The KRAKEN rises, meaning the 2020 election fraud is being corrected.

[BADecker]

While this post is concerned with Arizona, similar is being done at various places around the country.

True.  All over the country they recounted the votes and found that Biden won.  Just like in Arizona.  That's why he's the president and Trump is selling trading cards in Florida while he waits to be indicted.

You are talking about recounting the lies. You can recount the same thing all day long, get the same answer, and not take into account the truth. The Kari Lake lawsuit isn't about counting votes. Rather, it's about truthfully certifying the votes so that the true, legal votes can be counted.

[1714470461]

1714470461

[BADecker]

So, we have two major lawsuits going on over election fraud. The first is the Brunson lawsuit in the Supreme Court. The second is Kari Lake's lawsuit in Arizona, that claims election fraud in the race for Arizona Governor. One of the key elements of both lawsuits is that fact that election controllers wouldn't stop long enough to see if the massive election anomalies indicated corruption in the election process. If one or both of these lawsuits wins, the results could be a drastic change regarding who is governing the US and/or Arizona.

Check out the video to see the logic for both cases... even though the Brunson case isn't mentioned.


‘A Great Step Forward’ for Election Integrity: Jenna Ellis on Kari Lake’s Election Lawsuit Hearing

The filing is asking the judge to declare Lake the winner over governor-elect Katie Hobbs, or at least order a recount in Maricopa County where Lake claims voters were disenfranchised. A two-day trial has been agreed upon. NTD spoke to Jenna Ellis, then senior adviser and counsel to former President Donald Trump. Ellis said that the fact that the hearing took place is "a great step forward" for election integrity, and that regardless of whether a two-day trial is enough time, "at least she's getting a trial on the merits," which is "a huge threshold victory."

EDIT: Another messed up election. The Rep was leading the Dem by 10 votes. A recount was done, and the Cem won by 1 vote. There were all kinds of little anomalies in the race, but the question is, will the anomalies be checked over? And will there be another recount since the race was this close? https://www.zerohedge.com/political/vote-recount-flips-massachusetts-midterm-race-republican-democrat-1-vote

[BADecker]

Here is a clarification of what is happening with the recent Arizona election. A judge has ordered a prompt review of the complaint and the election processes as necessary.


Judge Orders Kari Lake And Katie Hobbs To Appear At Emergency Court Hearing Over Election Lawsuit

A judge overseeing Republican Arizona gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake's electoral lawsuit ordered Lake, Secretary of State and Arizona Gov.-elect Katie Hobbs, Maricopa County Board of Supervisors officials, and others to appear at a court hearing on Tuesday.

Judge Peter Thompson, in issuing the (pdf) order, wrote that the court has "reviewed" Lake's "verified statement of election contest" and said the "matter will be set on an accelerated basis." Maricopa County Recorder Stephen Richer and Board of Supervisors Chairman Bill Gates were also ordered to attend the hearing, which will start at 2 p.m. ET.

It comes as Lake stated Monday that her lawsuit is, in part, fueled by alleged whistleblower claims who have come forward.

"We've had three whistleblowers from Maricopa County reach out and say the system is seriously flawed," Lake told Just the News on Monday, days after the suit was filed with a Maricopa County court.

...

[BADecker]

Turns out Katie Hobbs didn't show up at court today as she was ordered by the judge. This was to work out the next step in Kari Lake's lawsuit against the Arizona election process. Hobbs was ordered by the judge, but being one of the defendants, she would not be required to personally be there if her attorney appeared in her place... which he did.

Seems like Hobbs is required to file a motion to dismiss by Thursday, if she wants, and Lake must have a response to the motion by Saturday. If the Hobbs motion to dismiss is not granted, the trial would be the following week.

Here's a video with some of the details... start at 16:30 of the video.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bURGA7FdqaE#t=16m30s



EDIT: Here is another video with slightly different info - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yvK32fYbVxc.

[sirazimuth]

Turns out Katie Hobbs didn't show up at court today as she was ordered by the judge. This was to work out the next step in Kari Lake's lawsuit against the Arizona election process. Hobbs was ordered by the judge, but being one of the defendants, she would not be required to personally be there if her attorney appeared in her place... which he did.

Seems like Hobbs is required to file a motion to dismiss by Thursday, if she wants, and Lake must have a response to the motion by Saturday. If the Hobbs motion to dismiss is not granted, the trial would be the following week.

