onecoin. Pi coin is one of such Ponzi scam coin and it's uncomparable with RLB token built and supported by Rollbit.

Ben Zhou is the author of this recent allegation and this is the latest Pi Network rebutal of the allegation.

Talk is cheap, the reality is supreme, and all I see with $Pi till now doesn't look like a scam to me, it's far better than the many shitcoins listed by even Binance, not to mention Bybit the author of more controversy that had listed more shitcoins that are Rug Pull in which millions of people had been swindled with their money in the name of crypto. Pi Network has suffered enough allegations and attacks from the beginning and I have a further reason to believe that it's political, $Pi doesn't look like a Ponzi to me.

You might want to read:

1. https://www.ccn.com/education/crypto/pi-network-crypto (Not A Scam)
2. https://www.binance.com/en/square/post/20237625559105 (Not proven a scam, just speculation)
3. https://cointelegraph.com/learn/articles/what-is-pi-network (Not classified as a scam project)

[Catenaccio]

Ben Zhou is the author of this recent allegation and this is the latest Pi Network rebutal of the allegation.

Ben Zhou said what he said, and said what he believed right thing to do for waking up Pi fans or people who are attracted by Pi. He does a right thing and I respect him for this action.

Talk is cheap, the reality is supreme, and all I see with $Pi till now doesn't look like a scam to me, it's far better than the many shitcoins listed by even Binance, not to mention Bybit the author of more controversy that had listed more shitcoins that are Rug Pull in which millions of people had been swindled with their money in the name of crypto. Pi Network has suffered enough allegations and attacks from the beginning and I have a further reason to believe that it's political, $Pi doesn't look like a Ponzi to me.

Ben Zhou did not simply talk it for fun, and many people did not talk about it for fun. They did it with their deeply and heartfully willingness to help others, but it's up to you and others to continue their belief and bets in Pi coin.

Pi is scam since years ago, not now it doesn't look like a scam like you said. From your arguement, I am sure you are one of Pi fans, want to get rich with it, so good luck to you but if you read my post, even if Pi skyrockets to $400 or $500 like Bitconnect, it will still be a scam coin.

Bitconnect already died and do you consider it as a scam coin or a successful and non scam coin?
Make sure you can differentiate between a sucesssful scam coin, a failed scam coin, and a non-scam coin. Successful or failed, scam coin is always a scam coin.

You might want to read:

1. https://www.ccn.com/education/crypto/pi-network-crypto (Not A Scam)
2. https://www.binance.com/en/square/post/20237625559105 (Not proven a scam, just speculation)
3. https://cointelegraph.com/learn/articles/what-is-pi-network (Not classified as a scam project)

I don't need to read, because I am sure Pi is scam as it is in the past, now and in future. You are in cryptocurrency market long time enough to know what is blockchain, and can easily realize why Pi coin is a scam project. Be woke, it's not too late!

[Wonder Work]

You might want to read:

1. https://www.ccn.com/education/crypto/pi-network-crypto (Not A Scam)
2. https://www.binance.com/en/square/post/20237625559105 (Not proven a scam, just speculation)
3. https://cointelegraph.com/learn/articles/what-is-pi-network (Not classified as a scam project)

I don't need to read, because I am sure Pi is scam as it is in the past, now and in future. You are in cryptocurrency market long time enough to know what is blockchain, and can easily realize why Pi coin is a scam project. Be woke, it's not too late!

The way Pi has started its progress, although there has been no scam here for years, but I think it is better to have a scam than to do this. The kind of work they have been doing for years, later they brought their token unlocking system, then I thought it made no sense to unlock it in this way.

From their process, it can be said that customers will not be allowed to unlock the entire token. What kind of rule is this that they will have to wait for years to unlock the token? This can be said from their activities. Since they could not say that they will not pay the customers, they have slowly progressed in this process. If you think with a common brain, you can see that they know very well how many more years they will have to wait to unlock the Pi token. All in all, their activities seem like a Pi scam to me.

[God Of Thunder]

TBH, I think there is more to listing than paying a fee. If I think about it, suppose there is a non gambling token out there with the same performance, popularity and from a pretty successful business, I'd say it would have been listed in a tier 1 CEX by now. I would say it's likely that there could be some friction with tier 1 CEX and gamba platforms in general.

I have seen similar discussions before. If you noticed, the CEX does not like casinos. If users make transactions with casinos, some freeze their accounts. For example, coinbase freezes a user account if they find that you are making a deposit to a casino. I don't know about other CEX, but I do believe the exchanges do not like casinos.

