Betpanda.io | Anonymous Crypto Casino | Welcome Bonus Up to 1BTC

[beveryu778]

Some people use VPN to use casinos in restricted regions.  those people must be aware that if they make large wins and try to withdrawal they may be requested KYC.

If you are from a restricted region, some casinos might even block your withdrawal. It is very important to be aware of such things, and even avoid gambling using VPN in restricted regions to avoid such problems

Casinos typically clearly state in their terms of service that individuals residing within a restricted country cannot play on their platform, this means that anything related to account creation, deposits, etc., is prohibited, and using a VPN to bypass this rule is considered a violation of the casino's policies. therefore, if individuals within restricted countries continue to use a VPN to hide their location, they are taking a risk, as the casino reserves the right to restrict or even terminate their accounts if they are caught doing so.

A lot of users access casino sites using VPNs, they know that but they never care about them because it gets a lot of users who are losing a lot of money there. And those are the benefits of the platform. But when someone wins a big jackpot while gambling like this, he will definitely be asked to do KYC. And at that time if his country is restricted, then he will not be able to verify with the documents of that country. And at that time even if he wins a big win, that user will not be able to withdraw that money. Casino sites reserve the right to refuse to pay that customer at that time. Because they have restricted that country for their platform.

[Asiska02]

Some people use VPN to use casinos in restricted regions.  those people must be aware that if they make large wins and try to withdrawal they may be requested KYC.

If you are from a restricted region, some casinos might even block your withdrawal. It is very important to be aware of such things, and even avoid gambling using VPN in restricted regions to avoid such problems

Some users are very stubborn and very adamant in rule breaking when it comes to using casinos that have rules set out to prohibit them from gambling from another region. Some are being forced to bypass the rules because of the good offers the casino are offering new users which they can’t get due to their countries restrictions.

It is always in the long term they are being caught and what accounts are closed down, they begin to come up with allegations against the casino and try to tell others to boycott them. Rules are stated in order to be obeyed once you want to use a service, if you don’t want disappointment in the long run, it is better you don’t even engage if you’re not qualified to use their services.

[Rikafip]

However, in countries where KYC is not required to withdraw coins from an ATM, I can definitely see this as an alternative.

I don't think that such country exists, where there's no KYC at all, no matter how much moeny you withdraw (at least not in Europe).

No KYC for using Bitcoin ATMs is a very old story years ago as with Bitcoin growth and adoption, governments put more eyes on Bitcoin ATMs and they force Bitcoin ATM provider companies as well as Bitcoin ATM operators to enforce KYC on users.

Fortunately, in my country in EU (Croatia) we can still sell up to 990 euro via BATM without any KYC whatsoever, and we also have physycal crypto exchanges with the same limit. I don't expect this to last for too long  as regulation is getting stricter as we speak.

[Mallampue]

Some users are very stubborn and very adamant in rule breaking when it comes to using casinos that have rules set out to prohibit them from gambling from another region. Some are being forced to bypass the rules because of the good offers the casino are offering new users which they can’t get due to their countries restrictions.

It is always in the long term they are being caught and what accounts are closed down, they begin to come up with allegations against the casino and try to tell others to boycott them. Rules are stated in order to be obeyed once you want to use a service, if you don’t want disappointment in the long run, it is better you don’t even engage if you’re not qualified to use their services.

Perhaps that's one way for them to play at the casino using a VPN. This can have negative consequences for users, as if the casino prohibits VPN use, their account could be blocked.

Sometimes local governments also block gambling sites, leaving no alternative but to use a VPN.

Usually, if a well-known casino doesn't obtain a permit to operate in a particular region, the government in that region will block the site. VPNs can sometimes be very useful for bypassing government blocks, but on the other hand, casinos prohibit the use of VPNs for gambling at their casinos.

[Odusko]

Some people use VPN to use casinos in restricted regions.  those people must be aware that if they make large wins and try to withdrawal they may be requested KYC.

