AI Spam Report Reference Thread

[macson]

What's the verdict on Newbie Solarmesh who's on a posting spree?

This is what I got:

your tx must include a valid scriptSig for each input
the script/witness rules have to match what the prevout actually encumbered
the two errors you saw map pretty well to that:

• missingorspent = wrong/unknown prevouts (or spent according to the node’s view)
• scriptsig-not-pushonly = your scriptSig contains non-push operations for a script type that requires push-only elements.

also most push-tx endpoints reject non-standard/malformed txs by policy

pangram: 100%
StealthWriter: 100%
Undetectable: 99% AI/GPT

There are 2 possible scenarios:

1. If the address is valid but not the intended recipient's address the Bitcoin will be sent to that address and you will lose your funds.
2. If the address does not exist or is invalid (for instance, it does not match the correct format of a Bitcoin address), the transaction will not go through at all. Transaction will simply fail.

Keep in mind that once a Bitcoin transaction is confirmed, it cannot be reversed.

Quillbot: 100%
Sapling.ai: 100%
GPTZero: AI Polished

multisig isn’t pointless, but you’re right that it’s not magic
it mainly protects against a single key loss or a single rogue transaction signer, not against bad contracts, bad admin logic, or a compromise of enough of the signers (or upgrade keys) through social engineering, phishing, malware, or stolen devices/credentials.

many of those big losses weren’t multisig fails in the sense of the math being wrong
they were often governance/execution paths that the multisig authorized, or they relied on assumptions like “no one will misuse this.

so is defi still worth locking/staking? it can be, but only if you treat it like risk management
the real question is: can the attacker reach the multisig’s effective control surface, and can they move assets without a time delay or constraint?
if the answer is yes, then multisig alone won’t save you.

pangram: 100%
Copyleaks: 100%
GPTZero: 100% AI Generated
StealthWriter: 100%
Undetectable: 99% AI/GPT

Altcoins are moving again, but it feels less like new adoption and more like a single thing: risk-on/risk-off trading.
Bitcoin acts like the market’s core, while most alts just swing like leverage on top of it.
Lately I’ve been seeing pairs where alts don’t actually diverge on fundamentals, they diverge on whether liquidity is coming back.
If BTC dominance is rising, it usually means capital is rotating out of alts, not into them.
So I’m wondering: are we in a phase where altcoins are just beta to BTC (and macro liquidity), meaning picking individual winners is mostly luck?
Or are there still pockets where fundamentals matter and you can front-run the rotation?

pangram: 100%
Copyleaks: 100%
Originality.io: 100%
StealthWriter: 100%
GPTZero: 100% AI Generated

some RWA/derivative listings are structured so funding is minimal or they use a different mechanism (like price tracking / mark-price rules) instead of classic perpetual funding.
sometimes the funding rate is non-zero but displayed as 0% due to rounding.
also, even if funding is 0, that doesn’t guarantee it’s risk-free can still have liquidity risk, tracking/peg risk, and spreads that matter a lot for entries/exits.

pangram: 100%
GPTZero: 100% AI Generated
Copyleaks: 100%
StealthWriter: 100%
Undetectable: 99% AI/GPT

[nutildah]

I put a lot of effort in my posts and I suggest you to stop making false accusations
How am I a bot? For using translator?

Did you really just say you put "a lot of effort" into your posts? How much effort can you possibly put into a post if it takes you less than 3 minutes to write it?

I agree.
Willingness to learn often comes down to mental comfort and having a stable base (expenses + emergency fund).

[LoyceV]

I put a lot of effort in my posts

No you don't.

I suggest you to stop making false accusations

Noted. And ignored. Your trust abuse is meaningless. Read My Beginners guide to correct use of the Trust system.

I am being bullied for participating in the forum

You're shitposting, you're not being bullied, and you're not participating in anything. Welcome to reality and my Ignore list.

I am allowed to share an opinion right?

