FIFA World Cup 2026 :Canada/Mexico/United States: Discussion Thread

[swogerino]

If we look at things from a positive perspective, then we will see something positive, conversely, if we look at things from a negative perspective, then all we will see is the negative. It's the same with the World Cup, I would say there is no perfect World Cup without any problems or anything like that. So it's just a matter of how we look at it.
I agree with you that each country has its own characteristics, we can't compare the World Cup held in country A with the World Cup held in country B, because those are 2 different countries. It might make more sense to compare World Cups held in the same country in different editions.

I would say world cup without any problems is one thing, but world cup with a ton of problems is another. Qatar one never felt like a true world cup to me, not because of any religious stuff but because not that many fans went there, that's the biggest issue. I mean normally what I understand from world cup is that when Brazil is playing, there will be tens of thousands of brazil fans cheering on the stadium, and when France does then French ones.

When you look at Qatar world cup, you will see that it was like made for the Qatari people and it was mostly them that was watching it and that's an issue if you ask me. It is not made for a nation, it's made for every nation, and if there aren't tens of thousands of fans of that nation there, then it makes no sense.

The biggest problem we had in Qatar was the lack of freedom and we all knew Qatar couldn't be a good host mostly because of the rules they have. We know Qatar as a Muslim country where you are not allowed to during in some places and in the other hand this country is very rich-friendly, which means if you have the money you can do anything you want, otherwise you should respect all the rules and you won't have freedom there.

That is the same in any country,even in the most well developed western society money can bypass laws and this is a big flaw of the human population in the world,corruption is everywhere and people are bribed commonly through rich persons to persuade them to give them what they want.Qatar has no difference in this,even in the most difficult country regarding rules which is Saudi Arabia with the right acquaintance you can open doors there too,so in this context the World Cup was let's say normal even in Qatar but of course in USA will be much better.

[1715696101]

1715696101

[1715696101]

1715696101

[1715696101]

1715696101

[1715696101]

1715696101

[1715696101]

1715696101

[bitgolden]

Well.. that is the point. For the next world cup in 2026, the defending champions need to go through the qualification route, while the three hosts would be given automatic qualification. I can understand if the United States is being given direct entry, because they are hosting more than 80% of the matches. But then what is the point in giving automatic entry for teams like Canada, who are going to host just 10 out of the total 104 matches? And it is so unfair to the other teams in CONCACAF, such as Costa Rica, Panama and Jamaica.

Only the hosts benefit because they qualify automatically, but what's the point if the hosts are not able to qualify for the next round via grub, like the previous world cup in Qatar and they only played until the grub preliminary round because they were unable to collect points to qualify for the next round. Argentina has no problem in terms of qualifying, because they have great players and have always been able to get through the qualifying preliminary phase.

The organizers have the rules in place and although in our opinion there is no point in giving Canada the opportunity to qualify automatically, they do have an assessment that is adjusted to the rules of holding the next world cup match. So like it or not, that's the rule that will probably apply.

I feel like it would be fair to let the teams that host have some advantage but also not give them automatic group stages as well. Give them some higher chance to be qualifying for the position, I do not know what would be the chance, but let them have a higher chance and that would be lovely but after that let them also have a potential to be not there as well.

However, it's always better to have the host team to play so that you get to see the full might of a world cup tournament. Not sure how much USA fans care about football, they have a different type of football there, so maybe it won't be too many fans but I am sure all the people around the world would love to go there if they can, it's the land of the free, and will be better.

[Leviathan.007]

If we look at things from a positive perspective, then we will see something positive, conversely, if we look at things from a negative perspective, then all we will see is the negative. It's the same with the World Cup, I would say there is no perfect World Cup without any problems or anything like that. So it's just a matter of how we look at it.
I agree with you that each country has its own characteristics, we can't compare the World Cup held in country A with the World Cup held in country B, because those are 2 different countries. It might make more sense to compare World Cups held in the same country in different editions.

I would say world cup without any problems is one thing, but world cup with a ton of problems is another. Qatar one never felt like a true world cup to me, not because of any religious stuff but because not that many fans went there, that's the biggest issue. I mean normally what I understand from world cup is that when Brazil is playing, there will be tens of thousands of brazil fans cheering on the stadium, and when France does then French ones.

When you look at Qatar world cup, you will see that it was like made for the Qatari people and it was mostly them that was watching it and that's an issue if you ask me. It is not made for a nation, it's made for every nation, and if there aren't tens of thousands of fans of that nation there, then it makes no sense.

