What will be the next big industry move?

[Lucasgabd]

can't even imagine the full scope of what neural interfaces will be able to do Smartprofit
quite interesting to think about it

I usually think that web4 will be the fully immersed metaverse experience, but not many people elaborated these concepts yet

on the bright side, the ways to apply these new technologies for human development and learning will be really interesting

[1715011370]

1715011370

[1715011370]

1715011370

[1715011370]

1715011370

[1715011370]

1715011370

[1715011370]

1715011370

[1715011370]

1715011370

[xSkylarx]

<..>

The future of the metaverse is promising, and when combined with the increasingly advanced technologies of VR equipment, if combined with crypto, they can be a huge success in the not too distant future.
Unfortunately the value of the equipment is still very expensive and inaccessible for many people, I hope this changes soon.
Only on the issue of health, I'm a little concerned, because if today people already exchange many experiences of face-to-face relationship through online and video chats, imagine then that the metaverse is quite widespread.

regarding costs it'll probably go down, remember personal computer and cellphones 20 years ago? it was much rarer to see it and much more expensive.

regarding health I agree with you, in fact I'm reading a book by Naval and just read a page where he says that in general, more screens = less happiness, less screens = more happiness.

I agree that the cost will decrease significantly over time, but if you are the first in line, the cost will be extremely high, even though you will experience it sooner than others. I imagine that when the touch screen phone first became popular, the price was prohibitively expensive, and only the wealthy could afford it; now, however, they are inexpensive, and anyone can afford it. I believe that the same thing will happen with virtual reality equipment. We only said that the more screens you have, the more things happen, but that hasn't been the case since we've become lazy and are wasting a lot of our time.

[molsewid]

But even though the casino has difficulty following requests from the community, the casino can still try to attract more gamblers to feel this way. But if the casinos feel they don't need to implement web 3.0, they can look for other ways to entice gamblers to stay on their site. In that case, the casino could try to give a bonus or something to keep them there. In addition, loyal members will not move to other sites, especially if members already feel comfortable playing gambling on that site.

However, improving the quality of services of those gambling casinos are essential to their business like providing their gamblers a quality of services even like  operating online though it's quite true that casino businesses are having trouble following the requests of their community but if they can provide it in near future or atleast giving their community the assurance that they will research or study about adopting changes in their gambling experience inside their establishments or sites then this will atleast maintain their loyal customers stay to them.

[pieppiep]

But even though the casino has difficulty following requests from the community, the casino can still try to attract more gamblers to feel this way. But if the casinos feel they don't need to implement web 3.0, they can look for other ways to entice gamblers to stay on their site. In that case, the casino could try to give a bonus or something to keep them there. In addition, loyal members will not move to other sites, especially if members already feel comfortable playing gambling on that site.

However, improving the quality of services of those gambling casinos are essential to their business like providing their gamblers a quality of services even like  operating online though it's quite true that casino businesses are having trouble following the requests of their community but if they can provide it in near future or atleast giving their community the assurance that they will research or study about adopting changes in their gambling experience inside their establishments or sites then this will atleast maintain their loyal customers stay to them.

They can try it and with the help of their loyal customers, I think the casino will benefit from it because the casino will know which members are loyal to them. One way they might be able to do this is to try to dialogue with the community or its members about this plan and how they will react. If the members think that this is a good step to follow the current trend, the casino can try to make a basic plan that they will follow. It requires a lot of dialogue with the community so that the casino can provide the best for its members.

[passwordnow]

There are already casinos that are applying web 3.0 on their business. Whether they adopt new trends like web 3.0, nft or metaverse. They'll remain for sure as a gambling business.
The older ones can easily stay to what they've been working with while the newer ones, might find it hard to go along with the demand of the community in terms of gambling services.

But even though the casino has difficulty following requests from the community, the casino can still try to attract more gamblers to feel this way. But if the casinos feel they don't need to implement web 3.0, they can look for other ways to entice gamblers to stay on their site. In that case, the casino could try to give a bonus or something to keep them there. In addition, loyal members will not move to other sites, especially if members already feel comfortable playing gambling on that site.

