The KRAKEN rises, meaning the 2020 election fraud is being corrected.

[sirazimuth]

……
I hear you heard wrong

…says the genius who has a link to a list of articles in his sig by “doctors” that have all been debunked
and/or spread misinformation if one does a simple search on them.
But thanx for letting me know I “ heard wrong” my friend.
Next time I’ll just listen to you if I need to raise my gullibility level up a few notches.

[1714473651]

1714473651

[1714473651]

1714473651

[1714473651]

1714473651

[1714473651]

1714473651

[suchmoon]

I hear you heard wrong

https://www.fox10phoenix.com/news/draft-election-audit-report-joe-biden-won-in-maricopa-county-by-more-votes-than-originally-tallied

The draft copy we obtained tallied up the presidential race and then compared it to the Maricopa County official count from November. Cyber Ninjas' forensic audit shows Biden actually got 99 more votes during the audit count, and Trump received 261 fewer votes after the recount. Officials with the Arizona Secretary of State’s Office have provided FOX 10 with a similar report showing the same results.

As if that embarrassment was not enough, Texas will now do some sort of partial audit. Maybe they'll find that Biden won that state too.

[BADecker]

Maricopa County did a vote recount, and said that votes were just the same as they were originally. But the County neglected to do the important things in the count. What is Maricopa County missing?:
1. The fact that there were loads of votes without anybody behind them... no voter;
2. The fact that many votes were missing right from the start or there-abouts;
3. The fact that many people voted more than once;
4. The fact that many peoples' votes magically were done for them, and they weren't allowed to vote when they tried, being told that they had voted already.
The county isn't even looking into these things.

The County says that other people simply don't understand voting laws, and that's why they are complaining. The County is partially right. If people had realized that voting laws allowed all kinds af voting manipualtion that was against what the people voted, they would have gotten the voting laws changed long ago.

The County simply made voting laws that placed relevancy on what Stalin said (transliteration): "It's not the one who votes that counts, but the one who counts the votes."


Hand count in audit affirms Biden beat Trump, as Maricopa County said in November

A monthslong hand recount of Maricopa County's 2020 vote confirmed that President Joe Biden won and the election was not "stolen" from former President Donald Trump, according to early versions of a report prepared for the Arizona Senate.

The three-volume report by the Cyber Ninjas, the Senate's lead contractor, includes results that show Trump lost by a wider margin than the county's official election results. The data in the report also confirms that U.S. Sen. Mark Kelly won in the county.

The official results are set to be presented to the Senate at 1 p.m. Friday. Several versions of the draft report, titled "Maricopa County Forensic Audit" by Cyber Ninjas, circulated prematurely on Wednesday and Thursday. Multiple versions were obtained by The Arizona Republic.

The Cyber Ninjas and their subcontractors were paid millions to research and write the report by nonprofits set up by prominent figures in the "Stop the Steal" movement and allies of Donald Trump, but Cyber Ninjas CEO Doug Logan said that would not influence their work.

...

[suchmoon]

Maricopa County did a vote recount, and said that votes were just the same as they were originally. But the County neglected to do the important things in the count. What is Maricopa County missing?

Except it was not the county that did the recount. It was some contractor hired by AZ Senate trumplings. So if they "neglected" the very thing they set out to do then we have a problem - maybe it was all a big lie and none of those horrible things with "many" votes actually happened? Just a thought. Consider it while waiting for the Kraken.

[BADecker]

Maricopa County did a vote recount, and said that votes were just the same as they were originally. But the County neglected to do the important things in the count. What is Maricopa County missing?

Except it was not the county that did the recount. It was some contractor hired by AZ Senate trumplings. So if they "neglected" the very thing they set out to do then we have a problem - maybe it was all a big lie and none of those horrible things with "many" votes actually happened? Just a thought. Consider it while waiting for the Kraken.

That doesn't negate the fact that the current laws make voting open to all kinds of fraud and mistakes.