The biggest problem we had in Qatar was the lack of freedom and we all knew Qatar couldn't be a good host mostly because of the rules they have. We know Qatar as a Muslim country where you are not allowed to during in some places and in the other hand this country is very rich-friendly, which means if you have the money you can do anything you want, otherwise you should respect all the rules and you won't have freedom there.

That is the same in any country,even in the most well developed western society money can bypass laws and this is a big flaw of the human population in the world,corruption is everywhere and people are bribed commonly through rich persons to persuade them to give them what they want.Qatar has no difference in this,even in the most difficult country regarding rules which is Saudi Arabia with the right acquaintance you can open doors there too,so in this context the World Cup was let's say normal even in Qatar but of course in USA will be much better.

Indeed but the standards in European are not the same as in other Asian countries, for example as far as I know in most of the countries in Europa you won't have a problem if you drink alcohol in public but that's not allowed in Qatar.
I was hoping to see Qatar change some rules or at least make some expectations for the people who visit this country during the world cup.

[ancafe]

I feel like it would be fair to let the teams that host have some advantage but also not give them automatic group stages as well. Give them some higher chance to be qualifying for the position, I do not know what would be the chance, but let them have a higher chance and that would be lovely but after that let them also have a potential to be not there as well.

That complies with what is stated in the FIFA rules and providing an automatic qualification opportunity could give an advantage to the hosts who have been preparing for a successful World Cup run. After that they will determine the fate of their country through matches and whether or not they qualify for the next round is largely determined by the quality of the players they have.

However, it's always better to have the host team to play so that you get to see the full might of a world cup tournament. Not sure how much USA fans care about football, they have a different type of football there, so maybe it won't be too many fans but I am sure all the people around the world would love to go there if they can, it's the land of the free, and will be better.

The United States does have other sports besides football, but football has also developed rapidly there, so that the enthusiasm of the people there is also great about their team competing in the world cup, let alone being able to give satisfactory results. The world cup is also a concern for many people in all corners of the world, apart from football activities and there are many other things that can benefit the host because it might talk about the huge flow of money during the world cup process going on.

[Sithara007]

Indeed but the standards in European are not the same as in other Asian countries, for example as far as I know in most of the countries in Europa you won't have a problem if you drink alcohol in public but that's not allowed in Qatar.
I was hoping to see Qatar change some rules or at least make some expectations for the people who visit this country during the world cup.

Europe and Qatar both have their own advantages and disadvantages. One good thing with Qatar is that it is very easy to get a tourist visa. But apart from that, there were a lot of negatives. Hotel prices were extremely high and they changed the rules at the last minute restricting alcohol only to those holding the highest tier tickets. Also, there were a lot of restrictions in place for LGBT and unmarried couples. In Europe the only issue as far as I can see is regarding the visa. Higher crime rate is also a concern.

[Leviathan.007]

However, it's always better to have the host team to play so that you get to see the full might of a world cup tournament. Not sure how much USA fans care about football, they have a different type of football there, so maybe it won't be too many fans but I am sure all the people around the world would love to go there if they can, it's the land of the free, and will be better.

The United States does have other sports besides football, but football has also developed rapidly there, so that the enthusiasm of the people there is also great about their team competing in the world cup, let alone being able to give satisfactory results. The world cup is also a concern for many people in all corners of the world, apart from football activities and there are many other things that can benefit the host because it might talk about the huge flow of money during the world cup process going on.

Recently I see more people say the USA shouldn't host the 2026 world cup because they think in the USA there are other sports than football and there is more interest in other sports than football in the USA. While we all know America hosted the World Cup before and they were hosting it perfectly while stadiums were always full of the fans.

[nullama]

~snip~
Europe and Qatar both have their own advantages and disadvantages. One good thing with Qatar is that it is very easy to get a tourist visa. But apart from that, there were a lot of negatives. Hotel prices were extremely high and they changed the rules at the last minute restricting alcohol only to those holding the highest tier tickets. Also, there were a lot of restrictions in place for LGBT and unmarried couples. In Europe the only issue as far as I can see is regarding the visa. Higher crime rate is also a concern.

The football level of Qatar is very low though, in my opinion it should not have been hosted there because the team lowered the quality of the tournament.

In the next world cup we will probably see a lower level of football because now many countries will be able to qualify.