Yes, there's no need for all of them to apply it. As long as they see that there's no demand on it, they should just stay where they are. The demand is with them and they just have to continue and improve anything that the customers see what they lack of.
It's not always that they would go with the flow of the other casinos. But if there's really a need for them to do so, it's for sure will be applied and tried by most of them.

[pieppiep]

Yes, there's no need for all of them to apply it. As long as they see that there's no demand on it, they should just stay where they are. The demand is with them and they just have to continue and improve anything that the customers see what they lack of.
It's not always that they would go with the flow of the other casinos. But if there's really a need for them to do so, it's for sure will be applied and tried by most of them.

Indeed. I'm sure they will comply with the user's wishes as long as it also provides benefits for the casino and the casino can have more opportunities to develop better in the future. Any requests from users will be forwarded to the relevant divisions and discussed to what extent it will provide good progress for the casino. But if the casino sees that the advice is not necessarily beneficial for the casino, they will accept it. Going with the flow of other casinos may work for their site but it depends on the readiness of the casino itself.

[delfastTions]

However, improving the quality of services of those gambling casinos are essential to their business like providing their gamblers a quality of services even like  operating online though it's quite true that casino businesses are having trouble following the requests of their community but if they can provide it in near future or atleast giving their community the assurance that they will research or study about adopting changes in their gambling experience inside their establishments or sites then this will atleast maintain their loyal customers stay to them.

If we proceed from the fact that the development of the casino should make it as easy as possible for users to freely play, deposit and, of course, withdraw money to their account, then I think that it would be ideal if the casino consists of "three buttons".   
1. By pressing a button or an icon in a mobile phone, wrote the amount - that's it, the money is on deposit. 
2. I chose a game, placed a bet, won ... well, or lost . 
3. Pressed the button - once, the winnings are on your account....
And no extra troubles. 
Here, in my opinion, where it should be striving, developing gambling services. 
But this is still, of course, just an ideal dream.

[Smartprofit]

However, improving the quality of services of those gambling casinos are essential to their business like providing their gamblers a quality of services even like  operating online though it's quite true that casino businesses are having trouble following the requests of their community but if they can provide it in near future or atleast giving their community the assurance that they will research or study about adopting changes in their gambling experience inside their establishments or sites then this will atleast maintain their loyal customers stay to them.

If we proceed from the fact that the development of the casino should make it as easy as possible for users to freely play, deposit and, of course, withdraw money to their account, then I think that it would be ideal if the casino consists of "three buttons".   
1. By pressing a button or an icon in a mobile phone, wrote the amount - that's it, the money is on deposit. 
2. I chose a game, placed a bet, won ... well, or lost . 
3. Pressed the button - once, the winnings are on your account....
And no extra troubles. 
Here, in my opinion, where it should be striving, developing gambling services. 
But this is still, of course, just an ideal dream.

Yes, this is a completely new niche. 

I would also like to see an online casino with a minimalist design.  Minimum features and simple design.  However, perhaps such a concept is contrary to the rules of marketing. 

For example, in a shopping center, orientation in space is especially complicated.  This is done so that the potential buyer visits as many stores as possible and buys as many different products as possible.  The same is true for online casinos.  You need to make sure that the site visitor spends as much time on it as possible. 

Minimalism and simplicity do not contribute to this goal.

[Lucasgabd]

<..>

<..>

<...>

I agree that the cost will decrease significantly over time, but if you are the first in line, the cost will be extremely high, even though you will experience it sooner than others. I imagine that when the touch screen phone first became popular, the price was prohibitively expensive, and only the wealthy could afford it; now, however, they are inexpensive, and anyone can afford it. I believe that the same thing will happen with virtual reality equipment. We only said that the more screens you have, the more things happen, but that hasn't been the case since we've become lazy and are wasting a lot of our time.

yes, competition and technology are usually good ways to make prices more accessible for all
personally I'm not that interested on being the first on metaverse tech since the progress on the technology will probably be quite fast, remember how was life before having these flat monitors and televisions?

before we had these huge "tube" monitors that looked like a big box and were never as big as cinemas.