If you are from a restricted region, some casinos might even block your withdrawal. It is very important to be aware of such things, and even avoid gambling using VPN in restricted regions to avoid such problems

Some users are very stubborn and very adamant in rule breaking when it comes to using casinos that have rules set out to prohibit them from gambling from another region. Some are being forced to bypass the rules because of the good offers the casino are offering new users which they can’t get due to their countries restrictions.

It is always in the long term they are being caught and what accounts are closed down, they begin to come up with allegations against the casino and try to tell others to boycott them. Rules are stated in order to be obeyed once you want to use a service, if you don’t want disappointment in the long run, it is better you don’t even engage if you’re not qualified to use their services.

Sometimes you may not have to blame the people entirely in this situation, sometimes their use VPN with the hopes that they are going to just play small on the casino and not make any tangible winning or deposits a high amount, but the problem arise when luck smiles at them and they win huge amount of money and they want to withdraw whole at once, they get stocked and KYC demanded this is when the real situation will arise from and the bad side of using VPN to create an account on a restricted casino.

[bettercrypto]

Some people use VPN to use casinos in restricted regions.  those people must be aware that if they make large wins and try to withdrawal they may be requested KYC.

If you are from a restricted region, some casinos might even block your withdrawal. It is very important to be aware of such things, and even avoid gambling using VPN in restricted regions to avoid such problems

Some users are very stubborn and very adamant in rule breaking when it comes to using casinos that have rules set out to prohibit them from gambling from another region. Some are being forced to bypass the rules because of the good offers the casino are offering new users which they can’t get due to their countries restrictions.

It is always in the long term they are being caught and what accounts are closed down, they begin to come up with allegations against the casino and try to tell others to boycott them. Rules are stated in order to be obeyed once you want to use a service, if you don’t want disappointment in the long run, it is better you don’t even engage if you’re not qualified to use their services.

DCA means you are willing to hold the assets long-term, meaning you really won't touch them for several years, because if we are hesitant to do this,
then don't even try, as our main long-term goal will just be wasted.

Of course, if we do DCA and then the assets are just touched due to emergency reasons, what we are doing will still be pointless, even though the fact remains
that we have something to draw from for the emergency.

[virasog]

DCA means you are willing to hold the assets long-term, meaning you really won't touch them for several years, because if we are hesitant to do this,
then don't even try, as our main long-term goal will just be wasted.

Of course, if we do DCA and then the assets are just touched due to emergency reasons, what we are doing will still be pointless, even though the fact remains
that we have something to draw from for the emergency.

This problem of spending the funds that we have already invested in crypto ( through DCA or any other way) in emergency situation or to meet any other crucial need should not arise unless we have no proper planning or we are willing to invest more than we may afford to save at any given time or duration.

Even I know people who will keep doing DCA but when they lose in gambling, they need more funds for gambling and they take it out from the DCA's amount. This would lead to good approach.

[pusaka]

I cashed out my bet, winning all six matches I bet on. However, I changed my mind midway through because I was a little unsure about one of the two remaining matches, so I decided to cash out. This was a decent amount; at least it was x10 my stake.

By the way, the match I was unsure about was Galatasaray. I bet on them, but I wasn't sure, so I decided to cash out. What do you think? Was my decision a good one?

[BigBos]

This is the risk someone must bear when forcing a VPN into a country banned by the casino to access and start playing. This should be avoided, unless we're prepared to face the prospect of no withdrawals. However, no one wants to simply play without making withdrawals.

This is also a common complaint, and it can lead to bad reviews for the casino. It's not the casino not paying, but the user violating the terms and conditions, one of which is accessing with a VPN.

Unfortunately, that’s how it is  as you said, the risk must be taken if you want to play from a country where the casino is banned. Many reviews, as you mentioned, come from users who used a VPN and were unable to withdraw their winnings. I don’t know what to do in that case, because if a casino has good offers and bonuses, using a VPN is the only way but is big risk...