[Litzki1990]

Indeed but the standards in European are not the same as in other Asian countries, for example as far as I know in most of the countries in Europa you won't have a problem if you drink alcohol in public but that's not allowed in Qatar.
I was hoping to see Qatar change some rules or at least make some expectations for the people who visit this country during the world cup.

Europe and Qatar both have their own advantages and disadvantages. One good thing with Qatar is that it is very easy to get a tourist visa. But apart from that, there were a lot of negatives. Hotel prices were extremely high and they changed the rules at the last minute restricting alcohol only to those holding the highest tier tickets. Also, there were a lot of restrictions in place for LGBT and unmarried couples. In Europe the only issue as far as I can see is regarding the visa. Higher crime rate is also a concern.

As Qatar is a predominantly Muslim country, certain restrictions were imposed on traveling to their country but no one had any trouble getting a Qatar tourist visa and got the tourist visa easily. But the things that were banned in Qatar were homosexuality, extramarital affairs, alcohol, and certain size clothing for girls, but in Europe there is no such problem, but the big problem in Europe is the visa. There are many processes to go through to get a tourist visa for traveling to Europe which is very difficult and most of the tourist visas are usually rejected. If the visa complications could be eased for those who will enjoy the football match directly in the stadium, then the football lovers would not have to struggle so much to get a European visa.

[Juggy777]

Indeed but the standards in European are not the same as in other Asian countries, for example as far as I know in most of the countries in Europa you won't have a problem if you drink alcohol in public but that's not allowed in Qatar.
I was hoping to see Qatar change some rules or at least make some expectations for the people who visit this country during the world cup.

Europe and Qatar both have their own advantages and disadvantages. One good thing with Qatar is that it is very easy to get a tourist visa. But apart from that, there were a lot of negatives. Hotel prices were extremely high and they changed the rules at the last minute restricting alcohol only to those holding the highest tier tickets. Also, there were a lot of restrictions in place for LGBT and unmarried couples. In Europe the only issue as far as I can see is regarding the visa. Higher crime rate is also a concern.

As Qatar is a predominantly Muslim country, certain restrictions were imposed on traveling to their country but no one had any trouble getting a Qatar tourist visa and got the tourist visa easily. But the things that were banned in Qatar were homosexuality, extramarital affairs, alcohol, and certain size clothing for girls, but in Europe there is no such problem, but the big problem in Europe is the visa. There are many processes to go through to get a tourist visa for traveling to Europe which is very difficult and most of the tourist visas are usually rejected. If the visa complications could be eased for those who will enjoy the football match directly in the stadium, then the football lovers would not have to struggle so much to get a European visa.

@Litzki1990 while both can’t be compared but what truly disappointed me was the way they treated those labourers and despite so much noise being made nothing really happened which would have done justice for those labourers. Also now let’s turn our attention to the 2026 FIFA World Cup and I hope that USA relaxes their visa policies otherwise many will miss out on this tournament.

[Litzki1990]

Indeed but the standards in European are not the same as in other Asian countries, for example as far as I know in most of the countries in Europa you won't have a problem if you drink alcohol in public but that's not allowed in Qatar.
I was hoping to see Qatar change some rules or at least make some expectations for the people who visit this country during the world cup.

Europe and Qatar both have their own advantages and disadvantages. One good thing with Qatar is that it is very easy to get a tourist visa. But apart from that, there were a lot of negatives. Hotel prices were extremely high and they changed the rules at the last minute restricting alcohol only to those holding the highest tier tickets. Also, there were a lot of restrictions in place for LGBT and unmarried couples. In Europe the only issue as far as I can see is regarding the visa. Higher crime rate is also a concern.

As Qatar is a predominantly Muslim country, certain restrictions were imposed on traveling to their country but no one had any trouble getting a Qatar tourist visa and got the tourist visa easily. But the things that were banned in Qatar were homosexuality, extramarital affairs, alcohol, and certain size clothing for girls, but in Europe there is no such problem, but the big problem in Europe is the visa. There are many processes to go through to get a tourist visa for traveling to Europe which is very difficult and most of the tourist visas are usually rejected. If the visa complications could be eased for those who will enjoy the football match directly in the stadium, then the football lovers would not have to struggle so much to get a European visa.

@Litzki1990 while both can’t be compared but what truly disappointed me was the way they treated those labourers and despite so much noise being made nothing really happened which would have done justice for those labourers. Also now let’s turn our attention to the 2026 FIFA World Cup and I hope that USA relaxes their visa policies otherwise many will miss out on this tournament.