[LUCKMCFLY]

~

So far, everyone is looking for only the positive aspects of the metaverse. But there is a huge amount of very negative things. After all, living in the virtual world, we limit our physical activity, which in the long term will lead to many diseases that cannot be cured in the metaverse.
Also, the metaverse itself can have many brutal downsides. Take a look at this:

https://www.ladbible.com/news/latest-woman-says-her-female-avatar-was-gang-raped-in-facebooks-metaverse-20220201

Of course it's not only positive things that exist in the metaverse world, negative things can't be separated from that too

but let's just discuss the positive things because over time, the bad/negative things from the metaverse we can certainly minimize as much as possible

gambling while staying at home and being integrated into the world of the metaverse is a wonderful thing that will definitely be available in the future

Every hype or new developments is accompanied by its pros and cons. As we are still battling the pandemic era, I strongly believe that metaverse will indeed find its good place in the gambling industry also. However, parents should be mindful about their kids as they may stumble this kind of platform without their knowledge. They should remind their kids on what to do if in case they encounter this kind of entertainment. Be open with them regarding discussions of hobbies and activities. As many people are going digital, you can't say they won't chance upon metaverse especially if they click those ads popping on their screen.

I really don't see anything substantially relevant that would support all this unjustified hype for the metaverse. But that again, is only the opinion of one man. Me. From my own personal view, I would be more excited about web 3.0 and what it can offer for the future of online gambling. I realise the current web 3.0 is still way too immature for complexities such as gambling functions, but it really is worth looking more into, again, from my own opinion.

Metaverse should be phasing out now, especially in europe.

Well the web 3.0 thing is a fact, and I see what your point is and what you want to show, however, there are a couple of things to recognize:

1.-Most people talk about the metaverse and only refer to the gaming part, and do not see the potential that exists when the metaverse is integrated into a conglomerate.

2.- If Mark Zuckerberg was able to change his controversial name from Facebook to Meta, it is because the business model is very lucrative, and not only that, but it will have a very big impact on the world.

Seeing that there are some premises we are only seeing a part of what can happen, there is still much to develop, that in fact notices and internet publications do not talk about everything that the metaverse represents, for me it goes much further than what Until now we have seen focused on games, be it casinos, NFT, among others.

[Silberman]

<..>

The future of the metaverse is promising, and when combined with the increasingly advanced technologies of VR equipment, if combined with crypto, they can be a huge success in the not too distant future.
Unfortunately the value of the equipment is still very expensive and inaccessible for many people, I hope this changes soon.
Only on the issue of health, I'm a little concerned, because if today people already exchange many experiences of face-to-face relationship through online and video chats, imagine then that the metaverse is quite widespread.

regarding costs it'll probably go down, remember personal computer and cellphones 20 years ago? it was much rarer to see it and much more expensive.

regarding health I agree with you, in fact I'm reading a book by Naval and just read a page where he says that in general, more screens = less happiness, less screens = more happiness.

I have read some studies that seem to indicate that the more screen time that a person employs in front of digital devices the greater the chance they are suffering depression, now as we know correlation does not mean causation, however it seems that the current generation that is spending so much time online already is neither happier or better because of it, and something like the metaverse is only going to make this even worse.

[TheGreatPython]

The future of the metaverse is promising, and when combined with the increasingly advanced technologies of VR equipment, if combined with crypto, they can be a huge success in the not too distant future.
Unfortunately the value of the equipment is still very expensive and inaccessible for many people, I hope this changes soon.
Only on the issue of health, I'm a little concerned, because if today people already exchange many experiences of face-to-face relationship through online and video chats, imagine then that the metaverse is quite widespread.

Metaverse wont be completed without a VR equipment but with crypto? I do not think its necessarily needed but if they add it then fine, it will be a good news for us who support crypto because they are being introduced along with the newer technologies.

Speaking of the equipment, the VR technology is not that new anymore so I believe there are now older versions of VR that are cheap and affordable for the masses. They need to decrease its value over time if they will release a newer model, the same thing happens on mobile phones, gaming consoles and other stuffs. If your worrying about health issues, just do not over use it but only use it as moderation and you will be fine.

[bekti3]

yes, competition and technology are usually good ways to make prices more accessible for all
personally I'm not that interested on being the first on metaverse tech since the progress on the technology will probably be quite fast, remember how was life before having these flat monitors and televisions?

before we had these huge "tube" monitors that looked like a big box and were never as big as cinemas.

