FIFA World Cup 2026 :Canada/Mexico/United States: Discussion Thread

[nullama]

~snip~
Just one question to you.

If a country can't qualify for the FIFA World Cup, why should that country be given the hosting rights? This was very evident during the 2022 FIFA World Cup. Qatar was given automatic entry to the tournament since they were the hosts. And what happened after that? They lost all three of their group stage matches and got crashed out of the tournament. I still believe that if a more deserving country from AFC was given that slot, then they would have performed much better. Anyway, in this case United Arab Emirates was the team that was ranked 6th in the AFC qualifiers. I don't know how they would have performed, had they been given the chance.

Well, I find it fair that the hosting country has the qualification given right away.

There's a lot of preparation, time and money that goes into hosting the world cup, so at a minimum you want your country to be represented there and see how it performs.

The point of doing it in Qatar actually showed that it's not that FIFA just treats Europe and South America preferentially, they simply are the best in the world, and Qatar showed it. It's not because they are not given enough slots, the Asian countries(and North America, and Africa) are just not as good as Europe and South America.

[CLS63]

There is nothing much to argue about in this rule which has been a rule that previous hosts have enjoined over the years. @Leviathan.007  how fair would it be that your country is a host of the world cup tournament with the so much inconveniences that follows the whole process of preparations and arrangement of hospitality to all tourists that would be in attendance? It makes no sense at all that's why the express slot are given to host countries and nothing unfair about that, it's rather understandable.

Just one question to you.

If a country can't qualify for the FIFA World Cup, why should that country be given the hosting rights? This was very evident during the 2022 FIFA World Cup. Qatar was given automatic entry to the tournament since they were the hosts. And what happened after that? They lost all three of their group stage matches and got crashed out of the tournament. I still believe that if a more deserving country from AFC was given that slot, then they would have performed much better. Anyway, in this case United Arab Emirates was the team that was ranked 6th in the AFC qualifiers. I don't know how they would have performed, had they been given the chance.

I'm also doubtful about if it is the right thing to give this qualification right to host countries just like that. I don't know if this gives the right to that country to join the group stage directly just because of hosting the tournament. That country should also earn their way to the main tournament by playing qualification matches.

Qatar really didn't make us watch some good football from them. The players just represented their country in the last World Cup and that's all. They were an easy target for all of their opponents in their group.

In the 2026 World Cup there are going to be 3 host countries like Mexico, Canada and USA. Now all of these countries have qualified for the main tournament already.  

[Leviathan.007]

There is nothing much to argue about in this rule which has been a rule that previous hosts have enjoined over the years. @Leviathan.007  how fair would it be that your country is a host of the world cup tournament with the so much inconveniences that follows the whole process of preparations and arrangement of hospitality to all tourists that would be in attendance? It makes no sense at all that's why the express slot are given to host countries and nothing unfair about that, it's rather understandable.

Just one question to you.

If a country can't qualify for the FIFA World Cup, why should that country be given the hosting rights? This was very evident during the 2022 FIFA World Cup. Qatar was given automatic entry to the tournament since they were the hosts. And what happened after that? They lost all three of their group stage matches and got crashed out of the tournament. I still believe that if a more deserving country from AFC was given that slot, then they would have performed much better. Anyway, in this case United Arab Emirates was the team that was ranked 6th in the AFC qualifiers. I don't know how they would have performed, had they been given the chance.

I'm also doubtful about if it is the right thing to give this qualification right to host countries just like that. I don't know if this gives the right to that country to join the group stage directly just because of hosting the tournament. That country should also earn their way to the main tournament by playing qualification matches.

Qatar really didn't make us watch some good football from them. The players just represented their country in the last World Cup and that's all. They were an easy target for all of their opponents in their group.

In the 2026 World Cup there are going to be 3 host countries like Mexico, Canada and USA. Now all of these countries have qualified for the main tournament already.  

These three teams will get the three positions in the world cup tournament and this can make the other three strong teams to be out of the World Cup because the three teams are getting auto qualification for this tournament. I think at least they had to just let America get the qualification chance and two other teams could race for the ticket just like other teams because in fact, America is the main host of 80 percent of games that are going to be in America.