If America does not relax the visa policy, we will definitely miss the 2026 World Cup. It is very difficult to get visas for the three countries where the next World Cup will be held. Even if special visas are arranged only for World Cup visitors, football lovers will get a great opportunity to enjoy the World Cup on the field. Even if the US relaxes the visa policy, the visas for the World Cup in Qatar will not be as easy to obtain as the visas for the World Cup in the US. The World Cup tournament, which will be held with three countries, will undoubtedly make it very difficult for the spectators to manage visas and enjoy the game

[Kasabus]

Indeed but the standards in European are not the same as in other Asian countries, for example as far as I know in most of the countries in Europa you won't have a problem if you drink alcohol in public but that's not allowed in Qatar.
I was hoping to see Qatar change some rules or at least make some expectations for the people who visit this country during the world cup.

Europe and Qatar both have their own advantages and disadvantages. One good thing with Qatar is that it is very easy to get a tourist visa. But apart from that, there were a lot of negatives. Hotel prices were extremely high and they changed the rules at the last minute restricting alcohol only to those holding the highest tier tickets. Also, there were a lot of restrictions in place for LGBT and unmarried couples. In Europe the only issue as far as I can see is regarding the visa. Higher crime rate is also a concern.

Very understandable because FIFA is a huge event and the nearest establishments like hotels and apartments will surely take advantage of the event as they know that it's not every year they will have an event like that. Also, LGBT and unmarried couples were discouraged because it is a Muslim country, we cannot expect to change their beliefs and traditions just for that event. People who flock towards the country should know and obey the rules, failing to know the rules doesn't make them innocent.

[Leviathan.007]

Indeed but the standards in European are not the same as in other Asian countries, for example as far as I know in most of the countries in Europa you won't have a problem if you drink alcohol in public but that's not allowed in Qatar.
I was hoping to see Qatar change some rules or at least make some expectations for the people who visit this country during the world cup.

Europe and Qatar both have their own advantages and disadvantages. One good thing with Qatar is that it is very easy to get a tourist visa. But apart from that, there were a lot of negatives. Hotel prices were extremely high and they changed the rules at the last minute restricting alcohol only to those holding the highest tier tickets. Also, there were a lot of restrictions in place for LGBT and unmarried couples. In Europe the only issue as far as I can see is regarding the visa. Higher crime rate is also a concern.

As Qatar is a predominantly Muslim country, certain restrictions were imposed on traveling to their country but no one had any trouble getting a Qatar tourist visa and got the tourist visa easily. But the things that were banned in Qatar were homosexuality, extramarital affairs, alcohol, and certain size clothing for girls, but in Europe there is no such problem, but the big problem in Europe is the visa. There are many processes to go through to get a tourist visa for traveling to Europe which is very difficult and most of the tourist visas are usually rejected. If the visa complications could be eased for those who will enjoy the football match directly in the stadium, then the football lovers would not have to struggle so much to get a European visa.

@Litzki1990 while both can’t be compared but what truly disappointed me was the way they treated those labourers and despite so much noise being made nothing really happened which would have done justice for those labourers. Also now let’s turn our attention to the 2026 FIFA World Cup and I hope that USA relaxes their visa policies otherwise many will miss out on this tournament.

If America does not relax the visa policy, we will definitely miss the 2026 World Cup. It is very difficult to get visas for the three countries where the next World Cup will be held. Even if special visas are arranged only for World Cup visitors, football lovers will get a great opportunity to enjoy the World Cup on the field. Even if the US relaxes the visa policy, the visas for the World Cup in Qatar will not be as easy to obtain as the visas for the World Cup in the US. The World Cup tournament, which will be held with three countries, will undoubtedly make it very difficult for the spectators to manage visas and enjoy the game

In any country, there are some rules and restrictions depending on the country and people, but the fact about some countries like Qatar is about very limited restrictions because even for the people who travel to this country, Qatar forces them to respect the rules and while in the next world cup in America, we won't have these restrictions anymore.

[Jody.Drummer]

If we look at things from a positive perspective, then we will see something positive, conversely, if we look at things from a negative perspective, then all we will see is the negative. It's the same with the World Cup, I would say there is no perfect World Cup without any problems or anything like that. So it's just a matter of how we look at it.
I agree with you that each country has its own characteristics, we can't compare the World Cup held in country A with the World Cup held in country B, because those are 2 different countries. It might make more sense to compare World Cups held in the same country in different editions.