There's not much that can be done, as it all depends on user awareness. If they're aware of their mistakes, they won't engage in such behavior. And even if they do use a VPN, they won't blame the casino, let alone leave a bad review, as they accept they're breaking the rules in the first place.

Perhaps casinos could better protect themselves by enforcing stricter VPN restrictions, although this would be difficult. Furthermore, irresponsible users will always find a way to get their way.

[The Cryptovator]

[img]
I cashed out my bet, winning all six matches I bet on. However, I changed my mind midway through because I was a little unsure about one of the two remaining matches, so I decided to cash out. This was a decent amount; at least it was x10 my stake.

By the way, the match I was unsure about was Galatasaray. I bet on them, but I wasn't sure, so I decided to cash out. What do you think? Was my decision a good one?

Definitely it was a good decision. Unless you have enough confidence that you may win, then it's better to avoid it and take a break for some time. You win six matches, which means you already have pretty good profits. It isn't necessary for you to win all the matches and make more money. Ten times your winnings from your stake means it's really a handsome amount; now you should chill. Don't be greedy when you already have good profits.

Everyone should have their own strategy during a gamble, so the chance of winning will be increased. Who knows? If you choose to play another two matches, you may lose as well. And you might eventually be a loser when trying to recover lost funds. However, you did the right thing by cashing out.

[AHOYBRAUSE]

However, in countries where KYC is not required to withdraw coins from an ATM, I can definitely see this as an alternative.

I don't think that such country exists, where there's no KYC at all, no matter how much moeny you withdraw (at least not in Europe).

At least in Hong Kong I have used btc ATMs last year, without any KYC. Don't know it's handled right now but I will know that in a couple of days since we are flying there, so I will check.

[img]
I cashed out my bet, winning all six matches I bet on. However, I changed my mind midway through because I was a little unsure about one of the two remaining matches, so I decided to cash out. This was a decent amount; at least it was x10 my stake.

By the way, the match I was unsure about was Galatasaray. I bet on them, but I wasn't sure, so I decided to cash out. What do you think? Was my decision a good one?

I also don't have any issue with you cashing out there. 10x is already a decent multiplier and taking the risk of letting another game run and then maybe lose might be so frustrating. If you still thought that game would win you can cash out the 10x and then bet half of that profit on the game, that way you still have a win when they proceed to win the match and you are still up with the rest.

[bitmover]

However, in countries where KYC is not required to withdraw coins from an ATM, I can definitely see this as an alternative.

I don't think that such country exists, where there's no KYC at all, no matter how much moeny you withdraw (at least not in Europe).

At least in Hong Kong I have used btc ATMs last year, without any KYC. Don't know it's handled right now but I will know that in a couple of days since we are flying there, so I will check.

But what  is the withdrawal limit without kyc?

Do they get any information of yours when you access the atm machine?

If you insert your Visa card to the atm machine, you dont need to pass any kyc: you are already fully identified.

[yudi09]

I cashed out my bet, winning all six matches I bet on. However, I changed my mind midway through because I was a little unsure about one of the two remaining matches, so I decided to cash out. This was a decent amount; at least it was x10 my stake.

By the way, the match I was unsure about was Galatasaray. I bet on them, but I wasn't sure, so I decided to cash out. What do you think? Was my decision a good one?

You have won 6 out of your 8 selections, but because you are unsure, you make that decision, and for me, it is the right decision to take the cashout rather than remain unsure and end up losing everything.
The benefit of having a cashout option is to allow players to reconsider their decisions while the game is still in progress. If a player feels that their bet no longer has a chance of winning, then with the cashout option available, they can take it while there is still time.

[|MINER|]

A lot of users access casino sites using VPNs, they know that but they never care about them because it gets a lot of users who are losing a lot of money there. And those are the benefits of the platform. But when someone wins a big jackpot while gambling like this, he will definitely be asked to do KYC. And at that time if his country is restricted, then he will not be able to verify with the documents of that country. And at that time even if he wins a big win, that user will not be able to withdraw that money. Casino sites reserve the right to refuse to pay that customer at that time. Because they have restricted that country for their platform.

