The KRAKEN rises, meaning the 2020 election fraud is being corrected.

[Cnut237]

the disbarred attorney [...] if he is certain the men/women who disbarred him acted wrongly, can't he bring a case against them just like any other person, to get compensation for being wronged?

In this instance, with these two, things they are "certain" about may bear no relation to reality.

But given that the ruling stated that the Powell/Wood lawsuit was a "historic and profound abuse of the judicial process"... then you'd certainly not bet against them raising another frivolous, fact-free claim.

[1714487789]

1714487789

[1714487789]

1714487789

[1714487789]

1714487789

[1714487789]

1714487789

[DaveF]

All judges, at the base of it, are people. Being people, they can be accused of a crime by any other people. Since the disbarred attorney is no longer an officer of the court via his disbarring, and if he is certain the men/women who disbarred him acted wrongly, can't he bring a case against them just like any other person, to get compensation for being wronged?

Once again, judges do not disbar people, the state bar does. The bar is 100% independent of the court system & judges.
And, no in most (all?) states disbarred lawyers cannot sue the bar association for the action of disbarring them.

-Dave

[BADecker]

All judges, at the base of it, are people. Being people, they can be accused of a crime by any other people. Since the disbarred attorney is no longer an officer of the court via his disbarring, and if he is certain the men/women who disbarred him acted wrongly, can't he bring a case against them just like any other person, to get compensation for being wronged?

Once again, judges do not disbar people, the state bar does. The bar is 100% independent of the court system & judges.
And, no in most (all?) states disbarred lawyers cannot sue the bar association for the action of disbarring them.

-Dave

Isn't the state bar made up of attorneys and judges? Do all state bar people disbar an attorney, or just some of them? Nobody is talking about suing the BAR Association. The suit is a claim for relief against the men/women who did what they did in their acting as BAR people.

The BAR Association does nothing without some people doing it under the guise of BAR members. Don't sue the BAR. Sue the people in their capacity as people.

If you are an attorney who earns $500,000 a year, those PEOPLE who disbarred you, causing you to lose $hundreds of thousands a year, better have had their ducks in a row (same as you in your suit), or they could lose their funds as people, not as BAR Association members... and maybe even jail time.

Complaints and claims are two different critters in court. Complaints might get someone disbarred, but a claim could get him his funds back. His best bet would be to file against the people separately, each in a separate claim. This way if one failed, it would not necessarily be failure of them all (depending on what the claims were).

[TwitchySeal]

All judges, at the base of it, are people. Being people, they can be accused of a crime by any other people. Since the disbarred attorney is no longer an officer of the court via his disbarring, and if he is certain the men/women who disbarred him acted wrongly, can't he bring a case against them just like any other person, to get compensation for being wronged?

Once again, judges do not disbar people, the state bar does. The bar is 100% independent of the court system & judges.
And, no in most (all?) states disbarred lawyers cannot sue the bar association for the action of disbarring them.

-Dave

Isn't the state bar made up of attorneys and judges? Do all state bar people disbar an attorney, or just some of them? Nobody is talking about suing the BAR Association. The suit is a claim for relief against the men/women who did what they did in their acting as BAR people.

The BAR Association does nothing without some people doing it under the guise of BAR members. Don't sue the BAR. Sue the people in their capacity as people.

If you are an attorney who earns $500,000 a year, those PEOPLE who disbarred you, causing you to lose $hundreds of thousands a year, better have had their ducks in a row (same as you in your suit), or they could lose their funds as people, not as BAR Association members... and maybe even jail time.

Complaints and claims are two different critters in court. Complaints might get someone disbarred, but a claim could get him his funds back. His best bet would be to file against the people separately, each in a separate claim. This way if one failed, it would not necessarily be failure of them all (depending on what the claims were).

So we're going back to the "All you have to do is say your aren't a person in court and then they can't lock you up " logic, huh.

[BADecker]

All judges, at the base of it, are people. Being people, they can be accused of a crime by any other people. Since the disbarred attorney is no longer an officer of the court via his disbarring, and if he is certain the men/women who disbarred him acted wrongly, can't he bring a case against them just like any other person, to get compensation for being wronged?

Once again, judges do not disbar people, the state bar does. The bar is 100% independent of the court system & judges.
And, no in most (all?) states disbarred lawyers cannot sue the bar association for the action of disbarring them.