 

[Japinat]

There is nothing much to argue about in this rule which has been a rule that previous hosts have enjoined over the years. @Leviathan.007  how fair would it be that your country is a host of the world cup tournament with the so much inconveniences that follows the whole process of preparations and arrangement of hospitality to all tourists that would be in attendance? It makes no sense at all that's why the express slot are given to host countries and nothing unfair about that, it's rather understandable.

Just one question to you.

If a country can't qualify for the FIFA World Cup, why should that country be given the hosting rights? This was very evident during the 2022 FIFA World Cup. Qatar was given automatic entry to the tournament since they were the hosts. And what happened after that? They lost all three of their group stage matches and got crashed out of the tournament. I still believe that if a more deserving country from AFC was given that slot, then they would have performed much better. Anyway, in this case United Arab Emirates was the team that was ranked 6th in the AFC qualifiers. I don't know how they would have performed, had they been given the chance.

I'm also doubtful about if it is the right thing to give this qualification right to host countries just like that. I don't know if this gives the right to that country to join the group stage directly just because of hosting the tournament. That country should also earn their way to the main tournament by playing qualification matches.

Qatar really didn't make us watch some good football from them. The players just represented their country in the last World Cup and that's all. They were an easy target for all of their opponents in their group.

In the 2026 World Cup there are going to be 3 host countries like Mexico, Canada and USA. Now all of these countries have qualified for the main tournament already.  

These three teams will get the three positions in the world cup tournament and this can make the other three strong teams to be out of the World Cup because the three teams are getting auto qualification for this tournament. I think at least they had to just let America get the qualification chance and two other teams could race for the ticket just like other teams because in fact, America is the main host of 80 percent of games that are going to be in America.

We should start to be accustomed that there will be some time that three countries will be qualified automatically without the need to make a run for the qualifications and go through the normal set-up just like the other team because in the upcoming World Cup, three countries will host it and it will be just rightful to have their own team to be qualified directly. Moreover, in World Cup 2030, I bet the same thing will happen as it seems like Morocco-Spain-Portugal will host the event.

[Silberman]

I'm also doubtful about if it is the right thing to give this qualification right to host countries just like that. I don't know if this gives the right to that country to join the group stage directly just because of hosting the tournament. That country should also earn their way to the main tournament by playing qualification matches.

Qatar really didn't make us watch some good football from them. The players just represented their country in the last World Cup and that's all. They were an easy target for all of their opponents in their group.

In the 2026 World Cup there are going to be 3 host countries like Mexico, Canada and USA. Now all of these countries have qualified for the main tournament already.  

Some benefits must be given to the countries hosting the cup and traditionally allowing them to qualify automatically to the tournament is one of them, besides even if we are talking about three countries this time around with the increase on the number of teams allowed to the world cup and a reduction on the spots available to the CONCACAF that will be enough to offset this, besides the USA, Canada and Mexico qualified for the 2022 Qatar world cup so I doubt we will see the same abysmal performance we saw with the Qatar soccer team.

[Leviathan.007]

I'm also doubtful about if it is the right thing to give this qualification right to host countries just like that. I don't know if this gives the right to that country to join the group stage directly just because of hosting the tournament. That country should also earn their way to the main tournament by playing qualification matches.

Qatar really didn't make us watch some good football from them. The players just represented their country in the last World Cup and that's all. They were an easy target for all of their opponents in their group.

In the 2026 World Cup there are going to be 3 host countries like Mexico, Canada and USA. Now all of these countries have qualified for the main tournament already.  

Some benefits must be given to the countries hosting the cup and traditionally allowing them to qualify automatically to the tournament is one of them, besides even if we are talking about three countries this time around with the increase on the number of teams allowed to the world cup and a reduction on the spots available to the CONCACAF that will be enough to offset this, besides the USA, Canada and Mexico qualified for the 2022 Qatar world cup so I doubt we will see the same abysmal performance we saw with the Qatar soccer team.

I think they are already taking benefits, they host the world cup games there are going to be many teams that come to these countries, and many fans from all over the world will come with them to watch the games, obviously, these people need hotels to stay there and foods to eat they will use the facilities from the host and they should pay money for it, this huge demand is enough for the hosts to help their business.