My little list of 4 points is certainly not all there is.

The fact of the canvassing by private people, to find out what really happened, is simply that the Kraken has risen... with the canvassing being one part of the Kraken's operation.

[suchmoon]

That doesn't negate the fact that the current laws make voting open to all kinds of fraud and mistakes.

If that were a fact I'm sure all these audits would have turned up something. Well they did, a few more votes for Biden and a few less votes for Trump so that's the extent of "mistakes", about 0.018% (360 votes out of 2+ million).

My little list of 4 points is certainly not all there is.

The fact of the canvassing by private people, to find out what really happened, is simply that the Kraken has risen... with the canvassing being one part of the Kraken's operation.

Right. So the whole point of Kraken was to prove that Biden actually won? He shouldn't have bothered, we knew that already.

[BADecker]

That doesn't negate the fact that the current laws make voting open to all kinds of fraud and mistakes.

If that were a fact I'm sure all these audits would have turned up something. Well they did, a few more votes for Biden and a few less votes for Trump so that's the extent of "mistakes", about 0.018% (360 votes out of 2+ million).

My little list of 4 points is certainly not all there is.

The fact of the canvassing by private people, to find out what really happened, is simply that the Kraken has risen... with the canvassing being one part of the Kraken's operation.

Right. So the whole point of Kraken was to prove that Biden actually won? He shouldn't have bothered, we knew that already.

The Kraken might like it if Trump won, but since there was so much corruption in the voting, the Kraken is trying to find out who really won.

The evidence coming in regarding my 4 points shows that Trump probably won. But it isn't official, yet, this way or that.

However, if the Kraken finds that Biden absolutely DID win without overwhelming corruption (there will always be a small amount of corruption and honest mistakes), The Kraken will accept such. But the preliminaries make it obvious that at best, the election will have to be done over because of overwhelming contradictions in what votes where what.

[Cnut237]

what votes where what.

Subject exists within a maelstrom of interrogative adverbs and pronouns, sometimes repeated. The word 'votes' is thrown in. Suggests both unwillingness and inability to accept the reality of an election outcome.

[sirazimuth]

……. the election will have to be done over because of overwhelming contradictions in what votes where what.

Hey Bud, I hear the election will be done over in 2024 , though Tash says I hear things wrong,
so best DYOR….


         SHEEPLE AWAKEN AND BEHOLD THE KRAKEN!

[suchmoon]

But it isn't official, yet, this way or that.

It's been very official for a long time, nearly a year now. Biden won. Trump lost. Even Kraken says so. There has been zero evidence produced to the contrary.

[BADecker]

But it isn't official, yet, this way or that.

It's been very official for a long time, nearly a year now. Biden won. Trump lost. Even Kraken says so. There has been zero evidence produced to the contrary.

You are kinda a year behind now. Biden didn't win. Rather, he was awarded the winning position based on fraud. His whole presidency is fraudulent. Fraud vitiates every thing...

'Fraud vitiates every thing, and a judgment equally with a contract; that is, a judgment obtained directly by fraud, and not merely a judgment founded on a fraudulent instrument; for, in general, the court will not go again into the merits of an action for the purpose of detecting and annulling the fraud.'

This means we have to reverse everything that Biden has done and start over.


AZ forensic audit results show SYSTEMIC fraud, faked votes, more than 5X the margin of “victory” from just one county out of the entire state … prepare for CRISIS THEATER distractions

The Maricopa County forensic audit results have been leaked, and if the draft documents are correct, they already show over 54,000 fraudulent, faked and otherwise invalid ballots — more than five times the margin of “victory” for Joe Biden. (See the draft table below.)

And this is from just one county alone: Maricopa.

If the same holds true across other counties in Arizona, the fraud vastly exceeds 100,000 ballots. (Pima, Pinal, Cochise, etc., haven’t even been audited yet.)