-Dave

Isn't the state bar made up of attorneys and judges? Do all state bar people disbar an attorney, or just some of them? Nobody is talking about suing the BAR Association. The suit is a claim for relief against the men/women who did what they did in their acting as BAR people.

The BAR Association does nothing without some people doing it under the guise of BAR members. Don't sue the BAR. Sue the people in their capacity as people.

If you are an attorney who earns $500,000 a year, those PEOPLE who disbarred you, causing you to lose $hundreds of thousands a year, better have had their ducks in a row (same as you in your suit), or they could lose their funds as people, not as BAR Association members... and maybe even jail time.

Complaints and claims are two different critters in court. Complaints might get someone disbarred, but a claim could get him his funds back. His best bet would be to file against the people separately, each in a separate claim. This way if one failed, it would not necessarily be failure of them all (depending on what the claims were).

So we're going back to the "All you have to do is say your aren't a person in court and then they can't lock you up " logic, huh.

Well, no, not exactly. Unless you are an experienced debater, you don't say anything. You carefully write your paperwork, and then constantly refer to it.

Depending on the particular circumstances, you make it really simple for the court. Suppose that Jane stole Tarzan's bone, and Tarzan wanted to get it back. He might take her to court like this, with this simple claim:

----------

NOTICE

Tarzan, man wronged

by

Jane, woman wrongdoer.


Man, Tarzan have bone.
Woman, Jane steal bone.
Return bone to man, Tarzan, plus court costs, and other expenses in the amount of an additional bone.

See exhibit A (picture of bone).

Signed, man, Tarzan _x .

----------

There's the claim. Simple as that.

If the judge asks who the attorney is, or if Tarzan is acting pro se, Tarzan's answer is 'no' to both. "Am present."

If the judge won't let Tarzan stand present without representation, he is contradicting himself. Tarzan was placed on the docket when he presented his paperwork to the clerk of the court. In other words, the judge said 'yes' then, but 'no' once it came to court time. Tarzan has a claim against the man acting as judge, which he can file in a higher court, with a higher judge.


I could write all day about possible happenings in court, but this should be enough to give you the picture. The simple point is, let the paperwork do the talking. Don't deviate from it.

[BADecker]

It's time for the people to use the jury to protect themselves from evil laws that destroy the country.


NESARA: What Really Happened

President Clinton signed NESARA into law on October 10, 2000. At that point NESARA, as with any legislation so acted upon, became a "law of the land", but wait a minute! No one wanted to enforce it. Why? No one wanted to enforce NESARA because this law required the physical and permanent removal from their government positions of all those, who were treasonous. Those, who had deliberately acted outside the Constitution of the Republic, had committed treason. Those who were treasonous included the United States president and vice president, the presidential cabinet, all members of Congress, various government departmental heads, all fifty governors of the fifty states, judges and others.

You ask, "Why would the United States Congress ever pass a law that would, upon enactment, instantly remove them from public office? On March 9, 2000 in a secret joint session of Congress with the walls of the House Chambers lined with Navy Seals and Delta Force, the United States Congress passed the NESARA law unanimously at gun point under the threat of death.

...

[TwitchySeal]

NESARA: What Really Happened[/b]

President Clinton signed NESARA into law on October 10, 2000. At that point NESARA, as with any legislation so acted upon, became a "law of the land"

No. Lol.  Bill Clinton did not sign NESRA.  Neither did any other president.  it wasn't even passed by the House or the Senate.  In fact it wasn't even introduced to congress.  It was a proposal by one member of congress in the 90s.  That's it.

[Tash]

Scott McKay the Entire Trump Presidency Has Been a Military Sting Operation?
https://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2021/09/scott-mckay-the-entire-trump-presidency-has-been-a-military-sting-operation-post-election-video-3757541.html



Guinea President Alpha Conde detained in military coup
https://www.upi.com/Top_News/World-News/2021/09/05/Guinea-President-Alpha-Conte-detained-coup/4171630857530/

[Cnut237]

Here we go, boys and girls. The Kraken is finally starting to lift off the bottom.

Just an observation that this Kraken has now been lifting off the bottom for a little over four months, and is yet to breach the surface.
That's the problem with this mythical beast; it sounds terrifying and world-ending if you believe in that stuff, but it turns out it's all superstition and wishful thinking, and has no bearing on the real world because, fundamentally, it doesn't exist.