[Daniel91]

I'm also doubtful about if it is the right thing to give this qualification right to host countries just like that. I don't know if this gives the right to that country to join the group stage directly just because of hosting the tournament. That country should also earn their way to the main tournament by playing qualification matches.

Qatar really didn't make us watch some good football from them. The players just represented their country in the last World Cup and that's all. They were an easy target for all of their opponents in their group.

In the 2026 World Cup there are going to be 3 host countries like Mexico, Canada and USA. Now all of these countries have qualified for the main tournament already.  

Some benefits must be given to the countries hosting the cup and traditionally allowing them to qualify automatically to the tournament is one of them, besides even if we are talking about three countries this time around with the increase on the number of teams allowed to the world cup and a reduction on the spots available to the CONCACAF that will be enough to offset this, besides the USA, Canada and Mexico qualified for the 2022 Qatar world cup so I doubt we will see the same abysmal performance we saw with the Qatar soccer team.

I think they are already taking benefits, they host the world cup games there are going to be many teams that come to these countries, and many fans from all over the world will come with them to watch the games, obviously, these people need hotels to stay there and foods to eat they will use the facilities from the host and they should pay money for it, this huge demand is enough for the hosts to help their business.

It seems to me that this was the case in the past, but I am not sure that it still applies.
The organizers of the world cup in Qatar last year had almost no infrastructure necessary to organize such a large competition and had to build all the stadiums before the start of the world cup.
It is a huge cost in billions of dollars and I am sure that the organizers in Qatar have not earned that much from fans or from TV and marketing rights.
However, the organizers of the World Cup in Qatar clearly did not plan to make money from the World Cup in football, but it was more important for them to get the big international promotion that comes with such big events and to change the public image of Qatar as a non-democratic state.

[Oneandpure]

Some benefits must be given to the countries hosting the cup and traditionally allowing them to qualify automatically to the tournament is one of them, besides even if we are talking about three countries this time around with the increase on the number of teams allowed to the world cup and a reduction on the spots available to the CONCACAF that will be enough to offset this, besides the USA, Canada and Mexico qualified for the 2022 Qatar world cup so I doubt we will see the same abysmal performance we saw with the Qatar soccer team.

Have been tradition for all countries hosting FIFA World Cup qualify automatically without participants in qualifying round, not only with World Cup but also all tournament give special thing for countries hosting from Asian Cup, Euro, Copa America and African Cup. But next time FIFA World Cup 2026 have three countries hosting and take two slot participants in World Cup. Actually realistic with FIFA World Cup 2026 need three hosting countries because participants added from 32 countries become 48 countries.
Need many stadium for FIFA World Cup 2026 and three hosting countries seems can help how to manage well all World Cup matches.

[freedomgo]

There is nothing much to argue about in this rule which has been a rule that previous hosts have enjoined over the years. @Leviathan.007  how fair would it be that your country is a host of the world cup tournament with the so much inconveniences that follows the whole process of preparations and arrangement of hospitality to all tourists that would be in attendance? It makes no sense at all that's why the express slot are given to host countries and nothing unfair about that, it's rather understandable.

Just one question to you.

If a country can't qualify for the FIFA World Cup, why should that country be given the hosting rights? This was very evident during the 2022 FIFA World Cup. Qatar was given automatic entry to the tournament since they were the hosts. And what happened after that? They lost all three of their group stage matches and got crashed out of the tournament. I still believe that if a more deserving country from AFC was given that slot, then they would have performed much better. Anyway, in this case United Arab Emirates was the team that was ranked 6th in the AFC qualifiers. I don't know how they would have performed, had they been given the chance.

There is nothing we can do about that topic because this rule has been established already by the FIFA that the ones who will host the event will be given a special treatment to qualify automatically without having to go through the regular process and we have grown accustomed by that rule, and so I don't see any new about this because performance is certainly not a basis for a country(s) to host the FIFA World Cup, it's on the business side, national teams are not included in the negotiations in the first place.

[Daniel91]

There is nothing much to argue about in this rule which has been a rule that previous hosts have enjoined over the years. @Leviathan.007  how fair would it be that your country is a host of the world cup tournament with the so much inconveniences that follows the whole process of preparations and arrangement of hospitality to all tourists that would be in attendance? It makes no sense at all that's why the express slot are given to host countries and nothing unfair about that, it's rather understandable.