I would say world cup without any problems is one thing, but world cup with a ton of problems is another. Qatar one never felt like a true world cup to me, not because of any religious stuff but because not that many fans went there, that's the biggest issue. I mean normally what I understand from world cup is that when Brazil is playing, there will be tens of thousands of brazil fans cheering on the stadium, and when France does then French ones.

When you look at Qatar world cup, you will see that it was like made for the Qatari people and it was mostly them that was watching it and that's an issue if you ask me. It is not made for a nation, it's made for every nation, and if there aren't tens of thousands of fans of that nation there, then it makes no sense.

The biggest problem we had in Qatar was the lack of freedom and we all knew Qatar couldn't be a good host mostly because of the rules they have. We know Qatar as a Muslim country where you are not allowed to during in some places and in the other hand this country is very rich-friendly, which means if you have the money you can do anything you want, otherwise you should respect all the rules and you won't have freedom there.

It is a natural thing, and we also have to understand each other with policies that will certainly be different from each country. I will illustrate it in a small thing like a guest at home for example, of course we as guests must respect what is the rule in the house, and of course also the host must be able to respect us. We certainly don't want to have guests who are arbitrary in our homes, right? But because this is a different thing, Qatar is also not unwilling to give in to this, but they also relax the policy policy even though by loosening it I am not enough for some people. But again there must be mutual respect from everyone, isn't it in football that mutual respect is prioritized?

[bitgolden]

If America does not relax the visa policy, we will definitely miss the 2026 World Cup. It is very difficult to get visas for the three countries where the next World Cup will be held. Even if special visas are arranged only for World Cup visitors, football lovers will get a great opportunity to enjoy the World Cup on the field. Even if the US relaxes the visa policy, the visas for the World Cup in Qatar will not be as easy to obtain as the visas for the World Cup in the US. The World Cup tournament, which will be held with three countries, will undoubtedly make it very difficult for the spectators to manage visas and enjoy the game

I am guessing that just getting USA one seems like doable isn't it? That's where the finals will be held? If that's the case then go to any game that is in the USA and then go to finals game and you are done, no need for anything extra about that.

The reality is that you wouldn't be able to go to 3 countries that size anyway, how could you move from USA to Mexico and then to USA and then to Canada, that's just way too much travel and I do not think that anyone would catch the games like that anyway, it is just too far apart. So you pick just one nation, which I would do USA if I could afford it. In that case getting Visa for world cup should be easier for sure, you could have your tickets, and reservations and all that ready, and it will definitely make sense.

[Leviathan.007]

If America does not relax the visa policy, we will definitely miss the 2026 World Cup. It is very difficult to get visas for the three countries where the next World Cup will be held. Even if special visas are arranged only for World Cup visitors, football lovers will get a great opportunity to enjoy the World Cup on the field. Even if the US relaxes the visa policy, the visas for the World Cup in Qatar will not be as easy to obtain as the visas for the World Cup in the US. The World Cup tournament, which will be held with three countries, will undoubtedly make it very difficult for the spectators to manage visas and enjoy the game

I am guessing that just getting USA one seems like doable isn't it? That's where the finals will be held? If that's the case then go to any game that is in the USA and then go to finals game and you are done, no need for anything extra about that.

The reality is that you wouldn't be able to go to 3 countries that size anyway, how could you move from USA to Mexico and then to USA and then to Canada, that's just way too much travel and I do not think that anyone would catch the games like that anyway, it is just too far apart. So you pick just one nation, which I would do USA if I could afford it. In that case getting Visa for world cup should be easier for sure, you could have your tickets, and reservations and all that ready, and it will definitely make sense.

It is quite difficult for some people in some countries to obtain a visa for America, and it usually takes a lot of time for them to obtain one. I think the United States will make some exceptions during the world cup when it hosts it, as well as try to put in place some rules to make it easier for people to obtain a visa during the tournament.

[Sithara007]

It is quite difficult for some people in some countries to obtain a visa for America, and it usually takes a lot of time for them to obtain one. I think the United States will make some exceptions during the world cup when it hosts it, as well as try to put in place some rules to make it easier for people to obtain a visa during the tournament.

Creating an exception for World Cup would be tricky, because the US do have a problem with people arriving in legal visa and then overstaying. In case they issue visas without doing proper verification steps, then there is a good chance that a lot of people will land in the US. But then the illegal immigrant problem in the US mostly results from migrant caravans crossing the southern border illegally, rather than people arriving and then overstaying on valid visas. Anyway, we still have three more years to go for the tournament, and hopefully the situation will change and the US authorities will approve a visa process that is mutually beneficial. 