Not if your "opinion" is pointless:

1. No zero or low value, pointless or uninteresting posts or threads.

Update: some bully nuked him

[Dark.Look]

User: Bit-Mj1014

I used to think it had to be one or the other, but it really doesn't. If I could do it over again, I’d probably start a small side hustle while working a regular job or going to school part time. That way you don't starve if things go sideways, but you're still building real world skills. The truth is, no textbook can teach you how to sell or how to handle the stress of running a business you just have to learn by doing.

gptzero: 100% AI
stealthwriter: 0% Human
sapling: 99.9% AI

I see where you're coming from, but I look at it a bit differently, if everyone is just holding onto Bitcoin hoping the price goes up, it kind of stops working like actual money.
For a currency to really succeed, people need to actually use it to buy things and move it around, not just lock it away like digital gold, if nobody ever spends it, it's more like a speculative asset than a true peer to peer system.

gptzero: 100% AI
stealthwriter: 0% Human
sapling: 99.3% AI

It’s a great reality check. It’s so easy to get caught up looking at charts and trying to find patterns, but like you said, history doesn't just repeat itself perfectly.
The psychological trap of trying to time everything ruins a lot of people. For beginners, trying to trade the daily noise in this raging sea is just a recipe for stress. Sticking to a simple plan and not trying to outsmart the market makers is definitely the smarter move.

gptzero: 100% AI
stealthwriter: 0% Human
sapling: 98.1% AI

When the market drops, the financial loss causes real anxiety and a deep sense of isolation, looking at crashing charts makes us feel helpless, so we naturally look for meaning in the chaos.
Michael Saylor provides that comfort by turning a painful dip into a heroic test of personal conviction, he changes the story from a passive loss into a courageous battle against panic.  Belonging to a community with a shared identity makes the heavy emotional burden much easier to carry.

gptzero: 100% AI
stealthwriter: 0% Human

I like this perspective. Bitcoin forums are usually full of people pretending they have it all figured out, so reading something this honest is incredibly refreshing.
You are completely right about the hesitation, even when you trust your strategy, that little voice of doubt creeps in after a loss. For me, the turning point was realizing that staying calm isn't about ignoring my emotions it’s just about learning not to act on them immediately. Appreciate you sharing this reminder today.

gptzero: 100% AI
stealthwriter: 0% Human
sapling: 100% AI

That part about A.I being an assistant and not the actual decision maker really hits the nail on the head for me.
Bitcoin is all about holding your own keys and being responsible for your own wealth, so handing full control over to an AI trading bot or wallet just feels wrong.
I love the idea of using A.I to scan for bad addresses or flag suspicious activity, but at the end of the day, I still want to be the one pulling the trigger.

gptzero: 100% AI
stealthwriter: 0% Human
copyleaks: 100% AI Content Found

It’s a harsh truth, but it’s being told with a lot of wisdom.Crypto can be incredibly unforgiving, and it’s comforting to remember that even the smartest people get blindsided by sudden market shifts. We aren't robots. We panic, we get anxious, and we make emotional mistakes because we are human.
Accepting that knowledge doesn't make us invincible is actually pretty freeing. It teaches us to be more cautious, look after our mental health, and not tie our self worth to a green or red candle.

gptzero: 100% AI
stealthwriter: 0% Human
sapling: 89.7% AI

This is a really important reminder, and honestly, it hits close to home. It is so easy to fall into that trap of comfort because the big exchanges make everything look so familiar, almost like a regular bank. But like you said, when things go south, it happens in the blink of an eye, ttaking that extra step to set up a hardware wallet can feel intimidating at first, but that peace of mind is worth every bit of the effort.
Thanks for writing this out.

gptzero: 100% AI
stealthwriter: 0% Human
sapling: 99.6% AI

[nutildah]

Circling back to this:

Honestly before someone claims that AI is been used on a post, they must used 3 or more detectors to prove their claims, just like I already did previously.