Just one question to you.

If a country can't qualify for the FIFA World Cup, why should that country be given the hosting rights? This was very evident during the 2022 FIFA World Cup. Qatar was given automatic entry to the tournament since they were the hosts. And what happened after that? They lost all three of their group stage matches and got crashed out of the tournament. I still believe that if a more deserving country from AFC was given that slot, then they would have performed much better. Anyway, in this case United Arab Emirates was the team that was ranked 6th in the AFC qualifiers. I don't know how they would have performed, had they been given the chance.

There is nothing we can do about that topic because this rule has been established already by the FIFA that the ones who will host the event will be given a special treatment to qualify automatically without having to go through the regular process and we have grown accustomed by that rule, and so I don't see any new about this because performance is certainly not a basis for a country(s) to host the FIFA World Cup, it's on the business side, national teams are not included in the negotiations in the first place.

The rule that the host has the right to automatic participation in the World Cup has existed since the very beginning, when the first World Cup was held in Uruguay in 1930.
I think it turned out to be a good rule because there would certainly be fewer fans at the matches and less interest in the matches if the home team did not play.
After all, the same rules exist in other team sports such as basketball, handball, waterpolo etc.
When the USA hosted the FIFA World Cup in 1994, it helped to increase interest in soccer in the USA, their league and national team got better and they have played an increasingly prominent role in the World Cups ever since.
The USA has become a very important market for soccer, and it all started with the organization of the World Cup in 1994. That is why it is always important that even weaker hosts can perform and play at the World Cup and help the promotion and development of football in their countries.
After all, from the next world cup, the number of participants will increase so that even weaker national teams from other continents will get the opportunity to play at the world cup.

[fzkto]

There is nothing much to argue about in this rule which has been a rule that previous hosts have enjoined over the years. @Leviathan.007  how fair would it be that your country is a host of the world cup tournament with the so much inconveniences that follows the whole process of preparations and arrangement of hospitality to all tourists that would be in attendance? It makes no sense at all that's why the express slot are given to host countries and nothing unfair about that, it's rather understandable.

Just one question to you.

If a country can't qualify for the FIFA World Cup, why should that country be given the hosting rights? This was very evident during the 2022 FIFA World Cup. Qatar was given automatic entry to the tournament since they were the hosts. And what happened after that? They lost all three of their group stage matches and got crashed out of the tournament. I still believe that if a more deserving country from AFC was given that slot, then they would have performed much better. Anyway, in this case United Arab Emirates was the team that was ranked 6th in the AFC qualifiers. I don't know how they would have performed, had they been given the chance.

I think that in FIFA sit not stupid guys who can decide which country will host the next World Cup. Qatar showed us a lot of negative things and in general it is a good experience for future World Cups. But I think that any country can be a host and get the opportunity to play, so this football is for the whole world. Yes, it is impossible for all countries to play, so something may seem unfair.

[tusandii]

I think they are already taking benefits, they host the world cup games there are going to be many teams that come to these countries, and many fans from all over the world will come with them to watch the games, obviously, these people need hotels to stay there and foods to eat they will use the facilities from the host and they should pay money for it, this huge demand is enough for the hosts to help their business.

It is a fortune and an honor for every country to be chosen as the host of the World Cup.
Qatar had a very positive impact from being chosen as the host of the World Cup yesterday because Qatar now has a truly magnificent football stadium infrastructure apart from that there is the advantage of the Qatar national team having free tickets to compete in the World Cup plus several financial benefits as you have said.
I think FIFA should really choose a country that alternates every 4 years so that all countries in the world feel the positive impact and benefits after hosting the World Cup.

[KTChampions]

There is nothing much to argue about in this rule which has been a rule that previous hosts have enjoined over the years. @Leviathan.007  how fair would it be that your country is a host of the world cup tournament with the so much inconveniences that follows the whole process of preparations and arrangement of hospitality to all tourists that would be in attendance? It makes no sense at all that's why the express slot are given to host countries and nothing unfair about that, it's rather understandable.

Just one question to you.