Here's a video with some of the details... start at 16:30 of the video.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bURGA7FdqaE#t=16m30s



EDIT: Here is another video with slightly different info - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yvK32fYbVxc.

BAHHHHAAAHHHAAA

Hey bud you wanna bet with me who's gonna be sworn in as governor to your state come Jan 2nd?
I'll give you 100 to 1 odds on a gentleman's bet.
To wit.....
If the court turns over the peoples choice and makes moron pretty pixie face Kari Kraken Lake the winner, I'm an idiot 100 times over.
If Katie Hobbs is sworn in Jan 2nd, because of course she will be, you are an idiot just 1 time  (even though you are an idiot 1000 times over)

[BADecker]

Turns out Katie Hobbs didn't show up at court today as she was ordered by the judge. This was to work out the next step in Kari Lake's lawsuit against the Arizona election process. Hobbs was ordered by the judge, but being one of the defendants, she would not be required to personally be there if her attorney appeared in her place... which he did.

Seems like Hobbs is required to file a motion to dismiss by Thursday, if she wants, and Lake must have a response to the motion by Saturday. If the Hobbs motion to dismiss is not granted, the trial would be the following week.

Here's a video with some of the details... start at 16:30 of the video.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bURGA7FdqaE#t=16m30s



EDIT: Here is another video with slightly different info - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yvK32fYbVxc.

BAHHHHAAAHHHAAA

Hey bud you wanna bet with me who's gonna be sworn in as governor to your state come Jan 2nd?
I'll give you 100 to 1 odds on a gentleman's bet.
To wit.....
If the court turns over the peoples choice and makes moron pretty pixie face Kari Kraken Lake the winner, I'm an idiot 100 times over.
If Katie Hobbs is sworn in Jan 2nd, because of course she will be, you are an idiot just 1 time  (even though you are an idiot 1000 times over)

Talk about idiots, you can't even say BAHHAHAHAHAHAHA correctly.

Be that as it may, here are more details about the hearing. It's about truth and honesty in election politics, not about who wins or loses. And the judge knows it.


Judge Delivers Massive Legal Victory for Kari Lake

When the midterm races were called, Democrat Secretary of State Katie Hobbs was proclaimed to have defeated Republican challenger Kari Lake by just over 17,000 votes in the Nov. 8 election. Lake did not skip a beat objecting to the result, as the election day and days after were marred by malfunctions and holdups that could have skewed the tabulations.

Lake filed a lawsuit naming her objections in an effort to show she had the votes to win, and also the lack of integrity in the Arizona voting system.

Lake's attorneys argued in her lawsuit filed last week that the widespread ballot printer and tabulator issues on Election Day affecting 131 polling locations (59 percent of the total) suppressed the candidate's vote totals. And, as the nation watched online, hours-long lines developed due to malfunctions at multiple locations throughout Maricopa County.

Lake's team clearly wants to get a better sense of what exactly caused so many machines to, essentially, simultaneously go down on Election Day, and seek to determine whether negligence or malfeasance was involved. Maricopa County has said that 71 sites were impacted, which is roughly one-third of all the sites. The county also said a setting on the ballot printers in question caused the ballot tabulators to not be able to read the ballots, Western Journal reports.

As Lake's arguments were heard in court, testimony was given as to the details of the malfunctions, holdups, and redirecting of citizens to alternate voting areas.

...

And now, Lake’s lawsuit will have even more data with which to make their case against the flawed voting system in the state. Arizona Republican gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake won a legal victory Friday when the judge overseeing her legal challenge of November’s election granted her team access to review ballots cast.

...

EDIT: Note that SCOTUS is watching this case. Even if Kari Lake doesn't win, there will be enough evidence brought that SCOTUS will be encouraged to make a more investigation directed examination of the 2020 election with regard to the Brunson lawsuit they have before them.

[TwitchySeal]

Note:  The massive victory = Judge letting her look at 150 random ballots.

So far she's found 3 people that didn't vote because of the printer issue - they didn't want to have to wait in line or go to a different polling place (within a few miles).

The whole thing is a joke, at this point the only reason she's doing it is to get tapped as Trumps running mate.  

[suchmoon]

The whole thing is a joke, at this point the only reason she's doing it is to get tapped as Trumps running mate.  

I think she definitely deserves a limited edition badly photoshopped running mate NFT.

Speaking of which, if Trump doesn't get nominated / drops out / croaks / etc, what does that mean for the Kraken? It looks like the poor creature waited way too long to rise and Trump has gone mad (well, a bit more mad than usual) while waiting.

