The KRAKEN rises, meaning the 2020 election fraud is being corrected.

[BADecker]

The Brunson's are appealing for reconsideration.

They got all the way to the SC and got thrown out. Who are they going to appeal to? Some fairy in the sky? Oh, wait...

The Brunson lawsuit has a format that can be followed for anybody who feels he was disenfranchised by Congress, to be able to use the newly adjudicated right to sue any government agent.

It might be happening slowly, but people are starting to wake up and use their rights. The Brunson lawsuit is showing them how.

Showing how to lose.

EDIT: Let me mention. A lawsuit is one lawsuit. If you have 388 people named in your lawsuit, and it is found that only one of them was not guilty but the rest of them were guilty, the whole suit can be thrown out based on its failure regarding that one innocent person. The suit is one.

In other words, this suit should be brought by many people against one of the 388 at a time.

The SC threw the case out because it was illiterate garbage. In other words, not only did the court not find anyone guilty, it didn't see any reason to waste time with the case. Bringing 388 illiterate lawsuits will not make it better but if you want to give money to the Brunsons - feel free.

You have read the suit I take it. Oh, you didn't? It copies other suits that were successful in some cases. The structure, wording, and objects of the suit were not the reasons it lost. But the appeal is to SCOTUS for reconsideration.

The advantage of the suit is that it can be copied and edited for loads of other cases, so that it can be used by people who have wanted a way to sue government agents for a long time. Why is it good for that? Because of what it went through to get to the Supreme court.

[1714492379]

1714492379

[1714492379]

1714492379

[1714492379]

1714492379

[1714492379]

1714492379

[1714492379]

1714492379

[TwitchySeal]

Looks like SCOTUS shot down the Brunson lawsuit

So to summarize the Kraken so far:


- Audit of Maricopa county concluded that Biden definitely won and with a few more votes than the official number)
- Massive lawsuits are ongoing with Dominion suing people like Sydney powell and Fox News for billions for spreading lies that they knew were lies about them.
- Election deniers got stomped in the mid terms.
- Only serious proven fraud that has has been uncovered involved an attempt to count fake electoral votes was committed by Trump and his supporters.
- It's very possible Trump is charged criminally any day now.  
- Biden is the president.  (and becoming a two term president more likely now than it was a year or two ago)

And now this joke of a lawsuit has proven once again that BADecker is the crazy one.  Not everyone else.  

The Brunson's are appealing for reconsideration.

The Brunson lawsuit has a format that can be followed for anybody who feels he was disenfranchised by Congress, to be able to use the newly adjudicated right to sue any government agent.

It might be happening slowly, but people are starting to wake up and use their rights. The Brunson lawsuit is showing them how.



EDIT: Let me mention. A lawsuit is one lawsuit. If you have 388 people named in your lawsuit, and it is found that only one of them was not guilty but the rest of them were guilty, the whole suit can be thrown out based on its failure regarding that one innocent person. The suit is one.

In other words, this suit should be brought by many people against one of the 388 at a time.

So to summarize the Kraken so far:


- Audit of Maricopa county concluded that Biden definitely won and with a few more votes than the official number)
- Massive lawsuits are ongoing with Dominion suing people like Sydney powell and Fox News for billions for spreading lies that they knew were lies about them.
- Election deniers got stomped in the mid terms.
- Only serious proven fraud that has has been uncovered involved an attempt to count fake electoral votes was committed by Trump and his supporters.
- It's very possible Trump is charged criminally any day now.  
- Biden is the president.  (and becoming a two term president more likely now than it was a year or two ago)

And now this joke of a lawsuit has proven once again that BADecker is the crazy one.  Not everyone else.  

The Brunson's are appealing for reconsideration.

I don't think the supreme supreme court will hear it either.  Do you?

The Brunson lawsuit has a format that can be followed for anybody who feels he was disenfranchised by Congress, to be able to use the newly adjudicated right to sue any government agent.