If a country can't qualify for the FIFA World Cup, why should that country be given the hosting rights? This was very evident during the 2022 FIFA World Cup. Qatar was given automatic entry to the tournament since they were the hosts. And what happened after that? They lost all three of their group stage matches and got crashed out of the tournament. I still believe that if a more deserving country from AFC was given that slot, then they would have performed much better. Anyway, in this case United Arab Emirates was the team that was ranked 6th in the AFC qualifiers. I don't know how they would have performed, had they been given the chance.

Maybe this is a fair question if we are talking about the old format, but due to the expansion of the number of participants in the World Cup, this issue is already less relevant.
As for the format for selecting African countries, I already wrote that it is monstrously unfair and I hope it will be changed (by the way, maybe there is already some news about this?).

[Maslate]

I think they are already taking benefits, they host the world cup games there are going to be many teams that come to these countries, and many fans from all over the world will come with them to watch the games, obviously, these people need hotels to stay there and foods to eat they will use the facilities from the host and they should pay money for it, this huge demand is enough for the hosts to help their business.

It is a fortune and an honor for every country to be chosen as the host of the World Cup.
Qatar had a very positive impact from being chosen as the host of the World Cup yesterday because Qatar now has a truly magnificent football stadium infrastructure apart from that there is the advantage of the Qatar national team having free tickets to compete in the World Cup plus several financial benefits as you have said.
I think FIFA should really choose a country that alternates every 4 years so that all countries in the world feel the positive impact and benefits after hosting the World Cup.

Yes, it is truly an honor if your country will be given the chance to host a World Cup event because not all the countries around the world has the power and resources to host an event like this. In fact, it's not an easy road for the hosts because before they were given a right, they will undergo to a tough process like bidding and ballot voting before they will know if their campaign to host will be successful. Take note, countries all over the world are starting to merge so that they can gather their resources to a bidding, so that their chances will increase. Just like what happen now.

[freedomgo]

There is nothing much to argue about in this rule which has been a rule that previous hosts have enjoined over the years. @Leviathan.007  how fair would it be that your country is a host of the world cup tournament with the so much inconveniences that follows the whole process of preparations and arrangement of hospitality to all tourists that would be in attendance? It makes no sense at all that's why the express slot are given to host countries and nothing unfair about that, it's rather understandable.

Just one question to you.

If a country can't qualify for the FIFA World Cup, why should that country be given the hosting rights? This was very evident during the 2022 FIFA World Cup. Qatar was given automatic entry to the tournament since they were the hosts. And what happened after that? They lost all three of their group stage matches and got crashed out of the tournament. I still believe that if a more deserving country from AFC was given that slot, then they would have performed much better. Anyway, in this case United Arab Emirates was the team that was ranked 6th in the AFC qualifiers. I don't know how they would have performed, had they been given the chance.

There is nothing we can do about that topic because this rule has been established already by the FIFA that the ones who will host the event will be given a special treatment to qualify automatically without having to go through the regular process and we have grown accustomed by that rule, and so I don't see any new about this because performance is certainly not a basis for a country(s) to host the FIFA World Cup, it's on the business side, national teams are not included in the negotiations in the first place.

The rule that the host has the right to automatic participation in the World Cup has existed since the very beginning, when the first World Cup was held in Uruguay in 1930.
I think it turned out to be a good rule because there would certainly be fewer fans at the matches and less interest in the matches if the home team did not play.
After all, the same rules exist in other team sports such as basketball, handball, waterpolo etc.
When the USA hosted the FIFA World Cup in 1994, it helped to increase interest in soccer in the USA, their league and national team got better and they have played an increasingly prominent role in the World Cups ever since.
The USA has become a very important market for soccer, and it all started with the organization of the World Cup in 1994. That is why it is always important that even weaker hosts can perform and play at the World Cup and help the promotion and development of football in their countries.
After all, from the next world cup, the number of participants will increase so that even weaker national teams from other continents will get the opportunity to play at the world cup.

Indeed mate. Having the host countries a privilege to have their team qualified directly does come with a reason for a purpose of getting the home crowd riled up because they have their own team who will face the other national teams and for which will make the home crowd watch the games as it will be entertaining for them in that way.