[BADecker]

Hey, man. Thanks for sticking a picture of yourself into my post. But you didn't really need to. We understand the way you are without the picture.

Note:  The massive victory = Judge letting her look at 150 random ballots.

So far she's found 3 people that didn't vote because of the printer issue - they didn't want to have to wait in line or go to a different polling place (within a few miles).

The whole thing is a joke, at this point the only reason she's doing it is to get tapped as Trumps running mate.  

She's only 11% of the way through the 150, so far, right? A joke, yes. A joke that anybody would think Katie Hobbs could possibly win.




Even if the Kari Lake lawsuit is dismissed or struck down, here is an important quote from http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/News/337236-2022-12-18-a-great-step-forward-for-election-integrity-jenna-ellis-on.htm: "A two-day trial has been agreed upon. NTD spoke to Jenna Ellis, then senior adviser and counsel to former President Donald Trump. Ellis said that the fact that the hearing took place is "a great step forward" for election integrity, and that regardless of whether a two-day trial is enough time, "at least she's getting a trial on the merits," which is "a huge threshold victory."

[sirazimuth]

.....
Talk about idiots, you can't even say BAHHAHAHAHAHAHA correctly.
....

So that's your top rebuttal argument eh? I didnt say  "BAHHAHAHAHAHAHA correctly." .....Seriously Bud?  And to top it off, you didnt even post a correction ....as if that even matters...smh

.......
Be that as it may, here are more details about the hearing. It's about truth and honesty in election politics, not about who wins or loses. And the judge knows it.
.......

Yeah more details alright.  And yes the judge does know it.  Hey Bud, you really need to get out of your fantasy online bubble you live in and join the real world.
Stop getting your information from retarded websites with zero credibility that support your narrative. I know..... that's a reeeeally a tall order.

Now about that bet in my previous post that you failed to address (gee I wonder why?) Are we on?  Jan 2nd is next week.

....
EDIT: Note that SCOTUS is watching this case. Even if Kari Lake doesn't win, there will be enough evidence brought that SCOTUS will be encouraged to make a more investigation directed examination of the 2020 election with regard to the Brunson lawsuit they have before them.

Oh jeeezus Bud... let it go ffs. You are just reinforcing the the notion that everyone on this forum thinks you are lunatic.
...And BTW, that's on both sides of the aisle.

[BADecker]

Well, well. What do you know?! They couldn't beat Trump, so they cancelled the subpoena. And the judge in Kari Lake's lawsuit quashes a counter lawsuit by Katie Hobbs against Lake. Further, the "Hobbs" recall is beginning while Lake moves up with her appeal on her dismissed lawsuit.


Jan. 6 Committee Withdraws Trump Subpoena


https://www.zerohedge.com/political/jan-6-committee-withdraws-trump-subpoena
The January 6th special committee has formally withdrawn its subpoena of former President Donald Trump.

"In light of the imminent end of our investigation, the Select Committee can no longer pursue the specific information covered by the subpoena," wrote Rep. Bernie Thompson (D-MI) in a Wednesday night letter sent to Trump's attorneys, which was obtained by CNN.

"Therefore, through this letter, I hereby formally withdraw the subpoena issued to former President Trump, and notify you that he is no longer obligated to comply or produce records in response to said subpoena," the letter continues.

...

Trump took a victory lap on Truth Social, writing: "Was just advised that the Unselect Committee of political Thugs has withdrawn the Subpoena of me concerning the January 6th Protest of the CROOKED 2020 Presidential Election. They probably did so because they knew I did nothing wrong, or they were about to lose in Court. Perhaps the FBI’s involvement in RIGGING the Election played into their decision. In any event, the Subpoena is DEAD!"




Kari Lake Scores Legal VICTORY as 'RECALL KATIE HOBBS' Begins!!!


Kari Lake Scores Legal VICTORY as ‘RECALL KATIE HOBBS’ Begins!!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X5Aqrkr-yH0

[sirazimuth]

<snipped kraken krap>

Long live The Kraken! ....as it rises above the foothills!
 .....then promptly crashes into Death Valley, with a barely audible sound...... "flop"

we all love ya Bud!!
Happy new year and enjoy your new Governor!

...lol

Oh yeah, and say hi to your imaginary invisible sky fairy friend in the sky for me.
He never answers me, no matter how fucking hard I pray. I cant imagine why.

