AI Spam Report Reference Thread

[nutildah]

originality.ai - 100% confident that’s AI
gptzero.me - 100% AI
gowinston.ai - 0%

So now we're using AI detector websites as evidence?

We're coming up on the 3rd anniversary of this thread, in just 2 weeks.

Maybe I should stop spending time writing proper replies and just post a few lazy one-liners. Seems like that would attract less attention than actually trying to explain a point.

You can do whatever you want except for copy/paste ChatGPT output and pretend its your own writing. If the forum allowed this, it would quickly be overrun by AI shitposters and there'd be nothing human left.

If you think a post is wrong, then explain why it's wrong. Posting a bunch of percentages from random websites doesn't prove who wrote it.

We don't have to prove who wrote it, we just know you didn't write it.

[FinneysTrueVision]

So now we're using AI detector websites as evidence?

Yes, that’s the purpose of this thread. Human intuition alone is usually enough to discern when something is AI generated. Including AI detector results just makes the case stronger.

If you think a post is wrong, then explain why it's wrong.

Your posts are wrong because they violate the forum’s guidelines on appropriate AI usage.

Posting a bunch of percentages from random websites doesn't prove who wrote it.

AI wrote your posts. It doesn’t matter if you gave it a basic idea to generate an output from.

[memehunter]

So now we're using AI detector websites as evidence?

So you accept that it is right to differentiate between genuine human efforts and AI shit posting, it is just a matter of nature of evidences, right? So please suggest a better way of doing this.

Maybe I should stop spending time writing proper replies and just post a few lazy one-liners.

Please try that if you want to nobody is stopping you. Just like we cant stop someone from tagging you as 'lazy one liner shit poster' 
 

[macson]

What's the verdict on Newbie Azorx? My gut feeling tells me this is chatbot verbal diarrhea:

I just checked that his post was detected as AI generated:

Do you use a VPN, or is it better to set up your own private server in a random location and connect through that? I’m trying to understand how someone can hide their IP address and protect their identity online.

I want to have one dedicated computer used only for crypto-related activity, with the strongest possible privacy and anonymity setup. What would be the safest and most practical way to do that?

Also I know it has do to do with a lot more then just your IP. Internet anonymity depends on many factors including device fingerprinting, browser behavior, account history, payment trails, metadata, and operational mistakes.

If some people on this forum have any input i would gladly hear it.

GPTZero: 77%
Sapling.ai: 80%
StealthWriter: 100% AI Detected

Hi everyone,

I have a question about using Monero with a Trezor hardware wallet.

I currently use a Trezor to store multiple coins, and I’m trying to understand whether it’s possible to safely store Monero (XMR) with it as well.

My main questions are:

Can Monero be stored using a Trezor hardware wallet?
If yes, is it supported directly inside Trezor Suite?

Does Monero still keep its normal privacy features when used with a hardware wallet?
For example, do stealth addresses, ring signatures, and confidential transactions still work the same way when signing transactions through Trezor?

What is the best way to store native Monero securely with Trezor?
Is it stored on the actual Monero network, or are there different versions/wrapped versions I should avoid?

Are there any risks, compatibility issues, or important setup details I should know before using Monero with Trezor?

I’m mainly trying to make sure I do this in the safest way possible without reducing Monero’s privacy or exposing my hardware wallet to unnecessary risks.

Any advice from people who have actually used Monero with Trezor would be appreciated.

Originality.ai: 100%
GPTZero: 100%
Sapling.ai: 99%
StealthWriter: 77% AI Detected

Hi, I was wondering whether it’s a good idea to buy crypto directly through my Trezor hardware wallet.

I have two main concerns:

Cost: Is buying through Trezor usually more expensive compared to using a regular crypto exchange?
Security: Are there any safety risks involved? I want to keep my Trezor as secure as possible and avoid exposing it to any potential vulnerabilities.

What’s your opinion? Would you recommend buying directly through Trezor, or is it better to buy on an exchange and then transfer the crypto to the hardware wallet?