This rule wasn't made just because of a reason that they are the hosts, it is made to maximize the profits in-order to make the event more successful because foreign crowds plus home crowds will be a good combination that will result them into a much wanted revenues. Let's not forget that all of this is also a business behind the curtains.

[Leviathan.007]

I think they are already taking benefits, they host the world cup games there are going to be many teams that come to these countries, and many fans from all over the world will come with them to watch the games, obviously, these people need hotels to stay there and foods to eat they will use the facilities from the host and they should pay money for it, this huge demand is enough for the hosts to help their business.

It is a fortune and an honor for every country to be chosen as the host of the World Cup.
Qatar had a very positive impact from being chosen as the host of the World Cup yesterday because Qatar now has a truly magnificent football stadium infrastructure apart from that there is the advantage of the Qatar national team having free tickets to compete in the World Cup plus several financial benefits as you have said.
I think FIFA should really choose a country that alternates every 4 years so that all countries in the world feel the positive impact and benefits after hosting the World Cup.

Yes, it is truly an honor if your country will be given the chance to host a World Cup event because not all the countries around the world has the power and resources to host an event like this. In fact, it's not an easy road for the hosts because before they were given a right, they will undergo to a tough process like bidding and ballot voting before they will know if their campaign to host will be successful. Take note, countries all over the world are starting to merge so that they can gather their resources to a bidding, so that their chances will increase. Just like what happen now.

Yes exactly and that's why I said there is no reason to let the country get auto qualification when they host the world cup because betting qualification is something related to the quality of their national team which is not related to hosting the world cup by that country.
I think the country which hosts the world cup can get enough benefits and this can help their economy also it will help the, to introduce their traditions to the world and there are many other benefits for them.

[tusandii]

It is a fortune and an honor for every country to be chosen as the host of the World Cup.
Qatar had a very positive impact from being chosen as the host of the World Cup yesterday because Qatar now has a truly magnificent football stadium infrastructure apart from that there is the advantage of the Qatar national team having free tickets to compete in the World Cup plus several financial benefits as you have said.
I think FIFA should really choose a country that alternates every 4 years so that all countries in the world feel the positive impact and benefits after hosting the World Cup.

Yes, it is truly an honor if your country will be given the chance to host a World Cup event because not all the countries around the world has the power and resources to host an event like this. In fact, it's not an easy road for the hosts because before they were given a right, they will undergo to a tough process like bidding and ballot voting before they will know if their campaign to host will be successful. Take note, countries all over the world are starting to merge so that they can gather their resources to a bidding, so that their chances will increase. Just like what happen now.

To be able to host it seems that there is no voting but the full rights of all FIFA members that determine and when a country has been chosen there is an agreement and also an offer whether the country is able to be able to facilitate the World Cup such as providing a decent and comfortable stadium and as well as security for all participating national team members.
But I'm sure no country will refuse to be chosen as the host of the World Cup because it is very profitable and can have a very positive impact in the future.

[mirakal]

I think they are already taking benefits, they host the world cup games there are going to be many teams that come to these countries, and many fans from all over the world will come with them to watch the games, obviously, these people need hotels to stay there and foods to eat they will use the facilities from the host and they should pay money for it, this huge demand is enough for the hosts to help their business.

It is a fortune and an honor for every country to be chosen as the host of the World Cup.
Qatar had a very positive impact from being chosen as the host of the World Cup yesterday because Qatar now has a truly magnificent football stadium infrastructure apart from that there is the advantage of the Qatar national team having free tickets to compete in the World Cup plus several financial benefits as you have said.
I think FIFA should really choose a country that alternates every 4 years so that all countries in the world feel the positive impact and benefits after hosting the World Cup.

Yes, it is truly an honor if your country will be given the chance to host a World Cup event because not all the countries around the world has the power and resources to host an event like this. In fact, it's not an easy road for the hosts because before they were given a right, they will undergo to a tough process like bidding and ballot voting before they will know if their campaign to host will be successful. Take note, countries all over the world are starting to merge so that they can gather their resources to a bidding, so that their chances will increase. Just like what happen now.

Yes exactly and that's why I said there is no reason to let the country get auto qualification when they host the world cup because betting qualification is something related to the quality of their national team which is not related to hosting the world cup by that country.
I think the country which hosts the world cup can get enough benefits and this can help their economy also it will help the, to introduce their traditions to the world and there are many other benefits for them.