The Brunsons lost.  Appealed to the supreme court. Supreme court said "no, you lost".

Same thing happened to Trump in the 2020 election.  That's why Biden is the president in 2023.

[BADecker]

So to summarize the Kraken so far:


- Audit of Maricopa county concluded that Biden definitely won and with a few more votes than the official number) - Using unconscionable methods that maybe weren't illegal, because voting was left up to the states by the US Constitution.
- Massive lawsuits are ongoing with Dominion suing people like Sydney powell and Fox News for billions for spreading lies that they knew were lies about them. - However, having seen the courts in action against Kari Lake, we know that there has to be a payoff of the judges. It isn't over.
- Election deniers got stomped in the mid terms. - Again, unconscionable methods that maybe weren't illegal, but were against honest principles.
- Only serious proven fraud that has has been uncovered involved an attempt to count fake electoral votes was committed by Trump and his supporters. - Not adjudicated, and certainly not any worse that the unconscionable, illegal, election fraud methods used by the Biden team.
- It's very possible Trump is charged criminally any day now.   - But Biden first, because he did the stealing of classified documents long before Trump was even considered for the Presidency.
- Biden is the president.  (and becoming a two term president more likely now than it was a year or two ago) - President in name only, until a thorough, honest investigation is done.

And now this joke of a lawsuit has proven once again that BADecker is the crazy one.  Not everyone else.  

The Brunson's are appealing for reconsideration.

I don't think the supreme supreme court will hear it either.  Do you? - Nope, I don't think so either. The way to do it is to push for an investigation, first, now. Then tackle each of the Congress people individually.

The Brunson lawsuit has a format that can be followed for anybody who feels he was disenfranchised by Congress, to be able to use the newly adjudicated right to sue any government agent.

The Brunsons lost.  Appealed to the supreme court. Supreme court said "no, you lost".

Same thing happened to Trump in the 2020 election.  That's why Biden is the president in 2023.

Until it's over, it isn't over.

[TwitchySeal]

So to summarize the Kraken so far:


- Audit of Maricopa county concluded that Biden definitely won and with a few more votes than the official number) - Using unconscionable methods that maybe weren't illegal, because voting was left up to the states by the US Constitution.
- Massive lawsuits are ongoing with Dominion suing people like Sydney powell and Fox News for billions for spreading lies that they knew were lies about them. - However, having seen the courts in action against Kari Lake, we know that there has to be a payoff of the judges. It isn't over.
- Election deniers got stomped in the mid terms. - Again, unconscionable methods that maybe weren't illegal, but were against honest principles.
- Only serious proven fraud that has has been uncovered involved an attempt to count fake electoral votes was committed by Trump and his supporters. - Not adjudicated, and certainly not any worse that the unconscionable, illegal, election fraud methods used by the Biden team.
- It's very possible Trump is charged criminally any day now.   - But Biden first, because he did the stealing of classified documents long before Trump was even considered for the Presidency.
- Biden is the president.  (and becoming a two term president more likely now than it was a year or two ago) - President in name only, until a thorough, honest investigation is done.

And now this joke of a lawsuit has proven once again that BADecker is the crazy one.  Not everyone else.  

The Brunson's are appealing for reconsideration.

I don't think the supreme supreme court will hear it either.  Do you? - Nope, I don't think so either. The way to do it is to push for an investigation, first, now. Then tackle each of the Congress people individually.

The Brunson lawsuit has a format that can be followed for anybody who feels he was disenfranchised by Congress, to be able to use the newly adjudicated right to sue any government agent.

The Brunsons lost.  Appealed to the supreme court. Supreme court said "no, you lost".

Same thing happened to Trump in the 2020 election.  That's why Biden is the president in 2023.

Until it's over, it isn't over.

It's 2023.  The 2020 election is over.  Trump lost.  It's over.  Done.  Finished.  Same as this lawsuit.