[Silberman]

It is quite difficult for some people in some countries to obtain a visa for America, and it usually takes a lot of time for them to obtain one. I think the United States will make some exceptions during the world cup when it hosts it, as well as try to put in place some rules to make it easier for people to obtain a visa during the tournament.

We must not forget that there will be presidential elections at the US on 2024, and it seems that once again immigration is going to be a very hot topic, so while it would make sense for the US to relax the requirements for fans which want to obtain a visa to visit their country during the world cup, we may as well end up seeing the opposite and instead we could see the US becoming way stricter on their policies, and people that had already bought their tickets and booked hotel rooms may be denied a visa losing a lot of money in the process.

[Fuso.hp]

If America does not relax the visa policy, we will definitely miss the 2026 World Cup. It is very difficult to get visas for the three countries where the next World Cup will be held. Even if special visas are arranged only for World Cup visitors, football lovers will get a great opportunity to enjoy the World Cup on the field. Even if the US relaxes the visa policy, the visas for the World Cup in Qatar will not be as easy to obtain as the visas for the World Cup in the US. The World Cup tournament, which will be held with three countries, will undoubtedly make it very difficult for the spectators to manage visas and enjoy the game

I am guessing that just getting USA one seems like doable isn't it? That's where the finals will be held? If that's the case then go to any game that is in the USA and then go to finals game and you are done, no need for anything extra about that.

The reality is that you wouldn't be able to go to 3 countries that size anyway, how could you move from USA to Mexico and then to USA and then to Canada, that's just way too much travel and I do not think that anyone would catch the games like that anyway, it is just too far apart. So you pick just one nation, which I would do USA if I could afford it. In that case getting Visa for world cup should be easier for sure, you could have your tickets, and reservations and all that ready, and it will definitely make sense.

It is quite difficult for some people in some countries to obtain a visa for America, and it usually takes a lot of time for them to obtain one. I think the United States will make some exceptions during the world cup when it hosts it, as well as try to put in place some rules to make it easier for people to obtain a visa during the tournament.

It is very difficult to get USA Canada or Mexico visa directly from my country. Apart from celebrities, maybe very few people in my country will be able to directly enjoy World Cup tournament matches sitting in the stadium. Because an ordinary person has to struggle a lot to get an American visa and after a lot of hard work, most of the time the visa is rejected from the American embassy, so maybe we have to spend the 2026 World Cup sitting in front of the TV. If the visa policy is slightly different for the World Cup only, there may be some possibility for America to watch the World Cup. Waiting for America to make a separate visa channel for football world cup where we can easily get American visa.

[Strongkored]

~snip~
Europe and Qatar both have their own advantages and disadvantages. One good thing with Qatar is that it is very easy to get a tourist visa. But apart from that, there were a lot of negatives. Hotel prices were extremely high and they changed the rules at the last minute restricting alcohol only to those holding the highest tier tickets. Also, there were a lot of restrictions in place for LGBT and unmarried couples. In Europe the only issue as far as I can see is regarding the visa. Higher crime rate is also a concern.

The football level of Qatar is very low though, in my opinion it should not have been hosted there because the team lowered the quality of the tournament.

In the next world cup we will probably see a lower level of football because now many countries will be able to qualify.

Judging without the correct data is certainly a subjective assessment and not all will agree and state the same thing, an assessment of quality must take into account many factors such as the number of goals, the number of spectators present at the stadium or those who watch via television broadcasts or many other things Judging without mentioning these factors your assessment is invalid, including saying that the 2026 World Cup will also experience a lowered level due to the number of participants, because if that happens I'm sure FIFA will suffer losses due to the reduced number of sponsors because there will be a lowered level of organizing the world cup, because companies and audiences don't want to spend money to see something that isn't interesting

[armanda90]

Finally, due my national teams Indonesian has lower FIFA rank must start first qualifier round against Brunei Darussalam with home and away format, optimistic with my national team chance lead to second qualifier round have been waiting by Iraq, Vietnam and Philippines national teams. Still long journey for my national teams has chance for the first time manage to FIFA World Cup 2026 because after winning against Brunei Darussalam should be first or second standing position on group F lead to next qualifier round.

First round qualifier against Brunei Darussalam will play on October 12 for first leg and second leg will play five days later on October 17, actually Brunei Darussalam national teams is not difficult against for Indonesia and optimistic with my national teams chance will play in World Cup 2026.