As for listing casino tokens, I feel most tier 1 exchanges won't even list casino tokens. Do we have any examples of listing casino tokens? I don't remember seeing any exchanges listed casino tokens before. Not sure if we will see it in the future.

[avp2306]

TBH, I think there is more to listing than paying a fee. If I think about it, suppose there is a non gambling token out there with the same performance, popularity and from a pretty successful business, I'd say it would have been listed in a tier 1 CEX by now. I would say it's likely that there could be some friction with tier 1 CEX and gamba platforms in general.

I have seen similar discussions before. If you noticed, the CEX does not like casinos. If users make transactions with casinos, some freeze their accounts. For example, coinbase freezes a user account if they find that you are making a deposit to a casino. I don't know about other CEX, but I do believe the exchanges do not like casinos.

As for listing casino tokens, I feel most tier 1 exchanges won't even list casino tokens. Do we have any examples of listing casino tokens? I don't remember seeing any exchanges listed casino tokens before. Not sure if we will see it in the future.

I don't know if there's something issue with regulation happening on why we see most of casino tokens struggle to be added on big exchange.

I also tried to view some tokens which is under gambling category https://coinmarketcap.com/view/gambling/  have big volumes and I see Arcadeum which got $30m volume which also been listed on Bitget,gate.io,HTX and Lbank which is somehow a decent exchange.

So maybe by this that means other top casino tokens have chance to get listed and its just they need to push to make this happen.

[ultrloa]

I didn't say what I said to justify what exchanges are doing, they could be idiotic at times and political for whatever reason they have. Lately, people started calling out those big exchanges regarding $Pi and even Coinmarketcap because, for about 2 weeks now, $Pi has been unjustly rated.

At a point, it was at over #3200 position despite holding a self-reporting $10B MC, which got to over $17B at a point. It is now $11B and still ranked #201 at the time of writing. Holding as low as that for that long is not justified.

The same goes for CEXs, for their peculiar reasons, they list nonsense coins/tokens and do not list better ones. You can imagine when TON was listed on Binance compared to the time it was launched and doing well in the market. It's beyond any factor we can think of.

Pi is a scam coin in a way how it was created, shilled in communities, and many activities so far.

Do anyone see it is very ironicallly that how a scam coin team and its communities borrow an exchange listing to say it is not a scam coin?
And they use another reason, it has a main net launch after years of development, and say it is not a scam coin, another hilarious explanation.

With open source code, it's easy to create a  scam coin, and their let's say 'main net blockchain' is like shit.

It plus with a basic Ponzi scheme of Pi coin, gives me enough reason to conclude that is a scam coin, forever scam coin.

Don't forget scam coins like Bitconnect or Onecoin. Pi coin is one of such Ponzi scam coin and it's uncomparable with RLB token built and supported by Rollbit.

Ben Zhou is the author of this recent allegation and this is the latest Pi Network rebutal of the allegation.

Talk is cheap, the reality is supreme, and all I see with $Pi till now doesn't look like a scam to me, it's far better than the many shitcoins listed by even Binance, not to mention Bybit the author of more controversy that had listed more shitcoins that are Rug Pull in which millions of people had been swindled with their money in the name of crypto. Pi Network has suffered enough allegations and attacks from the beginning and I have a further reason to believe that it's political, $Pi doesn't look like a Ponzi to me.

You might want to read:

1. https://www.ccn.com/education/crypto/pi-network-crypto (Not A Scam)
2. https://www.binance.com/en/square/post/20237625559105 (Not proven a scam, just speculation)
3. https://cointelegraph.com/learn/articles/what-is-pi-network (Not classified as a scam project)

I don't think the issue about Pi is financial scamming like they are doing ponzi scheme model. But the growing concern before is they are just collecting data which provably could cause harm for people doing it before  https://www.binance.com/en/square/post/14735376441073

But even though they are in good position now still didn't take about they are rather safe and I still warn people to participate on activities with Pi including their submitting their data unto that platform since its truly risky to do it. Bitconnect and One coin are shittiest among these coin although Pi is to far from these and provably all of us could agree that a better coin if we compare with those two shitcoins.

If someone got curious about how they been listed in Binance I think the growing demand and the volumes they got is key factor to make this happen and if RLB could achieve this in future maybe this will also happen with them especially that we see that Binance has list a casino token before.