[BADecker]

It's 2023.  The 2020 election is over.  Trump lost.  It's over.  Done.  Finished.  Same as this lawsuit.

More important, the American people lost. But things are changing with the people. Now that we realize what happened, we are bringing up the Kraken, even if we have to become the Kraken to do it. So, the Trump loss, which was really a loss for the people, is working to clean the swamp by showing us how deeply the swamp is entrenched.

Not finished. Rather, just starting.

[BADecker]

I DO have a question. How long will it take justice to change the election results?


Testimony to Arizona Senate Election Committee Reveals Almost Half the Ballots Ran Through Maricopa County Tabulators Failed


https://thestarnewsnetwork.com/2023/01/25/testimony-to-arizona-senate-election-committee-reveals-almost-half-the-ballots-ran-through-maricopa-county-tabulators-failed/
The election committee of the Arizona Senate held a hearing on Monday featuring the results of an investigation into Maricopa County's 2022 midterm election conducted by the election integrity group We the People AZ (WPAZ). Commissioned by outgoing Senate President Karen Fann (R-Prescott), the group submitted public records requests to Maricopa County Elections Department to obtain the data. The leader of WPAZ, Shelby Busch, testified to the committee chaired by State Senator Wendy Rogers (R-Flagstaff) that 464,926 ballots fed into tabulators on Election Day in Maricopa County, 217,305 were rejected, which is nearly a 50 percent failure rate.

Busch told the legislators it was a "complete systemic failure" of signature verification and urged "legislative intervention." She warned that the system is "vulnerable to fraud."

Dr. Walter Daugherity, a math professor at Texas A&M University, testified that he was 99.999 percent confident that there were 290,644 bad signatures accepted in the election.

Of the verified signatures, 47,366 failed to meet the basic Arizona Secretary of State standards, the group found. Busch showed how they failed multiple points of the 12 points of signature verification. A full 10 percent "egregiously" failed signature verification.

Busch said every single one of the 446 tabulators in Maricopa County failed the allowable error standard allowed by the Electoral Assistance Commission (EAC). The EAC allows for only a misfeed rate of .002 percent, or one out of every 500. Some had a failure rate as high as 95 percent.
...

[TwitchySeal]

I DO have a question. How long will it take justice to change the election results?


Testimony to Arizona Senate Election Committee Reveals Almost Half the Ballots Ran Through Maricopa County Tabulators Failed


https://thestarnewsnetwork.com/2023/01/25/testimony-to-arizona-senate-election-committee-reveals-almost-half-the-ballots-ran-through-maricopa-county-tabulators-failed/
The election committee of the Arizona Senate held a hearing on Monday featuring the results of an investigation into Maricopa County's 2022 midterm election conducted by the election integrity group We the People AZ (WPAZ). Commissioned by outgoing Senate President Karen Fann (R-Prescott), the group submitted public records requests to Maricopa County Elections Department to obtain the data. The leader of WPAZ, Shelby Busch, testified to the committee chaired by State Senator Wendy Rogers (R-Flagstaff) that 464,926 ballots fed into tabulators on Election Day in Maricopa County, 217,305 were rejected, which is nearly a 50 percent failure rate.

Busch told the legislators it was a "complete systemic failure" of signature verification and urged "legislative intervention." She warned that the system is "vulnerable to fraud."

Dr. Walter Daugherity, a math professor at Texas A&M University, testified that he was 99.999 percent confident that there were 290,644 bad signatures accepted in the election.

Of the verified signatures, 47,366 failed to meet the basic Arizona Secretary of State standards, the group found. Busch showed how they failed multiple points of the 12 points of signature verification. A full 10 percent "egregiously" failed signature verification.

Busch said every single one of the 446 tabulators in Maricopa County failed the allowable error standard allowed by the Electoral Assistance Commission (EAC). The EAC allows for only a misfeed rate of .002 percent, or one out of every 500. Some had a failure rate as high as 95 percent.
...