[TwitchySeal]

And the judge in Kari Lake's lawsuit quashes a counter lawsuit by Katie Hobbs against Lake. Further, the "Hobbs" recall is beginning while Lake moves up with her appeal on her dismissed lawsuit.

Yes everything is going Kari Lake's way.  She went to trial, had her case thrown out, election results reafirmmed (by Republican judge), ordered to pay $30k + in legal fees to Hobbs.  

Some gems from the trial:

Lake's attorneys for the suit include Bryan Blehm, who was a lawyer for Cyber Ninjas, the contractor hired by the state Senate for its review of the 2020 election, and Kurt Olsen, a Washington, D.C., lawyer who recently was ordered to pay sanctions in a federal suit against voting machines brought by Lake and Finchem.

On the first day, IT professional Clay Parikh of Alabama – who also testified in the aforementioned federal suit – told the court that bad printer settings caused problems in ballots from six voting sites he inspected, and in that he was certain this had been intentionally done. He could not prove a malicious act.

But his theory had a fatal flaw: He acknowledged that any ballot that could not be read by a machine would be duplicated by hand and, as long as that was done correctly, counted by the county. He had no evidence to show the ballots weren’t ultimately counted.

Heather Honey, who owns a Pennsylvania company that worked on the state senate’s partisan election audit last year, testified about her failure to obtain public records and introduced hearsay evidence from affidavits. She cited information from a Republican election observer who claimed to see sloppy chain of custody procedures, and an election contract worker who claimed to have knowledge of 50 ballots being introduced into the voting system illegally. Neither of the two witnesses from the affidavits testified themselves.

Half of the second day was taken up by testimony from conservative pollster Rich Baris. His evidence was his deduction that Lake was robbed of her rightful victory, a conclusion he based on a poll of voters and assumptions about why an unusual number of people didn’t complete his election follow-up survey.

https://www.azcentral.com/story/news/politics/elections/2022/12/24/judge-tosses-kari-lakes-election-challenge-in-arizona-governors-race/69754643007/

[BADecker]

And the judge in Kari Lake's lawsuit quashes a counter lawsuit by Katie Hobbs against Lake. Further, the "Hobbs" recall is beginning while Lake moves up with her appeal on her dismissed lawsuit.

Yes everything is going Kari Lake's way.  She went to trial, had her case thrown out, election results reafirmmed (by Republican judge), ordered to pay $30k + in legal fees to Hobbs.  

...

There might be as many as 6 million Arizonans. Many of them are too smart to attempt to fight the system. Kari Lake was too dumb... or was it too patriotic.

Lake is waking up, so the benefit is hers. She isn't stopping. Appeal.

In addition, Arizonans are working on a Hobbs recall. So, we will find out where the people stand, and if all of Lake's 'preaching' did anything.

Also, did you miss the part about the judge striking down Hobbs's attempts to silence Lake? The judge knows that by his actions, with as much evidence, including Lake's expert witness, that the point wasn't really the technicalities of Lake's lawsuit. The point was the fair and true election. In other words, the judge by dismissing the suit, without adding something that challenged the election shambles, pushed himself into breaking his oath of office.

The people of Arizona, not Lake or Hobbs or the election. But when this is over, it will decide the whole state of the USA.

[TwitchySeal]

In addition, Arizonans are working on a Hobbs recall. So, we will find out where the people stand

We already found out where the people stand.  They had an election.

[BADecker]

In addition, Arizonans are working on a Hobbs recall. So, we will find out where the people stand

We already found out where the people stand.  They had an election.

You know as well as I, that wasn't an election. It was a manipulation by the people who wanted Hobbs in power.

[BADecker]

Looks like SCOTUS shot down the Brunson lawsuit - https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22-380/243739/20221027152243533_20221027-152110-95757954-00007015.pdf - by formally agreeing to not litigate it. It's not over, and there is a good side to what SCOTUS did.

First, take a look at the Brunson's personal announcement of what happened and what they are going to do - http://ralandbrunson.com/History/History.html.

Next, look at the gift that SCOTUS gave to the people. Now the people can download the Brunson lawsuit (https://7discoveries.com/), and design their own lawsuit in the same way, thanks to the gift of SCOTUS. See below...