Apart from making this affordable with technological advances, this makes us also required to compete because it is like the law of the jungle now who is left behind will lose and it will be difficult to catch up.
Now indeed the era is different and indeed with progress like this it certainly makes things easier but on the other hand this also makes competition in the competition even tougher. Depending on the strategy later, who can compete enough, they will survive

[Wexnident]

The future of the metaverse is promising, and when combined with the increasingly advanced technologies of VR equipment, if combined with crypto, they can be a huge success in the not too distant future.
Unfortunately the value of the equipment is still very expensive and inaccessible for many people, I hope this changes soon.
Only on the issue of health, I'm a little concerned, because if today people already exchange many experiences of face-to-face relationship through online and video chats, imagine then that the metaverse is quite widespread.

Metaverse wont be completed without a VR equipment but with crypto? I do not think its necessarily needed but if they add it then fine, it will be a good news for us who support crypto because they are being introduced along with the newer technologies.

Speaking of the equipment, the VR technology is not that new anymore so I believe there are now older versions of VR that are cheap and affordable for the masses. They need to decrease its value over time if they will release a newer model, the same thing happens on mobile phones, gaming consoles and other stuffs. If your worrying about health issues, just do not over use it but only use it as moderation and you will be fine.

Yea no, let's not put crypto as a requirement for the metaverse bs. Pretty sure it could live as a stand-alone, maybe an integration as an addition of sorts if you were going for something fully anonymous (but fr, if it's developed by a company, expect a certain amount of KYC and data gathering so I think that's just useless).

regarding costs it'll probably go down, remember personal computer and cellphones 20 years ago? it was much rarer to see it and much more expensive.

regarding health I agree with you, in fact I'm reading a book by Naval and just read a page where he says that in general, more screens = less happiness, less screens = more happiness.

I have read some studies that seem to indicate that the more screen time that a person employs in front of digital devices the greater the chance they are suffering depression, now as we know correlation does not mean causation, however it seems that the current generation that is spending so much time online already is neither happier or better because of it, and something like the metaverse is only going to make this even worse.

Pretty sure that's rather subjective? I've always faced a screen in the past 3,4 years and I've never been unhappy (or depressed). Those studies were probably when we were transitioning into the current tech, it would've been rather expected.

[Fortify]

However, improving the quality of services of those gambling casinos are essential to their business like providing their gamblers a quality of services even like  operating online though it's quite true that casino businesses are having trouble following the requests of their community but if they can provide it in near future or atleast giving their community the assurance that they will research or study about adopting changes in their gambling experience inside their establishments or sites then this will atleast maintain their loyal customers stay to them.

If we proceed from the fact that the development of the casino should make it as easy as possible for users to freely play, deposit and, of course, withdraw money to their account, then I think that it would be ideal if the casino consists of "three buttons".   
1. By pressing a button or an icon in a mobile phone, wrote the amount - that's it, the money is on deposit. 
2. I chose a game, placed a bet, won ... well, or lost . 
3. Pressed the button - once, the winnings are on your account....
And no extra troubles. 
Here, in my opinion, where it should be striving, developing gambling services. 
But this is still, of course, just an ideal dream.

Casinos are engineered to make it simple to deposit, that is absolutely the first thing they need to capture a user - which is why many just starting out use a really basic interface where they can fly under the radar without asking for KYC. As they grow, they become a target for law enforcement and are required to demand this information (otherwise they may have staff/servers/domains/etc seized) which creates extra barriers. The people paying money into these places also love the illusion of choice, most games follow a similar setup but might have extra hidden games that customers think are providing extra value but it's all pre-calculated. Casinos also don't want people to withdraw so might make this part of the process a little trickier or try to entice you to stay at this point.

[Cookdata]

But even though the casino has difficulty following requests from the community, the casino can still try to attract more gamblers to feel this way. But if the casinos feel they don't need to implement web 3.0, they can look for other ways to entice gamblers to stay on their site. In that case, the casino could try to give a bonus or something to keep them there. In addition, loyal members will not move to other sites, especially if members already feel comfortable playing gambling on that site.

Most casinos are wiser now, they give weekly draw for participants and each winner are announced towards the end of the week or the following week.