You think Hugo Chavez is still changing votes with dominion voting or was it one of those groups the pillow guy was talking about.

[BADecker]

Listen to and watch Kari Lake from yesterday, January 25. People are watching around the world.

Trump started it with his 2020 fight. When Trump lost - something that couldn't have happened without a bunch of corruption - we saw how deep the corruption went. Now watch the Kari Lake, Rumble video where Kari explains what is happening - https://rumble.com/v2749w6-january-25-2023.html.

Note that, when Lake was in court, the important point was ignored. The point is that the election was technically a failure. This was ignored.

[BossTrack]

Democracy is based on election fraud. Case in point, it's illegal for a politician to bribe people into voting for him by paying them. However it is NOT ILLEGAL for the politician to bribe people into voting for him by "cancelling student debt". The whole thing is a sham and the fraud is the system itself.

[BADecker]

^^^ Democracy is based on court decisions. If people do not bring their case to the courts the right way, they lose. Bringing the case properly might include a case against a corrupt judge: "Fraud upon the court by the court." The Arizona election fraud case that Kari Lake brought is almost like that. The judge played around, but skipped over the point of the cases... election fraud... for which there should have been an election redo.

Also. When I drive somewhere, I drive about 5 MPH over the speed limit. Why? So that I'm not driving under the speed limit for those who are trying to do 20 MPH over the speed limit. But here's the funny part. If there's a yellow line that says they can't pass, they won't pass, even if there isn't any traffic coming. So, why is it they only break the law regarding speed, yet won't disobey regarding the yellow line? The point is that most of us are illegal one way or another.

The point with the Arizona case is that the election fraud was BIG and right out in broad daylight. I expect that it will be turned around, one way or another. My fear is that because Kari Lake is as outspoken as she is, that she might be assassinated.

[TwitchySeal]

^^^ Democracy is based on court decisions.

Four Oath Keepers convicted of Jan. 6 seditious conspiracy

WASHINGTON (AP) — Four members of the Oath Keepers were convicted Monday of seditious conspiracy in the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack in the second major trial of far-right extremists accused of plotting to forcibly keep President Donald Trump in power.

https://apnews.com/article/oath-keepers-seditious-conspiracy-conviction-2b9fb724c9839524d00ee389959e0e62

[BADecker]

^^^ Democracy is based on court decisions.

Four Oath Keepers convicted of Jan. 6 seditious conspiracy

WASHINGTON (AP) — Four members of the Oath Keepers were convicted Monday of seditious conspiracy in the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol attack in the second major trial of far-right extremists accused of plotting to forcibly keep President Donald Trump in power.

https://apnews.com/article/oath-keepers-seditious-conspiracy-conviction-2b9fb724c9839524d00ee389959e0e62

They received what they deserved, but not in the way of justice. What I mean is this.

An attorney's first duty is to the court.
His second duty is to the public... the State or Federal.
His third duty is to himself.
His fourth duty is to his client as long as it doesn't interfere with the first three.

The client of an attorney is a ward of the court. This means that he is an infant or of unsound mind.

To see that this info is true, look in the law encyclopedia, CORPUS JURIS SECUNDUM, Volume 7, Section 4 and other sections. You don't need me to prove this to you. All you need is to go to any law library (most have a copy of CORPUS JURIS SECUNDUM) and look it up yourself. You can even find it online; it's popular.

So, these guys either hired attorneys, or accepted court appointed attorneys. They did it to themselves. What did they do to themselves? They didn't allow the 4 legs of a proper court case to appear, because attorneys won't bring the 4 legs (necessarily). What are the 4 legs?
1. An accuser bringing the lawsuit;
2. An accused;
3. Injury supposedly done by the accused;
4. At least one witness plus evidence.

If any of these are lacking, it isn't a proper lawsuit, and the court (judge) doesn't have subject matter jurisdiction. If you are at all interested in seeing this about the courts, look here http://voidjudgments.com/.