That means Biden didn’t win. The election was rigged.

The lying left-wing media is going to try to gaslight the nation and falsely claim the audit proves Biden somehow did win. That’s a brazen lie, like saying 2+2=5. (But what else would you expect from the media these days?)

...

It's happening right now, folks. Time to reverse everything Biden has done.

Sure, Maricopa in Arizona is only one. But it is only the first one. Texas is gearing up for theirs, and if theirs turns out like Arizona, it will be court material to force other States to do theirs.


WATCH LIVE: Arizona officials hold press conference on elections audit results

The results of the so-called audit of President Joe Biden's win and their unprecedented review of Maricopa County's vote counts, elections procedures, voting machines and related computers will be made public on Sept. 24, attorney Kory Langhofer told the judge.

Langhofer was ordered to say when the final report would be ready by Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Michael Kemp at the conclusion of a hearing on a public records lawsuit related to the review. The Senate had fought to keep its records and those of its outside contractors secret, but Kemp ruled both the Senate's records and those of its outside contractors must be made public.

The Arizona Court of Appeals upheld the ruling on the contractors' records last month in a decision allowed to stand Tuesday by the Arizona Supreme Court.

WATCH LIVE: Arizona officials hold press conference on elections audit results

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Q_2MVuJ--w

[sirazimuth]

.....blah blah blah

It's happening right now, folks. Time to reverse everything Biden has done.

Sure, Maricopa in Arizona is only one. But it is only the first one. Texas is gearing up for theirs, and if theirs turns out like Arizona, it will be court material to force other States to do theirs.

......

I swear Bud, you just love winding all us sane folk up with your Kraken nonsense trolling don't you?
What with your retarded thread that's now nine pages long and counting.
I know your game and I kinda like it.  Keeps me amused anyway. Have another morsel my silly friend....

[suchmoon]

AZ forensic audit results show SYSTEMIC fraud, faked votes, more than 5X the margin of “victory” from just one county out of the entire state

No, it doesn't show anything of the sort. Nonsensical insinuations have been debunked.

[TwitchySeal]

Congrats to Joe Biden for winning the 2020 election again! 

[Tash]

What does that mean?

[TwitchySeal]

What does that mean?

It means you're still falling for that nonsense.  Sad!

Just like when you fell for the pope getting arrested.  Or Biden getting arrested.  Or Pelosi getting arrested.  Or Biden never being inaugurated.  Or the Kraken.  Or covid being fake.  Or all of those obviously fake CNN articles.

When will you learn?

[Gyfts]

...

I remember the "sworn affidavit" fiasco very well, with many Republicans citing them as evidence of election fraud or poll tampering. As if the idea, completely inconceivable obviously, of someone lying about election fraud is beyond comprehension. Of course, a sworn affidavit absolves any possibility, clearly. I also recall watching some interviews of folks that claimed that someone had voted on their behalf through mail in's, almost always it was someone on the verge of complete senility with dementia, barely able to formulate a sentence.

So I don't take them seriously. Neither should you.

[l8orre]

... someone on the verge of complete senility with dementia, barely able to formulate a sentence.

So I don't take them seriously. Neither should you.

you do realize that you are talking about the so-called 'President' of the U.S. of A. there, RIGHT???

So let us know: Do you take Boe Jiden Joe Niden Joe Biden seriously?

[Viper1]

Sooooo.. still waiting... The interview she walked out of was entertaining. As a side note, that "only stupid people would believe anything I say" defense seems to be making the rounds. Didn't Carlson use it? Maddow did as well and the judge agreed with her.

[BADecker]

... someone on the verge of complete senility with dementia, barely able to formulate a sentence.

So I don't take them seriously. Neither should you.

you do realize that you are talking about the so-called 'President' of the U.S. of A. there, RIGHT???

So let us know: Do you take Boe Jiden Joe Niden Joe Biden seriously?

Maybe you mean the United States of Africa.