U.S. Supreme Court Rules Unanimously You May Sue Government Agents for Damages When They Violate Your Individual Rights


https://ij.org/press-release/u-s-supreme-court-rules-unanimously-you-may-sue-government-agents-for-damages-when-they-violate-your-individual-rights/
In a unanimous opinion issued today by the U.S. Supreme Court, and authored by Associate Justice Clarence Thomas, the Court ruled in Tanzin v. Tanvir that individuals may seek damages as a remedy when federal officers violate their rights. The opinion closely tracks an amicus brief submitted by the Institute for Justice.

The case involved FBI agents who retaliated against Muslim-Americans and green-card holders who followed the dictates of their faith and refused to cooperate with the FBI by spying on their own communities. As a result of their refusal to cooperate, these individuals were placed on the No Fly List, which caused significant hardship, such as the inability to travel to visit family or for work. Luckily, Congress provided a statutory authorization to sue for violations of religious rights, allowing a plaintiff to receive "appropriate relief against the government."

Not surprisingly, in the lawsuit against the FBI agents, the government argued that the words "appropriate relief" do not include damages. According to the government, damages might be an appropriate remedy against private actors, but damages should not be allowed if the person who violated your rights happens to work for the government.

The Institute for Justice filed an amicus brief arguing against this radical notion. IJ's brief outlined how suits for damages against government officials are the historical cornerstone of government accountability, how damages are often the only way to vindicate constitutional rights, and how none of the government's policy justifications against damages have a basis in reality. IJ further explained that matters of policy should be left to Congress, not courts.
...

[TwitchySeal]

Looks like SCOTUS shot down the Brunson lawsuit

So to summarize the Kraken so far:


- Audit of Maricopa county concluded that Biden definitely won and with a few more votes than the official number)
- Massive lawsuits are ongoing with Dominion suing people like Sydney powell and Fox News for billions for spreading lies that they knew were lies about them.
- Election deniers got stomped in the mid terms.
- Only serious proven fraud that has has been uncovered involved an attempt to count fake electoral votes was committed by Trump and his supporters.
- It's very possible Trump is charged criminally any day now.  
- Biden is the president.  (and becoming a two term president more likely now than it was a year or two ago)

And now this joke of a lawsuit has proven once again that BADecker is the crazy one.  Not everyone else.  

[BADecker]

Looks like SCOTUS shot down the Brunson lawsuit

So to summarize the Kraken so far:


- Audit of Maricopa county concluded that Biden definitely won and with a few more votes than the official number)
- Massive lawsuits are ongoing with Dominion suing people like Sydney powell and Fox News for billions for spreading lies that they knew were lies about them.
- Election deniers got stomped in the mid terms.
- Only serious proven fraud that has has been uncovered involved an attempt to count fake electoral votes was committed by Trump and his supporters.
- It's very possible Trump is charged criminally any day now.  
- Biden is the president.  (and becoming a two term president more likely now than it was a year or two ago)

And now this joke of a lawsuit has proven once again that BADecker is the crazy one.  Not everyone else.  

The Brunson's are appealing for reconsideration.

The Brunson lawsuit has a format that can be followed for anybody who feels he was disenfranchised by Congress, to be able to use the newly adjudicated right to sue any government agent.

It might be happening slowly, but people are starting to wake up and use their rights. The Brunson lawsuit is showing them how.



EDIT: Let me mention. A lawsuit is one lawsuit. If you have 388 people named in your lawsuit, and it is found that only one of them was not guilty but the rest of them were guilty, the whole suit can be thrown out based on its failure regarding that one innocent person. The suit is one.

In other words, this suit should be brought by many people against one of the 388 at a time.

[suchmoon]

The Brunson's are appealing for reconsideration.

They got all the way to the SC and got thrown out. Who are they going to appeal to? Some fairy in the sky? Oh, wait...

The Brunson lawsuit has a format that can be followed for anybody who feels he was disenfranchised by Congress, to be able to use the newly adjudicated right to sue any government agent.

It might be happening slowly, but people are starting to wake up and use their rights. The Brunson lawsuit is showing them how.

Showing how to lose.

EDIT: Let me mention. A lawsuit is one lawsuit. If you have 388 people named in your lawsuit, and it is found that only one of them was not guilty but the rest of them were guilty, the whole suit can be thrown out based on its failure regarding that one innocent person. The suit is one.

In other words, this suit should be brought by many people against one of the 388 at a time.

The SC threw the case out because it was illiterate garbage. In other words, not only did the court not find anyone guilty, it didn't see any reason to waste time with the case. Bringing 388 illiterate lawsuits will not make it better but if you want to give money to the Brunsons - feel free.