I wouldn't hire an attorney except as co-counsel, and with the expressed agreement that I wasn't his client. Of course, that means that I would have to be pro se, or something similar. I would have to do all my own talking in court. The attorney couldn't speak for me, but only could advise me.

[TwitchySeal]

^^^ Democracy is based on court decisions.

Judge orders Donald Trump to pay nearly $1 million to Hillary Clinton, James Comey and other political foes for ‘frivolous’ lawsuit

NEW YORK (AP) — A Florida judge sanctioned former President Donald Trump and one of his attorneys, ordering them to pay nearly $1 million for filing what he said was a bogus lawsuit against Trump’s 2016 rival Hillary Clinton and others.

In a blistering filing on Thursday, U.S. District Judge Donald M. Middlebrooks accused Trump of a “pattern of abuse of the courts” for filing frivolous lawsuits for political purposes, which he said “undermines the rule of law” and “amounts to obstruction of justice.”

“Here, we are confronted with a lawsuit that should never have been filed, which was completely frivolous, both factually and legally, and which was brought in bad faith for an improper purpose,” he wrote.

Citing Trump’s recent legal action against the Pulitzer Prize board, New York’s attorney general, big tech companies and CNN, he described Trump as “a prolific and sophisticated litigant” who uses the courts “to seek revenge on political adversaries.”

“He is the mastermind of strategic abuse of the judicial process,” he wrote.

The ruling required Trump and his attorney, Alina Habba, to pay nearly $938,000 to the defendants in the case.

[BADecker]

^^^ Democracy is based on court decisions.

Judge orders Donald Trump to pay nearly $1 million to Hillary Clinton, James Comey and other political foes for ‘frivolous’ lawsuit

NEW YORK (AP) — A Florida judge sanctioned former President Donald Trump and one of his attorneys, ordering them to pay nearly $1 million for filing what he said was a bogus lawsuit against Trump’s 2016 rival Hillary Clinton and others.

[Snipped for the sake of brevity]

This case, along with all the rest of the cases in America, make up part of American law.

Trump probably used attorneys, thereby making himself a ward of the court, and transferring himself into the jurisdiction of the court (judge) and its decision. Judges are clever. They can decide cases that are in their jurisdiction how ever they want. If there wasn't a jury trial, it can be appealed, same as any case.

If one or more of the 4 requirements I mentioned in my previous post are missing from in this case, and... if Trump decides to not make himself a ward of the court in an appeal... the case can be shown to be a 'void judgment case' in the appeal. But Trump will have to learn a little law and do his own talking in court... which he probably won't do.

However, Trump may have wanted, and might like, the courts decision to be this way, for reasons that are not readily apparent to us. It might be his way of gaining sympathy from his supporters who will realize even more how corrupt the swamp is after all.


Are you familiar with Shepardizing in law? It's a method that one can use to see which cases have been overturned. There are, maybe, millions of them. So, what's the point of your post?

But thanks. It gives me opportunity to strengthen my familiarity with the law, while at the same time showing others. If you are really interested in the insignificance of most court cases, get over to http://voidjudgments.net/ and learn the basics.

[TwitchySeal]

^^^ Democracy is based on court decisions.

Trump loves to win but keeps losing election lawsuits

For a man obsessed with winning, President Donald Trump is losing a lot.

He’s managed to lose not just once to Democrat Joe Biden at the ballot box but over and over again in courts across the country in a futile attempt to stay in power. The Republican president and his allies continue to mount new cases, recycling the same baseless claims, even after Trump’s own attorney general declared the Justice Department had uncovered no widespread fraud.

“This will continue to be a losing strategy, and in a way it’s even bad for him: He gets to re-lose the election numerous times,” said Kent Greenfield, a professor at Boston College Law School. “The depths of his petulance and narcissism continues to surprise me.”