...
First of all, you use the same filler words far too often, stuff like:

Honestly,
Actually,
you see, (wow 10x in 20 posts)
I will say,
For me, (9x)

I thought it would be good to pad my observation with some real data. The phrase "you see" is extremely common. So much so that its been used 20,266 times in the last year (according to BitList). If we make a list of the posters using this phrase the most, it yields some interesting results... We can make them even more interesting by adding a ratio to posts made in the same period:

1. Mhizlove: 312 / 915 posts = 0.34
2. Cookdata: 215 / 1646 posts = 0.13
3. GiftedMAN: 175 / 3644 posts = 0.05
4. Sexylizzy2813: 142 / 2302 posts = 0.06
5. Antotena: 138 / 1235 posts = 0.11
6. Odusko: 132 / 3263 posts = 0.04
7. Localhostspeed: 123 / 1088 posts = 0.11
8. JayJuanGee: 106 / 2854 posts = 0.04
9. Agbamoni: 98 / 3613 posts = 0.03
10. Yablee0: 90 / 1468 posts = 0.06

So, you see, he uses the phrase "you see" almost 3x more than the next closest account and over 10x more than average, if not significantly more. (This is only the top 10 "you see" posters, out of over 1000 in the last year).

I looked at the 2nd highest poster and they use it in natural conversation, not for the sake of breaking up a sentence for no reason.

Let's quickly look at the rank of Mhizlove's use of his other favorite phrases:

"Honestly" - #38
"Actually" - >#1000
"I will say" - #7
"For me" - #22

There's no problem with using these words every once in a while, like everybody else does, but using 4 of them waaaaaay more often than normal suggests something abnormal is going on. In this case, these phrases are being placed in AI text to break up the AI patterns that are most frequently detected by the detectors.

[Mhizlove]

Circling back to this:

Honestly before someone claims that AI is been used on a post, they must used 3 or more detectors to prove their claims, just like I already did previously.

...
First of all, you use the same filler words far too often, stuff like:

Honestly,
Actually,
you see, (wow 10x in 20 posts)
I will say,
For me, (9x)

I thought it would be good to pad my observation with some real data. The phrase "you see" is extremely common. So much so that its been used 20,266 times in the last year (according to BitList). If we make a list of the posters using this phrase the most, it yields some interesting results... We can make them even more interesting by adding a ratio to posts made in the same period:

1. Mhizlove: 312 / 915 posts = 0.34
2. Cookdata: 215 / 1646 posts = 0.13
3. GiftedMAN: 175 / 3644 posts = 0.05
4. Sexylizzy2813: 142 / 2302 posts = 0.06
5. Antotena: 138 / 1235 posts = 0.11
6. Odusko: 132 / 3263 posts = 0.04
7. Localhostspeed: 123 / 1088 posts = 0.11
8. JayJuanGee: 106 / 2854 posts = 0.04
9. Agbamoni: 98 / 3613 posts = 0.03
10. Yablee0: 90 / 1468 posts = 0.06

So, you see, he uses the phrase "you see" almost 3x more than the next closest account and over 10x more than average, if not significantly more. (This is only the top 10 "you see" posters, out of over 1000 in the last year).

I looked at the 2nd highest poster and they use it in natural conversation, not for the sake of breaking up a sentence for no reason.

Let's quickly look at the rank of Mhizlove's use of his other favorite phrases:

"Honestly" - #38
"Actually" - >#1000
"I will say" - #7
"For me" - #22

There's no problem with using these words every once in a while, like everybody else does, but using 4 of them waaaaaay more often than normal suggests something abnormal is going on. In this case, these phrases are being placed in AI text to break up the AI patterns that are most frequently detected by the detectors.

You only want to justify yourself about this because you actually know that I'm not making use of any AI or humanizing my texts. Just like what I said earlier, everyone has their writing patterns, don't expect me to adapt yours because you assume that I'm using an AI, which I'm not. At least you have the time to check through the forum to see that everyone has a particular phrase they normally use while writing here on the forum.