[Ojima-ojo]

The Rollbit 5 years birthday celebration has started already.
5 years of doing well and becoming even better.

https://x.com/rollbit/status/1894240907790037150?t=iQhN_sajsKffYDv4pJzr9w&s=19

Time flies very fast but this news on 5 year celebration means Rollbit company started their business in online gambling 1 year before their appearance in Bitcoin forum.

5 years of operations with a lot of product developments that all show their great dedication for Rollbit brand and top-notch service for their users. In addition, it's about one market cycle since the launches of their Rollbit RLB token and Rollbots. Cryptocurrency market is in hard time but if history repeats, the peak of this market cycle will be still many months ahead.

I think we can expect even more in the coming market cycle for the RLB token, the marketing strategy and over all efforts that the team has put on this project is already paying and we are going to see more. I won't be surprised that with time a big CEX may list the RLB token because we have already seen some other casino even having the RLB token. Good job, this 5 years has really shown a lot of positive growth from the effort they have put to make this casino a top one and another 5 years will even make it more remarkable, bigger and better.

Yeah, as long as the team don't turn around to leave the token behind to give all of their attentions to the building the casino like what betfury did some years back before deciding to turn around after seeing that a lot of people were already complaining about them neglecting the token with which they raised a lot of money from to build the casino.

But all the same, I completely agree that rollbit has been up and doing really, their token is currently in the top 300 tokens, rank 261 at the moment on coinmarketcap, this is basically the casino token with the highest market cap if I am not mistaken, so it is indeed great and let's look forward to where this token will be in the coming five years.

I don't have any interest in casino tokens anymore, I invested in one in my earlier days in the cryptocurrency investment thing altcoins and I though that the token was going to do well since it was the casino to support its liquidity.


But to my greatest surprise, I lost almost half of my
Investment within a short period let's say around 24 hours after investment and this became my disappointment in casino tokens.

[EarnOnVictor]

Ben Zhou is the author of this recent allegation and this is the latest Pi Network rebutal of the allegation.

Ben Zhou said what he said, and said what he believed right thing to do for waking up Pi fans or people who are attracted by Pi. He does a right thing and I respect him for this action.

Talk is cheap, the reality is supreme, and all I see with $Pi till now doesn't look like a scam to me, it's far better than the many shitcoins listed by even Binance, not to mention Bybit the author of more controversy that had listed more shitcoins that are Rug Pull in which millions of people had been swindled with their money in the name of crypto. Pi Network has suffered enough allegations and attacks from the beginning and I have a further reason to believe that it's political, $Pi doesn't look like a Ponzi to me.

Ben Zhou did not simply talk it for fun, and many people did not talk about it for fun. They did it with their deeply and heartfully willingness to help others, but it's up to you and others to continue their belief and bets in Pi coin.

In a sane world, Ben Zhou doesn't have that say, he should bury his face in shame.

If someone is to be countered and even be behind bars, it should be him with the cheating and atrocities being performed with their platform, especially the global branch. You may not notice this many of them, but I do daily, this guy is a huge bucket shop, deceit and swindlers, so I wonder what such like him would advise me on a project that is doing better than hundreds of what he had listed that I would believe.

Fine, there were allegations but I wonder why the government has not dealt harshly with Pi Network but allowed it to eventually list after many investigations. You are the enemy if you don't cooperate with the big guys, that's what I see here.

You may read this: https://cointelegraph.com/news/pi-network-responds-bybit-scam-claims

[God Of Thunder]

I don't know if there's something issue with regulation happening on why we see most of casino tokens struggle to be added on big exchange.

I also tried to view some tokens which is under gambling category https://coinmarketcap.com/view/gambling/  have big volumes and I see Arcadeum which got $30m volume which also been listed on Bitget,gate.io,HTX and Lbank which is somehow a decent exchange.

I thought we do not have any examples of Casino token listing on centralized exchanges. But when you mentioned arcadeum, I was interested in checking. When I click on the link to their website, it says something is wrong and forwards me to this URL

https://indir-zpf.com/zclkvisitor/87258d98-f8e1-11ef-96f3-128b85a0e2eb/d11f3a10-2cff-11ec-b832-0aea8b85a94f?campaignid=bd41fbd0-d4d7-11ef-b8f4-12832fc4c381

BTW, I also checked that Shuffle actually listed their token on XT.com, which is a centralized exchange. That proves I was wrong with my initial statement. The casino tokens can be listed on exchanges if they pay the listing fees. Some exchanges may allow listing them.