In an Associated Press tally of roughly 50 cases brought by Trump’s campaign and his allies, more than 30 have been rejected or dropped. About a dozen are awaiting action. Trump has notched just one small victory, a case challenging a decision to move the deadline to provide missing proof of identification for certain absentee ballots and mail-in ballots in Pennsylvania.

https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-losing-election-lawsuits-36d113484ac0946fa5f0614deb7de15e

[BADecker]

^^^ Democracy is based on court decisions.

Trump loves to win but keeps losing election lawsuits

For a man obsessed with winning, President Donald Trump is losing a lot.

He’s managed to lose not just once to Democrat Joe Biden at the ballot box but over and over again in courts across the country in a futile attempt to stay in power. The Republican president and his allies continue to mount new cases, recycling the same baseless claims, even after Trump’s own attorney general declared the Justice Department had uncovered no widespread fraud.

“This will continue to be a losing strategy, and in a way it’s even bad for him: He gets to re-lose the election numerous times,” said Kent Greenfield, a professor at Boston College Law School. “The depths of his petulance and narcissism continues to surprise me.”

In an Associated Press tally of roughly 50 cases brought by Trump’s campaign and his allies, more than 30 have been rejected or dropped. About a dozen are awaiting action. Trump has notched just one small victory, a case challenging a decision to move the deadline to provide missing proof of identification for certain absentee ballots and mail-in ballots in Pennsylvania.

https://apnews.com/article/donald-trump-losing-election-lawsuits-36d113484ac0946fa5f0614deb7de15e

You quote some news stuff. But looking further into it shows that:
1. Trump isn't doing it right, or;
2. This is the way Trump wants it, or;
3. Trump is as much of a puppet as Biden.

Your sources are more or less there for sensationalism, to sell copy. You can see how they change their story when the truth comes out into the open. This is what's happening with Covid and the vaxx, gradually. Sooner or later it will happen with Trump and the election stuff.

[TwitchySeal]

^^^ Democracy is based on court decisions.

Trump Organization found guilty of all charges in tax fraud scheme

Former President Donald Trump's company has been found guilty of all charges in a long-running tax fraud scheme. A New York Jury found the Trump Corporation guilty on a combined 17 counts.

https://www.npr.org/2022/12/06/1141063791/trump-organization-found-guilty-of-all-charges-in-tax-fraud-scheme

[BADecker]

^^^ Democracy is based on court decisions.

Trump Organization found guilty of all charges in tax fraud scheme

Former President Donald Trump's company has been found guilty of all charges in a long-running tax fraud scheme. A New York Jury found the Trump Corporation guilty on a combined 17 counts.

https://www.npr.org/2022/12/06/1141063791/trump-organization-found-guilty-of-all-charges-in-tax-fraud-scheme

You didn't mention that his company will appeal.     

[TwitchySeal]

^^^ Democracy is based on court decisions.

Judge finalizes $25 million settlement for 'victims of Donald Trump's fraudulent university'

Judge Curiel's order finalizing the $25 million Trump University settlement means that victims of Donald Trump's fraudulent university will finally receive the relief they deserve.

My office won't hesitate to hold those who commit fraud accountable, no matter how rich or powerful they may be.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/judge-finalizes-25-million-settlement-victims-donald-trumps/story?id=54347237

[Hispo]

^^^ Democracy is based on court decisions.

Judge finalizes $25 million settlement for 'victims of Donald Trump's fraudulent university'

Judge Curiel's order finalizing the $25 million Trump University settlement means that victims of Donald Trump's fraudulent university will finally receive the relief they deserve.

My office won't hesitate to hold those who commit fraud accountable, no matter how rich or powerful they may be.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/judge-finalizes-25-million-settlement-victims-donald-trumps/story?id=54347237

Did Trump have an university or campus? Really?
I would have never guessed it. He is really into all kind of businesses it seems: real state, NFT's , among others and it seems he even attempted with education and social media.

A pity to him, I would have guessed those university classes could have been interesting.