[BADecker]

Here we go, boys and girls. The Kraken is finally starting to lift off the bottom.

Just an observation that this Kraken has now been lifting off the bottom for a little over four months, and is yet to breach the surface.
That's the problem with this mythical beast; it sounds terrifying and world-ending if you believe in that stuff, but it turns out it's all superstition and wishful thinking, and has no bearing on the real world because, fundamentally, it doesn't exist.

You had better hope that the Kraken exists, because if it doesn't, the USA has fallen to the technocracy. And when THEY are through with you and all of us, your destruction will be complete.

[BADecker]

Here we go, boys and girls. The Kraken is finally starting to lift off the bottom.

Just an observation that this Kraken has now been lifting off the bottom for a little over four months, and is yet to breach the surface.
That's the problem with this mythical beast; it sounds terrifying and world-ending if you believe in that stuff, but it turns out it's all superstition and wishful thinking, and has no bearing on the real world because, fundamentally, it doesn't exist.

You had better hope that the Kraken exists, because if it doesn't, the USA has fallen to the technocracy. And when THEY are through with you and all of us, your destruction will be complete.

This coming from someone who fell for it.

It's been almost a year since the election.  There is no Kraken.  You're just very gullible.

You had better hope that the Kraken exists, because if it doesn't, the USA has fallen to the technocracy. And when THEY are through with you and all of us, your destruction will be complete.

[TwitchySeal]

You had better hope that the Kraken exists, because if it doesn't, the USA has fallen to the technocracy. And when THEY are through with you and all of us, your destruction will be complete.

This coming from someone who fell for it.

It's been almost a year since the election.  There is no Kraken.  You're just very gullible.

Just an observation that this Kraken has now been lifting off the bottom for a little over four months, and is yet to breach the surface.

More like 10 months.

[BADecker]

You had better hope that the Kraken exists, because if it doesn't, the USA has fallen to the technocracy. And when THEY are through with you and all of us, your destruction will be complete.

This coming from someone who fell for it.

It's been almost a year since the election.  There is no Kraken.  You're just very gullible.

Keep head in sand-hole. Fine with me.

[BADecker]

Another arm of the Kraken.


Liberals FREAK OUT As Trump Republicans WIN OVER 1000 Government Positions!


9-Minute Video - https://generaldispatch.whatfinger.com/liberals-freak-out-as-trump-republicans-win-over-1000-government-positions-drain-the-swamp/

[TwitchySeal]

Another arm of the Kraken.


Liberals FREAK OUT As Trump Republicans WIN OVER 1000 Government Positions!


9-Minute Video - https://generaldispatch.whatfinger.com/liberals-freak-out-as-trump-republicans-win-over-1000-government-positions-drain-the-swamp/

Isn't it the sane Republicans that are freaking out?  The ones that lost their 'government positions'?

[suchmoon]

Isn't it the sane Republicans that are freaking out?  The ones that lost their 'government positions'?

[Tash]

Democracy fell in 9 seconds, the moment where everyone (who chooses to) became free.
https://streamable.com/v2tsh7

[TwitchySeal]

Isn't it the sane Republicans that are freaking out?  The ones that lost their 'government positions'?

[BADecker]

Isn't it the sane Republicans that are freaking out?  The ones that lost their 'government positions'?

https://c.tenor.com/5An20XTvX_4AAAAM/rhino-charging-rhino-running.gif

https://www.dictionary.com/e/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/rino-2-229x300.png

This 12-minute video by Larken Rose should explain what's going on a little better.

The Jones Plantation

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vb8Rj5xkDPk

[TwitchySeal]

Isn't it the sane Republicans that are freaking out?  The ones that lost their 'government positions'?

https://c.tenor.com/5An20XTvX_4AAAAM/rhino-charging-rhino-running.gif

https://www.dictionary.com/e/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/rino-2-229x300.png

This 12-minute video by Larken Rose should explain what's going on a little better.

The Jones Plantation

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vb8Rj5xkDPk

The guy that thought he could evade taxes based on section 861 and ended up in prison.  Cool!

Tax Protester Who Dared U.S. to Prosecute Him Is Convicted of Not Filing Returns

"Mr. Rose argued for his acquittal because, he said, he sincerely believes he does not have to pay taxes."

https://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/13/business/tax-protester-who-dared-us-to-prosecute-him-is-convicted-of-not.html