Originality.ai: 100%
GPTZero: 100%
Sapling.ai: 100%

Okay, so if you were in my position: you have a Trezor with BTC and USDC (held across different networks, such as Ethereum, Solana, Arbitrum, etc.), and you want to swap the USDC for Bitcoin. Would you use the swap feature inside Trezor, or would you send the USDC to a centralized exchange, sell it, buy Bitcoin, and then send the Bitcoin back to your own wallet?

Originality.ai: 93%
Sapling.ai: 99%
StealthWriter: 100% AI Detected

Great input, thank you so much.

Regarding the paper trail, would you recommend keeping the Wi-Fi card installed but only using the laptop on public Wi-Fi, so it cannot easily be connected to my identity? Or would using Ethernet still be the better option?

Also, if I may ask, what would be a good laptop for running Tails OS?

Originality.ai: 100%
StealthWriter: 100% AI Detected

[khatarnak]

AI wrote your posts. It doesn’t matter if you gave it a basic idea to generate an output from.

So we went from AI detector scores, to "AI wrote your posts".

That's quite a jump.

How did we get from suspicion to proof? Did I miss a step somewhere?

So you accept that it is right to differentiate between genuine human efforts and AI shit posting.

The problem is that you've jumped straight from "this looks like AI" to " it is AI."

We don't have to prove who wrote it, we just know you didn't write it.

So the standard is:

We don't have to prove it. We just know.
 
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

It almost feels like some people see a lower-ranked account and immediately assume any decent post must be AI.

Maybe a brand new user wouldn't care, but I do find it weird.

I honestly don't know how some of you are so confident about something you can't possibly know.

[nutildah]

I honestly don't know how some of you are so confident about something you can't possibly know.

Why are you denying it when it so incredibly obvious that's what you're doing. If you keep doing it, your posts will continue to be deleted by moderators, and you'll eventually be banned. There's no point in arguing. You're not the first to argue, and you won't be the last.

Here is an official statement on AI use policy by the admin:

AI guidelines

Here's the relevant part:

You should not copy/paste text written by an AI into a post, with these exceptions:
 - If you clearly mention that something you're posting is AI-generated, and you only occasionally and appropriately post such AI-generated text, then that's OK.
 - If you have the AI do almost a direct translation of something you wrote, then that's OK. For example, you can tell the AI to "Directly translate this text into Spanish: <something you wrote>" or "Output the following text exactly as-is, except with any clear spelling or grammar mistakes fixed: <something you wrote>". It's not OK to tell an AI, "Improve this text: <something you wrote>", since then it will mostly rewrite it, and it risks becoming AI slop in the process.
 - Non-text AI content such as art is OK (subject to the normal rules).

[khatarnak]

Why are you denying it when it so incredibly obvious that's what you're doing. If you keep doing it, your posts will continue to be deleted by moderators, and you'll eventually be banned. There's no point in arguing. You're not the first to argue, and you won't be the last.

We are not talking rocket science here.

Just because something write clear english not mean is AI.

Most my posts is normal crypto and betting talk. Nothing special or big brain stuff.

And I not here doing $50-$100 signature campaign posting or anything like that. I just talk normal in forum like other people.

If only argument is “it sound too clean”, then this is not proof for anything.

So tell me, with this kind of writing, still not ok or what?

[nutildah]

If only argument is “it sound too clean”, then this is not proof for anything.

Nobody said that. You're doing everything you can to avoid understanding the problem. If you want to understand how this process works, then I encourage you to read the first post in this thread. Then you will understand why we know your posts were written with AI, and why they will be deleted as spam.

[memehunter]

The problem is that you've jumped straight from "this looks like AI" to " it is AI."

Let me repeat the main question again (which you seem to avoid knowingly)?

So you accept that it is right to differentiate between genuine human efforts and AI shit posting, it is just a matter of nature of evidences, right? So please suggest a better way of doing this.

And I not here doing $50-$100 signature campaign posting or anything like that.

Quoting for future references (I am sure the need will arise  ).
 

[khatarnak]

I encourage you to read the first post in this thread.

I read the policy.

I understand the concern.

But I don't think my account is the type that usually ends up in this thread.