Can I explain to you that the main reason why people here have a particular phrase they use mostly while writing is actually because they have a particular, let me say, specific board and discussion they respond to? You won't understand because you are looking for a means to justify your actions towards me, but anyway, it's alright. Am not desperate like others.

You have already banned me from using a signature because you assumed that I made use of an AI while writing a post, then used a humizer to modify it. Actually, as for me, I have no grudges at all because I already knew before now that it would end this way, so what's there to talk about? My advice to you is that you don't make any decisions based on your assumptions. Anyway, don't take my comment personal.

[nutildah]

You have already banned me from using a signature because you assumed that I made use of an AI while writing a post, then used a humizer to modify it.

That is not what I did. I'm going to make this next part bigger in hopes you'll REALLY READ it:

I performed a manual de-humanizer on your post. Meaning, I repaired it to its original form, which was an AI post. Do you think that is possible to do with posts written by human brains?

The answer doesn't matter because your deleted post is shown to be >70% AI by 2 different detectors and 23% by another:

It's a insightful point you got there, you see the concept of scarcity has always been bitcoin's core selling point the idea that something is genuinely limited will naturally grow into worth over time.
You're right because only few people took time to think about what that actually means for fairness. As bitcoin grows more limited in supply, it's risks moving away from its core purpose of financial freedom from all and instead of it becoming an asset that is controlled by those who got it at its early stage. It's reminds us that scarcity can create value but can also make the rich richer and the poor left behind if not balanced with fairness and wider acceptance.

GPTZero: 100% AI
Undetectable: 99% AI/GPT
Sapling: 23.7% Fake

Which of course explains why you deleted the post.

The evidence presented is enough for anybody capable of thinking critically to come to the same conclusions I have.

Its really quite something that you thought you could beat me at this game.

[Mhizlove]

You have already banned me from using a signature because you assumed that I made use of an AI while writing a post, then used a humizer to modify it.

That is not what I did. I'm going to make this next part bigger in hopes you'll REALLY READ it:

I performed a manual de-humanizer on your post. Meaning, I repaired it to its original form, which was an AI post. Do you think that is possible to do with posts written by human brains?

The answer doesn't matter because your deleted post is shown to be >70% AI by 2 different detectors and 23% by another:

It's a insightful point you got there, you see the concept of scarcity has always been bitcoin's core selling point the idea that something is genuinely limited will naturally grow into worth over time.
You're right because only few people took time to think about what that actually means for fairness. As bitcoin grows more limited in supply, it's risks moving away from its core purpose of financial freedom from all and instead of it becoming an asset that is controlled by those who got it at its early stage. It's reminds us that scarcity can create value but can also make the rich richer and the poor left behind if not balanced with fairness and wider acceptance.

GPTZero: 100% AI
Undetectable: 99% AI/GPT
Sapling: 23.7% Fake

Which of course explains why you deleted the post.

The evidence presented is enough for anybody capable of thinking critically to come to the same conclusions I have.

Its really quite something that you thought you could beat me at this game.

Hell NO!!!
I haven't for one second deleted any of my posts, a moderator deleted it because someone reported it, and of course I don't know why.
And you can't tell me that everyone on this forum doesn't have deleted posts (including you). Should I show you proof that my post was deleted by a moderator?. Besides, why would I post something if I know I will delete it later? Meanwhile, the forum has an archive where deleted and non-deleted posts are kept. Do you post something and delete it later?

Secondly, you shouldn't go around to start editing people's posts just because you want to prove a point. As a matter of fact, why do you have to remove words from someone's post before checking if they come out as AI content? This act shows that you are manipulative.

As I said in my previous post, you are only looking for means to justify your actions based on the fact that you banned my account based on your assumptions. Well, I have no doubts that some people are also doing the same right now by looking at my post history to see if there are any mistakes (we'll keep looking).