However, improving the quality of services of those gambling casinos are essential to their business like providing their gamblers a quality of services even like  operating online though it's quite true that casino businesses are having trouble following the requests of their community but if they can provide it in near future or atleast giving their community the assurance that they will research or study about adopting changes in their gambling experience inside their establishments or sites then this will atleast maintain their loyal customers stay to them.

We all have limits and so do casino websites. The number one purpose of every casino out there is to make big money, if players could lose all, I'm very sure they will be happy, the casino can't take most of the suggestions others are airing here.
what about current servers in use and hosting plan? are they efficient enough to carry these features? they also experience some losses times when a player wins a money bag, everything suggested by customers cannot be implemented as fast as they want.

[passwordnow]

Yes, there's no need for all of them to apply it. As long as they see that there's no demand on it, they should just stay where they are. The demand is with them and they just have to continue and improve anything that the customers see what they lack of.
It's not always that they would go with the flow of the other casinos. But if there's really a need for them to do so, it's for sure will be applied and tried by most of them.

Indeed. I'm sure they will comply with the user's wishes as long as it also provides benefits for the casino and the casino can have more opportunities to develop better in the future. Any requests from users will be forwarded to the relevant divisions and discussed to what extent it will provide good progress for the casino. But if the casino sees that the advice is not necessarily beneficial for the casino, they will accept it. Going with the flow of other casinos may work for their site but it depends on the readiness of the casino itself.

They should come with the demand of what their users like. But also, they have to weigh it depending on how they're looking at their own business and which they think is the right to adopt and not. Not all requests are good but there are some requests that they should be serious with and take into consideration.
They just have to listen and they still have their own decision on which they think is good to apply, adopt and not.

[TelolettOm]

They should come with the demand of what their users like. But also, they have to weigh it depending on how they're looking at their own business and which they think is the right to adopt and not. Not all requests are good but there are some requests that they should be serious with and take into consideration.
They just have to listen and they still have their own decision on which they think is good to apply, adopt and not.

I really agree with you. If there is something that they can improve to fulfill the users' needs, they will be exactly developing, not left behind by other gambling platforms that may also fulfill the needs. But, on the other hand, they also should consider whether they should fulfill all the development or needs or not. Because they may accept so many requests with different types format the suers and not all requests can be fulfilled.
Btw, In this case, not every user may also love the new version of the gambling ideas and types. Some may be still going to stay with old tyes of gambling. As we know so far, the old gambling types still survive and have their big fans. So, the new types may be only the additional.

[paxmao]

<..>

The future of the metaverse is promising, and when combined with the increasingly advanced technologies of VR equipment, if combined with crypto, they can be a huge success in the not too distant future.
Unfortunately the value of the equipment is still very expensive and inaccessible for many people, I hope this changes soon.
Only on the issue of health, I'm a little concerned, because if today people already exchange many experiences of face-to-face relationship through online and video chats, imagine then that the metaverse is quite widespread.

regarding costs it'll probably go down, remember personal computer and cellphones 20 years ago? it was much rarer to see it and much more expensive.

regarding health I agree with you, in fact I'm reading a book by Naval and just read a page where he says that in general, more screens = less happiness, less screens = more happiness.

I agree that the cost will decrease significantly over time, but if you are the first in line, the cost will be extremely high, even though you will experience it sooner than others. I imagine that when the touch screen phone first became popular, the price was prohibitively expensive, and only the wealthy could afford it; now, however, they are inexpensive, and anyone can afford it. I believe that the same thing will happen with virtual reality equipment. We only said that the more screens you have, the more things happen, but that hasn't been the case since we've become lazy and are wasting a lot of our time.

I think that one way forward would be to convert the gambling activity in something more social, something that could have a place in the future metaverse and create business opportunities to cross-sell other product or even virtual real state to the people gambling in such scenarios. Something like a mix between sales, social activities and a place to meet people akin... there are so many options to explore.

[STT]

Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication, whatever move they make should be to simplify the process for the end user and that should equate to higher revenue from ease of use.   Any hassle in the access and usage of a website discourages players from engaging more, its probably part of why crypto is popular to begin with for many people its less hassle, so long as they are already within the crypto space of course.