That is true, even without having an advantage where their own team will get an automatic qualification, it is still a win-win situation for the hosts because talking about business as this is the first and foremost reason why FIFA is making a world tour, it is almost certain that the host country will have a huge boost in that particular month as almost all businesses like hotels, bar, restaurants and even casinos near the stadiums will all be sold out, and that will reflect on the nation's economy.

[Jody.Drummer]

It is a fortune and an honor for every country to be chosen as the host of the World Cup.
Qatar had a very positive impact from being chosen as the host of the World Cup yesterday because Qatar now has a truly magnificent football stadium infrastructure apart from that there is the advantage of the Qatar national team having free tickets to compete in the World Cup plus several financial benefits as you have said.
I think FIFA should really choose a country that alternates every 4 years so that all countries in the world feel the positive impact and benefits after hosting the World Cup.

Yes, it is truly an honor if your country will be given the chance to host a World Cup event because not all the countries around the world has the power and resources to host an event like this. In fact, it's not an easy road for the hosts because before they were given a right, they will undergo to a tough process like bidding and ballot voting before they will know if their campaign to host will be successful. Take note, countries all over the world are starting to merge so that they can gather their resources to a bidding, so that their chances will increase. Just like what happen now.

To be able to host it seems that there is no voting but the full rights of all FIFA members that determine and when a country has been chosen there is an agreement and also an offer whether the country is able to be able to facilitate the World Cup such as providing a decent and comfortable stadium and as well as security for all participating national team members.
But I'm sure no country will refuse to be chosen as the host of the World Cup because it is very profitable and can have a very positive impact in the future.

Obviously they wouldn't say no and even volunteered to host the World Cup. There are many positive impacts for the country appointed as the host, in addition to 1 definite place in the World Cup of course there are other benefits, as well as in introducing their own country, in terms of the economy will also be very impactful.
Even for some countries, they do not hesitate to do everything possible such as bribery, which seems to be familiar to hear that, because Qatar is also reportedly doing the same thing. Actually, I don't want to go into that realm, but once again it shows that the interest in hosting the World Cup for each country is very large.

[freedomgo]

It is a fortune and an honor for every country to be chosen as the host of the World Cup.
Qatar had a very positive impact from being chosen as the host of the World Cup yesterday because Qatar now has a truly magnificent football stadium infrastructure apart from that there is the advantage of the Qatar national team having free tickets to compete in the World Cup plus several financial benefits as you have said.
I think FIFA should really choose a country that alternates every 4 years so that all countries in the world feel the positive impact and benefits after hosting the World Cup.

Yes, it is truly an honor if your country will be given the chance to host a World Cup event because not all the countries around the world has the power and resources to host an event like this. In fact, it's not an easy road for the hosts because before they were given a right, they will undergo to a tough process like bidding and ballot voting before they will know if their campaign to host will be successful. Take note, countries all over the world are starting to merge so that they can gather their resources to a bidding, so that their chances will increase. Just like what happen now.

To be able to host it seems that there is no voting but the full rights of all FIFA members that determine and when a country has been chosen there is an agreement and also an offer whether the country is able to be able to facilitate the World Cup such as providing a decent and comfortable stadium and as well as security for all participating national team members.
But I'm sure no country will refuse to be chosen as the host of the World Cup because it is very profitable and can have a very positive impact in the future.

Obviously they wouldn't say no and even volunteered to host the World Cup. There are many positive impacts for the country appointed as the host, in addition to 1 definite place in the World Cup of course there are other benefits, as well as in introducing their own country, in terms of the economy will also be very impactful.
Even for some countries, they do not hesitate to do everything possible such as bribery, which seems to be familiar to hear that, because Qatar is also reportedly doing the same thing. Actually, I don't want to go into that realm, but once again it shows that the interest in hosting the World Cup for each country is very large.

No need to mention because it's already obvious and even if we don't have any substantial evidence to prove our speculations, it is already safe to assume that there are negotiations happening behind the curtain to increase their chances to host the next World Cup.

Money is not really a big deal here if they bribe someone within the organization because the sky rocketing profits in return will not be comparable to what they bribed.