True, This may sound harsh, but it is true. In most cases, gambling sites are VPN friendly until the gambler hits a big jackpot. However, I am not saying that all casinos are the same because there are many casinos that are VPN friendly and may ask for extra documents from the player even after receiving big rewards, but they reward the player.
It's not that I've never explored gambling sites with a VPN, I've played games on gambling sites with a VPN many times just to explore, but in this case I try to check the terms and conditions carefully. And at the same time, I always use a small fund when I visit gambling sites with a VPN. Because in this case, even if the gambling sites don't allow me to withdraw, there will still be a small loss. And I wouldn't recommend anyone to deposit a large amount of funds with a VPN on any gambling site.

[bitmover]

Some not-muslim country also bans gambling, like china, japan, thailand, sokor,.etc., only those government run gambling lottery and race like moto race are okay there. Reasons are not due to its religion but some of the social issues and its values like japan.

Very often the reason for the ban is because it is too expensive for the state to solve the problems caused by gambling addiction. The revenues that come to the state from gambling are probably not that important (especially in developed countries) compared to the necessary investments of money and resources in mitigating the negative effects it brings. For example, gambling is allowed in the organization of the state, because there they have complete control and the possibility of prevention.

Brazil banned many different gambling platforms recently, especially those related to sportsbet.

The main reason was that some people are using social assistance funds to bet. This money should be used in food and other basic needs, but people are gambling that money.... Very complicated situation, so the government decide the ban the casinos which received most of that money.

[BABY SHOES]

I cashed out my bet, winning all six matches I bet on. However, I changed my mind midway through because I was a little unsure about one of the two remaining matches, so I decided to cash out. This was a decent amount; at least it was x10 my stake.

By the way, the match I was unsure about was Galatasaray. I bet on them, but I wasn't sure, so I decided to cash out. What do you think? Was my decision a good one?

You made the right decision by cashing out... because if I were in your position, I would rather cash out than wait for two more games that might not necessarily end in victory.

Meanwhile, this 10x payout is right in front of you.

Last night, many favorite teams won, scoring quite a lot of goals... it was a night of many goals.

[Uruhara]

I cashed out my bet, winning all six matches I bet on. However, I changed my mind midway through because I was a little unsure about one of the two remaining matches, so I decided to cash out. This was a decent amount; at least it was x10 my stake.

By the way, the match I was unsure about was Galatasaray. I bet on them, but I wasn't sure, so I decided to cash out. What do you think? Was my decision a good one?

Well, I think your decision is correct. I usually do the same. However, regarding the match you're doubtful about, Galatasaray, I think they'll win. I also favor Galatasaray in the upcoming match, and I hope I get lucky. 

[Haunebu]

By the way, the match I was unsure about was Galatasaray. I bet on them, but I wasn't sure, so I decided to cash out. What do you think? Was my decision a good one?

Bad decision if you ask me. Why? Because 5 bucks is not a lot of money and you should have let it ride it all the way regardless of whether you win or lose since cashout favored the house in this case.

x11 is still cool profit, but I would have held on till the end for a way bigger payout possibly. It's your money and you seem satisfied with your choice which is all that matters. No need to look for validation.

[Peanutswar]

So after the Liverpool losses to Man United with a score of 1:2 imagine a quick goal came from them I want to decide to make a play this time. But upon checking with platform seems there's an error prompt to my side.



Which is this but there's nothing more to show about the captcha verification. Does anyone experience the same thing?. I tried to reload again and again and seems there's no captcha at all and keep have this message.

[jeremypwr]

Just wanted to drop in to announce I have officially joined Team Betpanda. 
Really like the friendly user interface and the fact that there is no KYC.
Have already made a successful deposit and have little to no doubt it will be all smooth sailing when the time to withdraw does come.